Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

RX8 may be slower than some cars, but.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-28-2006 | 11:45 PM
  #26  
New Yorker's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 58
From: NYC
Originally Posted by tiltmode43
Most 8 owners wish they had a bit more power…
Just out of curiosity, how do you know that? Was there a poll of all 8 owners worldwide? Yes, maybe most 8 owners on this forum wish they had a bit more power… maybe… but most 8 owners… worldwide?? I suspect that's not, in fact, the case. (I, for one, don't yearn for more power—and I'm on this forum.) Why don't the auto journalists who positively rave about the car—which is most of them—long for a bit more power in their reviews? Each review typically mentions a few gripes: "The outside mirrors are too small". "Outward vision to the rear is poor". "The interior plastic scuffs too easily". "The oil dipstick is hard to reach". Read the reviews—you'll see plenty of "fuel economy disappoints," but "I just wish it had more power" is NOT a common complaint. In fact, most journalists describe the power and experience of revving the Renesis in very positive terms. I suspect most 8 owners don't particularly long for "more power". 20-somethings on this forum? Sure. But most 8 owners? I don't think so.

I could be wrong, but that's my hunch.

Last edited by New Yorker; 09-28-2006 at 11:47 PM.
Old 09-29-2006 | 12:20 AM
  #27  
toxin440's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
From: Texas
When i feel i need more power all i have to do is be rolling down a road, drop it into second doing 40ish and then ZOOM ZOOM! hearing the engine spin of lightening fast and the purr of everything coming out of the RP SuperCat and Racing Beat Catback = SEX!

Its my belief that all of us here with 8's that love them are the people that knew exacly what we were getting into with this car (power wise). I've never owned a powerful RWD sports car before so this always blows my mind when I get in it. Granted if i came from a Z06 or something i might be a little dissappointed. I spent 2 months researching the car before i even test drove it. After i got a feel for the car (owning it of course) im impressed daily by the cars grip and eagerness to get up and go into and out of corners.
Old 09-29-2006 | 01:42 AM
  #28  
tiltmode43's Avatar
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
Originally Posted by New Yorker
Just out of curiosity, how do you know that? Was there a poll of all 8 owners worldwide? Yes, maybe most 8 owners on this forum wish they had a bit more power… maybe… but most 8 owners… worldwide?? I suspect that's not, in fact, the case. (I, for one, don't yearn for more power—and I'm on this forum.) Why don't the auto journalists who positively rave about the car—which is most of them—long for a bit more power in their reviews? Each review typically mentions a few gripes: "The outside mirrors are too small". "Outward vision to the rear is poor". "The interior plastic scuffs too easily". "The oil dipstick is hard to reach". Read the reviews—you'll see plenty of "fuel economy disappoints," but "I just wish it had more power" is NOT a common complaint. In fact, most journalists describe the power and experience of revving the Renesis in very positive terms. I suspect most 8 owners don't particularly long for "more power". 20-somethings on this forum? Sure. But most 8 owners? I don't think so.

I could be wrong, but that's my hunch.
I don't know that but it wasn't intended to be presented as fact. It was intended to put forth the idea that 8 owners are satisfied with their cars. The claim was supplimented with speculation based on car reviews, forums, etc. Its not the fact that there should be more power, just more power relative to cars such as the 350z, s2000, etc. From reviews I've read "Lack of low end torque" is one of the most commonly occuring criticisms of the car. I suppose I should have said torque rather than hp because one without the other means nothing. Greater low-end torque would give faster acceleration (or at least not having to drop the clutch from the heavens) and the "feeling" of more power. The reason journalists often do not mention power and other terms of the like is because they are all relative. There is no set benchmark therefore no certain amount to be deemed as "enough" Now, one can say the realistic expectations of power output between a sports car and economy car are very different but a car such as the 8 - not 100% sport but not doscile by any means - the destiction can be difficult.

I appologize for making the careless generalization of "most" that seemed to offend you and no, I didn't poll all rx8 owners worldwide
Old 09-29-2006 | 01:43 AM
  #29  
Romeo's Avatar
...I'm SOOO Off Topic
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 497
Likes: 1
From: Burbank, CA
Huskyfan23, by any chance are you From North Hollywood?

I knew a guy from North Hollywood with a Screen Name like that.

-RoMeO
Old 09-29-2006 | 03:12 AM
  #30  
HighRoller's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Ike
Top speed is pretty meaningless, and you're also wrong. The top speed of the RX-8 is more like high 140s and it will take you a while to get there. Again, top speed of high 140s is nothing special.
Listen to Negative Ned over there always quick to tell people their wrong. Hows this one: see my avatar? You're wrong.

