Consumers Reports does the RX-8
11-07-2003, 06:55 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Consumer Reports article on rx8
Latest issue of CR just came out -- compared rx8 to STi, EVO, 350Z and Crossfire. The 8 came in 2nd in overall score to STi, but didn't make the "recommended" list because it's new.
Highs -- Smooth-revving engine, handling, ride, shifter, braking, 4-passenger capacity
Lows -- fuel economy
As a point of comparison, since 350Z seems to be the most popular comparison car on this board:
350 Highs: Acceleration, braking, fuel economy
Lows: Ride, noise, visibility, trunk capacity
Other comparisons:
0-60: rx8 6.7, Z 5.4
Quarter mile: rx8 15.2, Z 14.0
Article also claims that 8 requires premium fuel.
Highs -- Smooth-revving engine, handling, ride, shifter, braking, 4-passenger capacity
Lows -- fuel economy
As a point of comparison, since 350Z seems to be the most popular comparison car on this board:
350 Highs: Acceleration, braking, fuel economy
Lows: Ride, noise, visibility, trunk capacity
Other comparisons:
0-60: rx8 6.7, Z 5.4
Quarter mile: rx8 15.2, Z 14.0
Article also claims that 8 requires premium fuel.
11-07-2003, 07:19 PM
#2
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The STi is such an ugly piece of crap and they don't handle as well as the RX-8, I can't believe they would chose the STi over the RX-8. The wing on the STi is useless and ugly unless you use it for having picnics on. Lastly, everyone knows AWD cars don't handle well and the interior in the STi is made of recycled milk cartons. I'm canceling my subscription to Consumer Reports!
That should about sum it up...
That should about sum it up...
11-07-2003, 07:22 PM
#3
I see you
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by IkeWRX
The STi is such an ugly piece of crap and they don't handle as well as the RX-8, I can't believe they would chose the STi over the RX-8. The wing on the STi is useless and ugly unless you use it for having picnics on. Lastly, everyone knows AWD cars don't handle well and the interior in the STi is made of recycled milk cartons. I'm canceling my subscription to Consumer Reports!
That should about sum it up...
The STi is such an ugly piece of crap and they don't handle as well as the RX-8, I can't believe they would chose the STi over the RX-8. The wing on the STi is useless and ugly unless you use it for having picnics on. Lastly, everyone knows AWD cars don't handle well and the interior in the STi is made of recycled milk cartons. I'm canceling my subscription to Consumer Reports!
That should about sum it up...
My god, people CAN change
11-07-2003, 08:41 PM
#5
Registered
Originally posted by IkeWRX
That should about sum it up...
That should about sum it up...
Hey Ike, how about you and us go find a 350Z forum and brag about how our tarted-up economy cars and wimpy no-torque rotary cars beat the 350Z in that CR test? :P :D
Regards,
Gordon
Last edited by Gord96BRG; 11-07-2003 at 08:44 PM.
11-07-2003, 08:51 PM
#6
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Gord96BRG
Not nearly! You missed the Blue350Z et al Z lovers replies about how there's no possible way the RX-8 could rank ahead of the 350Z, why just look at the 0-60 and 1/4 mi times, CR doesn't have a clue about testing sports cars, they should stick to washing machines, Mazda must have paid off CR big time!
Hey Ike, how about you and us go find a 350Z forum and brag about how our tarted-up economy cars and wimpy no-torque rotary cars beat the 350Z in that CR test? :P :D
Regards,
Gordon
Not nearly! You missed the Blue350Z et al Z lovers replies about how there's no possible way the RX-8 could rank ahead of the 350Z, why just look at the 0-60 and 1/4 mi times, CR doesn't have a clue about testing sports cars, they should stick to washing machines, Mazda must have paid off CR big time!
Hey Ike, how about you and us go find a 350Z forum and brag about how our tarted-up economy cars and wimpy no-torque rotary cars beat the 350Z in that CR test? :P :D
Regards,
Gordon
11-07-2003, 08:54 PM
#7
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alto, Michigan
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Consumers Reports does the RX-8
Just got the December 2003 issue. They review the WRX STi, RX-8, Mitsubishi Evo, 350Z and the Crossfire.
They gave the WRX the highest score, but it appears to be because they don't have crash and reliability data on the RX-8.
