Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

To RX8 Automatic Owners only

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-21-2004 | 03:49 PM
  #1  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
To RX8 Automatic Owners only

How fast does your automatic go from 0-60mph (actual or how you feel .. does not matter). Mine feels like in the mid 7 seconds.

Last edited by ayap888; 09-21-2004 at 03:53 PM.
Old 09-21-2004 | 05:16 PM
  #2  
KrazieKave's Avatar
thats what she said
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 137
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
7 Secs sounds about right...
I would say 8-9 seconds on a hill.
Old 09-21-2004 | 05:55 PM
  #3  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by KrazieKave
7 Secs sounds about right...
I would say 8-9 seconds on a hill.
Yeah, sometimes i could swear it was about 7.2 - 7.3 seconds.

It's really not that bad compared to the BMW Z4's manual of 7.1 seconds.
Old 09-21-2004 | 06:04 PM
  #4  
VelociRedBeast's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Belleview, Florida
To me it starts off slow but around 4000rmps it takes off completely..this is in autostick mode with DSC turned off..
Old 09-21-2004 | 07:01 PM
  #5  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Originally Posted by ayap888
It's really not that bad compared to the BMW Z4's manual of 7.1 seconds.
This is an incorrect statement. A BMW Z4 3.0i does 0-60 in 5.4 seconds.

If you are really that interested, there is equipment out there that can measure your 0-60 time. You can also have a friend sit in the passenger seat with a stop watch and get a time that is +/- a few tenths.
Old 09-21-2004 | 07:27 PM
  #6  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by sti_eric
This is an incorrect statement. A BMW Z4 3.0i does 0-60 in 5.4 seconds.

If you are really that interested, there is equipment out there that can measure your 0-60 time. You can also have a friend sit in the passenger seat with a stop watch and get a time that is +/- a few tenths.

No. i am correct. I was referring to the Z4 2.5 not Z4 3.0. If you look at the numbers - the Z4 2.5 is rated by bmw at 7.1 sec.
Old 09-21-2004 | 07:46 PM
  #7  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Originally Posted by ayap888
No. i am correct. I was referring to the Z4 2.5 not Z4 3.0. If you look at the numbers - the Z4 2.5 is rated by bmw at 7.1 sec.
Your statement is misleading, at best. If you mean to say that the Z4 2.5i has a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds, they say that. Saying "It's not really that bad compared to the BMW Z4's manual of 7.1 seconds." implies that all Z4 manuals have a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds.
Old 09-21-2004 | 08:04 PM
  #8  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by sti_eric
Your statement is misleading, at best. If you mean to say that the Z4 2.5i has a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds, they say that. Saying "It's not really that bad compared to the BMW Z4's manual of 7.1 seconds." implies that all Z4 manuals have a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds.
Hey man .. it's not misleading. It's what BMW claims!!!! I'm just quoting the manufacturer (BMW). I'm not making numbers up. If I did make numbers, that would be misleading. In this case, you are actually accusing BMW .. not me. Are you trying to start another pointless arguement? BMW said that. That's BMW's statistics .. not mine. I'm not misleading anybody. You can go to BMW and that's the official number for them.

Last edited by ayap888; 09-21-2004 at 08:07 PM.
Old 09-21-2004 | 08:06 PM
  #9  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
its mid 7 to high 7s--normal driving low 8s
Old 09-21-2004 | 08:18 PM
  #10  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Originally Posted by ayap888
Hey man .. it's not misleading. It's what BMW claims!!!! I'm just quoting the manufacturer (BMW). I'm not making numbers up. If I did make numbers, that would be misleading. In this case, you are actually accusing BMW .. not me. Are you trying to start another pointless arguement? BMW said that. That's BMW's statistics .. not mine. I'm not misleading anybody. You can go to BMW and that's the official number for them.
I'm not trying to start an argument - I just hate when people post misleading and outright wrong information. In your quest to make your auto RX-8 out to be something its not, you intended to mislead people into thinking that the auto RX-8 has comparable performance to a Z4 by saying that the Z4 has a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds. This is not a factual statement. Certain trim lines of the Z4 have a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds, but other trim lines have a 0-60 time of 5.4 (as driven by C&D, 5.9 as quoted on bmwusa). It is not factual to say that a 911 has a 0-60 time of 3.8 seconds. A 911 Turbo has a 3.8s 0-60 time, but not all 911s have a 3.8s 0-60.
Old 09-21-2004 | 08:21 PM
  #11  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
STI ERIC

