Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

RX8 and the New Civic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-07-2008, 10:30 PM
  #151  
Registered
 
Slick8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Philly
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary Rasp
This isn't true. Above 80mph the rx8 is considerably faster. I went against a SI coupe several times on the freeway. My car dynoed at 192 whp.
The car is definitely quicker after 80, contrary to the 0-60 time. I've surprised a few cars on the highway (before the turbo), even myself! There's something about the linear/wider torque band of the rotary at higher speeds that gives the RX-8 a definite advantage.
Old 05-07-2008, 10:37 PM
  #152  
Vtak just kicked in yo!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Renesis07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake County IL
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comparing a civic to an RX8 is like comparing a crack ***** wearing make up to a brazilian model.

fail.
Old 05-07-2008, 10:47 PM
  #153  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
khronus79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have both cars, actually my brother owns the Si and I own the Rx8. We have come to the mutual agreement that the Rx8 > Si. We have gone against each other plenty of times, each one of us have driven both cars and although they are very equal during take off, that's were the similarities end.
Old 05-07-2008, 10:56 PM
  #154  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Aznxkaiser
Civic Si's will not out handle an RX8. You can buy a base NEW RX8 for similar price as the Si. Why would you pick an Si?
Because a Civic Si is more practical (bigger interior, bigger trunk, MUCH bigger trunk opening <- key) and gets better gas mileage. Not to mention a Si is actually better equipped than a base RX-8. I mean you might as well apply to your argument to be "the RX-8 outhandles a Camry for a similar price, why would you ever want to buy a Camry?" All of these cars are at different points of the practicality/fun trade-off curve.

The Integra Type R, stock for stock, is faster than a RX-8 on track.

And Richard, the S2000 engines have oil consumption rates about similar to that of a typical Renesis engine.
Old 05-07-2008, 10:56 PM
  #155  
Registered User
 
mdrx-8/83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MAryland
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HONDA! CIvIC lol

Originally Posted by Eric1987
Okay the RX8 dyno's with 180rwhp right? And so does the new civic Si. So what then makes the RX8 that much faster on the track? Is it the front vs rear wheel drive?
U must like the noise makers.. LIke my boy Green said Handling and Power is what u want not just whp. Ur better off on a Civic club if u ask me.... But for real now did you think b4 u typed what you did? RWd is the way to go, might i add doubble wishbone suspension do civics have that?....... lol
Old 05-07-2008, 11:11 PM
  #156  
Greensboro's Finest
 
RojoOcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Because a Civic Si is more practical (bigger interior, bigger trunk, MUCH bigger trunk opening <- key) and gets better gas mileage. Not to mention a Si is actually better equipped than a base RX-8. I mean you might as well apply to your argument to be "the RX-8 outhandles a Camry for a similar price, why would you ever want to buy a Camry?" All of these cars are at different points of the practicality/fun trade-off curve.
Awesome.
Old 05-07-2008, 11:11 PM
  #157  
n00b post whore
 
superglue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LionZoo
The Integra Type R, stock for stock, is faster than a RX-8 on track.
What does that have to do with anything? And it's faster on any track huh? Impressive. I still have an SCC issue where they put an ITR up against a last gen Mustang GT on Button Willow. The GT got a faster time, so I suppose a 1999 Mustang GT is faster than an RX-8 "on track".
Old 05-07-2008, 11:11 PM
  #158  
Greensboro's Finest
 
RojoOcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by khronus79
I have both cars, actually my brother owns the Si and I own the Rx8. We have come to the mutual agreement that the Rx8 > Si. We have gone against each other plenty of times, each one of us have driven both cars and although they are very equal during take off, that's were the similarities end.
Awesome as well.
Old 05-07-2008, 11:12 PM
  #159  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by RojoOcho
Motor Trend did it in 6.3....

again I'm not saying the Si is faster than the RX-8.

My point is that the Civic gets a bad rep because its called a Civic. That's all I'm arguing here.
Then you buy an Acura and be done with it!

