Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

16X At Least 6 YEARS AWAY or More..

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-20-2007 | 10:09 PM
  #1  
ASH8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 327
From: Australia
16X At Least 6 YEARS AWAY or More..

Extract 'attachment' from the December 07 Issue of WHEELS mag talking to Seiji Tashima a Mazda planning executive working on the 16X Rotary program.
Attached Thumbnails 16X At Least 6 YEARS AWAY or More..-wheels-16x.jpg  
Old 11-20-2007 | 10:20 PM
  #2  
ASH8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 327
From: Australia
SO what does Mazda do to the current 13B RENESIS now obviously going to be around for some time yet.

It appears that the next generation RX-8 will happen but with what power plant?, can Mazda extract any more HP from the 13B without using FI and All the associated issues that this add on creates like more gas consumption, extra cost, emissions and reliability.
DI wont happen with this 13B version.
Supercharge maybe?
Old 11-20-2007 | 10:37 PM
  #3  
refugeefrompistons's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
aww, shoot. Does that also mean that the next generation Rx-8 is not due until then? Now that makes me sad.
Old 11-20-2007 | 11:56 PM
  #4  
Old Rotor's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
I feel there will be further development of the 13B. We will see more power before the 16X comes out. Cant get the 16X here too soon though.
Old 11-21-2007 | 12:16 AM
  #5  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
All the article says is "early teens" so where did the inference of 5-6 years come from?
Old 11-21-2007 | 12:42 AM
  #6  
T-von's Avatar
The game changer!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 298
Likes: 1
From: Tx
Originally Posted by LionZoo
All the article says is "early teens" so where did the inference of 5-6 years come from?


Dude use basic math. 2013 (early teens) is 5-6 years from now.
Old 11-21-2007 | 01:34 AM
  #7  
shaunv74's Avatar
Power!!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 3
From: Sunny See attle
I've heard 2010 and 2011. That equals 3-4 years. Still basic math.
Old 11-21-2007 | 02:30 AM
  #8  
RXei8ht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Hmm... Very Interesting..
Old 11-21-2007 | 03:21 AM
  #9  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by shaunv74
I've heard 2010 and 2011. That equals 3-4 years. Still basic math.
And still early teens.
Old 11-21-2007 | 03:29 AM
  #10  
ASH8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 327
From: Australia
Early 'teens' mean 2013, two thousand and thirteen" or two thousand and fourteen, or fifteen, or so on... when I went to school 2013 minus 2007 === 6 years.

2010 or 2011 are not "teen" years.

Last edited by ASH8; 11-21-2007 at 03:31 AM.
Old 11-21-2007 | 04:12 AM
  #11  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Haven't you ozzies heard of eleventeen and twelveteen?
Old 11-21-2007 | 04:21 AM
  #12  
enforcer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane
Poor choice of words in the magazine. I think 3 - 4 years is a more realistic time frame....
Old 11-21-2007 | 04:25 AM
  #13  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by ASH8
Early 'teens' mean 2013, two thousand and thirteen" or two thousand and fourteen, or fifteen, or so on... when I went to school 2013 minus 2007 === 6 years.

2010 or 2011 are not "teen" years.
I think in this case teens means anything in the '10 decade. Calender date doesn't have the same rules as age.
Old 11-21-2007 | 04:41 AM
  #14  
erx8s's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
As long as the 16X has a lot fewer quirks than the RX8 , Personally i dont mind if they take their time .

We have had more problems with the RX8 than the changed number of Kinky Avatars in ..................Mazdamaniacs .............. Posts

I hope they get the 16X a hell of a lot more reliable with more usable torque

Cheers
Michael
Old 11-21-2007 | 05:11 AM
  #15  
ASH8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 327
From: Australia
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Haven't you ozzies heard of eleventeen and twelveteen?

