Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

New engine not good

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-28-2007, 12:42 PM
  #26  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe you have a banana in your tailpipe <whistles the Beverley Hills Cop theme song>
Old 02-28-2007, 11:22 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
typej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
new engine + new cat + new starter + new battery + new computer + new spark plugs will fix that problem. I know it fixed mine ... super easy
Old 03-01-2007, 12:17 AM
  #28  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by PaPaBear
My engine replacement was supposed to be completed by yesterday and is supposed to be ready today. I am concerned that these re-placement engines are just a band aid for something Mazda can't really fix. The shame is that I love the car but if this persist will explore the Florida Lemon Laws. Let you know how mine runs when I get it back.
just past 10k miles with the new motor.. it get the same mileage as the old one..... 21mpg.. does not feel as strong, but it only has 10k miles on it...

beers
Old 03-01-2007, 12:18 AM
  #29  
Skeet skeet skeet
 
TomAssBender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: making my way to the ATL
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemark
As someone that has worked on and rebuilt rotary motors for 20+ years, I guess I just must not know...

I'm not trying to be a wise ***, but do you know the technical reasoning behind this. i.e. what would be damaged and why? I drove according to the proper break in procedure, but when i bought my car "new" it had 96 miles on, which I figure is a lot of miles worth of test drives where people were probably on it pretty hard. just curious
Old 03-02-2007, 01:03 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TomAssBender
I'm not trying to be a wise ***, but do you know the technical reasoning behind this. i.e. what would be damaged and why? I drove according to the proper break in procedure, but when i bought my car "new" it had 96 miles on, which I figure is a lot of miles worth of test drives where people were probably on it pretty hard. just curious
apex seals mostly... takes about 2000 miles for the apex seals to bed properlly to the housings. And high revs (7000+RPM) when the seals are still sharp edged will end up with chatter marks on the housings (leading to issues of the housings often flaking down the road).

That is why if the motor is broken in properlly you will see more power at 10K miles or 40K miles than you will see when new.

Sorta the opposite of a piston motor.
Old 03-05-2007, 12:43 AM
  #31  
04 GT 6-speed
 
TRUOMEGA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor75
Also there is a school of thought that says hammering the car for the first 50 to 100 miles is really the best way to break in an engine. The individual had interesting test result and logic backing up his claim. Not saying he is right or wrong just that history is filled with people who "knew for sure" only to be proven wrong.

Dont know if this holds true to rotary engines but when i bought my bike i found this website which talks about breaking in an engine and how its actualy better to break it in hard. The site seems pretty convincing but again, He doesnt say anything about rotary engines so........
Old 03-05-2007, 01:52 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TRUOMEGA
Dont know if this holds true to rotary engines but when i bought my bike i found this website which talks about breaking in an engine and how its actualy better to break it in hard. The site seems pretty convincing but again, He doesnt say anything about rotary engines so........
and how many miles are you expecting to get from a Bike engine?

50K???
100k???

I expect to get 150-200K miles from a properly broken in non turbo 13B or 13B reni. with 2mm apex seals.

From Racing Beat (one of the longest running rotary shops in the world):

Originally Posted by Racing Beat
RX-8 Break-In

Mazda's Guidelines

The Mazda RX-8 Owners Manual lists the following information for the break-in period of a new vehicle:

"No special break-in is necessary, but a few precautions in the first 1000 KM (600 miles) may add to the performance, economy, and life of your Mazda.

- Don’t race the engine.
- Don’t maintain one constant speed for long.
- Don’t drive constantly at full-throttle or high engine RPM for extended periods of time.
- Avoid unnecessary hard stops.
- Avoid full-throttle starts."

A review of the Mazda RX-8 Service Manual Highlights revealed the following information regarding break-in:

"A fluorocarbon resin coating has been added to the trochoid surface (rotor housing) for improved initial break-in."

Racing Beat's Guidelines

The Mazda guidelines are reasonable and prudent. If you have any questions or uncertainly regarding the break-in period, we suggest you follow these official recommendations.

We receive many requests for our recommended break-in procedures. The following are Racing Beat's recommendations:

- For the first 1000 miles do not accelerate under full throttle.
- During the first 1000 miles do not exceed 4000 RPM.
- For miles 1000-2000, expand the RPM upwards - but do not accelerate at full throttle.
- Over 2000 miles, full throttle and high RPM is acceptable.

In summary, our guidelines offer a progessive method to increase the working loads placed on the engine.

Oil Change

The Mazda RX-8 Owners Manual indicates that the engine oil and oil filter be changed every six (6) months or every 7500 miles, whichever comes first. Racing Beat supports this recommendation.

Mazda recommends the use of SAE 5W/20 with a quality designation of ILSAC or SL.

Source:
2004 RX-8 Owners Manual - pages 4-7 & 8-4.
2004 RX-8 Service Highlights - page 01-10-4
and while I personally think that Racing Beat may be a bit overzealous with their recommendation of a 2000 mile break in, If I was indeed breaking in a rebuilt motor- they would be exactly on target.

Last edited by Icemark; 03-05-2007 at 01:58 PM.
Old 03-05-2007, 03:12 PM
  #33  
PaPa Bear
 
PaPaBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor75
The problem is the lousy job Mazda is doing rebuilding the engines (or should I say the 3rd party they hirer to do them). They are taking defective engines throwing in new parts and hoping they will run. Unfortunately many times they don't and that is why you see so many people getting 2 and 3 engines until they get one that works. I guess it is cheaper for Mazda then using a new one.
I picked up my RX8 last week with a brand new "REBUILD". It was smooth to begin with but now is hesitating from 1000 to about 1900 RPM's then smooths out. I am waiting for the Mazda Tech that did the engine change to call me back to see what is next. What I find to be amazing is my car ran great prior to Mazda performing the 30,000 mile service. I just don't get it. Maybe my 2004 engine was one of the good ones and got screwed up through a Mazda service mandate. I see the Speed Source RX-8 ate up the field in Mexico at the Rolex and am very happly about that. Now give me an RX-8 that runs right. That's all I want.
Old 03-05-2007, 08:44 PM
  #34  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That is what is so frustration about this car. When it is running right it is great, one of the finest cars I have owned but, when it has a problem many times Mazda dose not have the skills to fix it or dose not want to spend the money to find out what is wrong then fix it right.

If so many re manufactured engines are failing stop installing them. Spend the money, correct your mistakes and install new engines. Unfortunately Mazda cares more about saving money then satisfying their customer base. sounds like a great recipe to go out of business.

Originally Posted by PaPaBear
I picked up my RX8 last week with a brand new "REBUILD". It was smooth to begin with but now is hesitating from 1000 to about 1900 RPM's then smooths out. I am waiting for the Mazda Tech that did the engine change to call me back to see what is next. What I find to be amazing is my car ran great prior to Mazda performing the 30,000 mile service. I just don't get it. Maybe my 2004 engine was one of the good ones and got screwed up through a Mazda service mandate. I see the Speed Source RX-8 ate up the field in Mexico at the Rolex and am very happly about that. Now give me an RX-8 that runs right. That's all I want.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vapor2
West For Sale/Wanted
11
11-03-2020 03:38 PM
escapedan
RX-8 Racing
58
02-10-2020 06:11 PM
Davey's RX-8
Series I Trouble Shooting
0
07-28-2015 12:13 PM
RotaryRider
New Member Forum
11
07-20-2015 07:05 AM
Belalnabi
New Member Forum
9
07-17-2015 07:48 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New engine not good



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.