SPORTS CAR or SPORTS SEDAN?
#53
Originally posted by pelucidor
The perfect contradiction - I expected you to say the 911 is a sporty coupe.
The perfect contradiction - I expected you to say the 911 is a sporty coupe.
I said the 911 TURBO is a sports car. The TURBO is a 2 seater as far as I remember.
#54
Originally posted by Butt Dyno
All of you chiming in saying the RX8 is a sports car - if that's true - why isn't the Evo a sports car?
I went to MRIU and got all the RX8 propaganda... I am just trying to figure out what definition of sports car includes the 8 but not the Evo... seems kinda markety hypey.
All of you chiming in saying the RX8 is a sports car - if that's true - why isn't the Evo a sports car?
I went to MRIU and got all the RX8 propaganda... I am just trying to figure out what definition of sports car includes the 8 but not the Evo... seems kinda markety hypey.
Evo and Impreza are not...
why? very simple...cuz chicks dig it...chicks can smell sports cars from a mile away and if they say so, who am i to argue? (momma always told me not to argue with women)...
now ask them if an Evo or Impreza is a sports car...Evo and Impreza owners will say "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" but it seems the only beholders are the owners themselves...definitely not chicks
all joking aside, i think it's a sports coupe...dunno if i can call it a Grand Touring Sports Car since i'm accustomed to GT's as being much larger so i think a coupe would suffice...
Last edited by BRx8; 08-27-2003 at 02:51 PM.
#56
Originally posted by vudoodoodoo
My (and most people's) definition of a sports car.
Powerful
Lightwieght
Good handling
2 door
2 seater
The only 2 current Japanese cars I can think of that can be called sports cars are the NSX and 350Z. Although the Z COULD lose a few pounds.
My (and most people's) definition of a sports car.
Powerful
Lightwieght
Good handling
2 door
2 seater
The only 2 current Japanese cars I can think of that can be called sports cars are the NSX and 350Z. Although the Z COULD lose a few pounds.
I don't know why a "sports car" has to have just 2 seats. It's already been established that the RX-8 has practically the same dimensions as the 911. I do think a sports car should have rear-wheel drive. But put an engine as powerful as the 911's in this car and would you still say it's not a sports car? If so, your last two criteria are incorrect. If not, I'd like to hear how you defend that.
That only leaves engine performance, which is highly subjective. I've never owned an NSX so I'm not going to compare it to that. But it feels like a sports car to me, and therefore it is. To me. And that's all that matters. To me.
#57
I liked this...
-----
From: http://www.davewin.com/articles/sports-car.shtml
Definition of A Sports Car
A true sports car is a performance car whose primary function is to provide driving pleasure, and to allow the driver to immerse himself in that experience and communicate with the road as directly as possible. Its purpose is pure and singleminded.
The idea of a sports car has always been the same and it will never change. The designs will change as times change. But the concept will always remain.
A true sports car is light, direct and does without the things that more pedestrian vehicles possess. It is often derived from a race car in some fashion. The car may be a direct variation of a race car. It may feature technology and design from a race car. Or the people who designed and developed it have a competition background. It has heritage.
The car rewards drivers who are skilled and able. All drivers are not created equal. Those who can best feel and understand the subtle messages of the machine are rewarded with the greatest satisfaction. A sports car is meant to be driven well quickly.
What do sports cars look like?
They turn your head, they get you interested. You know just from looking at them that they offer performance and excitement. They are not ordinary cars. Even when parked, a sports car gives the impression that it is in forward motion.
What A Sports Car Is Not
Heavy cars are not sports cars. Sedans, wagons, SUVs, and the like are not sports cars. No matter how much power they make, how well they corner, how quickly they can accelerate or stop, or how much they've been modified, they are not sports cars. They may be performance cars. They may have very impressive performance. But they can never be sports cars. Thoroughbreds are horses. But not all horses are thoroughbreds.
-----
-Dan
-----
From: http://www.davewin.com/articles/sports-car.shtml
Definition of A Sports Car
A true sports car is a performance car whose primary function is to provide driving pleasure, and to allow the driver to immerse himself in that experience and communicate with the road as directly as possible. Its purpose is pure and singleminded.
