Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

MPG in the brochure !?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-16-2003, 08:41 PM
  #26  
Pure Unadulterated Fun
 
Puppy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Monterey Park, CA
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Renesis08
FD: 17/25 (21)
18 is > 17. Mazda specifically said mileage would improve 20% to 40% UNDER CERTIAN DRIVING CONDITIONS. They never said IN EVERY SITUATION.
Old 05-16-2003, 08:56 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
jbart1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: N Ky
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
brx8 do you have a vr-4? I have a 93 3000gt SL and get ~ 24mpg in mixed driving putting around 400 miles/week on the car.

definitley not looking forward to less economy than my 3kgt
Old 05-17-2003, 12:13 AM
  #28  
VW coulda had it...
 
KKMmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Crystal, Minnesota
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Dammit! Well, let's see: 20% better under what driving conditions? I would hope to attain 22 mpg in my normal commute; high 20's during a road trip. It doesn't look like that's gonna happen, whether I'm trying to utilize the performance the car is capable of, or not.

I'm not too happy about that. My ratty old FB does the above. (yes, I know there's a performance defecit) I thought the Renesis would be the answer to the fuel economy situation. If the engine isn't being pushed hard, I'd like to see a measurable improvement!
Old 05-17-2003, 03:05 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
maverikk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, I did state this before: Mileage WILL be the CRUCIAL factor for the RX-8. Even if it not soooo bad, many people will refrain to get one if they consider it too high, me included...

Personally I don't care too much about pollutions, it just has to be o.k. (Euro4). But with the ridicoulous gas prices here in Europe and ever increasing, this is one main factor of not getting an RX-8. Mazda's promise to have lowered consumption MUST be kept under ALL, not only CERTAIN conditions!
Old 05-17-2003, 05:23 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
gord boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately, hybrids just around corner combine performance
and much improved gas mileage. How do you sell this down the road when new gets over 40 mpg?
Alternatively, if you are combining Sports Car & 4-seater, and eliminating one car, then you can rationalize anything. If you get
v8 performance at a gas mileage slightly better, why not?????.
Old 05-17-2003, 05:30 PM
  #31  
Senior Rotor Router
 
DTECH-RX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually this does concern me a bit as well. Having owned a 99+ Mustang GT with a "gas guzzling" 4.6L V8, I used to average anywhere from 18-20 mpg depending on the amount of city and "spirited" driving I did between tanks.

According to East Moon, his standard power RX-8 is getting only 14 mpg which is very surprising and not very encouraging in my book. With the high power engine, this could be even more of a problem since I'm sure most of us don't buy a sports car to have to make an effort to NOT drive it too hard as to not use too much fuel.

This definitely might be an issue for me. I mean 18-20mpg I can understand, but 14mpg or possibly less???

Just imagine what it would be like with forced induction!
Old 05-17-2003, 06:45 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
grogiefrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My GSL-SE '84 RX-7 use to get as low as 8, or as high as 20, or possibly more on highway driving. It all depends on how you drive it. I remind everyone that it is a sports car. Plus, there is nothing like driving a rotary. You can enjoy it while driving it hard, or just cruising down a city street listening to it's hum.

But if you really are worried about the MPG, then buy a hybrid Civic.
Old 05-17-2003, 06:46 PM
  #33  
...
 
gettingan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ..
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My1985 RX-8 GSL-SE...14mpg in town...but fun to drive!
Old 05-17-2003, 08:53 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
grogiefrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a pair of soft rubber Generals one time that I got down to 8 MPG with. I only got about 12000 miles on them.
Old 05-17-2003, 09:09 PM
  #35  
Senior Rotor Router
 
DTECH-RX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by grogiefrog
But if you really are worried about the MPG, then buy a hybrid Civic.
This is a pretty silly comment considering we all know this is a sports car. You can be concerned about mpg without it having to be the end all and be all of a decision, but it does become a cost factor when you have to pay at the pump more frequently. It's the RELATIVE mpg among various sports car/sporty car alternatives that I'm looking at. I don't expect it to average 30mpg, but when Mazda makes a big deal about having improved the fuel economy by 30% or more, 14mpg(or possibly worse with the high power engine) is not very encouraging when you use it as a daily driver and you have to put premium in it. It also makes you wonder a little about what else Mazda may have possibly "exaggerated" about. You see, it's part of evaluating the RX-8 as a whole.

