Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

What other cars are you looking into?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-18-2002 | 09:06 PM
  #51  
Immi's Avatar
0-('.')-0
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Richmond Hill, Ontario
ahhhhhhhh...

4 canadian soldiers killed in afganistan because of friendly fire...... ahhhhhhh
Old 04-18-2002 | 11:25 PM
  #52  
Toadman's Avatar
Nomad Mod
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: Hilton or Marriott
Ahhh yes.. the RX-8 forum's first flame thread, over a non-auto topic. Be kewl guys...
Old 04-18-2002 | 11:54 PM
  #53  
veloceracing's Avatar
Moderatin this biznatch
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
just cuz we have the better army doesnt mean we can shoot....
Old 04-19-2002 | 10:54 AM
  #54  
NOTA V6's Avatar
Will trade kids for RX-8
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Bloomington, MN
Originally posted by Toadman
...kewl...
Okay then, let's make fun of your spelling skilz. :D
Old 04-21-2002 | 12:11 AM
  #55  
karmavore's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
back on track...

I'm also looking into this:

http://www.k1-styling.sk/attack.htm

Seriously.

What do you think?


Luke.
Old 04-21-2002 | 10:06 PM
  #56  
spwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
any1 here has Celica GTS? My final choices will probably be between Mini Cooper S, Celica TS (GTS + extra options for Euro market) & Mazda RX-8

the thing is that my family will open a toyota dealership, so I can get it at significant discount...

another thing is that Mini Cooper S will still be cheaper with more equipment... and no1 still knows anything about how much RX-8 will be... so post ur experiences with Celica GTS if you have them
Old 04-23-2002 | 03:57 PM
  #57  
RX8fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Originally posted by DANNER
car...It looks cool and it should be fast.
Fast? In comparison to what? I don't think it will be fast. I am comparing it to my '93 RX-7. It's going to drive like a Honda S2000. High revving, high strung motor. The only way to get power out of it will be either nitrous oxide, a supercharger, or turbocharger. I predict about mid to upper 14s with the car in the ¼ mile.
Old 04-23-2002 | 04:09 PM
  #58  
RX8fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Originally posted by FritzMan
Honestly, I've felt the exact same as veloracing several times. I'm *really* disappointed at how slow Mazda is on getting off their behind and releasing the damn thing. I'm more worried about waiting another full year and then learning that the final specs are disappointing (such as the curb weight), or an inflated price reducing the bang for the buck. But how many other fairly powerful rear wheel drive 4 seaters are there out there besides the oh-so-common Bimmer?
Hmmm... Mazda has stated that the intended roll out of the car was Fall-Winter 2002 to Spring 2003. Mazda has gotten off their behind. Velo experienced problems with a Mazda dealer. And anyone who has had a Mazda (including myself with an RX-7), knows that their customer service... wait a second, they have customer service??? I didn't think so.

That is one huge problem they have to address. Hopefully Ford pushes them in the right direction. Salesmen are usually clueless. When I was looking at a Mazda MP3, and told the sales guy about my RX, he started spouting specs about the car and all sorts of trash. 300HP from the factory? In his dreams. I walked out of there fast. When I order my RX-8, it will be at least the second model year, and through an online service. No more dealing directly with the dealer.
Old 04-24-2002 | 02:51 AM
  #59  
spwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
they are just humans, and you are asking them about info that they read in magazines like yourself, if they had super human abilities, they would own the place, not work in it
Old 04-24-2002 | 04:38 PM
  #60  
RX8fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Post

If the salesmen actually read the magazines, they would have their figures correct. The 3rd generation RX-7 has 255 HP from the factory. I don't expect them to know everything, but at least be honest with me when I am buying a car.

if they had super human abilities, they would own the place, not work in it
I wonder if the owner of a VW/Kia/Mazda dealership knows every fact about the cars he/she sells and services.
Old 04-26-2002 | 09:08 AM
  #61  
Grimace's Avatar
Certifiable car nut
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Well, I'd rather they delay the release and work out all the bugs. Gives me more time to save up.

I'm in the same boat as the rest of the Canucks on this board. I'm waiting to see MSRP on the car before I fully commit. Its my top choice right now, too sexy for its own good. Love rotary engines, and its amazing the amount of room inside considering its outside dimensions. More rear legroom than the 626, exterior dimensions identical (almost) the NSX (except height). Amazing. What a great packaging job.

Other cars I'm looking at:
- Mitsubishi EVO VII, depending on more details being released about this car (mainly pricing and release date, and if they "soften" it for our market).

- Lexus IS300, like the styling, love the straight-6

- Miata or Honda S2000 (but I think I need rear seats for occasional use, no matter how small they are). Porshe Boxter (heh heh yeah right, maybe if they drop the price $30000...)

