Mazda September sales numbers
#1
#5
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by RotoRocket
September 2005 Sales = 1,148
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
I read the sales numbers for the RX-8 and went on line to look up current sales prices on edmunds.com. To my amazement, edmunds.com shows a national purchase price of $24,448 for a manual transmission with no options (not including destination charge) which is $396 below invoice. This differs by almost $1,000 from the price on the Edmunds site just last week. Do any of you all have any experiences supporting or contradicting the edmunds.com pricing? Is Edmunds reasonably accurate in its pricing numbers? Could this be the forward data resulting from the lagging sales numbers? Is this the result of year-end overstock? Is there a possibility of Mazda incentives to boost sales ahead of dropping prices (if these are dropping, as edmunds.com seems to indicate)? I look forward to your ideas - information about year-end prices. MARK
#9
Black Like Sunday
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bartow, FL
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got my base with few minor options (spoiler, tint, polished rotary emblems, cargo net) for $22000 after $1500 in rebates (MSRP was just under 28k). This month the deals should be even better. I basically told them I wanted the car for 23.5 and I keep the rebates.
#11
Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd
With the way the 8's are going I may be able to get one and keep my current vehicle. 2004's are going for about 10k or more below MSRP.
#12
Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd
With the way the 8's are going I may be able to get one and keep my current vehicle. 2004's are going for about 10k or more below MSRP.
#13
Originally Posted by RotoRocket
Same month comparable sales of the RX-8 were actually up 76%.
September 2005 Sales = 1,148
September 2004 Sales = 651
September 2005 Sales = 1,148
September 2004 Sales = 651
The RX8 2004 numbers in the chart are on the Miata line.
Should be 1,148 versus 1,827 which is down about 40% for the month and
11,592 - 949 + 1,148 = 11,791 versus 19,226 which is down about 40% for the year.
Apparently changing the model name from Miata to MX5 was more than the Mazda accounting department could handle.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OldCodger
The 2004 numbers in the chart on the RX8 line are actually for the Miata.
The RX8 2004 numbers in the chart are on the Miata line.
Should be 1,148 versus 1,827 which is down about 40% for the month and
11,592 - 949 + 1,148 = 11,791 versus 19,226 which is down about 40% for the year.
Apparently changing the model name from Miata to MX5 was more than the Mazda accounting department could handle.
The RX8 2004 numbers in the chart are on the Miata line.
Should be 1,148 versus 1,827 which is down about 40% for the month and
11,592 - 949 + 1,148 = 11,791 versus 19,226 which is down about 40% for the year.
Apparently changing the model name from Miata to MX5 was more than the Mazda accounting department could handle.
Also, as the all new '06 MX-5 just started hitting showrooms in September, one would certainly expect the sales to be better than last year's figure, but this isn't what Mazda is reporting.
The numbers just don't add up, Mazda USA f*cked up their accounting. Unbelievable.
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Helens, OR
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got my 04 for 8K off MSRP.
Maybe after people have seen em on the road a bit, they started picking up sales.
I know I get comments all the time, and its stock.
Maybe after people have seen em on the road a bit, they started picking up sales.
I know I get comments all the time, and its stock.
#19
Stuck in a love triangle
Originally Posted by RX8PDX
I got my 04 for 8K off MSRP.
Maybe after people have seen em on the road a bit, they started picking up sales.
I know I get comments all the time, and its stock.
Maybe after people have seen em on the road a bit, they started picking up sales.
I know I get comments all the time, and its stock.
As opposed to seeing them on the road for the past TWO YEARS?
#20
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Prague, MN
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have seen a large number of them pop up here in Minnesota in the last month. Even my parents have said the same thing.
They talked to one of their neighbors who got one. Apparently Mazda (locally?) has a really good deal on lease rates right now.. short lease (2-3 years), about $250-$300 a month.. (or so they were told).
That could account for a large increase in sales right there.
They talked to one of their neighbors who got one. Apparently Mazda (locally?) has a really good deal on lease rates right now.. short lease (2-3 years), about $250-$300 a month.. (or so they were told).
That could account for a large increase in sales right there.
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Inland Empire, SoCalif
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
As opposed to seeing them on the road for the past TWO YEARS?
It probably has something to do with the fact that you can now get one out the door with tax and everything for under $30k, including the faster 6mt even with the GT option. I paid about $34k for mine over 2 years ago when it first came out.
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: I've shaken off the sands of SouthWest Asia and returned to Houston and Gulfport, MS
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ole Spiff
It probably has something to do with the fact that you can now get one out the door with tax and everything for under $30k, including the faster 6mt even with the GT option. I paid about $34k for mine over 2 years ago when it first came out.
#23
Originally Posted by Toly
Here are the numbers for September 2005. Note the S2000 has out-sold the RX-8 YTD - I would say that is a first (and a BAD sign for the RX-8). I wish Ford has the Mustange sales broken down by v-6 and GT, but I think the GT sales were limited ONLY by the number Ford could make. The Z just keeps on spanking the 8 and the Z + G35 coupe REALLY makes the 8 number look silly.
Model 9/2005 9/2004 change YTD 05 YTD 04 change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RX-8 1,148 651 76% 5,929 7,525 -21%
350Z 1,963 2,158 -9.0% 21,325 23,939 -10.5%
G35 Cpe 1,993 2,188 -8.9% 20,283 22,084 - .8%
S2000 659 482 36.7% 6,533 5,835 12.5%
Mustang 10,976 6,333 73.3% 128,485 94,468 36.0%
EDIT: Looks like Mazda has the Miata and RX-8 numbers crossed. The RX-8 YTD 05 numbers were a lot HIGHER before this latest round - and the September "RX-8" sale bump is really the new Miata sales bump. So the RX-8 should be:
RX-8 949 1,827 -48% 11,592 19,226 -40%
With the numbers in the table I posted belonging to the Miata. So they 8 has outsold the S2000 by about 2 to 1 (which sounds more like it).
Dennis
Last edited by dwynne; 10-12-2005 at 01:02 PM.
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dwynne
EDIT: Looks like Mazda has the Miata and RX-8 numbers crossed. The RX-8 YTD 05 numbers were a lot HIGHER before this latest round - and the September "RX-8" sale bump is really the new Miata sales bump. So the RX-8 should be:
RX-8 949 1,827 -48% 11,592 19,226 -40%
With the numbers in the table I posted belonging to the Miata. So they 8 has outsold the S2000 by about 2 to 1 (which sounds more like it).
Dennis
RX-8 949 1,827 -48% 11,592 19,226 -40%
With the numbers in the table I posted belonging to the Miata. So they 8 has outsold the S2000 by about 2 to 1 (which sounds more like it).
Dennis
So forget the September results, MNAO screwed up their report for that month. It's unclear if 1,148 or 949 RX-8s were sold; YTD is certainly wrong and should be at 11K+ based on the August results.