Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Racing Beat VS AEM Intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-08-2009 | 04:14 AM
  #1  
Ixonal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Racing Beat VS AEM Intakes

been lookin over some cool air intakes, mainly for the sound. from what I gather, the best seem to be racing beat and aem. from what I can tell, racing beat only sells one that has a housing over it to reduce sound (which is really the reason I want one) and aem's intake, while putting the intake in an area with the greatest amount of cool air, is in a position to take a massive hit of water on a rainy day, while also being a slight obstacle to the radiator. was lookin for some input as to which y'all prefer.
Old 07-08-2009 | 04:20 AM
  #2  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
I like the look of the AEM but RB is better.

My reason:
AEM uses a cone filter at the end. Racing Beat does to but they have the cold air intake duct. The duct is position so that when in motion, air is being pushed into the duct as oppose to the AEM.

If you dyno the Racing Beat REVi intake then the numbers will be incorrect because there are no air being forced into the intake duct as oppose to driving.

Now there are going to be a lot of people who will ague against this saying it's not true and such but that is just what I believe in.
Old 07-08-2009 | 04:28 AM
  #3  
Flashwing's Avatar
3-wheeler
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
I've been running the AEM with a lot of success. It's tubing is the exact shape of the OEM intake tube so it won't mess with your fuel trims at all.

The cone filter doesn't obstruct the radiator or any airflow. If you have the stock grill cover then you shouldn't have much issue with rain water. My filter gets wet from time to time because I have the grill removed with wire mesh in its place.

Not sure about sound, I was looking more for a replacement to my crappy K&N.
Old 07-08-2009 | 05:08 AM
  #4  
Ixonal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Flashwing
Not sure about sound, I was looking more for a replacement to my crappy K&N.
well, I've got a stock intake right now, so pretty much anything will make more noise lol

but it's lookin like the tally is 1:1 right now
Old 07-08-2009 | 05:27 AM
  #5  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: socal
I've had both. Let's just say I'm using the AEM now...
Originally Posted by Renesis SE3P
I like the look of the AEM but RB is better.

My reason:
AEM uses a cone filter at the end. Racing Beat does to but they have the cold air intake duct. The duct is position so that when in motion, air is being pushed into the duct as oppose to the AEM.
confused at what this is trying to prove...
all the duct does is provide cooler air to the intake.. something the AEM already does because of its position.
Old 07-08-2009 | 05:30 AM
  #6  
Ixonal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cjkim
I've had both. Let's just say I'm using the AEM now...

confused at what this is trying to prove...
all the duct does is provide cooler air to the intake.. something the AEM already does because of its position.

think he's referring to this...
http://www.racingbeat.com/resultset....rtnumber=18298

it is supposed to allow air to be rammed into the intake while the car is in motion
Old 07-08-2009 | 05:33 AM
  #7  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: socal
Originally Posted by Ixonal
think he's referring to this...
http://www.racingbeat.com/resultset....rtnumber=18298

it is supposed to allow air to be rammed into the intake while the car is in motion
i know, but he's saying the RB is "better" because of the duct... which is something the AEM replaces completely because of its filter position.
Old 07-08-2009 | 05:44 AM
  #8  
RXeckless's Avatar
Rotorless
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 3
From: Delhi, ON Canada
I have the RB intake & Duct reason I bought it was the clean look and the water issues AEM/MS owners have reported, also I live in canada and drive my 8 almost all year except on the worst days of winter. WOT is the only time you hear a real difference.
Old 07-08-2009 | 06:22 AM
  #9  
Huey52's Avatar
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 6
From: New England
I have a 'hybrid'. The Racing Beat Duct mated to my stock intake which contains a K&N flat filter. I of course removed the VFAD.

I get the "ram air" of the RB duct, the high pass of the K&N, and the relative quiet of the stock box, not to mention the cost savings.

But as we know, the intake style is really more about desired volume/tone than Hp gain, so go with the sound you like.