CR's "Recommended" status evidently cannot be given to a car they haven't crashed and "long term tested".
Only significant bone I had with the article was the statement that rotary engines "emissions aren't as clean" [as piston engines].
I've been trying to find the actual emissions numbers for the RX-8, after reading a great thread authored by Buger. A Road & Track article states that the Renesis engine has "reduce[d] exhaust emmisions to one tenth the amount recorded by the previous generations of Mazda rotaries".
If CR is unfairly slamming the 8 on emissions, its time for some reader feedback!
They gave the WRX the highest score, but it appears to be because they don't have crash and reliability data on the RX-8.
CR's "Recommended" status evidently cannot be given to a car they haven't crashed and "long term tested".
Only significant bone I had with the article was the statement that rotary engines "emissions aren't as clean" [as piston engines].
I've been trying to find the actual emissions numbers for the RX-8, after reading a great thread authored by Buger. A Road & Track article states that the Renesis engine has "reduce[d] exhaust emmisions to one tenth the amount recorded by the previous generations of Mazda rotaries".
If CR is unfairly slamming the 8 on emissions, its time for some reader feedback!
11-07-2003, 09:16 PM
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crossfire finished last by a wide margin.
"Although a new model, the Crossfire relies on a 7-yr-old design and can't compete with newer sports-car designs."
Highs: Engine, acceleration, braking, fuel economy
Lows: Ride, steering feel and response, shifter, controls, visibility, interior room
"Although a new model, the Crossfire relies on a 7-yr-old design and can't compete with newer sports-car designs."
Highs: Engine, acceleration, braking, fuel economy
Lows: Ride, steering feel and response, shifter, controls, visibility, interior room
11-07-2003, 11:41 PM
#12
uhhhhh....hello?
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
diff magazines get diff numbers...
anywho, i recall someone emissions testing their rx-8 at inspection and it had 0 emissions. now i dont know for sure, but i think 0 emissions is pretty clean
________
Vermont marijuana dispensaries
anywho, i recall someone emissions testing their rx-8 at inspection and it had 0 emissions. now i dont know for sure, but i think 0 emissions is pretty clean
________
Vermont marijuana dispensaries
Last edited by P00Man; 04-16-2011 at 08:48 PM.
11-08-2003, 12:34 AM
#13
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by mental pimp
i thought that the 8 did under 6.0 seconds to 60mph, wat the hell
i thought that the 8 did under 6.0 seconds to 60mph, wat the hell
11-08-2003, 02:19 AM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Spring
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by mental pimp
i thought that the 8 did under 6.0 seconds to 60mph, wat the hell
i thought that the 8 did under 6.0 seconds to 60mph, wat the hell
They ALWAYS test starting at idle. They do 'real world' testing, not track testing. It is more like the 5 to 60 times the mags get.
11-08-2003, 02:46 AM
#16
Registered User
Consumer Reports probably didn't turn off traction control and they were probably very easy on the clutch.
Think of your grandma with a racing helmet driving a car; that's CR's style. They are 100% unbiased though. I don't 100% agree with their conclusions at times, but at least no Manufacturer persuades their views.
They tested a Montero and got it to rollover pretty easilly. CR made their views known and provided a tape to anyone who wanted a copy. Mitsubishi threatened to sue them, but CR don't take **** from nobody and stuck to their evaluation.
Gotta love 'em.
-Mr. Wigggles
Think of your grandma with a racing helmet driving a car; that's CR's style. They are 100% unbiased though. I don't 100% agree with their conclusions at times, but at least no Manufacturer persuades their views.
They tested a Montero and got it to rollover pretty easilly. CR made their views known and provided a tape to anyone who wanted a copy. Mitsubishi threatened to sue them, but CR don't take **** from nobody and stuck to their evaluation.
Gotta love 'em.
-Mr. Wigggles
11-08-2003, 07:35 AM
#19
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally posted by mental pimp
i thought that the 8 did under 6.0 seconds to 60mph, wat the hell
i thought that the 8 did under 6.0 seconds to 60mph, wat the hell
11-08-2003, 08:09 AM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Omicron that CR isn't really sensitive to reasons why people buy sports cars. These reviews are a little better than other CR reviews I've read in the past but their main criterion is still very much "practicality."