You are not actually invited to post here. I said this post is only for automatic. You're one of those driving a manual. go away. I'm not interested in your stupid arguements. I'm not interested in what you are saying. I posted this thread for automatic owners. DON'T YOU HAVE A BRAIN TO UNDERSTAND THAT!!!
Old 09-21-2004 | 08:26 PM
  #12  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Originally Posted by ayap888
STI ERIC

You are not actually invited to post here. I said this post is only for automatic. You're one of those driving a manual. go away. I'm not interested in your stupid arguements. I'm not interested in what you are saying. I posted this thread for automatic owners. DON'T YOU HAVE A BRAIN TO UNDERSTAND THAT!!!
Ah, just like the little baby who cries and takes his ball home. Sorry, pal, this is a PUBLIC forum. I have as much right to post here as you do. If you want to start your own private forum for auto RX-8 owners, then you do that. Until then, I will post here as much as I want. I can't stand idly by as you post incorrect and misleading information. I think visitors to this site should have facts, not your own wishful thinking.

Besides, who really cares about the performance of a car with a 7 second+ 0-60 time and a 1/4 mile time above 16? If you wanted to talk about performance, you should've bought a car that actual has it.
Old 09-21-2004 | 08:38 PM
  #13  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
You Are The One Misleading Everyone ... Bmw Usa Claims 7.1 Sec For The Z4 2.5 And You Claim 5.9 .. Hahaha... Stupid Stupid. ,

Sti Eric .. You Are A Fraud .. You Are Misleading People
Old 09-21-2004 | 08:41 PM
  #14  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
BMW released prices for the
all-new 2003 Z4 roadster, the direct successor to the Z3 roadster that won
customers hearts and souls, and virtually created the premium roadster
segment. The Z4 roadster 2.5i will retail for $33,795 and the Z4 roadster 3.0i
for $40,945 including destination and handling.
The Z4 roadster will be available in two models, both featuring BMW's
renowned in-line sixes; the Z4 roadster 2.5i with the 2.5L, 184-horsepower
powerplant, and the Z4 roadster 3.0i featuring the 3.0L, 225-horsepower
engine. The Z4 2.5i will accelerate from 0-60 mph in 7.1 seconds with the
standard 5-speed manual transmission (7.2 with automatic);


THIS IS WHAT BMW SAID. ERIC STI IS MISLEADING EVERYONE THAT Z4 2.5 CAN DO 5.9 SEC. WHAT A DUMMY.
Old 09-21-2004 | 08:45 PM
  #15  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Originally Posted by ayap888
You Are The One Misleading Everyone ... Bmw Usa Claims 7.1 Sec For The Z4 2.5 And You Claim 5.9 .. Hahaha... Stupid Stupid. ,

Sti Eric .. You Are A Fraud .. You Are Misleading People
Are you on drugs??? Show me where I say that the Z4 2.5i has a 0-60 time of 5.9. I'll even do the work for you and go back through my posts:

Post #6: A BMW Z4 3.0i does 0-60 in 5.4 seconds.

Post #8: If you mean to say that the Z4 2.5i has a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds, they say that. Saying "It's not really that bad compared to the BMW Z4's manual of 7.1 seconds." implies that all Z4 manuals have a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds.

Post #11: Certain trim lines of the Z4 have a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds, but other trim lines have a 0-60 time of 5.4 (as driven by C&D, 5.9 as quoted on bmwusa).

I don't see anywhere that I claim that the Z4 2.5i has a 0-60 time of 5.9 seconds. I am merely pointing out the fact that you were intentionally trying to mislead people into believing that the auto RX-8 is as fast as ALL Z4s (reference your first post). You are now just angry that you have been caught and exposed as a liar.
Old 09-21-2004 | 08:46 PM
  #16  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Originally Posted by ayap888
BMW released prices for the
all-new 2003 Z4 roadster, the direct successor to the Z3 roadster that won
customers hearts and souls, and virtually created the premium roadster
segment. The Z4 roadster 2.5i will retail for $33,795 and the Z4 roadster 3.0i
for $40,945 including destination and handling.
The Z4 roadster will be available in two models, both featuring BMW's
renowned in-line sixes; the Z4 roadster 2.5i with the 2.5L, 184-horsepower
powerplant, and the Z4 roadster 3.0i featuring the 3.0L, 225-horsepower
engine. The Z4 2.5i will accelerate from 0-60 mph in 7.1 seconds with the
standard 5-speed manual transmission (7.2 with automatic);


THIS IS WHAT BMW SAID. ERIC STI IS MISLEADING EVERYONE THAT Z4 2.5 CAN DO 5.9 SEC. WHAT A DUMMY.
Dude, just give it up and apologize for trying to mislead everyone. Anyone going through this thread will obviously see who the dummy is. I present facts, you present lies and hysteria. After seeing how you are in this thread, I suggest if you want to come back here, you change your user name. You now have no credible on this forum.
Old 09-21-2004 | 09:09 PM
  #17  
nosubstitutec4s's Avatar
9000 RPM Viagera
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
jesus ******* christ, what a whining little *****.

