Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Autoweek has the story...

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-27-2003, 03:57 PM
  #1  
Accumulator
Thread Starter
 
Steve T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Weatherford,TX
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Autoweek has the "Official" story...

Did not see this posted yet so here you go:

http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content...._code=00435633


Mazda sez: "Mazda officials say after modifying the car’s powertrain control module to meet required federal emissions standards, the RX-8 with manual transmission is producing 238 hp, down from the promised 247 hp, while the automatic- trans model is down 10 hp to 197 hp. Mazda says the drop in power doesn’t affect the car’s 0-to-60-mph times, however."


Last edited by Steve T; 08-27-2003 at 04:02 PM.
Steve T is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:05 PM
  #2  
Ero-sennin
 
BRx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
and the powertrain contol module = ecu?
BRx8 is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:21 PM
  #3  
8 the HARD way.
 
RX-Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Things that make you go Hmmm.......
RX-Nut is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:30 PM
  #4  
Rotary Abuser
 
Gyro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes....Powertrain control Module is another way of saying ECU.

BTW this is the first I've ever heard Mazda specifying the Modification of our ECU's! We knew it anyways.....

Last edited by Gyro; 08-27-2003 at 04:33 PM.
Gyro is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 04:48 PM
  #5  
8 the HARD way.
 
RX-Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aha.. and so that means the changes to the ECU is quite possibly holding back the engine?

Hmmm.. More fire for BOOSTD7's quest.
RX-Nut is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 05:15 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Gord96BRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
... more fire to forget about getting a fix from Mazda - we just need somebody who can flash ECUs and who can develop a different set of parameters that will develop the extra power. Get a bunch of ECUs to send out on an exchange basis, and we're set. Someone needs to get the ECU flashing setup and get busy! For an experienced engine ECU tuner (TEC II/III, haltech, etc) this should be easy.

Regards,
Gordon
Gord96BRG is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 05:23 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
RX8-U-UP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Fort Walton Beach, Florida
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds a lot like my deductive post from last weeks "heres the letter" thread.

"I believe that this car showed up at America's door with 247HP. It did not meet our EPA standards, waited at all the ports until parts and equipment could be sent to all the ports to reburn ECU proms that would meets the EPA standards (remember the minimum 3 week wait at all ports for no reason). There will be aftermarket chips that will recover all that was lost, plus. Just my opinion. But it kind of explains the whole port hush, hush, thing.
Mazda would not nowingly inport another car after past problems and repercusions. They have spent the last 2 month (quick in corporate time) coming up with an acceptable remedy for the problem."

I hope that this part of my deduction will come true also:

"They are probably leaking good solid burn info to aftermarket companies as we speak, to further remedy the situation."

But this part of my post was not a guess, I mean deduction.

"I'm quite happy with whatever is coming out of it, and the money and service is a bonus."
RX8-U-UP is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 05:30 PM
  #8  
Love to rev!
 
Quick_lude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississauga - Ontario
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's convienient how they don't mention the effect of reduced power on the 1/4 mile times, only 0-60. For those that have done it, do you hit 60mph in first gear? If so, at what rpm?

So I guess this also means that Mazda admits to not putting the reflashed cars on the dyno to see if the new program affected the engine in any way? Or maybe they knew and hoped that people wouldn't notice? Interesting..

Last edited by Quick_lude; 08-27-2003 at 05:36 PM.
Quick_lude is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 06:04 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Wing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa,ON
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
60mph in first gear???? No way 2nd yes.
Wing is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 12:20 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
rx8daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2nd gear, 9000 RPM = 68MPH...
rx8daniel is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 07:50 AM
  #11  
Love to rev!
 
Quick_lude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississauga - Ontario
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by rx8daniel
2nd gear, 9000 RPM = 68MPH...
So 1st gear, 9500rpm, 60mph? :D
Quick_lude is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 11:13 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Zaphod's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got 45 mph in 1st at redline on my test drive.

Not the AutoWeek article said "federal" standards, not just Kalifornya.
Zaphod is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Truss
RX-8 Discussion
32
08-27-2004 08:12 PM
The_Bean
RX-8 Media News
7
07-24-2004 02:08 PM
ALMOST8IT
RX-8 Media News
8
07-20-2004 11:14 PM
RenoIV
RX-8 Media News
3
05-28-2004 02:12 PM
ggreen29
RX-8 Media News
6
09-15-2003 09:18 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Autoweek has the story...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.