Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Which should I buy? 2004 or 2007.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-06-2011 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
Draft 5200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Which should I buy? 2004 or 2007.

I am new to the club and to the 8. I test drove one just prior to christmas and fell in love with this awesome little car. I am currently looking at a 2007 with 33K miles ($17000) and a 2004 that had the engine replaced just 6K miles ago($11000). Both are Grand Touring.

My question is which is the best bet? Does the replaced engine come with another 100K mile warranty? Are the changes made to the 8 over those three model years worth the extra cost?

Thanks in advance to all.
Old 01-06-2011 | 09:38 PM
  #2  
jasonrxeight's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 3
From: Omaha, NE
no the warranty is on the car not on the engine.
04 has only 2 year or so engine warranty left, unless you gonna get rid of it before that.
Old 01-06-2011 | 09:42 PM
  #3  
Deathwatch's Avatar
Deathwatch
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Martinez California
Which ever one you prefer, If you are getting it from the Stealership they often offer warranties, I recommend getting one with a warranty. I had to use mine several times already. Had to replace the tranny. If you like the 04, then offer $9K or $9,500. see if they bite. If it's the 07 offer $14,500. When I bought my 04 it was worth $21K at the time and got it for $14,500. W same milage 33,000.

Last edited by Deathwatch; 01-06-2011 at 09:45 PM.
Old 01-06-2011 | 11:25 PM
  #4  
xexok's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 7
From: Aurora, CO
I don't think the changes will matter a whole lot unless your buying an automatic, then get an 06+. What model/package(sport, gt, etc) is the 04 and 07, that would help people giving you prices. I bought an 09 sport with 20kish miles and they were asking 16,900 about a year ago. They wouldn't go any cheaper but it was already a pretty fair price as it was.
Old 01-07-2011 | 12:53 AM
  #5  
Draft 5200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Both the 2004 and the 2007 are Grand Touring with manual tranny. The only real difference in options is that the '07 has a sunroof and the '04 does not.
Old 01-07-2011 | 01:03 AM
  #6  
Galen Darkmoon's Avatar
I don't remember
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
2007
Old 01-07-2011 | 01:11 AM
  #7  
lateralus's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 436
Likes: 1
From: Montgomery, AL
The newer the better... I'm not saying that you shouldn't get an '04. I have an '04... But if you can afford the '07, go with that one. Especially since its warranty will last 3 years longer (depending on mileage).
Old 01-07-2011 | 03:26 AM
  #8  
New Yorker's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 58
From: NYC
I bet the '07 is slightly more refined and improved. Slightly. Alas, aside from the rear end, the car got uglier in its second iteration, IMO.
Old 01-07-2011 | 12:20 PM
  #9  
iemdan's Avatar
what do you value?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Ct
Originally Posted by Draft 5200
Both the 2004 and the 2007 are Grand Touring with manual tranny. The only real difference in options is that the '07 has a sunroof and the '04 does not.
if it does not have a sunroof, it is not a grand touring. gt also has power leather seats and hid headlights.
Old 01-07-2011 | 01:02 PM
  #10  
EDZRIDE's Avatar
2005 White GT
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 2
From: Spokane Valley, Washington
Originally Posted by iemdan
if it does not have a sunroof, it is not a grand touring.
+1 on that ^
Old 01-07-2011 | 01:19 PM
  #11  
usnidc's Avatar
2008 40th Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Virginia, USA
2007, you won't have to worry if all the flashes were done and it will have the stronger starter.
Old 01-07-2011 | 06:07 PM
  #12  
Roidz's Avatar
Strength/Confidence
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Utah
2007 if you can afford the difference. It will be worth more down the road too.
Old 01-07-2011 | 06:28 PM
  #13  
Jacob6875's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Springfield,IL
I would go with the 2007 (though try and talk him down to like 16k if u can). You should get some of your money back when you sell it anyway.
Old 01-07-2011 | 10:14 PM
  #14  
Draft 5200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Thanks so much for all the advice. Highly appreciated.
Old 01-07-2011 | 10:16 PM
  #15  
The Reverend's Avatar
That's a lie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 1
From: I don't wear panties
if you feel brave take the 04...if it lasts you will save many a dollar

you should be able to get it for less than 11K too
Old 01-07-2011 | 11:02 PM
  #16  
Draft 5200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
I just spoke with the owner of the '04. I asked him if he had the starter, battery, coils, plugs, and flash updated. All things I have learned from this forum. He said just prior to the engine going, which was due to bad apex seals by the way, he replaced the plugs, wires, and coils. The battery is the same and he is not sure if the starter was upgraded, but I doubt the dealership would have upgraded the starter with the engine replacement. He said they also reflashed the cp with the engine replacement.

Thanks so much everyone. This forum is awesome.
Old 01-08-2011 | 12:18 AM
  #17  
DocBeech's Avatar
I drive at Red Line.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 5
From: Dallas, TX
If your going to make it a track car go with the 04. Because well a lot of things you will be replacing anyways.

If your leaving it stock and don't plan to heavily mod it go with the 07. You have 3 more years of warranty left on the engine, and don't have to worry about upgraded batteries or starters.
Old 01-08-2011 | 12:41 AM
  #18  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 32
From: Planet Earth
07 have most of the updates already. so if you can afford it, get 07. I won't pay that much for it tho, knock another 2-3 k off then we have a deal.
Old 01-10-2011 | 09:37 AM
  #19  
2tone's Avatar
The RX-8 is missed
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
2007
Old 01-10-2011 | 10:52 AM
  #20  
supergoat's Avatar
I don't "smell good".
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Crowfield Plantation, SC
Buy whichever is nicer and in better condition. I lucked up and found a 2004 that was near showroom condition with lower miles than the 2006 and 2007s on the lot. Just drive them, and whichever one feels better, go for it.

And NEVER buy a car based on resale value. If you buy a car, especially one like the RX-8, based on resale...please reconsider. These cars are meant to be driven....not babied and resold. Of course, I'm very happy the previous owner of my car did that...but still...

Last edited by supergoat; 01-10-2011 at 10:54 AM.
Old 01-10-2011 | 11:16 AM
  #21  
Bigbacon's Avatar
2006 WB AT
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 2
From: NOVA
17000 is a bit steep for the 07. You could probably get it down to 14 or less..

give you an idea, I got my 06 June of 09 with 18k miles for 14.5. car was in perfect shape inside and out minus one scratch down the passenger side rear door that had been touched up with the touch up paint. From a Dealer also.
Old 01-10-2011 | 11:18 AM
  #22  
terch1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 2
A little research on your part would have lead you to the answer you were looking for ...... 2007.
Old 01-10-2011 | 11:19 AM
  #23  
terch1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 2
As mentioned the price is a bit steep. I would pay maybe $14,000.
Old 01-10-2011 | 07:48 PM
  #24  
Draft 5200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Thanks All. I am going to go for the 07'. It's now time to begin haggling with the stealership.
Old 01-22-2011 | 06:13 PM
  #25  
Draft 5200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Brought the 2007 baby home today. I just got done reading the owners manual. One thing in the owners manual that seemed to be off to me is the recommended shift point, in mph, for shifting using a manual. The recommended shift speeds for 3rd to 4th and up seemed really low to me. Does anyone have any comments on the Mazda mph shift chart?

Thanks


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.