Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

why not a 6 rotor motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-04-2003 | 04:53 PM
  #26  
ZoomBlack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
A six rotor would have SERIOUS issues with eccentric shaft rigidity. Like NA-only-drag-car-1-season-then-its-done issues. would still be freakin cool, though.

BTW, I'm gonna build a compound forced induction (SC + turbo) for my project car. Its still in the "restore donor" phase right now, though.


EDIT: WTF!?! I'm not ZoomBlack...... ???
Old 12-04-2003 | 04:58 PM
  #27  
CypherNinja's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Fixed!! But, what the heck was that.

^
|
|
| Thats me above, weird. Forum screwed up. Never heard of ZoomBlack.
Old 12-04-2003 | 05:15 PM
  #28  
Kev's Avatar
Kev
[rapidus octus]
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
I like the idea of lots of rotors - but with a much smaller capacity...

How smoothe would a six rotor be with 300~350cc per rotor??? It's not going to happen until the design can become more fuel efficient.

Funny when you think about it - there haven't really been that many true inventors over the years. There's a lot of innovation and refinement, integration and optimisation, but not much that's truly new.
Old 12-04-2003 | 07:24 PM
  #29  
P00Man's Avatar
uhhhhh....hello?
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
i dont think they can use 3 rotors anymore because the overlap allows the unburned hydro carbons to escape

thats why they went to side porting
________
Depakote lawsuit info

Last edited by P00Man; 04-16-2011 at 08:52 PM.
Old 12-04-2003 | 10:37 PM
  #30  
Senseny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Phila suburbs
Why not a 22 rotor motor, it should make a whopping 2600 hp and would be lighter than a 16 cylinder engine. c'mon ya'll know ya want it and ya can shift it mad quick yo! I'll bet 0-60 would be sub 4 second, dallmmmmnnn dog!
Old 12-04-2003 | 10:40 PM
  #31  
Senseny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Phila suburbs
Kev, back to a relatively serious note. The internal combustion engine has been around for 100+ years. Most of the performance upgrades (super and turbos, ICs, etc) have been out there for 70+ years. Even our beloved Wankel has been around for quite a while. Truly new technology is very hard to come by. It seems like we just keep getting improved versions of what we already have. Something truly new and innovative would be refreshing.
Old 12-05-2003 | 02:57 AM
  #32  
RobDickinson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Senseny
Kev, back to a relatively serious note. The internal combustion engine has been around for 100+ years. Most of the performance upgrades (super and turbos, ICs, etc) have been out there for 70+ years. Even our beloved Wankel has been around for quite a while. Truly new technology is very hard to come by. It seems like we just keep getting improved versions of what we already have. Something truly new and innovative would be refreshing.
Theres plenty of improvements though, new stuff.

VTeck, variable capacity, electrostatic(camles)valves, common rail,multi valve ,new materials (alloys,ceramics) etc.

The piston engine has had an lot more man hours of development time than rotaries.
Old 12-05-2003 | 07:51 AM
  #33  
Senseny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Phila suburbs
Absolutely the improvements are phenomenal. I am just saying the original technology is over 100 years old. Its lasted becuase it works and much of our economy is based on it.
Old 12-05-2003 | 09:18 AM
  #34  
Beemer's Avatar
Technical prodigy
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Belgium - Diepenbeek
It would be nice to have a 6 rotor in the back of a Lambo Replica. Would smoke all original Lambo's :D

...Just dreaming...
Old 12-05-2003 | 09:49 AM
  #35  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
I'll settle for a 2 rotor with 1.6 displacement, and lower compression rotors for FI.
Old 03-14-2008 | 03:12 AM
  #36  
obsolute's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0


They tried to build an 8 rotor motor, but it kept twisting eccentric shafts. I think they even tried to build one out of titanium and it died too.
Old 03-14-2008 | 08:08 AM
  #37  
TheWulf's Avatar
My 8 looks like a Smurf
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Let's just make the rotors stackable so we can add as many as we can fit
Old 03-14-2008 | 08:15 AM
  #38  
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,527
Likes: 68
From: LA
They are stackable...
Old 03-14-2008 | 09:41 AM
  #39  
T-von's Avatar
The game changer!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
Likes: 1
From: Tx
Originally Posted by ZoomBlack
A six rotor would have SERIOUS issues with eccentric shaft rigidity.

Not if they engineer the 6 lobe e-shaft to have support bearings in the side housings to cut down on flexing. It would be no different than any in-line 6 cylinder engine with 7 main bearings. I don't see the 2Jz Supra engine having crank shaft problems. It's all in how you engineer it.

Last edited by T-von; 03-14-2008 at 09:48 AM.
Old 03-14-2008 | 09:45 AM
  #40  
T-von's Avatar
The game changer!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
Likes: 1
From: Tx
Originally Posted by obsolute


They tried to build an 8 rotor motor, but it kept twisting eccentric shafts. I think they even tried to build one out of titanium and it died too.




Stacking a rotary isn't the hard part. Knowing how to properly engineer the e-shaft is something obviously out of Hurley Engineering's capability. That's why it failed.

Last edited by T-von; 03-14-2008 at 09:49 AM.
Old 03-14-2008 | 10:13 AM
  #41  
1.3L's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by tribal azn2
why not 8
How about two 3-rotors, side by side. Or even two 4-rotors. What a plumbing nightmare that would be! LOL!


1.3L
Old 03-14-2008 | 10:43 AM
  #42  
Uncivilizedracer's Avatar
Turbo SR20deT Son!
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: North. dallas(Texas)
Are we really doing this ?
Old 03-14-2008 | 10:59 AM
  #43  
CyberPitz's Avatar
Huge hole is huge
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 1
From: Joplin, MO
Originally Posted by Uncivilizedracer
Are we really doing this ?
Haha, I wish!

I'd settle with just being able to sit in a 3 rotor car. I've seen enough videos to know I want to own one some day...
Old 03-14-2008 | 11:09 AM
  #44  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
5 year old thread
Old 03-14-2008 | 11:15 AM
  #45  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
i loled at the post date..........
Old 03-14-2008 | 11:16 AM
  #46  
CyberPitz's Avatar
Huge hole is huge
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 1
From: Joplin, MO
Originally Posted by zoom44
5 year old thread
At least he searched
Old 03-14-2008 | 12:18 PM
  #47  
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,527
Likes: 68
From: LA
Originally Posted by 1.3L
How about two 3-rotors, side by side. Or even two 4-rotors. What a plumbing nightmare that would be! LOL!


1.3L
Would that be a V 6 rotor?... Damn I have no idea...
Old 03-14-2008 | 12:22 PM
  #48  
CyberPitz's Avatar
Huge hole is huge
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 1
From: Joplin, MO
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
Would that be a V 6 rotor?... Damn I have no idea...
*Universe implodes*
Old 03-14-2008 | 12:34 PM
  #49  
8 Maniac's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 1
From: Aki City, Japan
how would that make a V? it'd me more like... oo..... the infinity engine... someone make that. now.
Old 03-14-2008 | 12:36 PM
  #50  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
No, it'll become a supercharger!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:R...iston_pump.svg

It's still a rotary except it's not a triangle type rotary!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: why not a 6 rotor motor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.