Is There Any Harm to Coasting
#26
Originally Posted by GiN
With that said, if the internal fuel mapping of the ECU is dependent upon TPS sensor readings, then the injector pulse and duty cycle during engine brake decel would probably be similar to that used during idle. However, I think ECUs nowadays base their fuel maps on a 3D grid of TPS vs MAP/MAF vs RPM. Therefore, having TPS at 0 with RPM > 1000 pretty much falls off the map, which results in 0 fuel duty.
#27
Wow I learn something everyday! Thanks Rasputin. I had no such idea that going downhill would under decel would consume zero fuel.
So to add to RWagz question: To be considered deceleration, brakes have to be engaged correct? What about situations where you are going downhill in gear and have little (or none) throttle engaged? Is that still consider a DFCO?
On a side note, I remember reading here that a fellow was out of town and was no where near a gas station. His gas fuel light came on. He ended up coasting the rest of the trip (all downhill) until he reach a gas station (for close to 80km?). Mind you I can get an additional 50-60km of mileage when the light comes on.
So to add to RWagz question: To be considered deceleration, brakes have to be engaged correct? What about situations where you are going downhill in gear and have little (or none) throttle engaged? Is that still consider a DFCO?
On a side note, I remember reading here that a fellow was out of town and was no where near a gas station. His gas fuel light came on. He ended up coasting the rest of the trip (all downhill) until he reach a gas station (for close to 80km?). Mind you I can get an additional 50-60km of mileage when the light comes on.
#28
Originally Posted by Johnnyma45
So you're saying cruising with the tach at 1000 rpm is using more gas than say, decelerating in third with the tach at 3500 rpm? please elaborate.
#33
Originally Posted by Napboy
is this the same tps system that doesn't work when you switch to aftermarket wheels? if so, is it just controlled by maf readings or are there sensors elsewhere?
#35
Originally Posted by Nubo
Short answer: No, there is no harm to coasting.
This is at least the 2nd thread I've seen on this topic and I'm again surprised by some of the claims
-it's illegal....?
-it's inherently extremely dangerous......?
These are both ridiculous statements.
This is at least the 2nd thread I've seen on this topic and I'm again surprised by some of the claims
-it's illegal....?
-it's inherently extremely dangerous......?
These are both ridiculous statements.
You live in San Francisco, right? According to the California DMV, it is a violation to coast on a downgrade in Neutral. It's a violation of Vehicle Code 21710 and is a ticketable offense.
Why is it illegal? Because it's inherently dangerous.
#36
Originally Posted by Mikelikes2drive
interesting! lets see if this actually helps my mpg...
so when im going to a red light... i should stay in lets say 6th gear until my rpms reach like... 1500 rpms and then shift to nuetral???
so when im going to a red light... i should stay in lets say 6th gear until my rpms reach like... 1500 rpms and then shift to nuetral???
Gomez.
#37
Originally Posted by antiver
Thats news to me too.. I always coast with the clutch in, but leave the stick in a gear, so, in emergency, i just have to pop the clutch and off i go, avoiding hazards.
youre a nut... :p
#38
Originally Posted by BlueFrenzy
Wow I learn something everyday! Thanks Rasputin. I had no such idea that going downhill would under decel would consume zero fuel.
So to add to RWagz question: To be considered deceleration, brakes have to be engaged correct? What about situations where you are going downhill in gear and have little (or none) throttle engaged? Is that still consider a DFCO?
....
So to add to RWagz question: To be considered deceleration, brakes have to be engaged correct? What about situations where you are going downhill in gear and have little (or none) throttle engaged? Is that still consider a DFCO?
....
Originally Posted by truemagellen
Hymee wasn't posting on this thread...
did you mean Rasputin?
did you mean Rasputin?
#39
Originally Posted by Nubo
<snip>
This is at least the 2nd thread I've seen on this topic and I'm again surprised by some of the claims
-it's illegal....?
-it's inherently extremely dangerous......?
These are both ridiculous statements.
<snip>
This is at least the 2nd thread I've seen on this topic and I'm again surprised by some of the claims
-it's illegal....?
-it's inherently extremely dangerous......?
These are both ridiculous statements.
<snip>
#40
Originally Posted by Sigma
It is illegal in almost every state.
You live in San Francisco, right? According to the California DMV, it is a violation to coast on a downgrade in Neutral. It's a violation of Vehicle Code 21710 and is a ticketable offense.
Why is it illegal? Because it's inherently dangerous.
You live in San Francisco, right? According to the California DMV, it is a violation to coast on a downgrade in Neutral. It's a violation of Vehicle Code 21710 and is a ticketable offense.
Why is it illegal? Because it's inherently dangerous.
The fact is, when doing my research on this, it seems that any state that does have a law regarding coasting in neutral specifically states that is illegal to coast on a downgrade in neutral. Is coasting uphill less inherently dangerous?
Well, yes, it is. Coasting isn't going to make you any less likely to avoid an accident (that round thing you hold on to and the middle pedal still work fine), but it could make you more likely to accelerate, thereby creating an unsafe situation. So, the risk has nothing to do with the gear your car is in or the ability to return it to gear in a timely fashion, but to prevent runaway vehicles that could potentially overheat their brakes.