- Celica GTS, RSX Type S (wish they were RWD and a few thousand cheaper)

- VW Golf GTi or Jetta 1.8T, now that they've got 180 HP and tighter suspension. Prices are getting a little high though.

- BMW 325ti. I like the idea of their excellent 2.5L 6 in a short RWD wheelbase. Haven't heard anything about this for a while though. Is it still coming to North America?
Old 04-26-2002 | 09:18 AM
  #62  
spwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
you mean new compact (bmw 325ti)? It will actually now be refreshed, only 12 months after it came out... I think BMW set the record on that one... its pretty pathetic that their new design chief has no clue about wtf is he doing.

so I suspect that new version will come to the states as well... luckily for us, since the one that came out last year was the ugliest bmw ever...
Old 04-26-2002 | 09:31 AM
  #63  
Grimace's Avatar
Certifiable car nut
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally posted by spwolf
you mean new compact (bmw 325ti)? It will actually now be refreshed, only 12 months after it came out... I think BMW set the record on that one... its pretty pathetic that their new design chief has no clue about wtf is he doing.

so I suspect that new version will come to the states as well... luckily for us, since the one that came out last year was the ugliest bmw ever...
Yeah, styling wasn't their strongsuit, thats for sure. Still, I'd have to drive one before I discounted it entirely, although I heard they were pretty "soft" for a bmw.
Old 04-26-2002 | 09:40 AM
  #64  
spwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
nah, 325ti was a sweet drive, real 3 series, inside and under... out is the problem... we will see if they can make it any better 2nd try

only other thing is that it is expensive... only a little bit less than similar 3 series ($1,5k less), so for USA, I dont see why would you get it at all...
Old 04-26-2002 | 09:43 AM
  #65  
spwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
As to EVO VIII (which is what is goin to USA), it is +$35,000 car, much more radical than WRX (even WRX STi)... inside is cheaper tho...what i read from brits so far is that they think its crazily good and better than WRX STi

Last edited by spwolf; 04-26-2002 at 09:46 AM.
Old 04-26-2002 | 12:49 PM
  #66  
FritzMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Yup, it's starting to sound like the Evo is getting up there in coin. From a performance stand-point probably worth it though.

I agree with all your points Grimace, except I don't care for the Celica's styling. The S is nice but just a little too much coin for no HID, LSD, or traction control. I'm dying of curiosity to see if they make any changes for '03. Typically Honda doesn't make dramatic changes so quickly but I've read the sales have been less than impressive, and they are showing off that "Concept RSX". It's not like they don't have these parts developed as they're all available in Japan. If I had to bet though, they'll probably come out in typical Honda-exciting fashion with a new color or something lame like that.

What about the Mazda6? Nice looking, totally functional package (I like the 5 door), 220hp V6 is a good starting point, and they'll have a sport version with 17" rims. For me, the only real knock against it is the FWD. From a price standpoint, it will help predict the RX8 placement. There's no way Mazda will overlap two sedan models. I imagine Mazda will start the 6 at $25K Cdn (right above the Protege), and a fully equipped version will reach $34 Cdn. That will make it compete with the Altima, Camry, and Accord. The RX-8 will then start with a base version around $35-$36K Cdn up to low $40K. The RX-8 pricing will be targeted against the likes of Nissan 350Z, Inifinty G35, and entry level 3 series Bimmers and C class Benzes. I'll bet I'm not far off...

Last edited by FritzMan; 04-26-2002 at 12:51 PM.
Old 04-26-2002 | 03:15 PM
  #67  
KrisA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Regina, SK, CA
Food for thought... the 350Z starts at 45K CDN! Lets hope Mazda is well under that mark!

I'm hoping for a 35K starting point.
Old 04-26-2002 | 04:01 PM
  #68  
Toadman's Avatar
Nomad Mod
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: Hilton or Marriott
Rumor has it they are shooting for under 30k to start.
Old 04-26-2002 | 04:53 PM
  #69  
RX8fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Thumbs down

If the car goes for under $30K in the U.S, then the Canucks will be paying at least a few grand more. CAN $1.00 = US $.64
Old 04-26-2002 | 05:38 PM
  #70  
Grimace's Avatar
Certifiable car nut
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally posted by FritzMan
Yup, it's starting to sound like the Evo is getting up there in coin. From a performance stand-point probably worth it though.

I agree with all your points Grimace, except I don't care for the Celica's styling. The S is nice but just a little too much coin for no HID, LSD, or traction control. I'm dying of curiosity to see if they make any changes for '03. Typically Honda doesn't make dramatic changes so quickly but I've read the sales have been less than impressive, and they are showing off that "Concept RSX". It's not like they don't have these parts developed as they're all available in Japan. If I had to bet though, they'll probably come out in typical Honda-exciting fashion with a new color or something lame like that.