Now your tally is 1-1-1

Last edited by Huey52; 07-08-2009 at 06:26 AM.
Old 07-08-2009 | 08:21 AM
  #10  
syntheticdarkness's Avatar
ThEy MaDe Me Do It
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
From: Stump Creek, PA
I had the lovely weapon r short ram intake (junk) which ran so hot I lost power. If it was 60*F out the AIT would be about 100-150*F (for that matter any temp out), my AEM runs 3-8*F mainly 5 above outside temps.
Old 07-08-2009 | 08:42 AM
  #11  
adamwzl's Avatar
<3's Bunnies
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
From: Murdaland
I'm with Huey, RB duct + K&N filter and removal of vfad. I'm not to concerned about intake sound. Maybe some day I might try the AEM CAI but for now there are plenty of other mods that need more attention than a expensive intake with minimal gains.
Old 07-08-2009 | 10:00 AM
  #12  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
The RB gives more HP over the whole range. AEM has 1 to 1,5 more at redline.

RB is much better.
Old 07-08-2009 | 10:06 AM
  #13  
04rx8gr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: West Jordan, Utah
I have the HKS . . If you want noise this is your guy haha
Old 07-08-2009 | 10:06 AM
  #14  
gh8st's Avatar
STiMPACK
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
From: Nassau County, NY
the gains are equally minimal. i loved the K&N type 2's sound, but the cars runs cooler with my current AEM system, plus it dresses up the engine bay nicely =)
Old 07-08-2009 | 10:38 AM
  #15  
rodjonathan's Avatar
silent assasin
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,398
Likes: 1
From: Houston
yea gains r minimal for either and i like the concept of the aem better as its positioned away from the engine bay
Old 07-08-2009 | 11:09 AM
  #16  
greg985's Avatar
The 337
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, LA
if you want sound go for the K&N Typhoon, its very loud
Old 07-08-2009 | 11:11 AM
  #17  
alz0rz's Avatar
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 3
From: NYC
the bling from the aem/ms is alone worth it.
Old 07-08-2009 | 11:30 AM
  #18  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,797
From: The Dark Side
Racing Beat all the way.
I don't have to worry about the cone being exposed to the elements, water getting sucked into it, and the RB duct helps get tons of air to the box.

As an added bonus; it even sounds great.
Old 07-08-2009 | 11:51 AM
  #19  
04rx8gr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: West Jordan, Utah
Originally Posted by Jedi54
Racing Beat all the way.
I don't have to worry about the cone being exposed to the elements, water getting sucked into it, and the RB duct helps get tons of air to the box.

As an added bonus; it even sounds great.
And storage for his dirty magazine's
Old 07-08-2009 | 12:52 PM
  #20  
alfy28's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
I have RB due to the 40 more HP and 100 more Torque.
also a great place to store my gold fishes, when i have long trips.

Last edited by alfy28; 07-08-2009 at 01:07 PM.
Old 07-08-2009 | 01:31 PM
  #21  
PSTNLSS's Avatar
The Former PSNTLSS
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
From: South Plainfield, NJ/ Center Valley, PA
HKS is a nice tone. I'm selling mine if interested =]
Old 07-08-2009 | 01:44 PM
  #22  
adamwzl's Avatar
<3's Bunnies
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
From: Murdaland
Originally Posted by alfy28
I have RB due to the 40 more HP and 100 more Torque.
also a great place to store my gold fishes, when i have long trips.

Alfy you sure that the RB gave you those performance gains?? I swear it was the Quad Electric Turbo that plugs into the DC outlet that gets more boost when the radio turns up.
Old 07-08-2009 | 01:59 PM
  #23  
cfm251's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Sac CA
AEM because you get a nice CARB sticker with it.
Old 07-08-2009 | 02:08 PM
  #24  
2tone's Avatar
The RX-8 is missed
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
+1 for rb plus duct. i love it - can feel it pull harder in the upper rpm's, and has a sweet 'whoooooosh' sound over 6k. below 6k is sounds pretty normal though. sound is good, but if you want LOUD, go with aem, that seems to be a bit louder throughout the rpm band.

fyi - the rb duct looks WICKED MEAN behind the ms front bumper
Old 07-09-2009 | 07:37 PM
  #25  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Originally Posted by 04rx8gr
And storage for his dirty magazine's
really?

That's where I keep my extra quart of oil.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Racing Beat VS AEM Intakes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.