Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

"Mazda expects to recall RX-8s"

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-03-2006, 05:16 PM
  #1326  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
canaryrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,325
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Tirminyl
What did you extend your warranty out to?
I had a 100k extended lumped into my loan (yeah I know, but it being a first year car I thought it might not be a bad idea, plus it's not like they raped me on the price, bare in mind this was 09-03) so when I got my notice I was like...er..."I already paid for that" so i must be missing something.
canaryrx8 is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 07:35 PM
  #1327  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cooldriver88
I just got my letters today and I have some questions.
Now that it looks like my warranties has been bumped out to 5 years or 60,000 miles. I had my clutch replaced after having the car for 1 year 1 month and it was just out of the warranty, but now it says I could get re-reimbursed for previous work. So would this be covered by that?
Also it says it covers transmission stuff, and I wonder if I could get my transmission fixed for free. Because it is hard to shift into 5th at higher rmp's and it’s harder to down shift into first at about 20 mph.
And if I go there to have this work done should I put back on all my stock parts (I have an intake, high flow cat, and cat back exhaust on the car right now) because I don’t want them to say that those parts void my warranty.

Also with Racing Beats new flash that they came out with, are people going to have problems with them? Because the new flash adds more oil to the motor to keep in more lubed up, but will the RB be adequate???
clutches generally aren't covered by warranty unless you have a really really nice dealer
r0tor is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 07:41 PM
  #1328  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by msrecant


This is the bullsh-t that I can't deal with. The customer shouldn't have to "correct" the dealership on a technical issue. Whether it is incompetence or maliciousness we shouldn't have to put up with it.
he just bought the car... carbon doesn't build up while its sitting on the lot doing nothing.

The plugs should have been changed as part of the standard prep and the ecu flashed.
r0tor is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 07:50 PM
  #1329  
Hubble has been saved!
 
msrecant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got my extended warranty notice in yesterday's mail. Nice to have the extra year (I have 3 years and 20K miles on the car so far). Definitely a help with the resale value of 2004s/2005s.

Now I am just waiting for the recall notice.
msrecant is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 08:07 PM
  #1330  
Listen to Zoom44
 
Tirminyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Overland Park
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cooldriver88
Also it says it covers transmission stuff, and I wonder if I could get my transmission fixed for free. Because it is hard to shift into 5th at higher rmp's and it’s harder to down shift into first at about 20 mph.
Why are you shifting into 1st at 20mph?

Also, clutch are wear items. Did you pay for a new clutch? Or pressure plate and just had them do the work? Or did they replace the part that failed and you paid labor? Im not understanding that part. Though I am really tired so my reading comprehension could be off. If they are replacing a part in your transmission because of failure, that is warranty work and you should not have to pay for labor.
Tirminyl is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 10:11 PM
  #1331  
Registered User
 
CCarlisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boston/NYC
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just sifted trough 90 pages and I still don't have the sense that anybody knows what cause of the problem is or how the flash solves it.

What is the problem:
1. damaged cat OR
2. low compression

What is the cause:
1. Apex seal damage OR
2. side seal damage causing oil control ring damage OR
3. carbon build up if the problem is only #2

How will increasing the OMP output fix these problems.
Guess for #1 and 2: reduce friction
Guess for #3: ????

Last edited by CCarlisi; 09-03-2006 at 10:17 PM.
CCarlisi is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 11:06 PM
  #1332  
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
I just sifted trough 90 pages and I still don't have the sense that anybody knows what cause of the problem is or how the flash solves it.

What is the problem:
1. damaged cat OR
2. low compression

What is the cause:
1. Apex seal damage OR
2. side seal damage causing oil control ring damage OR
3. carbon build up if the problem is only #2

How will increasing the OMP output fix these problems.
Guess for #1 and 2: reduce friction
Guess for #3: ????
Its rather simple, the major problem is the lack of oil injection under certain engine load scenario's that has been causing lack of power and compression, as well as damage to engine seals for some, but not all cars. The reason for the lack of oil injection was Mazda being stingy due to emissions issues (more oil injection = worse emissions). The cat issue is not really related but is another common problem caused by engines flooding. The flooding is a result of a crappy ECU tune at the begining of the RX8's life back in 2003/2004 and spark plug design. Since both these are emissions related issues, they addressed them at the same time as they had to get the car EPA re-certified.

The carbon issue was stated to be a issue with synthetic oil in the engines, which is somewhat controvercial, I would just skipping worrying about that one as I doubt that applies to you.
brillo is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 11:18 PM
  #1333  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,870
Received 322 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
I just sifted trough 90 pages and I still don't have the sense that anybody knows what cause of the problem is or how the flash solves it.