Didn't take that long to get there and my nerves gave out before the car did... it still had plenty more to go. Nice and smooth at that speed I might also add. So there are some cars out there in stock form that are faster than the RX8. Doesn't matter, there's so many other positives that make up for this that I could find no reason to talk down about it. (Disclaimer: I don't condone anyone driving over the speed limit on any public highway )
Old 09-29-2006 | 03:54 AM
  #31  
Krankor's Avatar
Klingon Grammarian
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally Posted by Huskyfan23
What a shock, someone turning what is supposed to be a praisal thread into something negative about the car.
And what a shock, that it's Ike.
Old 09-29-2006 | 04:52 AM
  #32  
Frynge's Avatar
Mad Scientist
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Colorado!
also a shock, prairie dogs love my 8 too. how unfortunate for them. (member of mad scientist's union for prevention of cruelty to possible test subjects)
Old 09-29-2006 | 05:03 AM
  #33  
tonyny's Avatar
Tonyny
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
I am a current owner of a 2006 G35 Coupe 6MT, I had a 2003 350Z touring and the 35th anniversay 350 Z, not to mention a 2005 S60R and other sports and sport like cars. That said, the 2004 RX8 manual that I recently traded-in was by far the most fun to drive. May not be the fastest but for pure driving pleasure, it was the most fun and least expensive of any of my recent cars. Enjoy your RX-8.
Old 09-29-2006 | 07:33 AM
  #34  
turbine's Avatar
4th Year runnin
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Spin9k
Few who have rung out an RX-8 will argue the fun factor. But those folks will also point out the fact that once past 3rd, there is very little uumph left on the loooooong way to the supposed 148mph top end. And that, sadly, is largely the only point of critizism of our fine car and the often heard request for Mazda to please, please, fill the top end with a bit more zoom!
I have wound 5th to 149, and it gets their very quick. G35 could not pull me. We both locked in till that speed. That was before most of my mods. I have not wound it out since. I am sure everyone has seen 6th pull 184 on the dyno. I wonder how much power we would need to overcome the wind drag the dyno can not reproduce? No doubt FI would be the only way to achieve the power 6th would need. I would guess we would need to be in the 1rwhp to every 10lbs range.

To me, the car impresses me over 80mph than it does below 80mph. My statagy off the line is to hold ground, not pull ahead. I know its not going to happen. If I can stay in the game until I slot 3rd, I usually start gaining ground in 3rd. So I never try to provoke anything until higher speeds. Besides that I like being the underdog.

The RX8 has more potential as a sports car than you know. Why? You can add power to any car. So stock power is not the major factor. What is the one thing you can not change about any sports car? Balance! That is priceless. 50/50 weight combined with the PPF is huge. Not to knock any other cars but, you can not go back and change those things.
Old 09-29-2006 | 08:11 AM
  #35  
Smileynh's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 1
From: none
The 350, s2000, sky redline only have 2 seats. How much do those back seats weigh anyhow?

Hence the 8 gets thrown in with the mustang, evo, sti, m3(twice it's cost). Only the mustang price tag is comparable. So it's muscle car vs. sports car. I'm happy with that.

The 8 is still exotic in looks and it's engine.



I saw a R32 in the mall. I was like, "cool car". I still like VW ergonomics. So I started researching. Guess what? Nothing else in the price range, with 4 seats, was even close. I kept coming back to the 8 over and over. I didn't buy a base because, If I'm buying the car I always wanted, I wanted to have a sunroof and leather.

The 8 was $23,500, the R32 was $29-30k. When the 8 is paid for, it's staying in my garage for a long long time.
Old 09-29-2006 | 08:12 AM
  #36  
New Yorker's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 58
From: NYC
Originally Posted by tiltmode43
I don't know that but it wasn't intended to be presented as fact. It was intended to put forth the idea that 8 owners are satisfied with their cars. The claim was supplemented with speculation based on car reviews, forums, etc. It's not the fact that there should be more power, just more power relative to cars such as the 350z, s2000, etc. From reviews I've read "Lack of low end torque" is one of the most commonly occuring criticisms of the car. I suppose I should have said torque rather than hp because one without the other means nothing. Greater low-end torque would give faster acceleration (or at least not having to drop the clutch from the heavens) and the "feeling" of more power. The reason journalists often do not mention power and other terms of the like is because they are all relative. There is no set benchmark therefore no certain amount to be deemed as "enough". Now, one can say the realistic expectations of power output between a sports car and economy car are very different but a car such as the 8—not 100% sport but not docile by any means—the distinction can be difficult.

