Why not 17" wheels?
#1
No more parachute
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Mary, FL
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why not 17" wheels?
Why do you guys think Mazda opt for 18” wheels rather than 17”? Aside from an aesthetic reason, I can't think of a reason. While I don't know how much the 18” weight, I'll bet an equivalent (same material and design) 17” would weight less and have less rotational inertia. Seems to me conserving unsprung mass is a priority for a car with modest torque. I will probably switch to light weight 17” for track use.
#2
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems like car companies are putting bigger and bigger wheels on cars due to demand. It used to be that 20" wheels (dubs) were massive. Now it is not uncommon to see them come stock. I think it is due to the bigger is better concept that is sweeping the car industy.
#3
Originally posted by cueball1029
It seems like car companies are putting bigger and bigger wheels on cars due to demand. It used to be that 20" wheels (dubs) were massive. Now it is not uncommon to see them come stock. I think it is due to the bigger is better concept that is sweeping the car industy.
It seems like car companies are putting bigger and bigger wheels on cars due to demand. It used to be that 20" wheels (dubs) were massive. Now it is not uncommon to see them come stock. I think it is due to the bigger is better concept that is sweeping the car industy.
Last edited by sheylen; 01-23-2003 at 03:27 PM.
#4
The bigger the better... that's what everyone wants these days. At the Mazda 6 unveiling @ John Hine Mazda (San Diego) awhile back, Mark from Mazda R&D brought a silver 6 with 8 rims on it. They looked a lot better with 18s. There was one person who wanted the six with the 8 rims and thought they were a dealer add on. I smiled :D and Mark laughed. He said they are not available for the 6 because they are for the new Mazda RX-8 which is due out in the spring/summer.
#8
Originally posted by MX-Man
In order to fit big 323mm brake rotors they have to use 18 inch wheels.
In order to fit big 323mm brake rotors they have to use 18 inch wheels.
#9
Love to rev!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississauga - Ontario
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only reason imo Mazda used 18's is for the "bling" and marketing value.
I would have much preferred 17's for lower unsprung weight, better inertia and cheaper tires. Especially since the bigger brakes/rotors apparently will fit with 17's. Stupid North American "bigger is better" mentality..
![Mad](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
![Mad](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How hard would it be to adjust the speedo if you change it to 17? Is it something that can be done yourself? I too think that it's kinda contradicting to put 18in wheels on a car that is supposed to be light weight, this is not a Z06! On top of that it is rotational weight, the worst kind of all.
#12
Certifiable car nut
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you keep the overall height of the 17" tire and rim the same as the overall height of the 18" tire and rim (which is HIGHLY recommended), no adjustment to the speedo is necessary.
#13
Love to rev!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississauga - Ontario
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Hercules
I'd assume that they are lightweight rims.
I'd assume that they are lightweight rims.
The point is that exactly the same rims constructed with the same alloy/design in a 17" size would weigh less and have a lesser rotational resistance than an 18" size. So no matter how lightweight the 18's are, 17's would always be lighter aotbe. Not to mention the much lower cost of replacement tires. There is no positive about 18" wheels.. just the "look"
#14
Well if Mazda's reading *wink wink* ![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Nah, I don't care one way or another.. I figure the difference in price for tires will run at most maybe ~$100 more for the set of four, so it's not a huge setback... Just a minor one.
![Smilie](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Nah, I don't care one way or another.. I figure the difference in price for tires will run at most maybe ~$100 more for the set of four, so it's not a huge setback... Just a minor one.
#15
2009 BS Nat'l Champ
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Central CA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I got an RX-8 and used it for track duty I'd probably buy some lightweight 17x8s and slightly smaller tires to shorten the gearing a bit. From reading the speeds at which each gear tops out at, it seems the RX-8 is geared on the long side, and some shorter, closer-ratio gearing would help give it some extra oomph.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Quick_lude
The point is that exactly the same rims constructed with the same alloy/design in a 17" size would weigh less and have a lesser rotational resistance than an 18" size. So no matter how lightweight the 18's are, 17's would always be lighter aotbe. Not to mention the much lower cost of replacement tires. There is no positive about 18" wheels.. just the "look"
The point is that exactly the same rims constructed with the same alloy/design in a 17" size would weigh less and have a lesser rotational resistance than an 18" size. So no matter how lightweight the 18's are, 17's would always be lighter aotbe. Not to mention the much lower cost of replacement tires. There is no positive about 18" wheels.. just the "look"
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even assuming the metal is lighter than rubber, I think the rotational inertia is still greater. Most of the weight of the wheel is concentrated on the rim. If you are going from 17in to 18in, you are moving the radius 0.5 in from the center. The rotational inertia is mass * r^2, assuming my calculations are correct, it would increased by 12%. As for the tire, it is losing that half inch of sidewall. Doing some basic math that comes out to about 55 sq in, or .382 sq ft of less rubber, which is not very much. I think it wouldn't overcome the effect of the rim. Maybe Buger or someone can jump in and do a more precise calculation.
Last edited by DYT; 01-24-2003 at 12:58 AM.
#18
Love to rev!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississauga - Ontario
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by R.Cade
Not always true. What if the alloy was actually lighter then the rubber. Bigger rim = lower profile tire = less rubber. I think a smaller sidewall would make a run-flat tire lighter. And less sidewall usually means less flex and more performance.
Not always true. What if the alloy was actually lighter then the rubber. Bigger rim = lower profile tire = less rubber. I think a smaller sidewall would make a run-flat tire lighter. And less sidewall usually means less flex and more performance.
#21
mostly harmless
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DYT
Even assuming the metal is lighter than rubber, I think the rotational inertia is still greater. Most of the weight of the wheel is concentrated on the rim. If you are going from 17in to 18in, you are moving the radius 0.5 in from the center. The rotational inertia is mass * r^2, assuming my calculations are correct, it would increased by 12%. As for the tire, it is losing that half inch of sidewall. Doing some basic math that comes out to about 55 sq in, or .382 sq ft of less rubber, which is not very much. I think it wouldn't overcome the effect of the rim. Maybe Buger or someone can jump in and do a more precise calculation.
Even assuming the metal is lighter than rubber, I think the rotational inertia is still greater. Most of the weight of the wheel is concentrated on the rim. If you are going from 17in to 18in, you are moving the radius 0.5 in from the center. The rotational inertia is mass * r^2, assuming my calculations are correct, it would increased by 12%. As for the tire, it is losing that half inch of sidewall. Doing some basic math that comes out to about 55 sq in, or .382 sq ft of less rubber, which is not very much. I think it wouldn't overcome the effect of the rim. Maybe Buger or someone can jump in and do a more precise calculation.
okay, i'll make this blunt, and easy to understand: solid metal alloy is NOT less dense than thin rubber and assorted light material lamenant filled with pressurized air. for any given wheel of the same overall diameter, it will ALWAYS be lighter with a taller side wall and smaller rim+hub assembly, all other things equal.
'nuff said.
another thing, losing area of rubber on road doesn't necessarily decrease grip. it's late, so i'll explain again later if someone asks. it does in the real world, more so at the limit than normal driving, but statically, no.
Last edited by wakeech; 01-24-2003 at 03:48 AM.
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Hercules
Actually you can fit a bare minimum of a 17" rim on there, even with the upgrade brakes.
Actually you can fit a bare minimum of a 17" rim on there, even with the upgrade brakes.
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sudbury, ON Canada
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Buger
Sheylen is allowed to have a VW bug in his avatar isn't he?
:D
Sheylen is allowed to have a VW bug in his avatar isn't he?
![Wink](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
:D
#25
Originally posted by zoom44
Sheylen! your avatar tsk tsk tsk
Originally posted by Buger
Sheylen is allowed to have a VW bug in his avatar isn't he?
posted by WankelWannabe
What are you talking about Buger? That is clearly an Audi TT in his avatar!
I think Buger knows best (as usual) it is a bug!:o
Sheylen! your avatar tsk tsk tsk
Originally posted by Buger
Sheylen is allowed to have a VW bug in his avatar isn't he?
posted by WankelWannabe
What are you talking about Buger? That is clearly an Audi TT in his avatar!
I think Buger knows best (as usual) it is a bug!:o