Rx8 stats.
#51
buddy, get a grip ! Jesus! He has the manual, I have driven it !
Have you????? !!! It is not "quite a bit faster" I guess your now going to tell me even though this is a good friend of mine, that has the manual, I must be dreaming that to. Man this board is hilarious sometimes. You can experience it first hand, and know the person well, yet there are some yahoos on here that still try to tell you, you were wrong. Once again, he has the 2003 Manual !!
And down low he would take me, but what I found is because of the broad power band in the 8, his car seems to peek out sooner. Sorry if the facts are hard for you to accecpt
Have you????? !!! It is not "quite a bit faster" I guess your now going to tell me even though this is a good friend of mine, that has the manual, I must be dreaming that to. Man this board is hilarious sometimes. You can experience it first hand, and know the person well, yet there are some yahoos on here that still try to tell you, you were wrong. Once again, he has the 2003 Manual !!
And down low he would take me, but what I found is because of the broad power band in the 8, his car seems to peek out sooner. Sorry if the facts are hard for you to accecpt
#52
I don't understand how you can get a accurate HP number from trap speeds.
It seems to me that gearing will have a HUGE effect on trap speeds, regardless of HP. Making a blanket statement that given trapspeed and weight, that you can calculate the actual HP is just BS.
It seems to me that gearing will have a HUGE effect on trap speeds, regardless of HP. Making a blanket statement that given trapspeed and weight, that you can calculate the actual HP is just BS.
#53
Originally posted by Broker73
buddy, get a grip ! Jesus! He has the manual, I have driven it !
Have you????? !!! It is not "quite a bit faster" I guess your now going to tell me even though this is a good friend of mine, that has the manual, I must be dreaming that to. Man this board is hilarious sometimes. You can experience it first hand, and know the person well, yet there are some yahoos on here that still try to tell you, you were wrong. Once again, he has the 2003 Manual !!
And down low he would take me, but what I found is because of the broad power band in the 8, his car seems to peek out sooner. Sorry if the facts are hard for you to accecpt
buddy, get a grip ! Jesus! He has the manual, I have driven it !
Have you????? !!! It is not "quite a bit faster" I guess your now going to tell me even though this is a good friend of mine, that has the manual, I must be dreaming that to. Man this board is hilarious sometimes. You can experience it first hand, and know the person well, yet there are some yahoos on here that still try to tell you, you were wrong. Once again, he has the 2003 Manual !!
And down low he would take me, but what I found is because of the broad power band in the 8, his car seems to peek out sooner. Sorry if the facts are hard for you to accecpt
This is your cue to reply and get the last shot in, should your ego require it. May I suggest a cynical remark about how non-owners can't possibly know anything about these cars? I don't think that one has been used enough.
M
Last edited by ///M-Spec; 02-25-2004 at 01:03 PM.
#54
I don't give a rats *** if my rx8 is 238hp, or 210,, 170 to wheels or 185. The fact is, it's got plenty of power, handles very well, looks amazing, and is more fun to drive then just about any car out there right now. We all know this car in it's stock form is not able to show full potential of what this renesis motor can do, as with many cars. Everyone is too focused on numbers, when in reality they mean very little. You can argue this subject with any new car out there, because there is simply no way to to figure out whp from base hp. If you are into hp and torque numbers, take your car on a dyno, get your results, and use them., That's the real Hp of this car and any car. What manufacturer claims as hp is hogwash on any car. Just drive and enjoy.
#55
I believe it is torque & gearing rather than horses that determine the trap speed (with the exception of drastic differences). I've never had a problem running with any car on the interstate as long as I drop it to 3rd for the pull, and in these cases I double clutch so there is no braking.
#57
Originally posted by Astor
I believe it is torque & gearing rather than horses that determine the trap speed (with the exception of drastic differences). I've never had a problem running with any car on the interstate as long as I drop it to 3rd for the pull, and in these cases I double clutch so there is no braking.
I believe it is torque & gearing rather than horses that determine the trap speed (with the exception of drastic differences). I've never had a problem running with any car on the interstate as long as I drop it to 3rd for the pull, and in these cases I double clutch so there is no braking.
#58
I was referring to cars with similar horsepower & weight, if you can get to maximum speed faster with torque, you go that speed for a longer period of time. Whereas with less torque, you reach your top speed later, thus in a race (since this seems to be based on 1/4 mile times) would have less top speed time, or the top speed you would reach in a 1/4 mile.
#60
I seem to remember a Japanese magazine complaining how it's difficult to dyno modern sport cars. They were dynoing a GT-R and couldn't get the AWD and ECU system to cooperate, so then had to pull some fuse and do other junk.... Then of course the dyno came back around 284WHP. So I guess it's not the same as the RX-8 dyno issue we are having here.
#65
Originally posted by IkeWRX
NOOOOOOO, the RX-8 is teh fast3st car EV4R!
NOOOOOOO, the RX-8 is teh fast3st car EV4R!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post