ayap888, in your original post where you compared the accelearation of an auto 8 to the 0-60 of a z4, you failed to mention which engine you were refering to. Any bmw enthusiast knows that the z4 comes with both a 2.5l inline 6 and a 3.0l inline 6, and one can get the car equiped with either engine. you were the one who was mis-leading when you said that, because you didnt mention which engine said z4 would be equiped.
while i knew you were refering to a z4, someone who doesnt know as much about the car might be unsure.

sti_eric never said that a 2.5 can go 0-60 in 5.9. In his original post, he said a 3.0 can do 0-60 in 5.9 sec, and later said that the 2.5 does it in 7.1.


go do us a favor and shut your trolling *** up
Old 09-21-2004 | 10:26 PM
  #18  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by ayap888
No. i am correct. I was referring to the Z4 2.5 not Z4 3.0. If you look at the numbers - the Z4 2.5 is rated by bmw at 7.1 sec.

And the RX-8 auto is rated by Mazda 0-60 in 9 seconds, what now smartguy?
Old 09-21-2004 | 10:27 PM
  #19  
canaryrx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,325
Likes: 2
how about we change this thread to read: "for all whiny trolls who like senseless arguements" who cares what the 0-60 time is anyway, we all know both versions of the 8 are not the fastest thing in the world in a straight line. I'd be more interested to know slalom speeds or real life lap times, that would be exciting, 0-60 is highly overrated.
Old 09-21-2004 | 11:38 PM
  #20  
kn34's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: tampa fl
well ayap888 i think sti eric has you beat on tha one. he maybe went a little overboard on the argument but you did start it and he was just trying to clear up a miunderstanding and you got all pissed. so if your going to make a post for autos only expect other who dont own an auto to look in the thread to see what is said. it is public. so you were wrong on just about everything you said and he eric was basically right so take a tissue wipe your eyes and try a new post where you can get along with everyone. it i kinda funny you stopped posting when someone put ou in your place.
Old 09-22-2004 | 06:24 AM
  #21  
zyran's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Malaysia
Stop this BMW discussion. I wanna know the true 0-60 time for the AT. Not estimations because many people have been saying things like "The AT is a dog off the line". IMO, 9 seconds just sounds about right.
Old 09-22-2004 | 06:41 AM
  #22  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by kn34
well ayap888 i think sti eric has you beat on tha one. he maybe went a little overboard on the argument but you did start it and he was just trying to clear up a miunderstanding and you got all pissed. so if your going to make a post for autos only expect other who dont own an auto to look in the thread to see what is said. it is public. so you were wrong on just about everything you said and he eric was basically right so take a tissue wipe your eyes and try a new post where you can get along with everyone. it i kinda funny you stopped posting when someone put ou in your place.
Hey! Do you know how to read. if you look at my previous post. I did try to clearn that up. I told STI Eric that I was referring to the Z4 2.5 not Z4 3.0 and he continued to barrage me with stuff. YOU TOO ARE JUST LIKE HIM. READ MY EARLIER THREAD!
Old 09-22-2004 | 06:42 AM
  #23  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by zyran
Stop this BMW discussion. I wanna know the true 0-60 time for the AT. Not estimations because many people have been saying things like "The AT is a dog off the line". IMO, 9 seconds just sounds about right.
Thanks! That's the purpose of this thread .. to know about the Automatic.
Old 09-22-2004 | 06:45 AM
  #24  
ayap888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
And the RX-8 auto is rated by Mazda 0-60 in 9 seconds, what now smartguy?
What now? Get me the official Mazda press release. I would appreciate it. Where is it? Provide a URL link. Or is that just hearsay??? You don't own an automatic, so you don't know. That's why i am asking the automatic owners!

For your info, I test drove the Z4 2.5i and the RX8 Automatic is faster. I test drove both cars on the same day - I went with the RX8 auto. BMW was correct with their official release. I'm not sure about the RX8.

I also read the thread about 2003 RX8 autos being slower than 2004 RX8 autos due to the flash programming. I just want to know that truth. Because the RX8 is definitely not slower than the Z4 I tested.

Only Auto owners will have a real feel about that !

Last edited by ayap888; 09-22-2004 at 06:52 AM.
Old 09-22-2004 | 07:52 AM
  #25  
DreRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Like I said--under leaving it in drive w/dsc its a mid 8 second car. If you do all that extra brake/torque whatever--its high 7s


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: To RX8 Automatic Owners only



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM.