Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Comment about RX-8 shows up in Feb/2007 Road&Track issue!

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-04-2007, 09:06 AM
  #1  
1.21 Jiggawatts
Thread Starter
 
Stavesacre21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lima, OH
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comment about RX-8 shows up in Feb/2007 Road&Track issue!

After reading the article 2 months back entitled "12 Best Cars under $30K", I was so shocked about the 8's absence that I sent R&T an e-mail asking about it's strange disappearance. I never heard back from them. However, I was a little shocked after flipping through this months issue to find that my comment (or part of it) was published under "Your Turn".

I know I shouldn't knock the publicity, but I was STILL a little mad that I never got an answer to my question. At any rate, I was glad to get my $0.02 in for the masses to remember...the 8's still around. Rather unchanged, but still here.

Take a look for yourself...it's the 3rd comment over from Andrew



My full comment I sent in to them read this:

I was rather surprised to find that the RX-8 was excluded from the best 12 cars under $30k in December’s issue. With other such runners as the Scion tC TRD, Mini Cooper and Volkswagen GTI, one can only help but wonder why the perfectly balanced, smooth revving RX-8 was so quickly forgotten. Torque issues aside, how does Mazda's flagstaff performance based sports car teamed with an impressive $26K price tag not appeal to a sports car enthusiasts crowd? When it comes to enthusiasts, I've found that the rotary engine has one of the most devoted followings I've ever seen.
Stavesacre21 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 09:18 AM
  #2  
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
StealthTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A Pacific Island.
Posts: 7,282
Received 174 Likes on 131 Posts
Cool Well said.....

Good letter!

S
StealthTL is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 09:19 AM
  #3  
I am a meat popcicle
 
TownDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: So CA
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
When I read that comment in the issue, I knew it had to be someone from this board. Way to go!
TownDrunk is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 09:35 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Endgame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good Job!
Endgame is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 10:07 AM
  #5  
Scuderia
iTrader: (6)
 
RA-Eight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Buckeye Country
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How did R&T quote you? And did they have a response? Sorry, I don't have the mag in front of me.
RA-Eight is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 10:08 AM
  #6  
i pwn therefore i am
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That'll teach them to write articles that help them sell magazines and increase their ad revenue! Oh wait...

Kudos for writing in, but that whole article was a joke. I have never met anyone with a 350Z who has gotten it for under $30k. And as I recall the performance numbers they got were of dubious value.
saturn is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 10:23 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
rotary crazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^well said ^^
rotary crazy is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 10:29 AM
  #8  
tjb
 
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
A decent mag would respond to comments by the readers. Personally I could care less since I don't read crappy magazines and know for a fact I got one of the best cars for under 30K. It may not be the best but it deserved a look, along with several other cars.
tjbourgoyne is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 11:25 AM
  #9  
T-29 years and counting
iTrader: (3)
 
lesper4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Fontana, CA.
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sweet! I like to see that they listen.
lesper4 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 12:08 PM
  #10  
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Jedi54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 22,411
Received 2,718 Likes on 1,959 Posts
Nice letter!
I would imagine the reason they didn't respond is because it would be awfully tough to argue with your letter. (AND Nissan pays them more for advertising)
Jedi54 is online now  
Old 01-04-2007, 12:14 PM
  #11  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The fact that they printed his letter means that it was well written and he had a point. What do you expect them to say in a reply. This was a passive way to say we blew it.
alnielsen is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 12:31 PM
  #12  
I am a meat popcicle
 
TownDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: So CA
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've subscribed to R&T since '86 (wow... I just realized I've been reading that thing for a really, really long time)... Anyhow, they rarely respond to letters. Sometimes they do, but it's not the norm.
TownDrunk is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 12:31 PM
  #13  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
yeah usually when a magazine just publish a reader comment w/o replies, that means they agree with your point of view, so +1 for you!
ZoomZoomH is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 12:56 PM
  #14  
doin' the bull dance
 
dmc27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Quahog, RI
Posts: 3,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ right on.

You posted this letter in a thread (bitchfest, lol) when you send it, right? Kudos.

Like a few have said - they publish letters that are well written & have a valid point. Combine Al & Jedi's posts and expand a little & you get the real answer:

"We can't argue this point, we blew it, but it's only b/c we value Nissan's money over actual journalistic integrity."

dmc27 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 02:15 PM
  #15  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alnielsen
The fact that they printed his letter means that it was well written and he had a point. What do you expect them to say in a reply. This was a passive way to say we blew it.
No, it was a way for them to show how every person with a car that didn't make the list had a gripe.
Ike is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 03:31 PM
  #16  
tjb
 
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
If I'm an author of an article and it is flawed and brought to my attention, I would admit it or explain the reason why it is the way it is. Now if I write for Teen Beat or Crappy Car Mag Extreme printing your comment is good enough and you get a free sticker.
tjbourgoyne is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 03:51 PM
  #17  
RRDI Member
 
Hotsauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too was wondering about why the 8 was left out, so I did a search on R&T forums and found these replies from the editor.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/idealbb/...&searchstring=
Hotsauce is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 04:02 PM
  #18  
tjb
 
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
So what he is saying is that they left out the part that states "cars we chose to look at" to mislead the reader into thinking they were going to get a real idea of what is out there. Looks like he took the same approach for the frames on his glasses under $30.
tjbourgoyne is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 04:08 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Endgame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hotsauce
I too was wondering about why the 8 was left out, so I did a search on R&T forums and found these replies from the editor.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/idealbb/...&searchstring=
I guess that makes sense, kind of. But it is still bull. If Mazda happens to have three cars in this category, then that means that Mazda is the company to go to if you want a great sports car for under 30k; simple as that. You can have your mix of three different types of 'sporty'. Good point brought up earlier that, for the most part, only the base Z is less than 30. They should have looked at comparatively equipped autos trim level wise.. That will show a more accurate 'best bang for the buck' comparison... Just my .02..
Endgame is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 04:13 PM
  #20  
doin' the bull dance
 
dmc27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Quahog, RI
Posts: 3,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This comment should bring the resident fanbois out pretty quick:

"I would agree the RX-8 is an easier car to drive, as it has less torque, softer ride quality, and a lighter feel. The Z will hang the rear end out more easily, especialy on a bump road. That's probably how most people scare themselves. To avoid such things and go even faster get the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and drive a 4-door that will beat the $(&* out of the Z, RX-8 and even an S2000."
dmc27 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 04:26 PM
  #21  
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Spin9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Hotsauce
I too was wondering about why the 8 was left out, so I did a search on R&T forums and found these replies from the editor.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/idealbb/...&searchstring=
Although I agree they blew it by not including the 8 vs. over some of their lame choices, in S Bailey's defense, at least the guy was honest and didn't BS the person questioning their choices. His answer said a lot.

It's a cop out to say that we included 2 Mazdas, can't do 3, but I'll agree the consumer's have lost interest so I guess like lemmings they have as well. Bottom line, the problem is more correctly put in Mazda's lap for virtually abandoning any meaningful refresh of the car's shortcomings (power) over 4 yrs time and even excluding it from brand awareness by leaving it out of most of its commercials. Sorta the bastard child syndrome, eventually people get the message and everyone begins to shun it, regardless of it's merits.
Spin9k is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 04:28 PM
  #22  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
No, it was a way for them to show how every person with a car that didn't make the list had a gripe.
Attached Thumbnails Comment about RX-8 shows up in Feb/2007 Road&Track issue!-ike1.jpg  
shaunv74 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 05:01 PM
  #23  
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Rootski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WHOA! I got published too! ("Cadet Travis Root" is me.) I had no idea.
Rootski is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 05:29 PM
  #24  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My RX8 started out just slightly over $30K, but now with all my mods, I'm over $40K YIKES!

(And I still don't have a blower on it...)

But, with 50,000 miles of trouble free service, I really cannot complain. Looking forward to the ride home in my beloved 8.
Nemesis8 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 06:21 PM
  #25  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hotsauce
I too was wondering about why the 8 was left out, so I did a search on R&T forums and found these replies from the editor.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/idealbb/...&searchstring=

Looks like I was pretty close, he was just a little more PC. It's hard work being right all the time.

Originally Posted by Ike

More of our readers care about the 350Z, and Mini, and we'll keep testing them as things keep getting improved on those models. The RX-8 hasn't had a damn thing done to it in over 3 years. In other words, RX-8 owners can suck it!

Sincerly,
Road and Track
Originally Posted by Ike
The biggest reason the RX-8 didn't make the list IMO is because it's the same car it was in 2003 when it was released. Mazda hasn't done anything to improve the car and for that reason maybe it doesn't deserve to make the list <shrugs>
Ike is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Comment about RX-8 shows up in Feb/2007 Road&Track issue!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.