Frankly, if this hill you're talking about has just enough of a downgrade to overcome rotational friction, but not enough to accelerate your car, I say go for it. Just don't tell the police what you were doing...
--Massive
#41
On my old car with one of the instananeous gas usage readouts, I'd get roughly 40mpg coasting out of gear (in neutral) at about 40mph. If I coasted in gear, it would peg the reading out at 200+mpg. Another simple way to look at it is your accessories have to be powered somehow. Altenator, A/C, PS, these all need power. So, if you are in neutral, the engine is have to consume enough fuel to make enough power to run these. In gear, you are using gravity/kinetic energy to do this.
It's illegal here in GA too. Still not exactly sure how they could know you were to ticket you though.
It's illegal here in GA too. Still not exactly sure how they could know you were to ticket you though.
#42
Originally Posted by Rasputin
After mentionning all this to my wife, she told me to point out one or two things...
#45
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Gosh...thanks again, I think I can hit 20mpg now that I know I was wasting gas all this time.
I'll post if I see a difference!
I'll post if I see a difference!
#46
Let's not be overdramatic. We've got some real zealots on this forum. Who cares if it's a ticketable offense....99% of us drive over the speed limit from time to time, right? Talk about hypocrisy.
I don't think the poster who brought it up was looking for a driving lesson on safety. The question was regarding fuel economy and mechanical impact of coasting, and it's been answered.
I don't think the poster who brought it up was looking for a driving lesson on safety. The question was regarding fuel economy and mechanical impact of coasting, and it's been answered.
#47
Let's not be overdramatic. We've got some real zealots on this forum. Who cares if it's a ticketable offense....99% of us drive over the speed limit from time to time, right? Talk about hypocrisy.
If the comment was about speeding, and someone said "Speeding isn't Illegal" I would expect someone to correct them on that as well. Whether you speed yourself or not has no bearing on the factualness of the illegality of the act. Saying "Idiot, speeding is illegal" doesn't mean nor make any implication that the person stating it doesn't speed themselves; they're only correcting an incorrect statement.
#48
Coasting isn't going to make you any less likely to avoid an accident (that round thing you hold on to and the middle pedal still work fine), but it could make you more likely to accelerate, thereby creating an unsafe situation. So, the risk has nothing to do with the gear your car is in or the ability to return it to gear in a timely fashion, but to prevent runaway vehicles that could potentially overheat their brakes.
I think you'd be surprised by how much more control you have over the car when it's in gear and you can modulate the throttle than when you do not. People's reliance on "that round thing and the middle pedal" (forgetting about the other one or two pedals that are also down there) is exactly why people can't evasively drive anymore and MANY accidents occur that could easily have been prevented if people knew to do more than "stomp on middle pedal and twist wheel".
And the rhetort is going to be "If it's so dangerous to drive in Neutral, then why is it only illegal to coast while going downhill and not while driving on level ground" -- and, in some states, it is in fact illegal to coast in Neutral period, whether downhill, uphill, or level ground; meaning that it does not, in fact, have to do solely with overheating brakes.
Last edited by Sigma; 04-25-2005 at 02:36 PM.
#49
Does fingers and a calculator count? LOL
I've been tracking my fuel economy since I got my 8 in December but I've always used the coasting method thinking that it helped fuel economy. Now that I've seen the light...I'll have to check again.
LOL...what? LOL...I know you did not say I would save a significant amount of fuel economy but .5%....it's not worth the effort...LOL
All this time I thought I would get another 1mpg out of this, LOL...but I'll try it anyway and see what happens.
I've been tracking my fuel economy since I got my 8 in December but I've always used the coasting method thinking that it helped fuel economy. Now that I've seen the light...I'll have to check again.
Expect a 0.5% improvement at best.
All this time I thought I would get another 1mpg out of this, LOL...but I'll try it anyway and see what happens.
#50
Originally Posted by Sigma
Go to a track, accelerate very quickly, put the car in neutral, and try to make it around a particular group of sharp turns without any power to the wheels. Then do the same with the car in gear and come back with the results.
I think you'd be surprised by how much more control you have over the car when it's in gear and you can modulate the throttle than when you do not. People's reliance on "that round thing and the middle pedal" (forgetting about the other one or two pedals that are also down there) is exactly why people can't evasively drive anymore and MANY accidents occur that could easily have been prevented if people knew to do more than "stomp on middle pedal and twist wheel".
I think you'd be surprised by how much more control you have over the car when it's in gear and you can modulate the throttle than when you do not. People's reliance on "that round thing and the middle pedal" (forgetting about the other one or two pedals that are also down there) is exactly why people can't evasively drive anymore and MANY accidents occur that could easily have been prevented if people knew to do more than "stomp on middle pedal and twist wheel".
BTW, I don't think I'd be suprised how much more control I have over the car when it's in gear...
Originally Posted by Sigma
And the rhetort is going to be "If it's so dangerous to drive in Neutral, then why is it only illegal to coast while going downhill and not while driving on level ground" -- and, in some states, it is in fact illegal to coast in Neutral period, whether downhill, uphill, or level ground; meaning that it does not, in fact, have to do solely with overheating brakes.
--Massive