NO, But now I have!!!
Old 11-21-2007 | 07:15 AM
  #16  
m477's Avatar
rotary courage
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Originally Posted by ASH8
Extract 'attachment' from the December 07 Issue of WHEELS mag talking to Seiji Tashima a Mazda planning executive working on the 16X Rotary program.
Since he's Japanese, it's most likely that this is simply a mistaken English translation. I'd bet anything what he meant was "early next decade."
Old 11-21-2007 | 09:50 AM
  #17  
fmzambon's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 3
From: Reggio Emilia - Italy
Originally Posted by Old Rotor
I feel there will be further development of the 13B. We will see more power before the 16X comes out. Cant get the 16X here too soon though.
Didn't the Senku prototype feature a DI Renesis? It's possible (IMHO) that a DI version of the 13b family might be brought on the streets. Not something extreme, just a mixed system with a low(ish) pressure DI system and standard port injectors.
Better performance and fuel consumption, plus it would provide Mazda engineers with a lot of experience with DI on a rotary in real world conditions.
It would not be a huge improvement, but it would be better than nothing. Particularly considering how it could be used to further improve the 16x design at a relatively low cost.
Old 11-21-2007 | 10:04 AM
  #18  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 25
From: Houston
Look how long it took the side port rotary to come out. The RX-01 first showed the 13B-MSP back in '95 or so. There is also the possibility that we'll never see a 16X make production. In '88 they showed off an all aluminum 3 rotor that had ceramic seals yet we never saw that. We also never saw the 15A or 21A become reality.

With gas prices the way they are now and the way they are rising, who knows what will happen? Car manufacturers make decisions all the time that could scrap projects that have been yeas in development. I don't want to see this happen with the 16X but until production becomes a reality, anything is possible. I love that they are still working hard on the rotary but until we get actual word of a release date, I'm going to just keep on worrying about the 13B and how to improve it.
Old 11-21-2007 | 10:35 AM
  #19  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
i think they should add DI as fmzambon said, that should increase gas mileage a little and make more people interested. i agree with what RG said, and i think we should all take this with a grain of salt. For now we should just focus on improving our own engines. If you are bored, go out and drive. there are always new roads to concour
Old 11-21-2007 | 11:11 AM
  #20  
The Mighty Red's Avatar
Rally Car Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 277
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Maybe they'll just decide to go electric. Now that Tesla Motors (http://www.teslamotors.com/) has successfully pulled off the electric sports car (0 - 60 in less than 4 seconds, top speed 125, maximum range 245 miles on a charge) maybe more companies will start jumping on it.

If Mazda can do it affordably, I would buy it. I really would. Especially if they could get specs close to those.
Old 11-21-2007 | 12:49 PM
  #21  
kiyoshi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
I read a blog where the blogger asked mazda staffs at Tokyo motor show about 16x. According to them, development of 16x is just on a start line. Emission and gas mileage are the top priority things to test, then they will looking for power and characteristic for product which will mount 16x.

My optimistic guess is 3 to 4 years to develop/test 16x. But the biggest concern is the high gas price. If gas price will go up more and more, negative marketing decision might make 16x development delay or kill, I guess.
Old 11-21-2007 | 01:11 PM
  #22  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
BUT as gas prices go up, and the rotary fans are still there, the fans might complain or push for them to get it done, so we could see it sooner
Old 11-21-2007 | 01:16 PM
  #23  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
6 YEARS?!?!?! WTJFN&Y^@YN

good god, so what are they gonna do in the mean time? please sell ur mazda stocks..........
Old 11-21-2007 | 01:25 PM
  #24  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
if you sell the stocks, then they will really not develop the 16x, they will have no money
Old 11-21-2007 | 01:42 PM
  #25  
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
tjb
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 877
Likes: 2
From: Louisiana
If it was ready now It would be a disaster. I'd say 2-3 years the market will adjust from the gas and housing woes and mazda will throw in the right car at the right time. I've said this before, we are fortunate we even got the 8 so I'm thankful. If it takes 5 years I'm fine with that, as long as they just don't throw in the towel.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 16X At Least 6 YEARS AWAY or More..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.