Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Premium or regular? Search is not helping.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-17-2007 | 04:21 AM
  #26  
Winfree's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
From: In the hills between San Miguel and Parkfield - "up in the boonie lands", Central Coast of California, Wine Country
She likes the high priced stuff especially Shell, Exxon, Texaco, but she likes cheap oil
Old 03-17-2007 | 04:29 AM
  #27  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by therm8
Higher octane = better combustion resistance. 87 burns easier than 93. That's why 93 protects against pre-detonation better than 87.

Some vehicles claim more power on high octane, but that usually means that the ecu changes fuel and ignition maps to better utilize the higher ping resistance. There's nothing magical about higher octane gas, it just allows for more aggressive tuning.

My car dislikes 87. I'm sure some high quality, freshly delivered 87 might work, but that's too much hassle and worry. So it's usually 89 in the cold, and 93 the rest of the year for me.
what is pre detonation? does it get off before it detonates?

and btw..

i run 87, good 87, still 87...

now if i were going to do a track day the rules change..

beers
Old 03-17-2007 | 10:36 AM
  #28  
Freddie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Grove CA
Long trips, cooler weather, easy cruising (even at 80-90 mph), higher altitudes = I burn 89 and consistently get better mileage.

Stop-and-go city driving, agressive driving, warmer weather, sea level = I burn only 91 octane.

Either way, I buy only 76, Shell, or Chevron. I am in SoCal and also drive in Nevada, Arizona, and Oregon.
Old 03-17-2007 | 11:36 AM
  #29  
Nopstnz's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 939
Likes: 28
From: Port Royal, SC
Originally Posted by Freddie

Either way, I buy only 76, Shell, or Chevron. I am in SoCal and also drive in Nevada, Arizona, and Oregon.
Have you experienced any pinging with any of them? Particularly 76? Also, any performance difference between them? I've consistantly put in Sell 93 for 17000 miles and recently switched to chevron, noticed a little more pefromance/smoothness then switched to 76 and thought I noticed pinging/deeper engine tone/equal performance.
Old 03-17-2007 | 01:11 PM
  #30  
copperred's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Cooper City, FL
Originally Posted by therm8
Higher octane = better combustion resistance.
Partially true. Better combustion resistance when compressed.

Originally Posted by therm8
87 burns easier than 93.
No. 93 resists igniting when you compress it better than 87. This is due to the higher octane content. The ability to resist compression detonation does not affect the ability of the fuel to burn once actually ignited.
Old 03-17-2007 | 05:10 PM
  #31  
Freddie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Grove CA
I have never experienced pinging except maybe once when I put in five gallons of cheap 87 because that was the only thing available, and I'm not even sure about that. After that experience I filled up with 91 at the first opportunity and have never used 87 again.

Of the three brands mentioned, I sort of think maybe Chevron runs a little stronger, or maybe I've been influenced by advertising and the opinions of a couple mechanics I've known, attesting to the cleaning properties of their "Techroline" (?) additive.

I also have heard that here in the West, the "76" brand has slipped in quality since it went from Unocal to Conoco/Phillips.

I wish 93 octane would be available in California. But, 91 is as good as it gets.

Can anyone say for sure whether altitude changes the effective compression of an engine? Sure seems like it does. For several years I lived at 5,000 feet above sea level, back when we were able to "tweak" our ignition timing at will. On the same fuel, my cars would not ping until I drove down to lower elevations, but then I would need to retard the timing or they would ping horribly. Now I live near sea level but have recently driven at all altitudes from almost 9,000 feet above sea level down to something like 100 feet below sea level (California desert beyond Palm Springs). And no, no pinging in the RX-8.

Originally Posted by t-run/8
Have you experienced any pinging with any of them? Particularly 76? Also, any performance difference between them? I've consistantly put in Sell 93 for 17000 miles and recently switched to chevron, noticed a little more pefromance/smoothness then switched to 76 and thought I noticed pinging/deeper engine tone/equal performance.
Old 03-17-2007 | 05:25 PM
  #32  
DAC17's Avatar
Are we having fun yet?
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Conn., USA
Why would the manufacturer recommend premium (at higher operating cost) if the car didn't need it?
Old 03-17-2007 | 05:35 PM
  #33  
kartweb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Freddie
Can anyone say for sure whether altitude changes the effective compression of an engine?
Yes it does.

Relative Air Density (RAD) changes with pressure, tempurature & humidity. Higher altitudes have lower pressure. While that doesn't change the compression ratio, it does reduce the compressed pressure and reduces the chance of detonation.

Higher humidity also reduces RAD but the humidity also tends to lessen detonation at a higher rate then the change of RAD alone.
Old 03-17-2007 | 05:39 PM
  #34  
kartweb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DAC17
Why would the manufacturer recommend premium (at higher operating cost) if the car didn't need it?
I think they tuned it with just enough timing advance that under worst case conditions 87 octane may not be good enough. Mazda wanted every last drop out of the Renesis to help offset some of the other 6 cylider and turbo rice burners in the same class.

