Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Impact of a lower Grade Gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-30-2008 | 10:35 PM
  #51  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
your right another lame MPG thread.

Oh that reminds me, I think I'll go over to the G8 forum and start a MPG thread and complain about bad MPG.
Old 05-30-2008 | 11:47 PM
  #52  
szym0n's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
all you can do is just drive like an old grandma and save your gas don't drive like a maniac. I live in chicago and i stop and go constantly i get about 210-240 miles on a full tank.

And yeah, if you cannot afford the 5extra bucks at the pump then the rx8 isent worth it. I look at it like this, this car is so damn amazing and your worth the extra 5bucks.
Old 05-30-2008 | 11:47 PM
  #53  
To be named later's Avatar
Now with 25% more fluff..
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by PSUGreySreet
Not trying to knock you or anything, but think of it this way instead of just "saving 1.25 a day"... Multiply that by 365 and you have saved $456.25 over the course of a year.

How many of you receive your tax refund check at the end of a year, say totaling $300, and are excited to get that spending money that you totally forgot about? Well you have just received a $450 "gas refund" check and if the gas works, why not use it??
Not that I am a rich guy, but saving $456 a year doesn't excite me.

I would rather pay an extra $1.25 a day to get the optimal performance from a car, if indeed the 93 gives better performance and/or it is better for the car than 89.

Originally Posted by Socket7
I once filled up with 87. My renny got out of my 8, punched me in the face, then told me that if anyone asked about why I had a black eye, I was to say that I fell down the stairs.


Originally Posted by r0tor
well i'm not getting 3-4 more mpg from 89 over 93 because of the 89 octane having more enerby... its from better and more complete combustion!
Ah, so you believe you get better MPG with 89 than you do with 93?

I'm not familiar with that "debate"
Old 05-31-2008 | 12:03 AM
  #54  
xsnipersgox's Avatar
One Shot One Kill
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 2
From: Houston
i have no science to back it up, nor do i recommend it.. but 89 has gave me some good mpg o.O...
Old 05-31-2008 | 12:52 AM
  #55  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by To be named later

Ah, so you believe you get better MPG with 89 than you do with 93?

I'm not familiar with that "debate"
This is not unusual, rotary engines have always run better on lower octane because of the long thin combustion chamber. The quicker burning of the lower octane is better suite for the Rotary. Race Rotary have run on octanes as low as 80 octane. So by the Rotary's nature it will run better, aka more power, with lower octane.

Granted the knock sensor could retard the time to the point that it would effect power out put but at the same time the lower octane could just as well over come this lose and provide more power. This is why the manual says may have decreased power.
Old 05-31-2008 | 04:59 PM
  #56  
motorups's Avatar
Gt/AT/Silver/Red&Black75%
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Next fill up I'm trying 89 even though I live in florida and it is now summer time.

Do though have a different question though not really related to octane.
Since we should rev our engines to avoid/remove carbon build up (which higher octane gas has no effect on if I follow this thread correctly) then how does one know just how long one needs to drive at the higher revs to 'meet' the goal of reducing/removing carbon build up?

Having an automatic, in auto mode, drops the revs below 2k it seems many times. I took her for a ride on the interstate for an one hour down somewhere then one hour back today and let it go in 3rd gear around 80mph and believe she was turning around 6,250 or 6,500 rpm. Did that for a few miles on curse control but I do wonder what is enough?

I know...most will say always keep her at 5 or 6k rpm but more times then that just won't be happening.

Bottomline -
just how many miles should one drive the rx8 at, say 6,500 rpm on each tank of gas to keep carbon build up at bay? Taking into account, and I have not a clue on this...that running at lower rpm will result is better mpg then running at the higher rpm ranges and since gas is costing more I would like to get better mpg then not provided I don't raise my rx8 to be a carbon build up baby.

And try, as best you can, to turn the flames down low if you would in your replies

19.37 mpg on prior tank (40% highway with a short 100mph run...less then two miles I would say)...just to see her do it
17.61 mpg last tank, mostly city driving

thanks

Last edited by motorups; 05-31-2008 at 05:06 PM.
Old 05-31-2008 | 07:57 PM
  #57  
superglue's Avatar
n00b post whore
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
^^^^

Rev it often. There's no exact number or ratio to go off of. Just make it a habit to rev it up a little in your driving routine. I make it a point to wrap out 2nd gear while merging onto the highway (as long as safety permits).
Old 05-31-2008 | 11:42 PM
  #58  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
Free post
Old 06-01-2008 | 12:47 AM
  #59  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 32
From: Planet Earth
Free post #2
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theblinkof
Series I Trouble Shooting
33
10-04-2023 06:24 PM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
02-20-2019 06:16 PM
hufflepuff
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
6
05-30-2016 11:45 AM
duworm
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
1
10-01-2015 05:57 PM
Zube6115
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
09-30-2015 01:57 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.