Last edited by Razz1; 05-08-2008 at 12:32 AM.
Old 05-07-2008, 11:16 PM
  #160  
Greensboro's Finest
 
RojoOcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fine. I'll let it go. Whatever. It's not that serious. I thought a reasonable discussion was going on but its cool.
Old 05-07-2008, 11:53 PM
  #161  
Vtak just kicked in yo!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Renesis07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake County IL
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RojoOcho
Fine. I'll let it go. Whatever. It's not that serious. I thought a reasonable discussion was going on but its cool.
All and all theyre different cars with similar 0-60 times.......

I almost want to say this thread is a fail, but judging by the 7 pages, theyre is some arguements about these two as competitors.

IMO- Cant compare, too different.
Old 05-08-2008, 12:34 AM
  #162  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The Civic SI is a good car. Close but not similar to an 8.

You want similar comare Sports car to Sports car. S2000 vs RX8
Old 05-08-2008, 12:34 AM
  #163  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by superglue
What does that have to do with anything? And it's faster on any track huh? Impressive. I still have an SCC issue where they put an ITR up against a last gen Mustang GT on Button Willow. The GT got a faster time, so I suppose a 1999 Mustang GT is faster than an RX-8 "on track".
Geez, people get so offended these days when they're told certain cars are faster. The Integra Type R in Best Motoring at Tsukuba was faster than the RX-8. It was a 3rd generation Integra, but the 2nd generation Type R was supposed to be just as fast. I also wouldn't doubt the Mustang GT being faster than the RX-8 over Buttonwillow. Depending on track configuration, Buttonwillow is a bit of a power track with several long straights. Streets of Willow is a much tighter circuit than Buttonwillow, but even there a SVT Cobra was almost 2 seconds quicker than a RX-8. While the GT is a slower car than the SVT, Buttonwillow would reward the main advantage of the Mustang GT (power) more than Streets of Willow would. While the Mustang and RX-8 tend to be opposites, the ITR has the same strength as the RX-8, namely good handling. It about the same power curve with a little less power, but also about 400 pounds less weight and has a pretty well set up front diff in an attempt to gain more traction out of corners. The Integra Type R was Honda's raw beast for the track and really it's not a real shame that the RX-8 might be a bit slower on most circuits.

I love my RX-8 to death and really there's only one car I'd trade it for (hint, it's made by Honda, but isn't RWD), but the car is not invincible.

Last edited by LionZoo; 05-08-2008 at 12:38 AM.
Old 05-08-2008, 12:52 AM
  #164  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Geez, people get so offended these days when they're told certain cars are faster. The Integra Type R in Best Motoring at Tsukuba was faster than the RX-8. It was a 3rd generation Integra, but the 2nd generation Type R was supposed to be just as fast. I also wouldn't doubt the Mustang GT being faster than the RX-8 over Buttonwillow. Depending on track configuration, Buttonwillow is a bit of a power track with several long straights. Streets of Willow is a much tighter circuit than Buttonwillow, but even there a SVT Cobra was almost 2 seconds quicker than a RX-8. While the GT is a slower car than the SVT, Buttonwillow would reward the main advantage of the Mustang GT (power) more than Streets of Willow would. While the Mustang and RX-8 tend to be opposites, the ITR has the same strength as the RX-8, namely good handling. It about the same power curve with a little less power, but also about 400 pounds less weight and has a pretty well set up front diff in an attempt to gain more traction out of corners. The Integra Type R was Honda's raw beast for the track and really it's not a real shame that the RX-8 might be a bit slower on most circuits.

I love my RX-8 to death and really there's only one car I'd trade it for (hint, it's made by Honda, but isn't RWD), but the car is not invincible.
+1 I still remember that episode, the integra type R is a very potent and fun track weapon. It actually cornered faster than the rx8 because of its light weight and track tuned stiff suspension. Unlike the rx8 that car is uncomfortable for everyday driving though... I dont think you can even get power window for it (not sure about this)
Old 05-08-2008, 12:57 AM
  #165  
B.I.G
iTrader: (4)
 
05rx8mazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AT---EIL
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dude why are people trash talking down on the civic???
I dont feel that is right.. credit is due where its earned.. adn the little civic is a very economical car handles ok its an overall alright car.. its not vette int he straights but its quick..

theres even this guy who has proof hes done the 1/4 mile in 14.1 seconds on a stock SI

SO what if its quicker than the 8???

