Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Let's compare VIN numbers and fuel economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 4.67 average.
 
Old 10-18-2003 | 11:32 PM
  #26  
Magnesium's Avatar
Lurking troll
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
xx1365 ...... 13
101450 .......15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)
102974........17 to 20
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841........13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105899 ...... 22 to 23
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 .......14.9 to 25.6
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
109161 ...... 19 to 21
Old 10-19-2003 | 12:05 AM
  #27  
rxeightr's Avatar
M0D Squad -charter member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
101212 ...... 21 to 22
xx1365 ...... 13
101450 .......15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)
102974........17 to 20
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841........13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105899 ...... 22 to 23
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 .......14.9 to 25.6
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
Old 10-19-2003 | 06:45 AM
  #28  
jdl's Avatar
jdl
just jd.
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, California
108837 min=14.28 max=22.58 lifetime avg=17.36
Old 10-19-2003 | 09:50 AM
  #29  
6speed8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Florida
106908 - 15.3 - 20.1 (avg 17.7 mostly) only 1400 miles on it.

What I have found is this: the engine loves to rev, and driving under 2800 rpms seems to use MORE fuel. I have been driving at all speeds trying to keep the rpms between 2800 - 3100, this appears to give (my car) the best economy, that is until I get on it. I have noticed that ONE TICK (line) on the fuel guage = 10 miles to get 15 mpg, if I get 12 miles per tick I get 16-17 mpg. I had gotten almost 15 miles per tick and got 20 mpg.

Also I noticed keeping the rpms between 2800-3100 greatly reduces the carbon residue on the tailpipes. Has anyone else noticed this?
Old 10-19-2003 | 10:10 AM
  #30  
56kb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, AZ
108417 18 - 20 mpg

70% Highway
Old 10-19-2003 | 10:13 AM
  #31  
Spin9k's Avatar
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 4
From: Colorado
Originally posted by 6speed8
I have noticed that ONE TICK (line) on the fuel guage = 10 miles to get 15 mpg, if I get 12 miles per tick I get 16-17 mpg. I had gotten almost 15 miles per tick and got 20 mpg.

per tick what? ticks per gal, miles per tick you could be on to (or just on) something here!

Also I noticed keeping the rpms between 2800-3100 greatly reduces the carbon residue on the tailpipes. Has anyone else noticed this?

Please tell me you are not serious?! If yiou drive keeping the RPMs in the 2800-3100 range, just forget it and trade it in on the new Toyota Prius. Smthg like ***80*** MPG and goobs of electric torque right at 0 RPM to boot! RideM cowboy!
Old 10-19-2003 | 10:38 AM
  #32  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
New Summary

100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
101212 ...... 21 to 22
101365 ...... 13 <-- LOW
101450 .......15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)
102974........17 to 20
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841........13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105899 ...... 22 to 23
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 .......14.9 to 25.6
106908 ...... 15.3 to 20.1 (avg 17.7 mostly) only 1400 miles on it.
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108417 ...... 18 to 20 mpg
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
108837 ...... 14.28 - 22.58, lifetime avg=17.36
109161 ...... 19 to 21

Looks like my own .. the 109161 .. is the newest on the list? I bought it 9/16/.

Last edited by ptiemann; 10-20-2003 at 12:11 AM.
Old 10-19-2003 | 10:45 AM
  #33  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
@Spin9k:

>> Please tell me you are not serious?! If yiou drive keeping the RPMs in the 2800-3100 range, just forget it and trade it in on the new Toyota Prius. Smthg like ***80*** MPG and goobs of electric torque right at 0 RPM to boot! RideM cowboy! <<



Hey, no need to flame anyone. Granted, I wouldn't be able to stay at 3000 rpm either (doesn't that amount to only 60 mph in 6th gear?), but his finding *is interesting*, to me at least.

About your comment on the Prius; I've stated on a different thread before that it is possible to build cars that are futuristic in terms of fuel economy AND are fun.

Prototype - Opel Eco Speedster gets 114 miles per Gallon

There are people who drive a lot of miles. I do 100 miles a day just to get to work. If I had a 13 mpg tiny RX-8, I'd raise hell at the dealership. As someone else said, with 13 mpg, I want a 500 hp Viper.
I'm lucky, my Mazda gets me 19-21, just barely tolerable.

