Octane requirements
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Octane requirements
I'm a little confused. I thought that the owners manual stated that the 8 must be run on premium 91 octane gasoline, yet I'm running across posts on this forum where owners state that they're using 87 octane. Is Mazda wrong about the octane requirements? What's the consequences of running lower octane fuel? Pinging? Detonation? Nothing???
1.3L
1.3L
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1.3L
I thought that the owners manual stated that the 8 must be run on premium 91 octane gasoline,
#7
Giant Space Hamster
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The manual says 87 is fine. Search "octane" for a full discussion of the pros and cons of 87 octane. In short pro better mileage, con possible risk to engine.
#8
The Eyes Have It
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't notice any difference with 87 octane. I might if I were hauling up a steep grade or out on a track, but for regular flat-land driving, it seems to make no difference in performance, I don't have any funny sounds or pings, and my gas milage is actually better. For that matter, I don't think that any production car "must" use premium fuel. That's oil company hype. Maybe the pros out there will disagree, but unless you're on a race track, it seems to matter not one bit.
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Grabitquick
I can't notice any difference with 87 octane. I might if I were hauling up a steep grade or out on a track, but for regular flat-land driving, it seems to make no difference in performance, I don't have any funny sounds or pings, and my gas milage is actually better. For that matter, I don't think that any production car "must" use premium fuel. That's oil company hype. Maybe the pros out there will disagree, but unless you're on a race track, it seems to matter not one bit.
Most new production cars will run on lower grade fuel, you're right there, but most high performance ones will not run to their full potential. Octane ratings are not merely oil company hype but are actually very important considerations when designing an engine. A class on internal combustion engine design here at my school puts a good deal of emphasis on octane ratings and choosing the right grade fuel for the job, as do all of the engineers and professors that I've ever talked to who actually work on engine design and really understand the physics and chemistry behind it all. Mazda's engineers certainly took fuel grade into consideration when designing the Renesis, although they, like all engineers designing a product to be sold to a largely technically ignorant populace, are overly cautious when delineating safety precautions.
You may not hear any knocking when you redline your car at WOT, but this doesn't mean that the computer isn't pulling timing and robbing you of some power. It all comes down to whether or not you value the performance of your car over a few dollars a week in cost savings. The way that I look at it is that if you buy a performance car, then why handicap it by skimping on fuel? Is the extra $3 a tank really worth it? Although I don't believe that it is, if you do then go ahead and buy 87 octane. Your engine will probably survive fairly well even on low grade fuel. However, I would be unwilling to risk thousands of dollars on the belief of a few people that 87 octane will cause no damage at all during high load conditions, so I would be wary of getting on the throttle too often if running sub-par fuel.
#10
You guys need to realized that the higher octane rating means that it has a higher resistance to ignition. Meaning that it takes a higher temperature and pressure in the combustion chamber before it'll ignite.
Higher octane fuels are especially important in high compression or forced induction engines. Reason being is that lower octanes will pre-ignite before top dead center, (detonation) causing a disturbance in the 4 stroke cycle. The piston will start to rattle back and forth within the cylinder against the sleeves causing the sound we all know as engine knock. This can cause extreme piston damage, and in some cases can throw rods, and bend crankshafts and valves.
As far as the rotary is concerned, my educated guess would be to use higher octane fuels. Detonation is a problem that I'd rather prevent than have to pay for later. Who knows what kind of damage detonation can cause on the apex seals, the rotor itself, or the eccentric shaft.
Higher octane fuels are especially important in high compression or forced induction engines. Reason being is that lower octanes will pre-ignite before top dead center, (detonation) causing a disturbance in the 4 stroke cycle. The piston will start to rattle back and forth within the cylinder against the sleeves causing the sound we all know as engine knock. This can cause extreme piston damage, and in some cases can throw rods, and bend crankshafts and valves.
As far as the rotary is concerned, my educated guess would be to use higher octane fuels. Detonation is a problem that I'd rather prevent than have to pay for later. Who knows what kind of damage detonation can cause on the apex seals, the rotor itself, or the eccentric shaft.
#11
The Eyes Have It
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoorCollegeKid
The benefits of high octane fuel are seen under high stress conditions. If you're just puttering around town, then using high octane isn't necessary as the computer can adjust ignition timing in case of detonation. However, if you like spinning it up to redline and feeling it push you back in your seat, or if you're towing something with your '8 or traveling through hilly areas, you really should use the minimum recommended octane (91, IIRC). The computer can adjust for lower octane fuel, but even the computer has its limits and it's generally better to be safe than sorry.
Most new production cars will run on lower grade fuel, you're right there, but most high performance ones will not run to their full potential. Octane ratings are not merely oil company hype but are actually very important considerations when designing an engine. A class on internal combustion engine design here at my school puts a good deal of emphasis on octane ratings and choosing the right grade fuel for the job, as do all of the engineers and professors that I've ever talked to who actually work on engine design and really understand the physics and chemistry behind it all. Mazda's engineers certainly took fuel grade into consideration when designing the Renesis, although they, like all engineers designing a product to be sold to a largely technically ignorant populace, are overly cautious when delineating safety precautions.
You may not hear any knocking when you redline your car at WOT, but this doesn't mean that the computer isn't pulling timing and robbing you of some power. It all comes down to whether or not you value the performance of your car over a few dollars a week in cost savings. The way that I look at it is that if you buy a performance car, then why handicap it by skimping on fuel? Is the extra $3 a tank really worth it? Although I don't believe that it is, if you do then go ahead and buy 87 octane. Your engine will probably survive fairly well even on low grade fuel. However, I would be unwilling to risk thousands of dollars on the belief of a few people that 87 octane will cause no damage at all during high load conditions, so I would be wary of getting on the throttle too often if running sub-par fuel.
Most new production cars will run on lower grade fuel, you're right there, but most high performance ones will not run to their full potential. Octane ratings are not merely oil company hype but are actually very important considerations when designing an engine. A class on internal combustion engine design here at my school puts a good deal of emphasis on octane ratings and choosing the right grade fuel for the job, as do all of the engineers and professors that I've ever talked to who actually work on engine design and really understand the physics and chemistry behind it all. Mazda's engineers certainly took fuel grade into consideration when designing the Renesis, although they, like all engineers designing a product to be sold to a largely technically ignorant populace, are overly cautious when delineating safety precautions.
You may not hear any knocking when you redline your car at WOT, but this doesn't mean that the computer isn't pulling timing and robbing you of some power. It all comes down to whether or not you value the performance of your car over a few dollars a week in cost savings. The way that I look at it is that if you buy a performance car, then why handicap it by skimping on fuel? Is the extra $3 a tank really worth it? Although I don't believe that it is, if you do then go ahead and buy 87 octane. Your engine will probably survive fairly well even on low grade fuel. However, I would be unwilling to risk thousands of dollars on the belief of a few people that 87 octane will cause no damage at all during high load conditions, so I would be wary of getting on the throttle too often if running sub-par fuel.
Last edited by Grabitquick; 10-06-2004 at 02:47 AM. Reason: misspelling
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In many of the more advanced, and high compression engines today the ECu can detect lower grade fuels and retard the timing of the engine. So in a way some of the posters are correct that if you do not need the full 238 hp, and you are just tooling around town you are using little of the engine. If you need the higher hp, the ECU will retard the timing if it senses the lower grade of fuel and you will lose hp, but it will protect your engine.
A while back, Car & Driver ran a new Honda Accord on 87, then 91 and found that the Accord ran about +10 hp more on higher octane fuel. Whether or not that can be acheived on most high performance engines (high compression) is debatable.
A while back, Car & Driver ran a new Honda Accord on 87, then 91 and found that the Accord ran about +10 hp more on higher octane fuel. Whether or not that can be acheived on most high performance engines (high compression) is debatable.
#14
87-91 octane?
Man, I just learnt something new today.
I wasn't aware the octane rating of fuel in the US was that low.
Here downunder, Mazda Australia recommends our cars to run on at least 95 RON.
Most 8 owners here run it on 98 octane which is readily available.
Man, I just learnt something new today.
I wasn't aware the octane rating of fuel in the US was that low.
Here downunder, Mazda Australia recommends our cars to run on at least 95 RON.
Most 8 owners here run it on 98 octane which is readily available.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DC Metro Area, USA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nojooc
87-91 octane?
Man, I just learnt something new today.
I wasn't aware the octane rating of fuel in the US was that low.
Here downunder, Mazda Australia recommends our cars to run on at least 95 RON.
Most 8 owners here run it on 98 octane which is readily available.
Man, I just learnt something new today.
I wasn't aware the octane rating of fuel in the US was that low.
Here downunder, Mazda Australia recommends our cars to run on at least 95 RON.
Most 8 owners here run it on 98 octane which is readily available.
So when someone in the US [ where we use (R+M)/2 method] says 93 octane, it's probably 98 RON. Our 87 is 91 RON and our 91 is 96 RON.
rx8cited
#16
Originally Posted by rx8cited
Octane rating is specified differently in the US vs Europe. From the manual "91 [ (R+M)/2 method] or above (96 RON or above)" and "87 octane (91 RON)".
So when someone in the US [ where we use (R+M)/2 method] says 93 octane, it's probably 98 RON. Our 87 is 91 RON and our 91 is 96 RON.
rx8cited
So when someone in the US [ where we use (R+M)/2 method] says 93 octane, it's probably 98 RON. Our 87 is 91 RON and our 91 is 96 RON.
rx8cited
Thanks for clarifying.
Phew, for a minute there I thought the US was a third world country.
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bolton (Northwest England)
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK some observations here...
I'm in the UK so we have a choice of 95, 97 (BP Ultimate and most other "super" type fuels) or 98 (Shell Optimax).
Mine's really sensitive to what kind of fuel goes in it. It is not happy at all on supermarket crap and I don't drive it over 5-6k at all when I am forced to buy a tank of that.
Delivery is smoother throughout the range running 97 and I'd say there was a little more power at the top. With Optimax in, response past 7k revs is DEFINITELY better.
So basically, I stick to 97 fuel and I only put Optimax in if I know I'll have a chance to see the benefit.
In Germany Shell sell "V-power" which is 100RON! It absolutely FLEW with that in. :D
It also helps if you can stay consistent - I guess because the ECU doesn't have to keep relearning.
I'm in the UK so we have a choice of 95, 97 (BP Ultimate and most other "super" type fuels) or 98 (Shell Optimax).
Mine's really sensitive to what kind of fuel goes in it. It is not happy at all on supermarket crap and I don't drive it over 5-6k at all when I am forced to buy a tank of that.
Delivery is smoother throughout the range running 97 and I'd say there was a little more power at the top. With Optimax in, response past 7k revs is DEFINITELY better.
So basically, I stick to 97 fuel and I only put Optimax in if I know I'll have a chance to see the benefit.
In Germany Shell sell "V-power" which is 100RON! It absolutely FLEW with that in. :D
It also helps if you can stay consistent - I guess because the ECU doesn't have to keep relearning.
#18
the Doctor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok here in the states (east coast) we have 87 89 and 93. 87 is usually 20c a gallon cheaper than 93...say you drive 12000 miles in a year, and to make this a high range estimate you only get 12mpg. 1000 gallons a year...by switching to a lesser fuel you've saved a grand total of 200 dollars in one year. if this car is that prohibitively expensive that 200 dollars makes a big difference you really shouldnt be driving it. i would hate to be someone down the road buying a used rx8 that didnt have anything but the best used in it. you owe it to your car to treat the way it was recommended to be treated.
#19
zoom freaking zoom
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaspeedFeras
by switching to a lesser fuel you've saved a grand total of 200 dollars in one year. if this car is that prohibitively expensive that 200 dollars makes a big difference you really shouldnt be driving it... you owe it to your car to treat the way it was recommended to be treated.
#20
New Member
How many litre of fuel do you have to save to replace a busted apex seal?
The chances are remote but it is there and I think a few cent a litre is a sense of security in my heart/mind
High RON/octane will save fuel and have a better environment too
The chances are remote but it is there and I think a few cent a litre is a sense of security in my heart/mind
High RON/octane will save fuel and have a better environment too
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DC Metro Area, USA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's what it says it the manual: "You may use a regular unleaded fuel with Octane Rating from 87 to 90 (91 to 95 RON) but this will slightly reduce performance."
I'll trust that Mazda knows what they are talking about. I don't mind the reduced perfomance, so I'll be sure to report back when my engine fails due to using "less than the best" Shell 87 octane in it.
rx8cited
I'll trust that Mazda knows what they are talking about. I don't mind the reduced perfomance, so I'll be sure to report back when my engine fails due to using "less than the best" Shell 87 octane in it.
rx8cited
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by shaolin
You guys need to realized that the higher octane rating means that it has a higher resistance to ignition. Meaning that it takes a higher temperature and pressure in the combustion chamber before it'll ignite.
Higher octane fuels are especially important in high compression or forced induction engines. Reason being is that lower octanes will pre-ignite before top dead center, (detonation) causing a disturbance in the 4 stroke cycle. The piston will start to rattle back and forth within the cylinder against the sleeves causing the sound we all know as engine knock. This can cause extreme piston damage, and in some cases can throw rods, and bend crankshafts and valves.
As far as the rotary is concerned, my educated guess would be to use higher octane fuels. Detonation is a problem that I'd rather prevent than have to pay for later. Who knows what kind of damage detonation can cause on the apex seals, the rotor itself, or the eccentric shaft.
Higher octane fuels are especially important in high compression or forced induction engines. Reason being is that lower octanes will pre-ignite before top dead center, (detonation) causing a disturbance in the 4 stroke cycle. The piston will start to rattle back and forth within the cylinder against the sleeves causing the sound we all know as engine knock. This can cause extreme piston damage, and in some cases can throw rods, and bend crankshafts and valves.
As far as the rotary is concerned, my educated guess would be to use higher octane fuels. Detonation is a problem that I'd rather prevent than have to pay for later. Who knows what kind of damage detonation can cause on the apex seals, the rotor itself, or the eccentric shaft.
I do think it is more important to prevent detonation with a Rotary motor than with a piston motor.
My 8 will see nothing but Premium gas in it.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bowman
Here's a question, what about the people running 93 octane? Per the manual, the only allowed octanes are 87-91.