I apologize for making the careless generalization of "most" that seemed to offend you and no, I didn't poll all rx8 owners worldwide
No offense taken. I'm probably overly sensitive about the "more power" thing because when people talk about it here they act like "it's a given"—but when auto journalists talk about the 8 you don't really hear this. True, they will mention the lack of torque—but they all then go on to say that the whole Renesis experience is so much fun that it doesn't really matter. Sorry for jumping on what you said.
Old 09-29-2006 | 09:37 AM
  #37  
Endor's Avatar
Vroom
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Originally Posted by Ike
There are many many cars that hit 90+ in 3rd gear, that's nothing unique or special.
Yep. Some top gear estimates from the interweb:

2005 Honda Accord EX
1st : 39
2nd : 62
3rd : 90

Ford Taurus SHO '95, 7000 redline
1st 45
2nd 70
3rd 90

2000 eclipse gt, redline starts at 6500rpm
1st 44
2nd 82
3rd 120

1992 Saab 9000 turbo, 5-spd manual, redline 6000 rpm
1st : 36
2nd : 58
3rd : 91

1995 Thunderbird, 4.6L V8 + 4R70W, 3.27:1 gears, 225/70R15
5600 RPM redline / fuel cut
1 - 49 MPH
2 - 90 MPH
3 - 140 MPH*

1993 Crown Victoria P71, 4.6L V8, 2.73:1 gears
1 - 62 MPH
2 - 102 MPH
3 - 140 MPH*
Old 09-29-2006 | 10:33 AM
  #38  
KeithL's Avatar
mmmmm, Pale Ale!
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
I was wondering how long it'd take Ike to show up and crap on this thread.... <g>

The thing I really hate about Ike is he's almost always right...

PS Guess I'm just a stupid fanboi, but I enjoy my 8 more than any other car I've owned (and I'm 45).
Old 09-29-2006 | 12:16 PM
  #39  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by New Yorker
No offense taken. I'm probably overly sensitive about the "more power" thing because when people talk about it here they act like "it's a given"—but when auto journalists talk about the 8 you don't really hear this. True, they will mention the lack of torque—but they all then go on to say that the whole Renesis experience is so much fun that it doesn't really matter. Sorry for jumping on what you said.

While what you say about journalists is for the most part true. How many people would respond with a no if Mazda said "here's the 20 extra hp we promised you 3 years ago, at no charge?" My guess would be...0.

I'm not sure why people must justify to others why they bought the car. I'm the driver, I'll buy what I want to drive. I don't feel the need to defend my purchase of the car when someone bashes on it.

Last edited by therm8; 09-29-2006 at 12:19 PM.
Old 09-29-2006 | 01:54 PM
  #40  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Huskyfan23
What a shock, someone turning what is supposed to be a praisal thread into something negative about the car.

I haven't owned too many fast cars in my life, but one thing I can tell you for sure is that it is faster than my fathers car. His C4 Corvette has literally 205 horsepower from a crossfire injected V8. It's really not as fast as you would think.

As for 90 mph in 3rd gear, what I was really referring to is the 9000 RPM redline allowing high speeds in any gear. I don't think any other car out there gives as much enjoyment in every gear as this car does, due to lower shift points. What I've noticed in other cars (one of my friends owns a WRX, another a 350Z) is that you spend so much time concentrating on shift points it takes away from the
enjoyment of the car. With the RX8, you don't need to worry about such quick shifting through the gears, even with a 6 speed transmission.
If by negative you mean the truth, then you're right.

Except I was wrong on one thing, I forgot about the Vette not getting the tuned port fuel injection til MY 85, so I stand corrected on that.

If you have to concentrate on shiftpoints in other cars it's mainly because you're not used to that car and/or because it accelerates faster than you're used to. But yes, many cars do top out a little quicker than the RX-8 in each gear. However, that probably hurts performance rather than helps it.

Last edited by Ike; 09-29-2006 at 01:56 PM.
Old 09-29-2006 | 02:36 PM
  #41  
Endor's Avatar
Vroom
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Originally Posted by Ike
If you have to concentrate on shiftpoints in other cars it's mainly because you're not used to that car and/or because it accelerates faster than you're used to. But yes, many cars do top out a little quicker than the RX-8 in each gear. However, that probably hurts performance rather than helps it.
Wait, accelerating fast and redlining quicker hurts performance? Wha? :
Old 09-29-2006 | 02:45 PM
  #42  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Endor
Wait, accelerating fast and redlining quicker hurts performance? Wha? :
No, but taller gears can hurt performance.
Old 09-29-2006 | 04:13 PM
  #43  
'87 Turbo II's Avatar
Don't own an Rx-8.
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by turbine
I have wound 5th to 149, and it gets their very quick. G35 could not pull me. We both locked in till that speed. That was before most of my mods. I have not wound it out since. I am sure everyone has seen 6th pull 184 on the dyno. I wonder how much power we would need to overcome the wind drag the dyno can not reproduce? No doubt FI would be the only way to achieve the power 6th would need. I would guess we would need to be in the 1rwhp to every 10lbs range.