What is the problem:
1. damaged cat OR
2. low compression

What is the cause:
1. Apex seal damage OR
2. side seal damage causing oil control ring damage OR
3. carbon build up if the problem is only #2

How will increasing the OMP output fix these problems.
Guess for #1 and 2: reduce friction
Guess for #3: ????
This is how I see it, the rotary relies on internal (combustion) lubrication from sump oil metered by the MOP, the re-flash will supply a greater quantity of oil to help prevent sticking apex, side and or corner seals that can occur when there is not enough lube. Sticking seals result in poor compression, hence poor performance.
Correct lubrication results in better compression, but too much results in emission problems, blocked CATS, spark plug fowling and higher deposits.

The only real way to remove excess carbon/deposits is to strip the motor.
ASH8 is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 11:21 PM
  #1334  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,870
Received 322 Likes on 229 Posts
Well there you go...^^^...two very similar opinions entered from 2 different parts of the world.!
ASH8 is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 11:24 PM
  #1335  
Registered User
 
CCarlisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boston/NYC
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the reply.

Originally Posted by brillo
Its rather simple, the major problem is the lack of oil injection under certain engine load scenario's that has been causing lack of power and compression, as well as damage to engine seals for some, but not all cars.
Lets make sure we keep the cause/effects straight. Oil does not have any impact on power. It can reduce compression by damaging the seals and that effects power. You may have meant just that, but I want to make sure as your comma usage suggests otherwise (to me).

The cat issue is not really related but is another common problem caused by engines flooding. The flooding is a result of a crappy ECU tune at the begining of the RX8's life back in 2003/2004 and spark plug design.
Didn't the Mazda press release say something about it being caused by oil leaking into the combustion chamber? If that is true, it sounds like a side seal problem that causes an oil control ring problem. I don't see how else the symptom of low compression could be tied to converter damage, unless the ecu is doing something or not doing something based on a change in compression.



This is how I see it, the rotary relies on internal (combustion) lubrication from sump oil metered by the MOP, the re-flash will supply a greater quantity of oil to help prevent sticking apex, side and or corner seals that can occur when there is not enough lube. Sticking seals result in poor compression, hence poor performance.
Correct lubrication results in better compression, but too much results in emission problems, blocked CATS, spark plug fowling and higher deposits.

The only real way to remove excess carbon/deposits is to strip the motor.
Thanks for the reply, but I doubt a little more oil would stop the seals from sticking if they were otherwise. It also doesn't explain how oil is destroying the cats.

Last edited by CCarlisi; 09-03-2006 at 11:33 PM.
CCarlisi is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 11:59 PM
  #1336  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
^^ You will need a bit more education on how the Renesis works before any refutation of your misunderstandings above will have any meaning to you.
MazdaManiac is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 12:46 AM
  #1337  
Registered User
 
CCarlisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boston/NYC
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is over your head, I don't expect you to contribute anything here, but please don't waste everyone's time by posting comments like that. You've got 3000+ posts, you can afford to sit this one out.
CCarlisi is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 12:52 AM
  #1338  
Registered User
 
demob05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
carbon deposit problem??

Maybe I missed this issue being addressed before, but can someone summarize what effects increased MOP injection with the latest flash would have on carbon deposits and build up??
demob05 is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 12:54 AM
  #1339  
Banned
 
Grizzly8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Until Mazda themselves let everyone know what the real issues/ problem is each one of us EXPERTS are entitled to our own missinformed views play nice .

Michael
Grizzly8 is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 01:11 AM
  #1340  
Freely Radical
iTrader: (1)
 
RotoRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,912
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I heard this whole problem is caused when the Johnson Rod fails to engage the nanoplate, and the Carborendum is then FUBARed.

The ECU flash reprograms the eliptical timing of the Johnson Rod, and better compression and an additional 12 horsepower is the result.
RotoRocket is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 01:19 AM
  #1341  
...goes like stink...
 
KAtC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got my letters yesterday. We'll see what they say at the dealer...
KAtC10 is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 01:20 AM
  #1342  
Shifty Bastard.
 
Gomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotoRocket
.......additional 12 horsepower is the result.
I was at my dealers today. He said to expect an 18hp increase.

You were wrong....SO THERE!!
Gomez is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 01:56 AM
  #1343  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
This is over your head, I don't expect you to contribute anything here, but please don't waste everyone's time by posting comments like that. You've got 3000+ posts, you can afford to sit this one out.
OK, but you are the one that said oil has no impact on power.
Obviously, your handle on cause/effect is the one that needs to be addressed.

Perhaps you should read the recall documentation a little more carefully?


Yay! Another page-topper! I think I'm going for a record.
MazdaManiac is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 03:04 AM
  #1344  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,870
Received 322 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
Thanks for the reply.


Lets make sure we keep the cause/effects straight. Oil does not have any impact on power. It can reduce compression by damaging the seals and that effects power. You may have meant just that, but I want to make sure as your comma usage suggests otherwise (to me).



Didn't the Mazda press release say something about it being caused by oil leaking into the combustion chamber? If that is true, it sounds like a side seal problem that causes an oil control ring problem. I don't see how else the symptom of low compression could be tied to converter damage, unless the ecu is doing something or not doing something based on a change in compression.





