Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

More News On the new 16X

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-21-2010, 09:27 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
More News On the new 16X

Mazda's rotary engine stalled, not forgotten


Development of the next-generation rotary engine from Mazda Motor Corp., first unveiled three years ago, is making slow progress despite missing emissions targets.
A top Mazda powertrain executive said today that the 1.6-liter rotary engine, called the 16X, is about 30 percent more fuel-efficient than the current rotary engine used in the RX-8 sporty car.
In fact, the 16X so far performs slightly better than Mazda's standard two-liter gasoline engine, said Mitsuo Hitomi, general manager of the Japanese carmaker's powertrain division.
But the engine is at least one model year behind schedule because of problems hitting emissions reduction targets. And Hitomi concedes it's still not ready for production.
Continued @ http://www.autoweek.com/article/2010...NEWS/101029989
alnielsen is offline  
Old 10-21-2010, 12:11 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Drumm09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Mazda says dropping the program isn't an option.
Said Hitomi: “We will never give up.”

That's what I want to hear Baby.... keep polishing that dimond until it outshines everything.
Drumm09 is offline  
Old 10-21-2010, 03:36 PM
  #3  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
velociti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drumm09
That's what I want to hear Baby.... keep polishing that dimond until it outshines everything.
Or at least isn't the dirtiest diamond available...
velociti is offline  
Old 10-21-2010, 04:58 PM
  #4  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,785
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,663 Posts
If they can't even project a potential production introduction for two more years and it's running one model year behind it doesn't sound as if it's intended for the RX-8 chassis I don't even see how the RX-8 will still be in production by then.
TeamRX8 is offline  
Old 10-21-2010, 05:25 PM
  #5  
X e p i A
iTrader: (1)
 
Aipex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/10/21/r...hind-schedule/
Aipex8 is offline  
Old 10-21-2010, 05:40 PM
  #6  
幹他媽!
 
Detrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 2,078
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2 years is a long time to wait though... :sigh:

at least they aren't giving up tho...
Detrich is offline  
Old 10-21-2010, 06:57 PM
  #7  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
If they can't even project a potential production introduction for two more years and it's running one model year behind it doesn't sound as if it's intended for the RX-8 chassis I don't even see how the RX-8 will still be in production by then.
exactly- new/updated chassis
zoom44 is offline  
Old 10-21-2010, 07:37 PM
  #8  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
30% more efficient? And that does not meet their reduction targets?
Nemesis8 is offline  
Old 10-21-2010, 09:16 PM
  #9  
The RX-8 is missed
iTrader: (3)
 
2tone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
30% more efficient? And that does not meet their reduction targets?
EMISSIONS targets are not being met. the 30% is for fuel economy...2 different points.
2tone is offline  
Old 10-21-2010, 09:18 PM
  #10  
Recreational User
iTrader: (1)
 
SpencerM1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Detrich
2 years is a long time to wait though... :sigh:

at least they aren't giving up tho...
but 3.5 yrs when the engine is available for salvage pickup is the perfect time to consider swapping it in the 8!
SpencerM1 is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 07:28 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Drumm09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
If they can't even project a potential production introduction for two more years and it's running one model year behind it doesn't sound as if it's intended for the RX-8 chassis I don't even see how the RX-8 will still be in production by then.
Easy because by then they will use a new updated chassis. In other words, a NEW RX machine. We all know that 2011 will be the last year of the 8. That's a fact. THis new engine will be in a new/updated chassis.

And, YES it is a long ways to wait. I guess w'll sit tight until it comes out.
Drumm09 is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 11:33 AM
  #12  
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Jedi54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 22,410
Received 2,695 Likes on 1,939 Posts
My guess is we'll see it somewhere around 2015 in an all new chassis.

I'm willing to wait...
Jedi54 is online now  
Old 10-22-2010, 01:36 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
A 16X could probably hit current emissions regulations. However they are probably thinking 15-20+ years into the future so they won't release an engine that is emissions obsolete in only 1 vehicle generation.
rotarygod is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 05:20 PM
  #14  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
A 16X could probably hit current emissions regulations. However they are probably thinking 15-20+ years into the future so they won't release an engine that is emissions obsolete in only 1 vehicle generation.
If that was the case, why not release it now and keep working on the improvements for when they will be needed in the future? Let it fly now.
alnielsen is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 06:50 PM
  #15  
The game changer!
 
T-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tx
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by alnielsen
If that was the case, why not release it now and keep working on the improvements for when they will be needed in the future? Let it fly now.


I know it's tough to wait but, I think Mazda is taking the right approach this time. Having to re-engineer the wheel every 6-7 years gets old. The previous PP exhaust rotary had a 30+ year life span. If the new engine can go the distance (as RG is suggesting) , then (hopefully) Mazda can start producing 2,3 and 4 rotor production versions of it. I'm personally sick and tired of having only 1 displacement version of the rotary. We need multiple displacement versions just like the pistons engine have. Hell Ford is no longer in control so the sky's the limit now.

Last edited by T-von; 10-22-2010 at 06:53 PM.
T-von is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 07:02 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
mKat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jedi54
My guess is we'll see it somewhere around 2015 in an all new chassis.

I'm willing to wait...
Can't help but agree with you.

And it's not the worst thing to have the RX8 go out of production for a season before an RX9 or RX7 comes along it means the 8 has some more time being the definitive X-factor sports car rather than get completely outshone by the next rotary. Possibly will slow the dropping of resale values a bit too.
mKat is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 08:52 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
77mjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 2tone
EMISSIONS targets are not being met. the 30% is for fuel economy...2 different points.

30% more fuel efficient would mean 20/28 compared to the current 16/22 for the Renesis. If you could get that in a car a couple hundred lbs lighter than the current 8 with even only marginally more hp and torque, I'd be thrilled.
77mjd is offline  
Old 10-24-2010, 06:31 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
PhillipM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I couldn't give a monkies about emissions targets, give me one!
PhillipM is offline  
Old 10-24-2010, 09:59 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
misdeismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PhillipM
I couldn't give a monkies about emissions targets, give me one!
hahaaha

who's emission's "target" are they missing? sell it now and improve it later
misdeismo is offline  
Old 10-25-2010, 02:01 AM
  #20  
Londons Yellow Peril
 
california style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North London
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well I'm sure that will be a fundamental part of the design process so its not like they can just "bolt on" emissions improvers.

The good thing is that they are really going for it.... Go Mazda!
california style is offline  
Old 10-25-2010, 03:23 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
8 Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aki City, Japan
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It makes sense for them to hit their final goals from the get go. It's much more economically sound if they can keep their production the exact same for a longer period of time and still have the engine sell.
8 Maniac is offline  
Old 10-25-2010, 04:14 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
misdeismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by california style
well I'm sure that will be a fundamental part of the design process so its not like they can just "bolt on" emissions improvers.

The good thing is that they are really going for it.... Go Mazda!
true that. props to mazda for pushing the limits
misdeismo is offline  
Old 10-25-2010, 04:51 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
PhillipM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure they must have some early development motors that don't hit the emissions targets they could crate up for me...
PhillipM is offline  
Old 10-25-2010, 05:03 PM
  #24  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by PhillipM
I'm sure they must have some early development motors that don't hit the emissions targets they could crate up for me...
Ha ha! . Not before they come here

Paul.
Mazmart is offline  
Old 10-25-2010, 05:14 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
PhillipM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, if you get a couple, forward on one will you
We've just won our class championship with the Renesis mind, so she's not too bad
PhillipM is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: More News On the new 16X



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.