Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD
View Poll Results: Have you had an engine replacement?
Yes, 2004 model year
42
20.19%
Yes, 2005 model year
13
6.25%
Yes, 2006 model year
4
1.92%
Yes, 2007 model year
4
1.92%
Yes, 2008 model year
0
0%
Yes, 2009 model year
0
0%
No
145
69.71%
Voters: 208. You may not vote on this poll

New engines?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-06-2009 | 06:54 PM
  #101  
jlf12345's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
TX Another brick in the wall...

My 2006 MT Sport is joining the ranks of those with heart transplants. Just today, North Park Mazda ordered a new engine as a warrenty replacement after she failed the TSB. So far, Mazda thus far has not given me the results of the tests, as I am outta town.

The proplems I was encounting were not super obvious initally. It started with a general feeling of my car being slower, shortly after pulling the plug on the life support (premix). Then last friday, I had 3 different occurances of stalling out at traffic lights, and having difficulties starting after the stalls.

90% of the time, I drive it like I stole it, including 3-5 redlines a day.

Additionally, I purchased the car used from carmax with about 30k on the odometer
Old 05-06-2009 | 07:25 PM
  #102  
shadycrew31's Avatar
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,806
Likes: 31
From: Burbs,PA
I had one stall out during a rain storm started back up just fine though, its the only time its happened to me.. very strange.
Old 05-06-2009 | 07:40 PM
  #103  
renesisgenesis's Avatar
mod edit
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
I think there is a disproportionately large number of 04 owners here.
Old 05-06-2009 | 07:49 PM
  #104  
shadycrew31's Avatar
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,806
Likes: 31
From: Burbs,PA
was that a funny?
Old 05-07-2009 | 10:19 AM
  #105  
Shoafb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by raleighRX8
Atleast 100k, but if you pre-mix, 4oz per tank, change your oil, and redline regularly you should get a long life out of it.

the key word here is "should"

but it isn't allways so.
Old 05-07-2009 | 12:42 PM
  #106  
shadycrew31's Avatar
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,806
Likes: 31
From: Burbs,PA
Honestly I think we just don't know enough about how this engine works, I don't think anyone does. my friend had an N/A fc had 200k on the clock never had a problem. granted its a different engine but its still a rotary. We shouldn't be seeing these types of problems on an na rotary I would expect this from FI.

From what I know factory maintenance schedules are generally garbage. so i think with a little times and research we can see these engines outlive the bodies.

I'm thinking it will have something to do with more durable side seals and apex seals...
Old 05-07-2009 | 12:49 PM
  #107  
raleighRX8's Avatar
hello, is this thing on?
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Does anyone know if there is a way to get the old oil out of the oil cooler when doing an oil change? I have always just left it in there
Old 09-16-2010 | 06:44 PM
  #108  
SleeplessFantasy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Live Bowie, MD / Work Sterling, VA
2004 MT My First engine lasted 98,000 Miles! Just swapped it out last week. The joy of breaking in a new engine under 5k RPM.....
Old 09-16-2010 | 06:51 PM
  #109  
REV-N-HIGH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 388
Likes: 1
From: Central Jersey
94K 05Ti Gray. engine replaced.

Last edited by REV-N-HIGH; 09-16-2010 at 06:52 PM. Reason: spelling
Old 09-16-2010 | 07:03 PM
  #110  
shadycrew31's Avatar
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,806
Likes: 31
From: Burbs,PA
Originally Posted by raleighRX8
Does anyone know if there is a way to get the old oil out of the oil cooler when doing an oil change? I have always just left it in there
yes remove the bumper, unbolt the oil cooler lines (27mm I believe), replace all 4 crush washers on the banjo connection. remove the oil cooler let it drain out for 10 minutes moving it around randomly. somehow clear the oil out of the lines... bolt everything back up torque to spec. maybe 50 ft pounds I forget.

Or you could just live with the extra quart in your system...

If you do your oil changes every 3k this shouldn't matter much. I wouldn't even bother with it.
Old 09-17-2010 | 05:05 PM
  #111  
RotoRocket's Avatar
Freely Radical
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 9
From what I have observed, and please tell me if anyone disagrees, the overwhelming majority of failed motors were MOSTLY:


1) From the first model year of production (produced in 2003-2004), being modelyear 2004 cars.


2) Automatics (automatics have one oil cooler rather than the two oil coolers thatthe manual transmission RX8s have).


3) Were ran in very hot climates, such as Nevada, Arizona, Florida, Texas, etc.


And even then, we have no idea what % of 2004 auto RX8s suffered failed motors - it may be statistically higher than other years and manual transmission equipped cars, but it still might be low as a % of total 2004s sold.


Does anyone NOT agree with this as a general impression based on everything we've seen/heard?
Old 09-17-2010 | 05:31 PM
  #112  
8 Maniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 1
From: Aki City, Japan
NEW THREADS: Series 1 owners, please vote!!!

https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/series-1-new-engines-everyone-please-vote-204862/
https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/series-1-new-engines-part-2-please-vote-204863/

Last edited by 8 Maniac; 09-17-2010 at 05:37 PM.
Old 09-17-2010 | 05:41 PM
  #113  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,786
Likes: 455
From: San Antonio, Texas
All of the years have been affected for the most part, its just because the 04's have higher mileages that they have a higher percentage. But our local member tech has done 2005 and 2006's as well recently now that the mileage is getting up there. I know our largest dealer (one of 4) has done in the 300 range, that's a lot for one city. Although I do think heat plays a big role. But I also believe many who are not "in the know" are driving 8's with low compression and do not even know it.


The increase in the OMP rate may have helped (not me) but it was a band aid at best. I think they licked it on the series II though.
Old 09-17-2010 | 05:42 PM
  #114  
8 Maniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 1
From: Aki City, Japan
Originally Posted by RotoRocket
From what I have observed, and please tell me if anyone disagrees, the overwhelming majority of failed motors were MOSTLY:


1) From the first model year of production (produced in 2003-2004), being modelyear 2004 cars.


2) Automatics (automatics have one oil cooler rather than the two oil coolers thatthe manual transmission RX8s have).


3) Were ran in very hot climates, such as Nevada, Arizona, Florida, Texas, etc.


And even then, we have no idea what % of 2004 auto RX8s suffered failed motors - it may be statistically higher than other years and manual transmission equipped cars, but it still might be low as a % of total 2004s sold.


Does anyone NOT agree with this as a general impression based on everything we've seen/heard?
Made a couple new threads which will address some of your questions hopefully. 2004's seemed to have the highest failure rate as well as automatics. Analyzing the locational differences would be very difficult, though it could be another significant factor. The model year and transmission type seem to be the most important factors though.
Old 09-17-2010 | 09:49 PM
  #115  
New Yorker's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 58
From: NYC
Originally Posted by RotoRocket
From what I have observed, and please tell me if anyone disagrees, the overwhelming majority of failed motors were MOSTLY:


1) From the first model year of production (produced in 2003-2004), being modelyear 2004 cars.

2) Automatics (automatics have one oil cooler rather than the two oil coolers thatthe manual transmission RX8s have).

3) Were ran in very hot climates, such as Nevada, Arizona, Florida, Texas, etc.

And even then, we have no idea what % of 2004 auto RX8s suffered failed motors - it may be statistically higher than other years and manual transmission equipped cars, but it still might be low as a % of total 2004s sold.

Does anyone NOT agree with this as a general impression based on everything we've seen/heard?

You nailed it, dude. Finally, a voice of reason. Thank you. Never thought I'd see it on this forum.
Old 09-18-2010 | 12:20 AM
  #116  
shaunv74's Avatar
Power!!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 3
From: Sunny See attle
From the above only #1 applies. I have a MT and the car has spent it's life in the northeast and PacNW.

At this point I think it's a design flaw that will affect all series I engines. I have 12K on my 2nd engine, dyno'd it a year and a half ago posted higher numbers against other RX8s at a tuning day and recently did a compression test. Results 5.1 lowest face.

Any I premix'd 4oz/gal. from day 1 of the second motor.

I don't know what to think at this point.
Old 09-18-2010 | 07:12 AM
  #117  
ggavgg's Avatar
2fast4u (ggavgg)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: federal way, WA (seattle)
how do i no if i have a bad motor... turbo'ed rx8 and well it ran fine for the fist 4 days then all of a sudden it started ideling really heavy and like shakes heavily at idle.. and at every shak u can hear a sound which almost sounds like it could be a vaccume leak.. but idk.. and my cel was flashing... flashes 8 times and it takes about 5-10 cranks till it starts up ..n i ran a code reader n it gave me 2 codes..1 for missfire and the second for the intake manifold...help me...=( oh and its a rebuilt 84k miles 2004 allot of ppl keep telling me since its runing on emanage it could be a ecu over rite dont no tho
Old 09-18-2010 | 09:27 AM
  #118  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,786
Likes: 455
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by shaunv74
From the above only #1 applies. I have a MT and the car has spent it's life in the northeast and PacNW.

At this point I think it's a design flaw that will affect all series I engines. I have 12K on my 2nd engine, dyno'd it a year and a half ago posted higher numbers against other RX8s at a tuning day and recently did a compression test. Results 5.1 lowest face.

Any I premix'd 4oz/gal. from day 1 of the second motor.

I don't know what to think at this point.

I feel you man, I am on my third motor despite my OCD level maintenance and precautions. I have ran no cat, BHR ignition, SOHN, and premixed from day on on this motor and I suspect it's dieing (gut feeling). I having my injectors cleaned soon and then I will compression test, then dyno and we will see how she is doing.

Originally Posted by ggavgg
how do i no if i have a bad motor... turbo'ed rx8 and well it ran fine for the fist 4 days then all of a sudden it started ideling really heavy and like shakes heavily at idle.. and at every shak u can hear a sound which almost sounds like it could be a vaccume leak.. but idk.. and my cel was flashing... flashes 8 times and it takes about 5-10 cranks till it starts up ..n i ran a code reader n it gave me 2 codes..1 for missfire and the second for the intake manifold...help me...=( oh and its a rebuilt 84k miles 2004 allot of ppl keep telling me since its runing on emanage it could be a ecu over rite dont no tho

It could be a multitude of issues, you need a Cobb AP to tune it correctly. But a compression test is the only way to know how the motor is doing for sure.
Old 09-18-2010 | 10:05 AM
  #119  
Never L8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 1
From: Crystal Lake, Illinois
2004, 66,000 miles on original engine. Running great! I use Castrol Syntec at OEM specs. Not a single problem with the engine...yet.
Old 09-18-2010 | 10:21 AM
  #120  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,786
Likes: 455
From: San Antonio, Texas
Yeah these engines are weird. My first one only lasted 22,000 miles and my second lasted 74,000 miles. I am on 20,000 on the third engine.
Old 09-18-2010 | 03:15 PM
  #121  
ggavgg's Avatar
2fast4u (ggavgg)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: federal way, WA (seattle)
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
I feel you man, I am on my third motor despite my OCD level maintenance and precautions. I have ran no cat, BHR ignition, SOHN, and premixed from day on on this motor and I suspect it's dieing (gut feeling). I having my injectors cleaned soon and then I will compression test, then dyno and we will see how she is doing.




It could be a multitude of issues, you need a Cobb AP to tune it correctly. But a compression test is the only way to know how the motor is doing for sure.

well they stop making cobb ap but i mean wat would u suggest doing first ???compression test.... and if it is the motor i prolly cant get the recall u think ??? since its a rebuilt title and it has 84k miles on a 04
Old 09-18-2010 | 05:06 PM
  #122  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,786
Likes: 455
From: San Antonio, Texas
You can still get the Cobb AP at www.mazdamaniac.com and used. If you want the pea ce fo mind you can go to the dealer and pay for a compression test, if the engine test fine then you know you have other issues.
Old 09-18-2010 | 05:14 PM
  #123  
8 Maniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 1
From: Aki City, Japan
Originally Posted by ggavgg
well they stop making cobb ap but i mean wat would u suggest doing first ???compression test.... and if it is the motor i prolly cant get the recall u think ??? since its a rebuilt title and it has 84k miles on a 04
There is absolutely no way a dealer will warranty a turbo'd motor. They can still run a compression test and that will help indicate the health of the engine.

Have the ignition coils and plugs been replaced?
Old 09-18-2010 | 06:20 PM
  #124  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,786
Likes: 455
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by 8 Maniac
There is absolutely no way a dealer will warranty a turbo'd motor. They can still run a compression test and that will help indicate the health of the engine.

Have the ignition coils and plugs been replaced?

Plus if it has a rebuilt title the warranty is void.
Old 09-25-2010 | 08:13 AM
  #125  
Never L8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 1
From: Crystal Lake, Illinois
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Yeah these engines are weird. My first one only lasted 22,000 miles and my second lasted 74,000 miles. I am on 20,000 on the third engine.
That's crazy. How did you personally know your motors went? Was it a an epic failure or was it the more subtle issues, such as difficult starts? Mine, ironically, just started occasionally giving me starting issues despite an all new igntion system.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.