The idea of a sports car has always been the same and it will never change. The designs will change as times change. But the concept will always remain.
A true sports car is light, direct and does without the things that more pedestrian vehicles possess. It is often derived from a race car in some fashion. The car may be a direct variation of a race car. It may feature technology and design from a race car. Or the people who designed and developed it have a competition background. It has heritage.
The car rewards drivers who are skilled and able. All drivers are not created equal. Those who can best feel and understand the subtle messages of the machine are rewarded with the greatest satisfaction. A sports car is meant to be driven well quickly.
What do sports cars look like?
They turn your head, they get you interested. You know just from looking at them that they offer performance and excitement. They are not ordinary cars. Even when parked, a sports car gives the impression that it is in forward motion.
What A Sports Car Is Not
Heavy cars are not sports cars. Sedans, wagons, SUVs, and the like are not sports cars. No matter how much power they make, how well they corner, how quickly they can accelerate or stop, or how much they've been modified, they are not sports cars. They may be performance cars. They may have very impressive performance. But they can never be sports cars. Thoroughbreds are horses. But not all horses are thoroughbreds.
-----
-Dan
#58
I agree with you Zaphod. Who really cares what category it is in? It's the car you wanted for whatever reasons and thats it. Saying it's a sports sedan and not a sports car doesnt make sense. The whole sport car elitism that a lot of people have here is about as logical as the superpriced luxury car people. They think what the have is the best cause it costs an unreasonable amount of money.
You all need to stop letting other peoples opinion matter to you over something so personally subjective as this. For me the RX-8 is the best car. I have had it for almost 3 weeks and enjoy it inmensely. I dont care in the least if someone thinks it's a POS. It's pretty damn obvious I disagree, so why argue over it?
You all need to stop letting other peoples opinion matter to you over something so personally subjective as this. For me the RX-8 is the best car. I have had it for almost 3 weeks and enjoy it inmensely. I dont care in the least if someone thinks it's a POS. It's pretty damn obvious I disagree, so why argue over it?
#59
babylou's rear seating comment
Originally posted by babylou
Unfortunately for me, I think the RX-8 is a bad concept. The rear seats are worthless for seating normal humans yet they create many performance compromises. What is the point? Make the seats real or don't make them at all!
Unfortunately for me, I think the RX-8 is a bad concept. The rear seats are worthless for seating normal humans yet they create many performance compromises. What is the point? Make the seats real or don't make them at all!
You obviously don't have kids.
Normal human beings? If babylou considers a normal human being 6'2, weighing 350 lbs or more, then I can see his point. But jeez, the rear seating is not worthless.
My brother-in-law is 5'10, heavy built and weighs 240. He is definately above average in height and weight. He didn't have one problem sitting in the back, or getting in or out of the car.
Last edited by RX-8 Zoomster; 08-27-2003 at 07:02 PM.
#61
who gives a rats ****.. if some think it's a sedan and others think it's a sportscar..
sports car?? = uh it's too weak to be a real sports car..
sedan? But but but it looks like a sports car it must be one..
gimme a break.
GREAT TASTE or LESS FILLING argument would be just as relevant here...
sports car?? = uh it's too weak to be a real sports car..
sedan? But but but it looks like a sports car it must be one..
gimme a break.
GREAT TASTE or LESS FILLING argument would be just as relevant here...
#64
There's enough old farts here to remember the old Certs commercials: "It's a breath mint! It's a candy mint! It's two, two, two mints in one!" So there's your answer: "It's two, two, two cars in one!"
#65
The '8 designers and marketeers gotta be grinnin' ear to ear as they read this thread. This was exactly the kind of debate they hoped to stir up. Go back and read from page 3 on if you haven't already; comments like "It's both" or "We're creating our own category." They gotta be loving it.
#66
Re: babylou's rear seating comment
Originally posted by RX-8 Zoomster
Originally posted by Zaphod
You obviously don't have kids.
Originally posted by Zaphod
You obviously don't have kids.
Or he obviously hasn't sat in the back himself. I see he has a RX-8 on order, but did he sit in it, before he made his statement?
Normal human beings? If babylou considers a normal human being 6'2, weighing 350 lbs or more, then I can see his point. But jeez, the rear seating is not worthless.
My brother-in-law is 5'10, heavy built and weighs 240. He is definately above average in height and weight. He didn't have one problem sitting in the back, or getting in or out of the car. [/QUOTE]
Well I've got some news for you. I did sit in the back with a 6 footer in the front. My knees were crushed by the seat back. I am 5"-7". I don't consider that enough room for "normal" adults of say 5'-10" average height.
Also, I didn't know I have an RX-8 on order. I wanted one...badly. However, I waited to until there were cars at the dealership because I thought Mazda's claim of rear seat room was exagerrated. It is. Kinda like some other claims.
#67
Originally posted by DanThMan
I liked this...
-----
What A Sports Car Is Not
Heavy cars are not sports cars. Sedans, wagons, SUVs, and the like are not sports cars. No matter how much power they make, how well they corner, how quickly they can accelerate or stop, or how much they've been modified, they are not sports cars. They may be performance cars. They may have very impressive performance. But they can never be sports cars. Thoroughbreds are horses. But not all horses are thoroughbreds.
-----
-Dan
I liked this...
-----
What A Sports Car Is Not
Heavy cars are not sports cars. Sedans, wagons, SUVs, and the like are not sports cars. No matter how much power they make, how well they corner, how quickly they can accelerate or stop, or how much they've been modified, they are not sports cars. They may be performance cars. They may have very impressive performance. But they can never be sports cars. Thoroughbreds are horses. But not all horses are thoroughbreds.
-----
-Dan
#68
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ELK
[B]The RX8 is a sports coupe and a very good one.
It is too softly sprung, has too much roll, not enough feedback (steering, clutch, shifter, seat-of-the-pants) to be a sports car.
It is incredibly well done, pretty and fun. But it has too many compromises sacrificing performance for comfort and convenience to be a sports car.
And yes, I have driven one.
And I think it is a great car for everyday use.
[B]The RX8 is a sports coupe and a very good one.
It is too softly sprung, has too much roll, not enough feedback (steering, clutch, shifter, seat-of-the-pants) to be a sports car.
It is incredibly well done, pretty and fun. But it has too many compromises sacrificing performance for comfort and convenience to be a sports car.
And yes, I have driven one.
And I think it is a great car for everyday use.
Last edited by MWG; 08-28-2003 at 09:47 AM.
#69
Re: Re: babylou's rear seating comment
Well I've got some news for you. I did sit in the back with a 6 footer in the front. My knees were crushed by the seat back. I am 5"-7". I don't consider that enough room for "normal" adults of say 5'-10" average height.
Also, I didn't know I have an RX-8 on order. I wanted one...badly. However, I waited to until there were cars at the dealership because I thought Mazda's claim of rear seat room was exagerrated. It is. Kinda like some other claims. [/B]
Dont assume it will be custom made to you is all.
#70
Re: Re: Re: babylou's rear seating comment
Originally posted by Genom
Dont assume it will be custom made to you is all.
Dont assume it will be custom made to you is all.
The fact is the rear seat room is very limited. All of the magazine tests have confirmed this. The rear seat room is nearly the exact same as an IS300 and one of the big knocks on that vehicle is lack of rear seat room.
#71
Re: Re: babylou's rear seating comment
Originally posted by babylou
Well I've got some news for you. I did sit in the back with a 6 footer in the front. My knees were crushed by the seat back. I am 5"-7". I don't consider that enough room for "normal" adults of say 5'-10" average height.
Also, I didn't know I have an RX-8 on order. I wanted one...badly. However, I waited to until there were cars at the dealership because I thought Mazda's claim of rear seat room was exagerrated. It is. Kinda like some other claims.
Well I've got some news for you. I did sit in the back with a 6 footer in the front. My knees were crushed by the seat back. I am 5"-7". I don't consider that enough room for "normal" adults of say 5'-10" average height.
Also, I didn't know I have an RX-8 on order. I wanted one...badly. However, I waited to until there were cars at the dealership because I thought Mazda's claim of rear seat room was exagerrated. It is. Kinda like some other claims.
'Nuf said.
Last edited by RX-8 Zoomster; 08-28-2003 at 03:09 PM.