To me, the car impresses me over 80mph than it does below 80mph. My statagy off the line is to hold ground, not pull ahead. I know its not going to happen. If I can stay in the game until I slot 3rd, I usually start gaining ground in 3rd. So I never try to provoke anything until higher speeds. Besides that I like being the underdog.

The RX8 has more potential as a sports car than you know. Why? You can add power to any car. So stock power is not the major factor. What is the one thing you can not change about any sports car? Balance! That is priceless. 50/50 weight combined with the PPF is huge. Not to knock any other cars but, you can not go back and change those things.
the gearing for your gearbox + the 155 governor proves to me you're lying. The 5th gear in my Rx-7 and the 6th gear in your Rx-8 have the same gear ratios and we have a top speed of 148, just like you guys do.
Old 09-29-2006 | 04:33 PM
  #44  
9291150's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown
Only Ike would have stats on '85 Vettes.

I remember spending much more time in my youth than I'm willing to admit in something similar - a 1990 IROC, same engine as the '85 Vette less 5 horsepower (245). Was considered "the car" back then, but barely was able to break into the 15's. I know a guy that has kept hisfrom that era.

Endor, your gearing examples make no sense, I think those are all slushboxes. A fair comparison are six speed manuals, especially those with similar power characteristics to the rotary.

For example, a S2000, I think, shifts into 4th at 80mph vs. a RX8 at 90mph. This higher gearing hurts the 8's trap speed in the 1/4, but probably helps with daily fuel economy.
Old 09-29-2006 | 04:37 PM
  #45  
wantan8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by playdoh43
i think its better to just enjoy your car for what it is instead of even wasting time thinking about what other people think about it.

Smartest thing anyone has ever said on these boards. Major props.
Old 09-29-2006 | 04:38 PM
  #46  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by 9291150
Only Ike would have stats on '85 Vettes.

I remember spending much more time in my youth than I'm willing to admit in something similar - a 1990 IROC, same engine as the '85 Vette less 5 horsepower (245). Was considered "the car" back then, but barely was able to break into the 15's. I know a guy that has kept hisfrom that era.

Endor, your gearing examples make no sense, I think those are all slushboxes. A fair comparison are six speed manuals, especially those with similar power characteristics to the rotary.

For example, a S2000, I think, shifts into 4th at 80mph vs. a RX8 at 90mph. This higher gearing hurts the 8's trap speed in the 1/4, but probably helps with daily fuel economy.
I've heard people claim the RX-8 can hit 95mph in 3rd gear. Which means that stock RX-8s should never shift into 4th if they want to run the best time.
Old 09-29-2006 | 04:40 PM
  #47  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
If there is no wind at all, maybe. I usually get up to 88-90 in 3rd, shifting passed 9k. Chances of 95 are probably better on a base too.
Old 09-29-2006 | 04:44 PM
  #48  
9291150's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown
Originally Posted by Ike
I've heard people claim the RX-8 can hit 95mph in 3rd gear. Which means that stock RX-8s should never shift into 4th if they want to run the best time.
maybe if they rev it to 9500rpm, at redline (9) I'm at 89-91.
Old 09-30-2006 | 07:32 AM
  #49  
turbine's Avatar
4th Year runnin
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by '87 Turbo II
the gearing for your gearbox + the 155 governor proves to me you're lying. The 5th gear in my Rx-7 and the 6th gear in your Rx-8 have the same gear ratios and we have a top speed of 148, just like you guys do.
I never said I went 155. I did see 148 at the end of 5th. Someone help me here. On a dyno 6th will turn 183 or 184. It's all over the forum. No way it can do it on the street. Not enough power to overcome the drag with stock power.

Dude check it out before you slam anymore people on this forum. I have seen your posts all over this forum. They are negative at best. IOF - Ignorance On Fire.

Someone flush the toilet, we got a stinker.
Old 10-01-2006 | 01:20 PM
  #50  
trusterotary307's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Huskyfan23
There has been a ton of discussion regarding different cars being faster than the RX8. But really, is there another car out there (under $50k) that can hit 90 mph in 3rd?

No car provides the adrenaline rush (in my opinion) above 4,000 RPM. It still keeps up with Mustang GT's and 350Z's once it gets going. And 0 - 60 in 5.8 (MotorTrend tested)? 5.8 is a very respectable time, and beats out tons of other sports cars. For example, my dad's 1984 Corvette does 0 - 60 in 6.7.

Also, top speed of 155? pretty impressive as well.

I don't understand how some people can complain about this car. The fun factor, the extremely smooth running rotary engine (never been so comfortable at 100 mph before), and the fact that it is unlike any other car on the road puts a smile on my face every day. It should for the rest of you, as well.

just a note ive ridden in 3 rx-8's that topped out at 187 believe it or not


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX8 may be slower than some cars, but.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM.