Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

MPG in the brochure !?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-16-2003 | 11:06 AM
  #1  
MattZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Bethel, CT
MPG in the brochure !?!?

Did anyone else notice that they list the MPG in the brochure at 18/24....

I thought it was listed at 23/30 on the website????

What gives?
Old 05-16-2003 | 11:19 AM
  #2  
medcina's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Maryland, USA
Re: MPG in the brochure !?!?

Originally posted by MattZ
Did anyone else notice that they list the MPG in the brochure at 18/24....

I thought it was listed at 23/30 on the website????

What gives?
The website has since been edited. Guess the EPA didn't agree with Mazda's claim...
Old 05-16-2003 | 11:19 AM
  #3  
MattZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Bethel, CT
Oh man...that blows!!!!!!!!!
Old 05-16-2003 | 11:44 AM
  #4  
ACRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Philly, Pa
Did Mazda make a mistake?

I think the engine is a 8.1L not the 1.3L
Old 05-16-2003 | 11:51 AM
  #5  
Superfan's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Can't be as bad as an FD tho. I was getting ~10mpg for city driving
Old 05-16-2003 | 02:03 PM
  #6  
BRx8's Avatar
Ero-sennin
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 769
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
wow, i didn't notice that...that is pretty bad...worse than my V6 which i floor all the time
Old 05-16-2003 | 02:34 PM
  #7  
RX-Nut's Avatar
8 the HARD way.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
whoa 18/24?? is that bad? honestly I dont know...

about how much miles would that be on a full tank I wonder.
Old 05-16-2003 | 02:37 PM
  #8  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Originally posted by BRx8
wow, i didn't notice that...that is pretty bad...worse than my V6 which i floor all the time
do you actually measure what you're getting from it?? your MPG is heavily dependant upon how the car is driven, and at what speeds.
Old 05-16-2003 | 02:45 PM
  #9  
BRx8's Avatar
Ero-sennin
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 769
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Originally posted by wakeech


do you actually measure what you're getting from it?? your MPG is heavily dependant upon how the car is driven, and at what speeds.
yea i know...i said i do floor it all the time...my car holds 19.4 gallons or so the manual says...one time i filled up my tank complete, and let my tripmeter run from 0...i got up to about 400 miles before it was on E and the gas light went on...so 400/19.4 = 20.6 m/gallon...
Old 05-16-2003 | 03:04 PM
  #10  
DTECH-RX's Avatar
Senior Rotor Router
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, FL
Actually you are suppose to divide the mileage by the amount of gas you put in at your fuel stop, not the total size of your tank...unless you ran out of gas.....
Old 05-16-2003 | 03:26 PM
  #11  
BlueAdept's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: London (England)
Perhaps Mazda had quoted a MPG, not Miles per US Gallon. :-D
Old 05-16-2003 | 03:27 PM
  #12  
revhappy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
These figures are really dissappointing. For comparison, here is a list of some other cars:

350Z: 20/26 (23)
G35 Coupe: 20/27 (23.5)
S2000: 20/26 (23)
EVO: 18/26 (22)
STI: 18/24 (21)
WRX: 20/27 (23.5)
FD: 17/25 (21)
Cobra: 16/22 (19)
BMW 330I: 21/30 (25.5)
RSX-S: 24/31 (27.5)
RX8: 18/24 (21)

Basically, no improvement vs. the FD. Maybe it will do better on emissions?
Old 05-16-2003 | 04:27 PM
  #13  
ed hall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
fuel economy on the RX8 is terrible. Hope buyers out there have don't do high mileages! In the UK, fuel is expensive, so economy and emissions become very very important. Reason why our RX8's are almost 20bhp less than yours.
Old 05-16-2003 | 04:28 PM
  #14  
Hercules's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 1
Originally posted by revhappy
These figures are really dissappointing. For comparison, here is a list of some other cars:

350Z: 20/26 (23)
G35 Coupe: 20/27 (23.5)
S2000: 20/26 (23)
EVO: 18/26 (22)
STI: 18/24 (21)
WRX: 20/27 (23.5)
FD: 17/25 (21)
Cobra: 16/22 (19)
BMW 330I: 21/30 (25.5)
RSX-S: 24/31 (27.5)
RX8: 18/24 (21)

Basically, no improvement vs. the FD. Maybe it will do better on emissions?
When C&D flogged it around the course, it only got one MPG less than the G35 Coupe....

So it's not *that* bad.. granted not that *good* either; but I'm not buying this car for gas mileage
Old 05-16-2003 | 04:43 PM
  #15  
ed hall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
absolutley, buy the car for the performance it offers and that incredible revving ability, which no doubt will suck fuel faster than Saddam can burn oil wells....

Just kidding! Fuel is little sacrifice for the free revving ability and enjoyment the rotory offers. I can't wait to get behing the wheel and floor the 'go' pedal
Old 05-16-2003 | 04:50 PM
  #16  
sheylen's Avatar
doc RX-8
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Cape Town
Originally posted by ed hall
fuel economy on the RX8 is terrible. Hope buyers out there have don't do high mileages! In the UK, fuel is expensive, so economy and emissions become very very important. Reason why our RX8's are almost 20bhp less than yours.
Come back to SA, it is still very cheap here!
Old 05-16-2003 | 05:03 PM
  #17  
RX-Nut's Avatar
8 the HARD way.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
yup, site shows 18/24 now.. shame on them.
Old 05-16-2003 | 05:13 PM
  #18  
ed hall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
sheylen...i hear there is another decrease in fuel prices this month....our Prices in London are about 74p per litre.....that's almost R9 per litre ! BTW : a pint of high grade oil, almost a R100.00


Reason : fuel tax here is almost 75%!
Old 05-16-2003 | 05:21 PM
  #19  
revhappy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Hercules
When C&D flogged it around the course, it only got one MPG less than the G35 Coupe....

So it's not *that* bad.. granted not that *good* either; but I'm not buying this car for gas mileage

I don't think so. If I recall, the mixed fuel economy was 14 for the cobra, 15 for the RX8 and 18 for the G35 coupe. I posted this awhile back below:

http://www.rx8forum.com/showthread.p...7436#post37436
Old 05-16-2003 | 05:32 PM
  #20  
Jerome81's Avatar
I Am Rotary Powered
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, California
Mazda certainly didn't deliver on their "improved mileage" promise. What did they say? 20% to 40% at idle?

The only screw up so far. A bit disappointing too. city mileage isn't horrible, but 24 on the freeway is pretty crummy.
Old 05-16-2003 | 05:33 PM
  #21  
Schneegz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Pullman, WA
I remember some magazines saying they got up to 28mpg when they drove like human beings. When they drove like maniacs, they got as little as 22mpg. But that is to be expected, don't you think?
Old 05-16-2003 | 05:40 PM
  #22  
RX-Nut's Avatar
8 the HARD way.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
What was the MPG on the FD?
Old 05-16-2003 | 05:48 PM
  #23  
Renesis08's Avatar
Are you driven?
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: socal
Originally posted by revhappy
These figures are really dissappointing. For comparison, here is a list of some other cars:

350Z: 20/26 (23)
G35 Coupe: 20/27 (23.5)
S2000: 20/26 (23)
EVO: 18/26 (22)
STI: 18/24 (21)
WRX: 20/27 (23.5)
FD: 17/25 (21)
Cobra: 16/22 (19)
BMW 330I: 21/30 (25.5)
RSX-S: 24/31 (27.5)
RX8: 18/24 (21)

Basically, no improvement vs. the FD. Maybe it will do better on emissions?
FD: 17/25 (21)
Old 05-16-2003 | 05:51 PM
  #24  
RX-Nut's Avatar
8 the HARD way.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
doh, I'm blind.
Old 05-16-2003 | 05:56 PM
  #25  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
whatever... i don't know how the EPA rated the FD that high: it wasn't.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.