What about the Mazda6? Nice looking, totally functional package (I like the 5 door), 220hp V6 is a good starting point, and they'll have a sport version with 17" rims. For me, the only real knock against it is the FWD. From a price standpoint, it will help predict the RX8 placement. There's no way Mazda will overlap two sedan models. I imagine Mazda will start the 6 at $25K Cdn (right above the Protege), and a fully equipped version will reach $34 Cdn. That will make it compete with the Altima, Camry, and Accord. The RX-8 will then start with a base version around $35-$36K Cdn up to low $40K. The RX-8 pricing will be targeted against the likes of Nissan 350Z, Inifinty G35, and entry level 3 series Bimmers and C class Benzes. I'll bet I'm not far off...
I'm a strange one- I really like the Celica's styling, although it'll look old in a few more years. The new celica is slated to come out 2004, but I'm not sure if the car I'm driving now will hold out that long. As for the Acura, I think it'll be a while before we see a new RSX (remember how long the previous Integra was around for?) Its styling is kind of ho-hum, but at least won't attract the cops. Stock tires are less than stellar too. And its a little expense considering the RSX Premium is $4000 less, and has every option the Type-S has except the bose subwoofer. Torque is at a much more usuable RPM level too in the Premium. HP curves are almost identical until 6000 RPM. Decisions...

The 6 is very sexy for a sedan; I forgot to include it in the list! I read a review in World of Wheels (a canadian mag for those south of the border) of the 4-cylinder 6 with the sport suspension and 17" wheels (available in that configuration in Europe) and they really liked the new 4-banger, almost more than the 6-cylinder. Handling was improved with less weight over the front axle. I'd have to drive both, of course! I saw the 6 at the autoshow in Toronto, and I definately liked it. (Unfortunetly, the RX-8 was at the show only one day, and I missed it, so I haven't seen the yellow one in public).

I bet you're pretty close on the pricing too. As long as its not much higher than that, I could justify a new RX-8 to myself easily. Considering a RSX Type S is $31000, and a Celica GTS is in the $30's, an extra $4-5 grand isn't bad considering the RX-8 will (probably) be a much nicer car (IMHO).
Old 04-29-2002 | 09:03 AM
  #71  
FritzMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
I was wondering if handling would be better with the 4 cylinder. It would make sense that it would. I've read that MazdaSpeed Mazda6 model could pressurize the 4 cylinder instead of the V6. It would be nice if the sport package and airbag options did come with the I4. Still, 160 hp from 2.3 liters is not too impressive, considering Honda is getting the same HP with their 2 liter engines on reg gas. I'm amost wondering if it's been detuned or understated to avoid competing with the V6.

What I find most impressive is that Mazda is committed to class-leading handling with features like a double wishbone suspension up front on their 6 and RX-8. Unlike others who have resorted to strut design in the interest of packaging and profit?

If I were to get an RSX, it would be the base. It seems the 6 speed is having grinding issues (like the S2000) and mis-shifts seem to be fairly easy to come by, along with a popped engine. Saving 150+ lbs on the base (50 lbs on the Premium - b/c the sunroof?) would be beneficial, and apparently the base 2 liter can be uncorked to release quite a bit of power... The 7K savings should find you at least 30 NA HP while still using reg gas, and install a LSD, better tires, and better suspension...
Old 04-29-2002 | 05:40 PM
  #72  
spwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
FritzMan, you need to have low end torque in sedan such as 6... 100 HP per liter engine would be out of place there... so 163 from 2.0 should be really nice, add a turbo and there you go...zoom, zoom...

Mazda now can look into Ford Mondeo (which is class leading handler, sells in Europe) and take few points from them... they said sporty models might be on par with Modeo's handling..

Too bad Ford USA cant find space in their lineup for Mondeo ST220, that thing owns... instead, we get crappy, plastic Taurus

Grimace - I like Celica's styling too... and I know everyone has been saying that it will grow old soon, but it still has to happen and car has been around for 3 yrs, it is aggresive enough and ahead of its time, I doubt it will grow old that fast
Old 04-30-2002 | 07:20 AM
  #73  
FritzMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Here's a new write-up on the 6 from a good Canadian review site:
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/tl/03mazda6.htm.
Turns out I was close in predicting the starting point. The RX8 is looking more and more like a $35K Cdn. base vehicle...

Actually, the new 6 has a base engine with 2.3 liters of displacement and has variable valve timing and lift duration and a 2 stage induction system. Pumping out 160 HP and approx the same lb/ft with that kind of technology and displacement is a little low. Numbers like 180-190 would be more typical.
Old 04-30-2002 | 11:44 AM
  #74  
spwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
oh my god
Old 04-30-2002 | 11:45 AM
  #75  
spwolf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
ahhhhhh


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.