Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

My first full-tank MPG: 18.1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-08-2006 | 11:09 PM
  #1  
GULAMAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
My first full-tank MPG: 18.1

OK, so it looks like this is in line with what most of you seem to get out of your RX8s, eh?. About 2/3 of this stint was Hwy miles, Chevron 91, and of course trying to keep it <4500 rpm.
I guess I do have to expect slightly lower numbers after I'm done w/ brake-in...when I will be using the *other* half of the rev range also
Old 01-09-2006 | 09:33 PM
  #2  
mkaresh's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Sounds about right. I took my father's RX-8 on a round trip between VA and MI, via the mountains of WV and hills of southeastern OH. Great roads down there.

In the mountain stretches I got about 15--this was with a lot of time between 5k and 9k. On the 3/4 highway stretches I got a bit over 20. I figured straight highway would yield 21.
Old 01-09-2006 | 11:24 PM
  #3  
UFGator12's Avatar
TEBOW FOR HE15MAN
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Florida
This may sound stupid, but... How do you know how many mpg's you are getting? Do you have some special trip meter or something that tells you? Or do you just divide it all out by the number of miles you have been and how many gallons of gas used?
Old 01-10-2006 | 01:01 AM
  #4  
GULAMAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Zoom Zoom, yup, it's really as simple as that. Just re-set your trip odometer when you fill up; then when you're almost empty again, fill up again and note the miles travelled and the # of gallons you filled up with.
there's some variability at work here, though. this assumes that you fill the tank to 'full' exactly the same each time. if you depend on the gas pump's automatic shut-off, it's not gonna be exactly the same from pump to pump. but close enough for the purposes of this discussion.
Old 01-10-2006 | 08:48 PM
  #5  
garynjr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Crap... I just filled up for the second time (first time between fillings that I did myself) and Wow... 13.98 mpg. Mostly 80% stop and go driving... But wow That's low... I'm trying the No DSC method to see if it helps...

Also, I noticed with the no DSC it still handles very well and is a little more predictable... Some times the DSC kicks in when I'm not ready for it to kick in yet and it drives me crazy... I do drive it pretty hard so I guess that's what I get...

Of course like an ***, today when I filled it up I noticed there was only a $.05 difference between 93 octane and 94... so I figured what the heck right... Woops! Better see the eye doctor... When I got back from checking my Oil. I noticed the bill was up to $50 already! LOL... It was actually $1.05 more... LOL...

Not going to make that mistake again...

Speaking ofwhich, What octane do you all run? Thanks, G.
Old 01-10-2006 | 09:29 PM
  #6  
VBprogrammer666's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, NJ
Originally Posted by GULAMAN
and of course trying to keep it <4500 rpm.
It's weird, but I find I don't get much of a difference in MPG when I drive it hard (near redline) or baby it.

But your numbers of about 18 mpg are not bad for your type of mixed driving you do - based soley on my experience.
Old 01-12-2006 | 12:43 AM
  #8  
garynjr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
I actually didn't notice that much of a difference with out the DSC. I've driven RWD cars that were around long before DSC was even around so I'm pretty comfortable with it. Although, if my tests show no change i will gladly leave it on.

As for the gas Grades... I live in the US so they don't sell 87 but there is a .10 diff between 89,91 and 93 but the 94 went up a buck 05! Crazy huh! Sunoco. Nuts.
Anyway, It doesn't drive any faster with it and usually the higher octane burns fast then lower anyway. i may just switch to medium or 89.
Does using 89 void the waranty?? Thanks, G.
Old 01-12-2006 | 02:06 AM
  #9  
GULAMAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by garynjr
I actually didn't notice that much of a difference with out the DSC. I've driven RWD cars that were around long before DSC was even around so I'm pretty comfortable with it. Although, if my tests show no change i will gladly leave it on.
G.
Yeah, my car is still new to me but the DSC seems to be 'gravy'...nice to have but not essential...assuming of course you've had/driven performance cars in the past (as garynjr said, sports cars were enjoyed for decades before DSC was invented). My most recent RWD car was a 911SC....the RX8, DSC or otherwise, seems utterly disciplined in comparison!!!
Old 01-12-2006 | 07:41 PM
  #11  
garynjr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Cool-Blue-Dad
I agree - I hope I don't sound too cautious at the wise old age of 33. I drove my mustang for years (as a teenager!) without wrecking it. My point was, the 'gravy' is like insurance - good chance it'll save you in the event of something unexpected.

We have 87 octane here in New York and the surrounding states and all of my other cars ran well enough off that. I've not seen 94 octane - it's amazing they would gouge you that much! +$1.05? That must have been ~$4/gallon. *faints*
Seriously! and to put it so close to the price of the 93 Who looks at the first number anyway?? I was had. My fault. shouldn't have waited until after work to fill up. Half asleep! Anyway, I completely forgot to turn off DSC today... Oops. there goes my study. oh well.
Thanks... G.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FWgraybeard
RX-8 Discussion
9
11-21-2007 09:40 PM
gr8jab
Series I Tech Garage
8
03-03-2007 07:12 PM
LawFitz
RX-8 Discussion
54
03-24-2005 06:23 AM
rx-8_or_?
RX-8 Discussion
7
01-26-2005 10:56 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.