16X At Least 6 YEARS AWAY or More..
#1
16X At Least 6 YEARS AWAY or More..
Extract 'attachment' from the December 07 Issue of WHEELS mag talking to Seiji Tashima a Mazda planning executive working on the 16X Rotary program.
#2
SO what does Mazda do to the current 13B RENESIS now obviously going to be around for some time yet.
It appears that the next generation RX-8 will happen but with what power plant?, can Mazda extract any more HP from the 13B without using FI and All the associated issues that this add on creates like more gas consumption, extra cost, emissions and reliability.
DI wont happen with this 13B version.
Supercharge maybe?
It appears that the next generation RX-8 will happen but with what power plant?, can Mazda extract any more HP from the 13B without using FI and All the associated issues that this add on creates like more gas consumption, extra cost, emissions and reliability.
DI wont happen with this 13B version.
Supercharge maybe?
#10
Early 'teens' mean 2013, two thousand and thirteen" or two thousand and fourteen, or fifteen, or so on... when I went to school 2013 minus 2007 === 6 years.
2010 or 2011 are not "teen" years.
2010 or 2011 are not "teen" years.
Last edited by ASH8; 11-21-2007 at 03:31 AM.
#13
I think in this case teens means anything in the '10 decade. Calender date doesn't have the same rules as age.
#14
As long as the 16X has a lot fewer quirks than the RX8 , Personally i dont mind if they take their time .
We have had more problems with the RX8 than the changed number of Kinky Avatars in ..................Mazdamaniacs .............. Posts
I hope they get the 16X a hell of a lot more reliable with more usable torque
Cheers
Michael
We have had more problems with the RX8 than the changed number of Kinky Avatars in ..................Mazdamaniacs .............. Posts
I hope they get the 16X a hell of a lot more reliable with more usable torque
Cheers
Michael
#16
Since he's Japanese, it's most likely that this is simply a mistaken English translation. I'd bet anything what he meant was "early next decade."
#17
Better performance and fuel consumption, plus it would provide Mazda engineers with a lot of experience with DI on a rotary in real world conditions.
It would not be a huge improvement, but it would be better than nothing. Particularly considering how it could be used to further improve the 16x design at a relatively low cost.
#18
Look how long it took the side port rotary to come out. The RX-01 first showed the 13B-MSP back in '95 or so. There is also the possibility that we'll never see a 16X make production. In '88 they showed off an all aluminum 3 rotor that had ceramic seals yet we never saw that. We also never saw the 15A or 21A become reality.
With gas prices the way they are now and the way they are rising, who knows what will happen? Car manufacturers make decisions all the time that could scrap projects that have been yeas in development. I don't want to see this happen with the 16X but until production becomes a reality, anything is possible. I love that they are still working hard on the rotary but until we get actual word of a release date, I'm going to just keep on worrying about the 13B and how to improve it.
With gas prices the way they are now and the way they are rising, who knows what will happen? Car manufacturers make decisions all the time that could scrap projects that have been yeas in development. I don't want to see this happen with the 16X but until production becomes a reality, anything is possible. I love that they are still working hard on the rotary but until we get actual word of a release date, I'm going to just keep on worrying about the 13B and how to improve it.
#19
i think they should add DI as fmzambon said, that should increase gas mileage a little and make more people interested. i agree with what RG said, and i think we should all take this with a grain of salt. For now we should just focus on improving our own engines. If you are bored, go out and drive. there are always new roads to concour
#20
Maybe they'll just decide to go electric. Now that Tesla Motors (http://www.teslamotors.com/) has successfully pulled off the electric sports car (0 - 60 in less than 4 seconds, top speed 125, maximum range 245 miles on a charge) maybe more companies will start jumping on it.
If Mazda can do it affordably, I would buy it. I really would. Especially if they could get specs close to those.
If Mazda can do it affordably, I would buy it. I really would. Especially if they could get specs close to those.
#21
I read a blog where the blogger asked mazda staffs at Tokyo motor show about 16x. According to them, development of 16x is just on a start line. Emission and gas mileage are the top priority things to test, then they will looking for power and characteristic for product which will mount 16x.
My optimistic guess is 3 to 4 years to develop/test 16x. But the biggest concern is the high gas price. If gas price will go up more and more, negative marketing decision might make 16x development delay or kill, I guess.
My optimistic guess is 3 to 4 years to develop/test 16x. But the biggest concern is the high gas price. If gas price will go up more and more, negative marketing decision might make 16x development delay or kill, I guess.
#25
If it was ready now It would be a disaster. I'd say 2-3 years the market will adjust from the gas and housing woes and mazda will throw in the right car at the right time. I've said this before, we are fortunate we even got the 8 so I'm thankful. If it takes 5 years I'm fine with that, as long as they just don't throw in the towel.