-Peter
Old 10-19-2003 | 12:35 PM
  #34  
sewingguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
112585 getting a consistent 21 mpg (combo of city & highway)
Old 10-19-2003 | 12:55 PM
  #35  
Wankeler's Avatar
zoom freaking zoom
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
101212 ...... 21 to 22
101365 ...... 13 <-- LOW
101450 .......15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)

102878 ...... I get 12-17 (85% city mostly, 6 mile work commute)

102974........17 to 20
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841........13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105899 ...... 22 to 23
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 .......14.9 to 25.6
106908 ...... 15.3 to 20.1 (avg 17.7 mostly) only 1400 miles on it.
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108417 ...... 18 to 20 mpg
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
108837 ...... 14.28 - 22.58, lifetime avg=17.36
112585 ...... getting a consistent 21 mpg (combo of city & highway)
Old 10-19-2003 | 01:11 PM
  #36  
6speed8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally posted by ptiemann
@Spin9k:

>> Please tell me you are not serious?! If yiou drive keeping the RPMs in the 2800-3100 range, just forget it and trade it in on the new Toyota Prius. Smthg like ***80*** MPG and goobs of electric torque right at 0 RPM to boot! RideM cowboy! <<
Chill - I did this on a hunch. I drive to work at 05:00 on 45 mph roads, speeding (much over 60 ) is not an option. The police are all over the place. I tested the RPM range because the RX-8 is rated at 24 highway right? and that testing is done by the EPA - Right? and at 55 mph in 6th gear is roughly 2800 rpms (or close to it) Right? So I figured if I kept the RPMS in the HIGHWAY rpm range (but going at legal speeds) would I, Could I get 24 mpg, and the answer is NO.

FYI I do not drive like a granny, it was just a test. Helps keep me awake on the 30 mile drive.
Old 10-19-2003 | 02:35 PM
  #37  
Spin9k's Avatar
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 4
From: Colorado
Originally posted by 6speed8
Chill - I did this on a hunch. ... Could I get 24 mpg, and the answer is NO.

FYI I do not drive like a granny, it was just a test. Helps keep me awake on the 30 mile drive.
No flame really, and I think the new Prius is pretty nice for relatively sedate ciy/suburban driving. It sounded like you were so focused on MPtick and all, not so much the rest of our nice car.

I also did a test of sorts this last week. Went upcountry NH on relatively quiet morning. Normal mileage here w/small trips 10-20 miles is 18mpg, this trip was 23.3mpg for 200+ miles, PDC to 24mpg advertized I'd say.

In fact my light normally comes on plus/minus 250m, this time at fill I was at 3/4 and it was 266miles !! Did some redlines, mostly 50-70 mph for long stretches, wasn't really paying attention to that.

Not bad, and it totally surprised me, I'd thought maybe 20. With no fun, it might even get 24+

Last edited by Spin9k; 10-19-2003 at 02:39 PM.
Old 10-19-2003 | 03:26 PM
  #38  
Genom's Avatar
Not so Super right now
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: Beyond that there swamp.
I'f I drive speed limit on the turnpike here in FL (70MPH) for my cruise to work (about 39 miles) I get as high as 26MPG. My everyday city driving with traffic and AC (mandatory most of the time in FL), I get a low of 16 and a high of 19 (pure city, no highway).

Not as good as the 30+ on my Neon, but then again, this aint no Neon :D
Old 10-19-2003 | 04:27 PM
  #39  
8_wannabe's Avatar
Go baby!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 0
From: La Jolla CA
101897 -- 16.7 mpg typically
Old 10-19-2003 | 04:56 PM
  #40  
6speed8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Most of my driving is from stoplight to stoplight, with a brief 4 mile run on a highway (that's when I let er rip) I love to hear that ever so faint chime. Almost all of my driving is with the A/C on, and you know what? The RX-8 does not feel any more powerful with A/C off than with it on. Some cars feel much stronger with the A/C off, but not the '8', it pretty much feels the same.