0-60 is nothing

0-60 is a ricer thing bro its like me saying ok lets race who evetr shifts to third first wins!!!

A 1997 STOCK ECLIPSE GST CAN beat an rx8
its 0-60 is in the high 6's but hey what about 60-100????
and yes A STOCK GST will beat a RX8 whoooptie doo daaaaa i knwo because i have one I had the engine rebuilt because it had a blown head gastket after that i sold it.. and it beat my rx with a misfire (sparkplugs)
and 3 oil leaks which were later fixed.. quick little car.

Who cares about 0-60

I wouldnt mind a civic.. its engine is really good its smooth.
FWD drawbacks though is loss of traction on a launches.. thats why rwd is quicker on the 0-60's

i do wish they made a civic with a K20a rwd that would be sweet honda needs to make more RWD cars they havent made anything that falls into my own personality.. i beleive that everyone chooses a car that fits their personality best
Old 05-08-2008, 01:01 AM
  #166  
B.I.G
iTrader: (4)
 
05rx8mazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AT---EIL
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Razz1
The Civic SI is a good car. Close but not similar to an 8.

You want similar comare Sports car to Sports car. S2000 vs RX8
yea your right about that a civic is a sedan built to look like a sports car..

the rx8 is a sports car built to perform function as a sedan but in deep inside its a real sports car.. some people dont think so but it really is a sports car.. I lvoe the way the interior is and everything else... sometime i feel like this car was custom built for me seriously... any one else have that feeling??

i think if i wrecked it i would buy another one!!

Im a rotary person and always will be. my first rotary and i can sure as hell tell you it wont be my last..

I want to buy my little cousin a 2nd gen 7 I love the look of them.. the 3rd gen i tihnk are overratted i kinda liek the old retro look a little better
Old 05-08-2008, 01:54 AM
  #167  
n00b post whore
 
superglue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Geez, people get so offended these days when they're told certain cars are faster. The Integra Type R in Best Motoring at Tsukuba was faster than the RX-8. It was a 3rd generation Integra, but the 2nd generation Type R was supposed to be just as fast. I also wouldn't doubt the Mustang GT being faster than the RX-8 over Buttonwillow. Depending on track configuration, Buttonwillow is a bit of a power track with several long straights. Streets of Willow is a much tighter circuit than Buttonwillow, but even there a SVT Cobra was almost 2 seconds quicker than a RX-8. While the GT is a slower car than the SVT, Buttonwillow would reward the main advantage of the Mustang GT (power) more than Streets of Willow would. While the Mustang and RX-8 tend to be opposites, the ITR has the same strength as the RX-8, namely good handling. It about the same power curve with a little less power, but also about 400 pounds less weight and has a pretty well set up front diff in an attempt to gain more traction out of corners. The Integra Type R was Honda's raw beast for the track and really it's not a real shame that the RX-8 might be a bit slower on most circuits.

I love my RX-8 to death and really there's only one car I'd trade it for (hint, it's made by Honda, but isn't RWD), but the car is not invincible.
And how did the Integra get into the conversation again?
Old 05-08-2008, 02:01 AM
  #168  
幹他媽!
 
Detrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 2,078
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
the reason is "because."
Old 05-08-2008, 02:36 AM
  #169  
Registered
 
neXib's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
One car is a family car, the other is a sports car. Case closed :P
Old 05-08-2008, 05:28 AM
  #170  
Wanna be 8 owner
Thread Starter
 
Eric1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 05rx8mazda
Dude why are people trash talking down on the civic???
I dont feel that is right.. credit is due where its earned.. adn the little civic is a very economical car handles ok its an overall alright car.. its not vette int he straights but its quick..

theres even this guy who has proof hes done the 1/4 mile in 14.1 seconds on a stock SI

SO what if its quicker than the 8???

0-60 is nothing

0-60 is a ricer thing bro its like me saying ok lets race who evetr shifts to third first wins!!!

