Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Whats the big deal with 20 inch rims?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-02-2009 | 12:39 AM
  #26  
myriadshalaks's Avatar
rot8ing
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 1
From: merritt island, fl
raw performance
Attached Thumbnails Whats the big deal with 20 inch rims?-unofficial-pimp-my-ride_1.png  
Old 05-02-2009 | 12:40 AM
  #27  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
Originally Posted by ZumnRx8
edit: i agree j8635621 (why so many numbers?)
It's an old phone number.
Old 05-02-2009 | 12:41 AM
  #28  
ZumnRx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX8 & RX7 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 3
From: So. California
Originally Posted by Fencig
With Width you add another dimension. If you went with a wider tire you could offset the loss of sidewall flex with sheer contact area. Hence my point of relying on contact and compound after a certain point. I was just trying to keep that dimension out of the picture for now. However, as you also said, it really depends on what you want to do and how the driver wants to do it.

Also to your question on price for lower profile. Yes I imagine they have to make it sturdier but that takes in trade the flex that is needed when making a high later g turn.
Agree

Originally Posted by j8635621
It's an old phone number.
oh:

Originally Posted by myriadshalaks
raw performance
the point was....
Old 05-02-2009 | 12:43 AM
  #29  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
Ok it's bed time so I will say the answer.
Chrome is not the most loved rim choice here because of weight and it usually looks bad on a sports car.
The 20" part is no good because the bigger diameter of the rim makes the majority of that weight farther from its center, even if it is the same weight as a smaller wheel/tire. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of_inertia http://www.stockcarracing.com/techar...moi/index.html

Last edited by J8635621; 05-02-2009 at 12:47 AM.
Old 05-02-2009 | 12:47 AM
  #30  
alz0rz's Avatar
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 3
From: NYC
huge chrome rims are not for sports cars.
Old 05-02-2009 | 12:51 AM
  #31  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,786
Likes: 455
From: San Antonio, Texas
This thread fails. If you like dubs, get em'.

20" rims generally weigh more and the performance minded care about that. I was present at a dyno day when a guy with a GTI swapped from 19's back to his stockers (no other changes) and he gained 8 WHP. To me that was an eye opener. But if your into the VIP style then why do you care?
Old 05-02-2009 | 12:51 AM
  #32  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
Originally Posted by ZumnRx8
The lower the series profile the more reinforced the sidewall would be i would say, or why would they be more expensive for less tire?
I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't say that is necessarily true. I know some tires have some sizes that are reinforced while others aren't, but I don't think it is lower profile = more reinforced. I think at least some of the price could be that fewer cars run that size so they have to make up for the quantity with price.
Old 05-02-2009 | 12:54 AM
  #33  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
My point is that even if a 20" rim didn't weigh more, it would still have worse performance. It is especially true on a car like ours (no tq).
Old 05-02-2009 | 01:20 AM
  #34  
ZumnRx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX8 & RX7 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 3
From: So. California
^why'd they up the size on the R3 to 19?
Old 05-02-2009 | 01:33 AM
  #35  
yokohamaboi's Avatar
Tea?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 1
From: shit hole south TX
it's an R3 thats why it can have it lol jk idk :/

The only 20s that should be on a sports car is a Nissan GTR "R35" thats just hit me, idk about other cars.

If you want to be a VIP isnt that more for a lexus and other luxary cars? dunno thats just me.

Are cars weren't made for VIP purposes. havn't seen any VIP rx8

If you like your 20s keep them
Old 05-02-2009 | 01:33 AM
  #36  
T-ReX-8's Avatar
Stormtrooper RX8??
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by ZumnRx8
^why'd they up the size on the R3 to 19?
Bling... To sell cars.. Duh.

And performance wheels that you see aren't ever chrome, they are POLISHED.. HUGE difference.. One adds weight, the other doesn't, but in general, both are ugly on sports cars...
Old 05-02-2009 | 01:43 AM
  #37  
ZumnRx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
RX8 & RX7 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 3
From: So. California
Originally Posted by T-ReX-8
Bling... To sell cars.. Duh.

And performance wheels that you see aren't ever chrome, they are POLISHED.. HUGE difference.. One adds weight, the other doesn't, but in general, both are ugly on sports cars...
Bling? to sell cars? the R3 19's are all polished black, and you say performance wheels arent ever chrome? Yeah right! VOLK, ADVANS, WORKS, RAYS all make CHROME performance wheels!
Old 05-02-2009 | 01:53 AM
  #38  
yokohamaboi's Avatar
Tea?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 1
From: shit hole south TX
lets just say it's not our cup of tea. but if you like it, keep it. :D
Old 05-02-2009 | 02:59 AM
  #39  
always.anthony's Avatar
is looking for his torque
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by yokohamaboi
lets just say it's not our cup of tea. but if you like it, keep it. :D
^ ended thread. perfect.
Old 05-02-2009 | 09:24 AM
  #40  
DubbsLuvs8s's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Wantagh, Long Island
Some of the physics up there aren't done very well.

It's a rotational system.

Torque = Moment of Inertia * Radial Acceleration.

T=I*alpha

Different rims distribute the weight of the wheel at a different distance from the center of the wheel. That increase/decreases the radius in the inertia equation, which differs with every shape, but it is a squared term in the formula.

So the lower the moment of inertia (I), the lower the amount of torque at the shaft needed to turn them for the same amount of rotational acceleration (more go fast.)

So, the most important factor is not how much the wheel weighs, but where the weight is placed relative to the center of the wheel.
Old 05-02-2009 | 09:49 AM
  #41  
04RX8man's Avatar
Rotary Powered Countryboy
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
just a little gangster for me what to each his/her own
Old 05-02-2009 | 11:03 AM
  #42  
myriadshalaks's Avatar
rot8ing
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 1
From: merritt island, fl
Originally Posted by j8635621
Ok it's bed time so I will say the answer.
Chrome is not the most loved rim choice here because of weight and it usually looks bad on a sports car.
The 20" part is no good because the bigger diameter of the rim makes the majority of that weight farther from its center, even if it is the same weight as a smaller wheel/tire. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of_inertia http://www.stockcarracing.com/techar...moi/index.html
see. i was on the right track.

Last edited by myriadshalaks; 05-02-2009 at 11:06 AM.
Old 05-02-2009 | 11:08 AM
  #43  
myriadshalaks's Avatar
rot8ing
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 1
From: merritt island, fl
Originally Posted by DubbsLuvs8s
Some of the physics up there aren't done very well.

It's a rotational system.

Torque = Moment of Inertia * Radial Acceleration.

T=I*alpha

Different rims distribute the weight of the wheel at a different distance from the center of the wheel. That increase/decreases the radius in the inertia equation, which differs with every shape, but it is a squared term in the formula.

So the lower the moment of inertia (I), the lower the amount of torque at the shaft needed to turn them for the same amount of rotational acceleration (more go fast.)

So, the most important factor is not how much the wheel weighs, but where the weight is placed relative to the center of the wheel.
i knew i was leaving something out. good job.
Old 05-02-2009 | 11:17 AM
  #44  
kersh4w's Avatar
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 3
From: DC Area
i see a major fail here. i dont believe for a second that the 20" rims were equal in weight.

cant be. first off, i doubt the company that made your rims cares about weight. 22lbs for 18" rims is actually pretty damn light. im going to guess that your 20" rims weigh about 28lbs and that your scale is off. some tires are lighter than others, but im going to say that the thinner tirewall has to be stiffer and will add weight so the a 225/45 and a 225/35 will not have a huge weight difference.

second point i want to make about inertia, the rim size DOES matter because the cylindrical portion of the rim (arguably a lot of the weight of the rim is here) is pushed out another inch. that does make a difference. especially coupled with the point that i said about tires not being a big deal here.

so, you said your rims were 50lbs, ok, im going to assume no more than a few pounds is added by the air. and im also going to say your rims were more like 55lbs. so lets say your set up weighs 7lbs more than stock.

we have already discussed how inertia is actually an issue here. the farther out an object is pushed, the "heaver" it becomes. to test this, put a 10lb weight 1 foot from your chest and hold it for 30 seconds. then, put it out at arms length.

a good rule of them is the x5 method for rotating mass. so take your 7lbs and multiply them by 5. thats 35lbs that you have effectively added PER corner. so thats 140lbs you've added to your car.

now tell me, do you notice a difference in acceleration when someone is sitting in your car with you?
Old 05-02-2009 | 12:36 PM
  #45  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
1) Center distance from hub for mass rotation
2) reduced performance
3) It will look like a Tonka toy car. Remember those yellow dumpsters?
Old 05-02-2009 | 01:12 PM
  #46  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 57
From: east of Knoxville, TN
Hustle hard Stack paper
It's alright ya'll haters
It's nothing We major
U c me Hi Hater
Old 05-02-2009 | 02:15 PM
  #47  
renesisgenesis's Avatar
mod edit
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
I think people tend to snicker a bit when they see a nice car like the 8 defiled with huge chrome rims; especially when the driver thinks he's made an improvement.

Of course people will hate on you for this. What did you expect?

I wouldn't have the ***** to show pics of my car on here if I had done that to it, so I guess I do owe you props for that.

Oh my looks like I posted another negative, insulting, pompous comment. What a surprise.
Old 05-02-2009 | 03:44 PM
  #48  
911SC's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Most people here are trying to improve the performance of their car, not slow it down.
Old 05-02-2009 | 03:56 PM
  #49  
renesisgenesis's Avatar
mod edit
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
Originally Posted by 911SC
Most people here are trying to improve the performance of their car, not slow it down.


Yeah when you consider that they even ever considered using 20 inch chrome rims, it is probably pointless to try to explain things like inertia....
Old 05-02-2009 | 04:05 PM
  #50  
911SC's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Now that you have the chrome 20's, get yourself an Escalade to put them on.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Whats the big deal with 20 inch rims?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.