Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

"Mazda expects to recall RX-8s"

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:15 PM
  #51  
RevTo9K's Avatar
1.3L is enough 4 anybody
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by map
If it's a lubrication issue wouldn't that effect people who rev the engine high more since more movement requires more lube? It sounds like there is more at work here.
If I understood zoom right in the Flash News Flash thread, high-revving increases the amount of oil injected and averts the problem. It's the low-rpm cruisers that are getting oil-starved.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:19 PM
  #52  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by rotten42
I had the flash done
how? its not out for another couple weeks
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:21 PM
  #53  
LostAngel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
how? its not out for another couple weeks
It may not be a recall for a few weeks...but most dealers have it...and are updating people.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:21 PM
  #54  
Tirminyl's Avatar
Listen to Zoom44
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park
Originally Posted by mysql101
Does anyone know how this will effect those of us with turbos installed on the car? Will they check and replace our engines too?
Uh, no. That is a stern no.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:21 PM
  #55  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
AFAIK the higher oil injection flash has been used in cars for months. I had it done last month.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:22 PM
  #56  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by RevTo9K
Is that four hours of labor, or four hours of continuous running? Also, where did you hear this? (just curious)
there are 4 tests, each one takes roughly an hour. theres a short drive test, a vacuum test, another drive test (drive part is like 8 minutes), and then another test.

mazda gave us a heads up on this one, its kinda comprehensive for a recall.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:23 PM
  #57  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by Tirminyl
Uh, no. That is a stern no.
Do you know this for a fact, or just pulling it out your ***? (I'm being serious).

Because recalls are done regardless of warranty.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:24 PM
  #58  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by mysql101
AFAIK the higher oil injection flash has been used in cars for months. I had it done last month.
oh ok, so that must be what they changed on the newer non recalled cars?
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:25 PM
  #59  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
merged the two threads. devious they ar eusign a new tool to test teh vacuum that the techs got training on last week. it wouldnt matter what vacuum you tested your self at because your number and theirs would be different. they will use this electronic solenoid thingy (sorry i dont have specs for the tool... yet) and it will spit back a number that is conmpaired to a chart which has altitude and temp or somethign as its X,Ys and if the number falls in the wrong place on the chart you get a new engine.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:27 PM
  #60  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by rodrigo67
I was being sarcastic...

There are alot more cars getting thier engines replaced then you think and many are on thier 3rd engine, with one poor guy on his fourth. All this is 2 years. Does not promote confidence in the car, no matter how much I love it, but I will say Mazda is doing better then I expected. It will be interesting to see what happens to an 8 that needs an engine and is over warranty...
its a regional problem, apparently high heat, low humidity areas are the problem. in the SF bay area, we havent seen any of the problems they are talking about

if its a little over the warranty period, mazda is able to still cover it, but its their option, so they will look at where, and when you've had the services done, and things like that. it is their option though, so ask nicely
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:30 PM
  #61  
saturn's Avatar
i pwn therefore i am
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 2
From: Delaware, USA
Survey controversy, capsized ship, and a recall all within a month of each other. It must suck to be Jeremy Barnes right now.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:30 PM
  #62  
Tirminyl's Avatar
Listen to Zoom44
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park
Originally Posted by mysql101
Do you know this for a fact, or just pulling it out your ***? (I'm being serious).

Because recalls are done regardless of warranty.
Im pulling it out my ***. Though if the recall is for "oil leaks", lack of oil lubrication, etc., do you really think they will look at a car that has a turbo on it? It is an aftermarket kit and not a factory produced car. If your car did fail their test, would it not be contributed to by the turbo?
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:31 PM
  #63  
Imp's Avatar
Imp
What's next?
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: SE Mass
Originally Posted by mysql101
AFAIK the higher oil injection flash has been used in cars for months. I had it done last month.
Would injecting more oil take away from the performance of the car any more?

I ask because I only auto-x the car. I bought it in '04, & I think the last flash I had was the M flash sometime early last year. That's the last time the car has been in the dealer. I guess if I get the recall, I'll bring it in to get it updated (like I would have a choice). High revs? Check. Colder climate? Check. Already paid for a new battery (can I be re-imbursed)? Only 14.5K on the odo.

In the back of my head I keep thinking that all the flashes take away a bit more performance from the car.... that I don't want to go away for obvious reasons. Anyone have any input on this?