As previously mentioned, my 4.6L V8 Mustang GT 5 speed used to average between 18 and 20mpg on 87 octane fuel which is what it was designed to run. I would expect the RX-8 to at least be able to match that without having to be thinking about how I'm driving to get optimum economy.

Let's try and keep the comments and discussion in perspective here, not "go buy X economy vehicle if you are so worried about mpg". Comments like that are just plain rediculous.
Old 05-17-2003, 10:21 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
grogiefrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know how many people are going to buy the RX-8 as a daily commuter?

As far as your Mustang getting 18 and 20 on 87 octane, comparing a rotary to a V8 is like apples and oranges. I do not know if you've ever owned a rotary, but a rotary has a truly unique feel and sound (not to mention the upkeep). Perhaps half of the people that buy a RX-8 once owned a RX-7.

I plan on buying one as a weekend car, but not until next Spring (providing it does not have the problems that the 3rd generation RX-7 had). I won't buy it because of MPG, or because of it's horsepower. There is always something better in both categories. But there is only one car with a rotary. Is that keeping things in perspective?
Old 05-17-2003, 11:35 PM
  #37  
Prodigal Wankler
 
eccles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by grogiefrog
I don't know how many people are going to buy the RX-8 as a daily commuter?
Me for one. It'll be a weekend toy too, but it'll see most use as my everyday commmuter.
Old 05-17-2003, 11:59 PM
  #38  
Zio
美浜ー先輩??!
 
Zio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did they even test the car for fuel economy before they put those first numbers up? I dont see how they could of if they had to change them. Weird.
Old 05-18-2003, 12:49 AM
  #39  
Member
 
Superfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a rumor that Mazda made some changes to the engine management code right before they went into production. That could explain why the fuel economy numbers were revised.
Old 05-18-2003, 07:06 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
gord boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
another 2004 comparison???????

The folk over on priusonline.com are bragging double the torque,
double the gas mileage, an extra passenger, a new generator
at 10,000 rpm capability, 4 cylinder camry performance, and using the Toyota Design Objective of:

"FUN TO DRIVE"!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 05-18-2003, 08:35 AM
  #41  
Senior Rotor Router
 
DTECH-RX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by grogiefrog
I don't know how many people are going to buy the RX-8 as a daily commuter?

As far as your Mustang getting 18 and 20 on 87 octane, comparing a rotary to a V8 is like apples and oranges. I do not know if you've ever owned a rotary, but a rotary has a truly unique feel and sound (not to mention the upkeep). Perhaps half of the people that buy a RX-8 once owned a RX-7.

I plan on buying one as a weekend car, but not until next Spring (providing it does not have the problems that the 3rd generation RX-7 had). I won't buy it because of MPG, or because of it's horsepower. There is always something better in both categories. But there is only one car with a rotary. Is that keeping things in perspective?
Much better grogie....

I'm aware of the differences of the rotary and the fact that I've never owned one is part of the reason I'm interested in the RX-8. I've been looking around and checked out the Asian board and I did see the additional fuel efficiency reports which look much more reasonable with an average of about 22mpg for the type of driving I'm primarily going to be doing.

EAST MOON must have been sitting in some gridlock traffic for a while to get only 14mpg.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WranglerFan
New Member Forum
9
08-21-2022 01:29 PM
CarAndDriver
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
4
09-25-2015 01:18 PM
yapakanichi
RX-8 Discussion
11
09-23-2015 02:14 PM
CMRine04
New Member Forum
15
07-29-2015 02:07 PM
73JPS
Canada Forum
15
05-25-2003 08:06 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: MPG in the brochure !?!?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.