Anyway, the engine appears to run better when it is revving rather than loafing.
Old 10-19-2003 | 11:53 PM
  #41  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
new summary (I see no scheme, looks like there are not that many folks with really poor mpg numbers), so we find out that at least :-)

100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
101212 ...... 21 to 22
101365 ...... 13 <-- LOW
101450 ...... 15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)
101897 ...... 16.7 mpg typically
102878 ...... I get 12-17 (85% city mostly, 6 mile work commute)
102974....... 17 to 20
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841....... 13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105899 ...... 22 to 23
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 ...... 14.9 to 25.6
106908 ...... 15.3 to 20.1 (avg 17.7 mostly) only 1400 miles on it.
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108417 ...... 18 to 20 mpg
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
108837 ...... 14.28 - 22.58, lifetime avg=17.36
109161 ...... 19 to 21
112585 ...... 21 - getting a consistent 21 mpg (combo of city & highway)

Last edited by ptiemann; 10-20-2003 at 12:11 AM.
Old 10-20-2003 | 12:04 AM
  #42  
mamccubbin's Avatar
Bert angry!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
109058 16.5-22
Old 10-20-2003 | 12:14 AM
  #43  
ozbot87's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
[i]

Not as good as the 30+ on my Neon, but then again, this aint no Neon :D [/B]
Yeah, at least the 8 doesn't break every 200 miles.
Old 10-20-2003 | 01:04 AM
  #44  
TDS's Avatar
TDS
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Got my 8 July 15, 03. My average MPG has been 15.9. VIN is 101604. MPG has been getting better with miles, I now have 2400. I really expect better mileage in line with the EPA estimates. Let's hope something shows up in our data sharing.
Old 10-20-2003 | 09:41 AM
  #45  
joanie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: staten island, ny
101145

13-15 CITY
19 HIWAY
Old 10-20-2003 | 10:25 AM
  #46  
Wingnut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 12
From: Richmond, VA
110311 17 mpg 50/50 mix city/hwy driving on first 2 tanks.
Old 10-20-2003 | 10:57 AM
  #47  
texlaw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
100112

17.5-19.8
Old 10-20-2003 | 11:09 AM
  #48  
Mitch Strickler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
VIN/mileage

100717, delivered July 16.
At 2.700 miles, last highway trip had 3 tanks -- 25,20,20; last city tank was 16.
Old 10-20-2003 | 11:32 AM
  #49  
o_town_racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
105730

I'm just under 2000 miles. Had to add about a quarter quart of oil because the oil light indicator came on and stayed on. The oil on the dip stick was only 1/3 of the way down.

Worst mileage 17 MPG city & hard driving
Best mileage 23.2 MPG highway only (75 MPH)

Average city/highway: 18-19 MPG

Average highway only: 22 MPG (that's at 75-80 MPH all the way)
Old 10-20-2003 | 11:57 AM
  #50  
ptiemann's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
100112 ...... 17.5 to 19.8
105730 ...... 17 to 22
100717 ...... 16 to 25
100804 ...... 20 to 21
100849 ...... 17.5 to 23.3
100879 ...... 18 to 20
101058 ...... 18 to 21
101083 ...... 15 to 19 (10% highway)
101145 ...... 13 to 19
101212 ...... 21 to 22
101365 ...... 13 <-- LOW
101450 ...... 15.3 to 19.3 (mostly city to 60% highway, normally around 17-18, just once above 18.4)
101604 ...... 15.9 average after 2400 miles
101897 ...... 16.7 mpg typically
102878 ...... I get 12-17 (85% city mostly, 6 mile work commute)
102974....... 17 to 20
103130 ...... 13 to 15 <-- LOW
103727 ...... 17.8 to 22.2
103841....... 13-20.5 (13 is hard driving, 20.5 is purely highway)
104226 ...... 15 to 17 (city)
105899 ...... 22 to 23
106429 ...... 17.3 to 21.3
106454 ...... 17.5 to 21
106647 ...... 14.9 to 25.6
106908 ...... 15.3 to 20.1 (avg 17.7 mostly) only 1400 miles on it.
107891 ...... 14 to 17 <-- LOW
108417 ...... 18 to 20 mpg
108583 ...... 18.3 to 19.5
108837 ...... 14.28 - 22.58, lifetime avg=17.36
109058 ...... 16.5 to 22
109161 ...... 19 to 21
110311 ...... 17 (on first 2 tanks, very new car)
112585 ...... 21 - getting a consistent 21 mpg (combo of city & highway)


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 4.67 average.

Quick Reply: Let's compare VIN numbers and fuel economy



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 PM.