--kC
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:32 PM
  #64  
devious12's Avatar
Flame Thrower
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by zoom44
merged the two threads. devious they ar eusign a new tool to test teh vacuum that the techs got training on last week. it wouldnt matter what vacuum you tested your self at because your number and theirs would be different. they will use this electronic solenoid thingy (sorry i dont have specs for the tool... yet) and it will spit back a number that is conmpaired to a chart which has altitude and temp or somethign as its X,Ys and if the number falls in the wrong place on the chart you get a new engine.
Thanks for the info, now I know not to waste my time trying to get a number myself. Funny because I heard this rumor over 1 month ago, and now it's starting to be reveiled.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:33 PM
  #65  
8is>enuff's Avatar
Bland
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 856
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by zoom44
merged the two threads. devious they ar eusign a new tool to test teh vacuum that the techs got training on last week. it wouldnt matter what vacuum you tested your self at because your number and theirs would be different. they will use this electronic solenoid thingy (sorry i dont have specs for the tool... yet) and it will spit back a number that is conmpaired to a chart which has altitude and temp or somethign as its X,Ys and if the number falls in the wrong place on the chart you get a new engine.

What are the odds of getting a look at the chart they use to determine the "acceptable" range?

Also, if the vacuum test goung to vary with RPMs (like the compression test), have the accounted for the upgraded starters, i.e. higher cranking RPMs?
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:34 PM
  #66  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by Tirminyl
Im pulling it out my ***. Though if the recall is for "oil leaks", lack of oil lubrication, etc., do you really think they will look at a car that has a turbo on it? It is an aftermarket kit and not a factory produced car. If your car did fail their test, would it not be contributed to by the turbo?
Exacty - which is why I asked


Originally Posted by Imp
Would injecting more oil take away from the performance of the car any more?

In the back of my head I keep thinking that all the flashes take away a bit more performance from the car.... that I don't want to go away for obvious reasons. Anyone have any input on this?
They are good to have, and if past flashes are any indication, they will usually help give you more power, better idle, etc. This one gives you better lubrication.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:38 PM
  #67  
Tirminyl's Avatar
Listen to Zoom44
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park
Originally Posted by Imp
Would injecting more oil take away from the performance of the car any more?
I don't believe it will. It is a safety measure that most do when racing their car on a full time schedule. Just making sure the engine is being lubricated as it should. Especially in a high performance enviroment.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:39 PM
  #68  
chrism's Avatar
Misfit Moderator TnC
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 1
From: armpit of the USA
umm.....devious....you thought i was crazy!
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:39 PM
  #69  
tiggerlee's Avatar
May Cause Anal Leakage
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
From: Orlando & Chicago
Originally Posted by saturn
Survey controversy, capsized ship, and a recall all within a month of each other. It must suck to be Jeremy Barnes right now.

I wonder if he'll get hazardous duty pay?
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:39 PM
  #70  
rkostolni's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: Virginia/Maryland
If this is a recall, as opposed to a TSB, then I the turbo might not be an automatic disqualifier.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:41 PM
  #71  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by saturn
Survey controversy, capsized ship, and a recall all within a month of each other. It must suck to be Jeremy Barnes right now.
and me pestering him about Mazda's bsegment plans
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:41 PM
  #72  
Tirminyl's Avatar
Listen to Zoom44
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park
Originally Posted by mysql101
Exacty - which is why I asked
I know. Just want to make sure people keep that in mind. Even though the dealer wont touch it, it will be noted, and could be denied. I would hate to see someone be denied for something legitimately wrong with the engine that isn't caused by the aftermarket part. But something as extreme as FI could be.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:42 PM
  #73  
devious12's Avatar
Flame Thrower
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by chrism
umm.....devious....you thought i was crazy!
I did believe that something was going to happen, I didn't expect you to be right on target!

I gotta call you to see if you're going to that exotic car show. Oh and on a side note... so much for me selling my 8, gonna have a hard time getting rid of it after that recall comes out!
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:43 PM
  #74  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by Imp
Would injecting more oil take away from the performance of the car any more?

I ask because I only auto-x the car. I bought it in '04, & I think the last flash I had was the M flash sometime early last year. That's the last time the car has been in the dealer. I guess if I get the recall,

--kC
you are already a recall behind. they'll have 2 (well 3 really to check you for the control arm)to do. the newer flash is nicer thanthe M.
Old 08-21-2006 | 12:52 PM
  #75  
expo1's Avatar
He's as bad as Can
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, NJ
I guess with 72,000 miles and no problems this doesn't apply to me??


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: "Mazda expects to recall RX-8s"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.