Thanks for the reply, but I doubt a little more oil would stop the seals from sticking if they were otherwise. It also doesn't explain how oil is destroying the cats.
You believe what you want mate, but, I am telling you from experience that APEX SEALS DO STICK allowing blow by and poor compressions/performance.

IF you Don't like the answer don't ask the question.
ASH8 is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 03:23 AM
  #1345  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,870
Received 322 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by demob05
Maybe I missed this issue being addressed before, but can someone summarize what effects increased MOP injection with the latest flash would have on carbon deposits and build up??
NONE, to put simply all engines have it, once its there..its there, its the excess accumulation generally by nursing the car too much...ie.. rarely putting the foot down...blowing the cobwebs out!
Long term the only way to remove it is to strip the engine and wire wheel it off.

It is also MMC (Mazda Japans) technical opinion that SOME (most IMO) Synthetic oils leave a greater deposit/build up when used compared to mineral engine oils, and they also believe that synthetic oils over time deteriorate oil control ring O rings, which in turn will allow excess engine oil to leak into combustion chambers.

But what would Mazda Japan know....less than others here that's for sure..

I will repeat that MMC have been very consistent about the use of semi and full synthetic engine oils for ANY rotary engine.
ASH8 is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 05:26 AM
  #1346  
Registered User
 
foxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ASH8
I will repeat that MMC have been very consistent about the use of semi and full synthetic engine oils for ANY rotary engine.
Oh, here in Germany they are consistent too! They want us to use their Dexelia Ultra 5W-30. It´s made by TOTAL. And TOTAL sells it under Quartz Future 9000!
And it is a HC-Oil!
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Mazda-Oel.pdf (66.6 KB, 133 views)

Last edited by foxy; 09-05-2006 at 03:26 PM.
foxy is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 08:36 AM
  #1347  
Registered User
 
bubbasuwannee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stow, OH
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I received the Warranty extension notice in the mail yesterday, but no recall information. I assume since I'm in a cooler climate area, I'll be one of the last to get the recall.
bubbasuwannee is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 09:14 AM
  #1348  
Registered User
 
two rotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Whitby Ont
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ASH8

I will repeat that MMC have been very consistent about the use of semi and full synthetic engine oils for ANY rotary engine.
Your assertion above appears to be at variance with the advice given in my RX-8 Owners Manual which clearly shows that Castrol Syntec meets Mazda's requirements.Now I am aware of the Service Information Bullrtin for Australia etc but no such Bulletin has been issued for North America.
Attached Thumbnails "Mazda expects to recall RX-8s"-oil.jpg   "Mazda expects to recall RX-8s"-oil-001.jpg  
two rotors is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 02:34 PM
  #1349  
Registered
 
cooldriver88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Campbell
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tirminyl
Why are you shifting into 1st at 20mph?

Also, clutch are wear items. Did you pay for a new clutch? Or pressure plate and just had them do the work? Or did they replace the part that failed and you paid labor? Im not understanding that part. Though I am really tired so my reading comprehension could be off. If they are replacing a part in your transmission because of failure, that is warranty work and you should not have to pay for labor.
I have to shift down to first from second going about 15-20 mph sometimes because where I live there are a lot of steep windy roads, and second gear bogs out.

I got the pressure plate replaced along with some other stuff like the thorwout bearing exct... but the parts I don’t really care about trying to get my money back for, it was that damn expensive labor that I want to try and get reimbursed for.
Like I said previously I live in a very steep area so my clutch goes out more easily, having to do a bunch of stop and go stuff on steep hills kills my clutch.
cooldriver88 is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 03:04 PM
  #1350  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by CCarlisi
I just sifted trough 90 pages and I still don't have the sense that anybody knows what cause of the problem is or how the flash solves it.

What is the problem:
1. damaged cat OR
2. low compression
1 - in some cases
2 - they're not doing a compression test. They are measuring vacuum, and from what I've read you can have compression within specs, but fail the vacuum test.

What is the cause:
1. Apex seal damage OR
2. side seal damage causing oil control ring damage OR
3. carbon build up if the problem is only #2
My guess is it has more to do with side seals and oil rings. In a scarce oil situation, it would seem that these would lose their sealing film first. The apex seals would seem to have an advantage in that they are running over a contiguous surface uninterrupted by openings. It's the soft seals damage that would lead to loss of oil control and excess oil into the cat. Carbon possibly an issue.

How will increasing the OMP output fix these problems.
Guess for #1 and 2: reduce friction
Guess for #3: ????
[/quote]

First, you must maintain the seal to prevent blowby and subsequent rubber seal damage. Thiis requires oil film of sufficient thickness. Secondly (and this is guess), you need a sufficient amount of liquid oil so that oil beginning to carbonize is held in suspension (and able to be scraped/blown away) rather than being allowed to bond to one spot and harden into permanent deposits.
Nubo is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: "Mazda expects to recall RX-8s"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.