Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

If the RX-8 came with a 300hp V6 would you be happy or sad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-20-2006 | 04:54 PM
  #1  
Captain Amazing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
If the RX-8 came with a 300hp V6 would you be happy or sad?

Rotary power! Would like some of that oomf though.
Old 05-20-2006 | 04:56 PM
  #2  
ccd2us's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
I would be happy with 238 lb ft to match the hp, with the 1.3L rotary
Old 05-20-2006 | 05:02 PM
  #3  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 7
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
It most likely would have been on the list of cars I was looking at. Rotory power was a plus.
Old 05-20-2006 | 05:16 PM
  #4  
Paul_in_DC's Avatar
Rotary Public
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 2
From: Northern Virginia near DC
If the RX-8 came with a 300hp V6 would you be happy or sad?
Neither. Since the weight of a 300hp V6 would send the car's handling into the toilet, I'd own a different car.
Old 05-20-2006 | 05:20 PM
  #5  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
It wouldn't be much of an RX either.
Old 05-20-2006 | 05:22 PM
  #6  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
If the RX-8 had a v6, I'd likely be driving a 350Z right now.
Old 05-20-2006 | 05:23 PM
  #7  
BlueRenesis82's Avatar
Registered Tracker
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
^ true that
Old 05-20-2006 | 05:25 PM
  #8  
NgoRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 4
From: CA, Rowland Hts.
If the RX-8 had a v6, i'd go pay for a 20B swap.
Old 05-20-2006 | 06:01 PM
  #9  
stickman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Just another car without the rotary engine. If all I wanted was hp there are many cars to choose from; I wanted the rotary experience.
Old 05-20-2006 | 06:34 PM
  #10  
RoXanneBlack8's Avatar
stop flooding ur engines
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 1
From: NE
i would have gotten an s2k. only thing i LIKE about the car is the glorious engine. screw torque, i wanna spin it to 9k!
Old 05-20-2006 | 07:23 PM
  #11  
supergoat's Avatar
I don't "smell good".
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Crowfield Plantation, SC
If it had a V6, it would not be in the RX family so I would not care.
Old 05-20-2006 | 07:50 PM
  #12  
FASTNMEAN8's Avatar
WHO's WANKEL?
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
yeah I would agree I like the 8 the way it is, but if it came with 300HP V6... I would probably be driving a Dodge Neon SRT-4 in White.....
Old 05-20-2006 | 08:20 PM
  #13  
Section 8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA
I probably wouldn't have gotten one :o
Old 05-20-2006 | 08:31 PM
  #14  
Vertigo-1's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Hilo, HI
Without the RENESIS you simply would not even have the RX-8...it wouldn't have even been possible. My understanding is the entire car was built completely around the engine layout and location, particularly the 4 door 4 seater concept. Throw in a V6 and yeah, I can imagine how badly the handling would go to hell.

As far as I'm concerned, a RX without a rotary is downright...disgusting. People dropping LS1s into FD RX-7s need to be shot off a cliff with a double barrelled shotgun.
Old 05-20-2006 | 09:24 PM
  #15  
New Yorker's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 58
From: NYC
I agree—the rotary "defines" the car. It's like asking "if a steakhouse served fish instead of steak, would I be happy?" I wouldn't go! If the 8 didn't have a rotary, the car would lose all appeal for me. It would be totally off my radar. I will NEVER have a car that trades handling for power.
Old 05-20-2006 | 09:29 PM
  #16  
Gfx6800Gtx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
RX8 without the Rotary Engie, I will drive My brother's Infiniti G35 Coupe now.
Old 05-20-2006 | 09:29 PM
  #17  
murix's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: La La Land
I could only imagine how much weight the car would add. I would have an elise instead!
Old 05-20-2006 | 11:03 PM
  #18  
presequel's Avatar
ay bay bay
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: 626, CA
eh, i don't think i would care. the main things i like about the car is the interior and the body style. i guess i'm a looks type of person, lol.
Old 05-20-2006 | 11:52 PM
  #19  
yiksing's Avatar
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
Originally Posted by mysql101
If the RX-8 had a v6, I'd likely be driving a 350Z right now.
This is so damn spot on, if it were to be a V6 then it would be a very similar car to the Z.
Old 05-20-2006 | 11:58 PM
  #20  
RoXanneBlack8's Avatar
stop flooding ur engines
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 587
Likes: 1
From: NE
only uglier
Old 05-21-2006 | 12:07 AM
  #21  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
How would it be similar....stick a v6 in and you lose your 50/50 weight distribution, you have better suspension than a Z, and 4 seats instead of two. That would make an odd car.

Like it's been said, the car was built around the Renesis.
Old 05-21-2006 | 12:26 AM
  #22  
yiksing's Avatar
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
Why wouldn't it be similar, you lose the 50/50 and get close to the Z's 53/47 weight distribution. You gain overall weight close to the Z. What makes you think the 8 has better suspension than the Z, both uses double wishbone and multi-link, only difference is spring and damper rates, wheelbase width and length. It only shows one performs better on track and one more forgiving on the street. I don't recall ever saying they are the same, do you even understand the word "similar", big deal with your 4 seat vs 2 seat, I could just easily rephrased it similar to a G35 which is the SIMILAR thing as the Z.
Old 05-21-2006 | 12:31 AM
  #23  
time4akshun's Avatar
Shink'd Out for 2006
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Morris Plains, NJ
I'll take the 300hp, but it HAS to stay rotary. Wouldn't be an RX without it. Add turbo to make it happen like the old days...

Time
Old 05-21-2006 | 12:43 AM
  #24  
Renesis_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Maybe the weight distribution will be worse than 53/47, not only its gonna be heavier, also the center of gravity will be moved, u know how far back the renesis sits? I guess its gonna be like 60/40 if you drop a V6 in the RX-8.
________
Mayra11

Last edited by Renesis_8; 09-11-2011 at 09:43 AM.
Old 05-21-2006 | 12:45 AM
  #25  
Blue87Sport's Avatar
Rotary only since 1980
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Southeast of Seattle
It's more than just weight distribution. The rotary engine enables a low center of gravity and low polar moment of inertia.

From http://www.autozine.org/html/Mazda/RX8.html: "Low center of gravity, low polar moment of inertia and perfect weight distribution are what all sports car engineers dream for, but not many cars can achieve them. For example, Nissan 350Z with its big V6 engine achieves only 53:47 and a much higher polar moment of inertia because a portion of its V6 hangs over the front axle. Benefited by the weight and size advantage of Wankel engine, Mazda RX-8 can easily beat its opposition even though it is a 4-seater. Chassis engineers will love this car."


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.