Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

No future rotary powered cars?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-02-2007, 06:00 PM
  #1  
Window Shopper :)
Thread Starter
 
LHpitcher4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South-Side Chicago
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No future rotary powered cars?

http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/12...my-standard-v/

^^^Congress might pass a fuel economy standard of 35mpg, and we all know a rotary engine will never live up to those expectations

Is the end near?.....
Old 12-02-2007, 06:06 PM
  #2  
The Former PSNTLSS
iTrader: (3)
 
PSTNLSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Plainfield, NJ/ Center Valley, PA
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its planned for 2020. A lot can change by that time. Its 13 years from now

atleast another generation of rx's to come
Old 12-02-2007, 06:12 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Absinthe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rochester Area, NY
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rotary shouldn't have any trouble with that... We've already got a hydrogen engine
Old 12-02-2007, 06:16 PM
  #4  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
champi0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why wouldnt there be a future in rotary, its the better technology.
Old 12-02-2007, 06:22 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
HxCRotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they know how many people are in love with rotary, they'll give them what they want to make the money.
No stopping Rotary.
Old 12-02-2007, 06:45 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
chetrickerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes, the rotary engine is still a baby compared to piston engines. there is so much we havent done with it or discovered with it. i have high hopes for it.
Old 12-02-2007, 06:57 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
77mjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Isn't that requirement just an average number for all vehicles in a company's fleet?
Old 12-02-2007, 07:02 PM
  #8  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
35mpg would take out lots of piston cars.....
Old 12-02-2007, 07:03 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
chetrickerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and everyone knows the power of the ever important lobbyists
Old 12-02-2007, 07:04 PM
  #10  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts
Hybrid rotary owns you... Search them up and come back.
Old 12-02-2007, 07:08 PM
  #11  
Window Shopper :)
Thread Starter
 
LHpitcher4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South-Side Chicago
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Twas a sarcastic thread, for those taking offense
Old 12-02-2007, 07:39 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
thisllub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northern NSW, Australia
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No more Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche,Hummer.

Yeah right.
Old 12-02-2007, 08:20 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
RMZ290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt that will ever happen. They have maximized the current technology pretty far with aerodynamics and Direct Injection and the cost to keep gaining efficiency is just going to to keep increasing exponentially. Its going to have to be hybrids, but more likely fuel cells in the future.
Old 12-02-2007, 10:08 PM
  #14  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
champi0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lets start recruiting suicide bombers to help us get this technology moving. We'll have a 3 week training course for new recruits... hopefully no one brings live bombs with their training vests.
Old 12-02-2007, 10:14 PM
  #15  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by LHpitcher4
'Twas a sarcastic thread, for those taking offense
None taken
Old 12-03-2007, 09:37 AM
  #16  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
we can easily convert our car to hydrogen. you just have to find a hydrogen refueling station.
Old 12-03-2007, 10:27 AM
  #17  
The RX-8 is missed
iTrader: (3)
 
2tone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 77mjd
Isn't that requirement just an average number for all vehicles in a company's fleet?
AGREED. there would be no sports cars, suv's, or trucks if this rating were for individual cars. it's an average for a car company, just to make sure all the gas guzzlers are balanced by having enough hybrids and other economical cars in their line-up.
Old 12-04-2007, 09:37 AM
  #18  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
champi0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
100% fuel cell vehicles are not the way of the future! Alternate fuels are. (such as Hydrogen). But even still its going to be Hybrid in either technology. It has to be.

Too many issues with fuel cells as a viable means of powering a car. Ooops honey we ran out of juice, better call the tow truck to get us to a power source and tell your mother we won't be able to get back on the road for another 8 hours while we "fill up". So lets go spend un-necessary money on this hotel now.

I prefer to take 5-10 minutes out of my life to pump some kind of fuel into my tank. I'd prefer it be some gasoline with some hydrogen.
Old 12-04-2007, 10:04 AM
  #19  
Destroying Threads
 
tajabaho1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: (swartsnegga state)
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
if the future has no lambo, I say the future is fucked
Old 12-04-2007, 10:21 AM
  #20  
"Is that thing FWD??"
 
LateralSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is the future. Compressed air engines. They run completely off of compressed air, emit only pure water and when paired up with their air compressor that is powered by the engine(like an alternator) bam... vehicle that never needs to be refueled. Only problem with this technology is I doubt all the oil/gas companies would ever let it be produced. They'd buy out the company and disband it before they let it go into full scale production. That and since it's such a new technology all the cars are very underpowered. But just like any new technology... given time it will catch up to the other internal combustion engines.

Old 12-04-2007, 11:44 AM
  #21  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by LateralSpeed
This is the future. Compressed air engines. They run completely off of compressed air, emit only pure water and when paired up with their air compressor that is powered by the engine(like an alternator) bam... vehicle that never needs to be refueled. Only problem with this technology is I doubt all the oil/gas companies would ever let it be produced. They'd buy out the company and disband it before they let it go into full scale production. That and since it's such a new technology all the cars are very underpowered. But just like any new technology... given time it will catch up to the other internal combustion engines.
It will not be able to go into production unless they can solve one of the most important safety issue. Running Compressed Air is MORE dangerous than running with a Gas Tank.

When you talk about Compressed air, in order for it to be able to make any *reasonable* power, it has to have a lot of oxygen in there. wow, I wouldnt want to drive around with a bottle of oxygen in my trunk. (or close to pure oxygen)
Old 12-04-2007, 11:48 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
chetrickerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats pretty much like driving on a 1 ton stick of TNT
Old 12-04-2007, 11:50 AM
  #23  
Vtak just kicked in yo!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Renesis07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake County IL
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
< Not worried
Old 12-04-2007, 12:33 PM
  #24  
Destroying Threads
 
tajabaho1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: (swartsnegga state)
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i drive with 2 bottles of 36% oxygen in my trunk and I'm still alive
Old 12-04-2007, 12:35 PM
  #25  
I ♥ Drifting!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
imput1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LHpitcher4
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/12...my-standard-v/

^^^Congress might pass a fuel economy standard of 35mpg, and we all know a rotary engine will never live up to those expectations

Is the end near?.....
I don't believe it, that'll be the end to several sports cars.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: No future rotary powered cars?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.