They don't award a "Recommendation" because they lack sufficient reliability and crash test data to make a decision. Fair enough.
But they also list the RX-8 second to the WRX STi on the basis of overall performance in the tests. This in spite of the fact that, after raving about the handling of the RX-8, they say this about the WRX:
"The Subaru WRX STi combines race-car-like acceleration and handling with the practicality of a four-door five passenger sedan... The trade-off is a stiff ride that is jittery but tolerable. There is also constant noise from the engine, drivetrain, and, particularly, the tires. For $6,500 less, you can buy the 227- hp Impreza WRX sedan or wagon. "
A wagon?
They don't award a "Recommendation" because they lack sufficient reliability and crash test data to make a decision. Fair enough.
But they also list the RX-8 second to the WRX STi on the basis of overall performance in the tests. This in spite of the fact that, after raving about the handling of the RX-8, they say this about the WRX:
"The Subaru WRX STi combines race-car-like acceleration and handling with the practicality of a four-door five passenger sedan... The trade-off is a stiff ride that is jittery but tolerable. There is also constant noise from the engine, drivetrain, and, particularly, the tires. For $6,500 less, you can buy the 227- hp Impreza WRX sedan or wagon. "
A wagon?
11-08-2003, 12:54 PM
#21
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by selmeralto
I agree with Omicron that CR isn't really sensitive to reasons why people buy sports cars. These reviews are a little better than other CR reviews I've read in the past but their main criterion is still very much "practicality."
They don't award a "Recommendation" because they lack sufficient reliability and crash test data to make a decision. Fair enough.
But they also list the RX-8 second to the WRX STi on the basis of overall performance in the tests. This in spite of the fact that, after raving about the handling of the RX-8, they say this about the WRX:
"The Subaru WRX STi combines race-car-like acceleration and handling with the practicality of a four-door five passenger sedan... The trade-off is a stiff ride that is jittery but tolerable. There is also constant noise from the engine, drivetrain, and, particularly, the tires. For $6,500 less, you can buy the 227- hp Impreza WRX sedan or wagon. "
A wagon?
I agree with Omicron that CR isn't really sensitive to reasons why people buy sports cars. These reviews are a little better than other CR reviews I've read in the past but their main criterion is still very much "practicality."
They don't award a "Recommendation" because they lack sufficient reliability and crash test data to make a decision. Fair enough.
But they also list the RX-8 second to the WRX STi on the basis of overall performance in the tests. This in spite of the fact that, after raving about the handling of the RX-8, they say this about the WRX:
"The Subaru WRX STi combines race-car-like acceleration and handling with the practicality of a four-door five passenger sedan... The trade-off is a stiff ride that is jittery but tolerable. There is also constant noise from the engine, drivetrain, and, particularly, the tires. For $6,500 less, you can buy the 227- hp Impreza WRX sedan or wagon. "
A wagon?
I LOVE the sound of the boxer engine, probably in the same way you guys love the sound of the rotary. With a nice exhaust it rivals the sound of some V8s IMO. and is certainly the sweetest sounding 4 banger I've ever heard.
Last edited by IkeWRX; 11-08-2003 at 01:03 PM.
11-08-2003, 12:59 PM
#22
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In fact the current SCCA STX Solo2 and Prosolo champ drives a WRX in wagon form. But I shouldn't say that because everyone knows the the WRX doesn't do well in autox... :p
11-08-2003, 02:51 PM
#23
Registered
Originally posted by IkeWRX
Yes, a wagon
Yes, a wagon
Regards,
Gordon
11-08-2003, 03:06 PM
#24
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Gord96BRG
YEAH, a wagon! Aside from the WRX, think of the Legacy GT-B, or Audi S6 and RS-6, S4, etc. Sporty performance, room to haul your gear and a few of your family or friends. Performance wagons are the real sport utility vehicles - not those stupid dressed-up overpriced trucks that never go offroad anyways!
Regards,
Gordon
YEAH, a wagon! Aside from the WRX, think of the Legacy GT-B, or Audi S6 and RS-6, S4, etc. Sporty performance, room to haul your gear and a few of your family or friends. Performance wagons are the real sport utility vehicles - not those stupid dressed-up overpriced trucks that never go offroad anyways!
Regards,
Gordon
http://www.clubwrx.net/forums/showth...threadid=41274
Ike
