Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

new engines at 80'000K?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-14-2004, 02:49 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Smoke_Weed_RX-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
new engines at 80'000K?

wtf? i have a few friends that work at mazda, and they way the rotor engins in the rx8's predescessors would statistically start going bad at like 40'000K. most were shot by 80'000K. am i going to run into this wht my 8 when it gets up there. i hope mazda would not make such a big deal about this being the "offical" rotary engine if it could be f'ing up before 100K.
somebody please quell my rising fear.

please.....
Smoke_Weed_RX-8 is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 03:29 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
BillK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
80,000K?

Wow, I'd be thrilled if I had an engine that would go 80,000,000 miles.

Seriously, there are lots of folks here who have had RX-7s with a lot more than 80,000 miles on them. Generally, replace the apex seals before permanent damage is done and you're good to go...
BillK is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 03:32 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Smoke_Weed_RX-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yo. that's good. geeze, these engins practially come assembled, and they're just bolted in and sealed up, and good to go, with that kind of production, how much quality assurance do we have?
Smoke_Weed_RX-8 is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 08:01 AM
  #4  
Grand Poobah
 
Sue Esponte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HUH?
Sue Esponte is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 09:04 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
RX8Lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
RX8Lover is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 10:27 AM
  #6  
Back in the family
 
Psylence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: philly 'burbs
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Smoke Weed!

I think that you might be a little paranoid, know what I mean?

Just like GM's crappy diesel in the 70's... the NSU RO80 and the FD3S have done more to damage the reputation of the rotary engine than anything else. Naturally aspirated rotaries are quite reliable. Don't listen to the haters.

Smaller hits man, smaller hits so you don't get so paranoid!
Psylence is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 10:49 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
bureau13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eh? I hope you realize that replacing the apex seals means removing and tearing down the motor...its basically what you would do if the motor went "bad." In fact, broken apex seals are probably the main thing that goes bad (along with coolant seals if the thing overheats).

jds

Originally posted by BillK
80,000K?

Wow, I'd be thrilled if I had an engine that would go 80,000,000 miles.

Seriously, there are lots of folks here who have had RX-7s with a lot more than 80,000 miles on them. Generally, replace the apex seals before permanent damage is done and you're good to go...
bureau13 is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 11:09 AM
  #8  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: new engines at 80'000K?

Originally posted by Smoke_Weed_RX-8
wtf? i have a few friends that work at mazda, and they way the rotor engins in the rx8's predescessors would statistically start going bad at like 40'000K. most were shot by 80'000K. am i going to run into this wht my 8 when it gets up there. i hope mazda would not make such a big deal about this being the "offical" rotary engine if it could be f'ing up before 100K.
somebody please quell my rising fear.

please.....
That's all BS-- your Mazda 'insiders' were probably referring to the reliability problems of the 3rd gen (FD) twin turbo. I have seen many, many 1st and 2nd gen RX7's running around with 200k miles on them... if kept lubed and cooled, NA rotaries can be bulletproof.
G8rboy is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 11:34 AM
  #9  
Still spining
 
RotorGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Miramar FL.
Posts: 986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah thats BS. I have a buddy with a 89 Vert running on 230k original miles No rebuilts
RotorGeek is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 12:29 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Mike Ockstynee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BillK
80,000K?

Wow, I'd be thrilled if I had an engine that would go 80,000,000 miles.

Seriously, there are lots of folks here who have had RX-7s with a lot more than 80,000 miles on them. Generally, replace the apex seals before permanent damage is done and you're good to go...

not to be a dick (no pun intended) but you obviously dont know crap. why would you post something that you obviously dont know anything about?

Generally, replace the apex seals bfore permanent damage is done and your good to go --This statement almost qualifies you for the Darwin award.

I have faith in you my friend. I have faith that you can reach inside and figure out why that statement you made is absolutely the 2nd most stupid thing ever said on this forum. (See IKE for the first).
Mike Ockstynee is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 01:00 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
boothguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah - properly cooled and lubed (meaning clean oil) is the right answer. My '86 2gen has 215,000 miles and my '94 3gen has 94,000 and neither of them has ever had the engine apart. Treat any motor like crap and it'll grenade on you.
boothguy is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 01:03 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
BillK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Mike Ockshuge
not to be a dick (no pun intended) but you obviously dont know crap. why would you post something that you obviously dont know anything about?

I have faith in you my friend. I have faith that you can reach inside and figure out why that statement you made is absolutely the 2nd most stupid thing ever said on this forum. (See IKE for the first).
IKE?

As far as the apex seal comment goes, I apologize for any confusion. I was once told that apex seal replacement was even recommended at 80K, this from a Mazda service manager when I bought my 1989 RX-7 GTU.

Last edited by BillK; 03-14-2004 at 01:08 PM.
BillK is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 01:10 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Mike Ockstynee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BillK
IKE?

As far as the apex seal comment goes, I apologize for any confusion. I was once told that apex seal replacement was even recommended at 80K, this from a Mazda service manager when I bought my 1989 RX-7 GTU.
You made 2 mistakes.

1) asking a Mazda service manager anything about the rotary
2) repeating it.


if you go to the trouble of replacing an Apex seal you may as well do a full rebuild as its basically the same thing.
Mike Ockstynee is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 01:30 PM
  #14  
Chicks dig me!
 
Baller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: What Happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas!
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: new engines at 80'000K?

Originally posted by Smoke_Weed_RX-8
wtf? i have a few friends that work at mazda, and they way the rotor engins in the rx8's predescessors would statistically start going bad at like 40'000K. most were shot by 80'000K. am i going to run into this wht my 8 when it gets up there. i hope mazda would not make such a big deal about this being the "offical" rotary engine if it could be f'ing up before 100K.
somebody please quell my rising fear.

please.....
Betty Ford!!!!!
Baller is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 06:04 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
PhineasFellOff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smoke Weed might be a troll.
PhineasFellOff is offline  
Old 03-14-2004, 11:23 PM
  #16  
Bert angry!
 
mamccubbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by PhineasFellOff
Smoke Weed might be a troll.
Or his brain is just totally fried.
mamccubbin is offline  
Old 03-15-2004, 02:42 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Rotary Soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he's probably just a lil under the influence, the stuff he's saying is not THAT outrageous
Rotary Soul is offline  
Old 03-15-2004, 07:20 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
Elara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is so obviously a troll. Closing. Smoke_weed, you've now had your warning. Any idiot who knows anything about rotary engines knows this is completely untrue.
Elara is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vapor2
West For Sale/Wanted
11
11-03-2020 03:38 PM
mr. GrandGame
New Member Forum
5
03-23-2016 10:16 AM
badinfluence
Series II Aftermarket Performance Modifications
6
08-31-2015 11:51 AM
cschoeps
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
08-06-2015 12:44 PM
Rx8Lovin
New Member Forum
4
07-25-2015 08:39 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: new engines at 80'000K?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.