A 1997 STOCK ECLIPSE GST CAN beat an rx8
its 0-60 is in the high 6's but hey what about 60-100????
and yes A STOCK GST will beat a RX8 whoooptie doo daaaaa i knwo because i have one I had the engine rebuilt because it had a blown head gastket after that i sold it.. and it beat my rx with a misfire (sparkplugs)
and 3 oil leaks which were later fixed.. quick little car.

Who cares about 0-60

I wouldnt mind a civic.. its engine is really good its smooth.
FWD drawbacks though is loss of traction on a launches.. thats why rwd is quicker on the 0-60's

i do wish they made a civic with a K20a rwd that would be sweet honda needs to make more RWD cars they havent made anything that falls into my own personality.. i beleive that everyone chooses a car that fits their personality best
Rofl a stock GS-T will NOT beat an RX8. That was the competition for the 5th Gen Prelude. And without SOME sort of mods there is no way in ******* hell a Civic SI got 14.1. Weight reduction or something but no way in **** COMPLETELY stock 14.1 The fastest I've seen was 14.8 with slicks. 14.9 Power shifting without slicks.
Old 05-08-2008, 05:33 AM
  #171  
Wanna be 8 owner
Thread Starter
 
Eric1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mdrx-8/83
U must like the noise makers.. LIke my boy Green said Handling and Power is what u want not just whp. Ur better off on a Civic club if u ask me.... But for real now did you think b4 u typed what you did? RWd is the way to go, might i add doubble wishbone suspension do civics have that?....... lol
Wtf? If suspension was it then the Prelude would stomp the civic. The Prelude SH ******* owns for handling. If honda still made them they would tear the RX8 a new hole. Not dissing the RX8 because I love it. It IS gonna be my next car. I'm just saying. The Prelude SH has fully-independent double wishbone suspension also.
Old 05-08-2008, 10:57 AM
  #172  
Registered User
 
F22C1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedefineRX8
but the civic you are speaking of was nowhere near stock and was a VERY well built EG. Hardly a fair comparison to this civic Si.

The comptech integra is also a heavily modified beast, you are comparing apples to oranges.

Just stop posting and taking best motoring to heart, unless you actually understand what the program is actually about.
Oh silly me... I forgot that because RWD lost it must of have been that the particular RWD vehicle wasn't modified/setup to compete and win races Yes the team is obviously racing for it's 'health'. We should all think this way and pass on our rwd defeats as such excuses (as if the RWD layout isn't enough of "advantage" therefore it's ego needs an 'excuse').

The examples I cited it just to clearly dispel the perception in this thread that RWD guarantees you a victory. RWD is a double edge sword and it does have it's compromises.
Old 05-08-2008, 11:55 AM
  #173  
Registered
 
neXib's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
FWD isn't a big disadvantage until over 300hp or so if the car is well balanced and good overall. That's the general consensus I get from carpeople anyway
Old 05-08-2008, 01:13 PM
  #174  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Eric1987
Wtf? If suspension was it then the Prelude would stomp the civic. The Prelude SH ******* owns for handling. If honda still made them they would tear the RX8 a new hole. Not dissing the RX8 because I love it. It IS gonna be my next car. I'm just saying. The Prelude SH has fully-independent double wishbone suspension also.
Now here we have a bit of an issue. It seems the general consensus among those that have owned both cars is that the RX-8 is a better handling car than the Prelude SH. Granted "handling" is such a nebulous term, but overall people have given the edge to the RX-8 in terms of turn-in, balance, grip, breakaway, exit, and transient characteristics so I think the RX-8 has the Prelude SH pretty well covered.
Old 05-08-2008, 01:15 PM
  #175  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by neXib
FWD isn't a big disadvantage until over 300hp or so if the car is well balanced and good overall. That's the general consensus I get from carpeople anyway
FWD's main disadvantage is on corner exit as the wheel doing the turning is suddenly also being asked to do the accelerating. You certainly don't need 300 hp to see the issues; my 180 hp Celica GT-S simply did not want to come out of a corner on the power. I had to play a waiting game with that car until it was pretty much all straightened out, or else I'd get bad inside wheelspin. By comparison, the RX-8 is absolutely rock solid on corner exit.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX8 and the New Civic



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.