I rarely see RAD at 100% and don't drive WOT for more then 2-4th gear a couple times a day so for me it's probably OK to use 4 parts 87 and one part 93. That results with about a 90 octane anyway.
Old 03-17-2007 | 05:55 PM
  #35  
Freddie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Grove CA
Originally Posted by Freddie
Can anyone say for sure whether altitude changes the effective compression of an engine?

Originally Posted by kartweb
Yes it does.

Relative Air Density (RAD) changes with pressure, tempurature & humidity. Higher altitudes have lower pressure. While that doesn't change the compression ratio, it does reduce the compressed pressure and reduces the chance of detonation.

Higher humidity also reduces RAD but the humidity also tends to lessen detonation at a higher rate then the change of RAD alone.
Thanks for the sceintific explanation, Kartweb. This explains why naturally aspirated engines lose power at high alititude. So is the effect less pronounced with FI ?
Old 03-17-2007 | 08:13 PM
  #36  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Always use premium.
Old 03-18-2007 | 09:34 PM
  #37  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by DAC17
Why would the manufacturer recommend premium (at higher operating cost) if the car didn't need it?
To cover their *** in the rare occasion that a rotary is pinging, by the way my manual says it is fine to use 87 octane. It is cheaper for them to have you pay more then for them to possibly have to replace a malfunctioning engine.
Old 03-18-2007 | 10:11 PM
  #38  
delhi's Avatar
Grand Chancellor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 58
From: Home of the NIMBYs
Originally Posted by DAC17
Why would the manufacturer recommend premium (at higher operating cost) if the car didn't need it?
silly wabbit. Any self respecting performance car must hav ethe mandatory premium gas requirement.
Old 03-19-2007 | 01:05 PM
  #39  
½mv²'s Avatar
printf("</%i pistons",3);
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
From: I'm a yankee trapped in Houston!!
Not sure if this will help anyone with their decision-making at their next fuel up, but I have a story that's relevent...




Yesterday my mom borrowed my car because I needed to use her car (Moving stuff, needed the extra trunk/interior space. Well, she used to own an 89 FC, so she's rotary-smart enough to trust not to flood it or stall it or make any other common rotard mistake. However, the owners manual for an FC says 87 octane is fine... so guess what she filled up with?

17.5 gallons of bottom-dollar 87 octane fuel pumped into the tank of an RX that's been running nothing but top-grade 93 octane for all 68,000 miles on the odometer. When she told me I kinda freaked and had to drive it for myself to get a damage assessment. It was a HARD, HARD, HARD start...
rrrRRRRr.rrr.r.r...rr.rr..rrr....rrrwrwr.r....rrrr ..rrrrrRRRRRr....rrr.r.r.r.rrrrrrRRRRAAAABRABRABRA BRABA<finally starts>

I feared the worst. Drove it like an old lady for a good 10 miles. Didn't notice anything. Got on it alittle. No difference. Redlined. Nothing! Got home, turned it off... OMG the car stunk like burning death! Let it sit for 30 minutes, turned it back on. Perfect start. Drove to nearest gas station and topped off with 93. Got home, turned it off, no smell...

It would seem to me, that aside from the first startup, my 8 could give a damn what I put in it. Lower octane = Greater smell, but that's about it!
Old 03-19-2007 | 02:13 PM
  #40  
04RX8man's Avatar
Rotary Powered Countryboy
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
I've been running 87 for the last three tanks or so and I never had any problems. However I filled up yesterday with 93 and it just seems to run so much better. Idk if its just me but it revs quicker and more smoothly. i think I'm gonna stick with the 93 since I'm only paying a little over 2 dollars a tank.
Old 03-19-2007 | 02:42 PM
  #41  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
We drive 8's and not Aveos--shouldn't we treat our car well?

It works out to "what" $3 bucks a fillup? Save money somewhere else!
Old 03-19-2007 | 06:30 PM
  #42  
Smileynh's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 1
From: none
You bought a sports car. If you enjoy reading the specs, drool at acceleration figures, or jus tlove your car don't get cheap on gas :P

Love your 8, give it the gas it was designed to use for max performance.

NH
Old 03-19-2007 | 08:27 PM
  #43  
Detrich's Avatar
幹他媽!
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 3
From: San Gabriel Valley, CA
y hasn't this thread been closed yet?
Old 03-20-2007 | 05:24 PM
  #44  
Raptor75's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
We drive 8's and not Aveos--shouldn't we treat our car well?

It works out to "what" $3 bucks a fillup? Save money somewhere else!
So over 8 years that works out to about $1,248 or

1 x Race Beat Exhaust system
1 x Race Beat induction system
4 x New performance tires

All for free just because you used 87 rather then 93 while getting the same performance and gas mileage. It's your call, by the way my RB sounds so sweet on 87 octane.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shankapotamus3
Series I Trouble Shooting
28
03-14-2021 04:53 PM
Evan Gray
Series I Trouble Shooting
4
11-24-2015 02:00 AM
garryg
Australia/New Zealand Forum
2
10-01-2015 05:54 PM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 02:53 PM
Evan Gray
Series I Trouble Shooting
0
09-26-2015 01:30 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 PM.