Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Road & Track: RX-8 vs. G35

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-09-2005 | 03:35 PM
  #51  
RotaryManiac's Avatar
1st time rotorhead
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Closter, NJ
On dragtimes, if the car isnt stock, the people usually put any mods done to the car. as you can see here http://www.dragtimes.com/Mazda-RX-8-Timeslip-4201.html, the people at pettit racing (owners of the particular 8) didnt have any mods.
Old 05-09-2005 | 04:28 PM
  #52  
RotaryManiac's Avatar
1st time rotorhead
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Closter, NJ
BTW. Polak ran a 1/4 in 14.58 and he said he could have shifted better. The weather was 90 degrees, he had extra gas in the tank, and about 50 pounds of extra gear in his car. with the correct amount of gas, correct shifting, and colder weather he could definitely get close to 14.1.

Here is the thread https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-racing-25/14-58-%40-94-55mph-37357/
Old 05-09-2005 | 05:59 PM
  #53  
Deslock's Avatar
WWFSMD?
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts, USA
^ Polak wrote he thought could get 14.3-14.4... that's a far cry from "close to 14.1".

^^ People at dragtimes.com often fill in their mods or write "stock", while the petit racing folks did not specify one way or the other. They are the only RX-8 with a 14.1 listed that I found. Your claim that multiple stock RX-8s did the 1/4 in 14.1 at dragtimes.com appears to be unsubstantiated.
Old 05-12-2005 | 12:36 AM
  #54  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
g35 is unrefined, the interior stinks its cheap and badly designed, my friend lives with one every day and hates it, good thing he's leasing it. its definately not a performance car like the s2k, rx8, or z are its just a luxury performance car that has a cheap sticker price
Old 05-12-2005 | 03:55 AM
  #55  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
I dont know
I really like the g35
but it is so common
Old 05-12-2005 | 05:30 PM
  #56  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
yeah thats another thing too its really common(i understand many of you couldn't care less, but i'd rather be a little different and have a car generally accepted as "cooler" for the same price)
Old 05-12-2005 | 07:17 PM
  #57  
crosswound's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Easthampton, MA United States
the g35's are very nice car i think.
Old 05-12-2005 | 10:41 PM
  #58  
RotaryManiac's Avatar
1st time rotorhead
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Closter, NJ
Originally Posted by Deslock
^ Polak wrote he thought could get 14.3-14.4... that's a far cry from "close to 14.1".

^^ People at dragtimes.com often fill in their mods or write "stock", while the petit racing folks did not specify one way or the other. They are the only RX-8 with a 14.1 listed that I found. Your claim that multiple stock RX-8s did the 1/4 in 14.1 at dragtimes.com appears to be unsubstantiated.
There are others on dragtimes.com that have 14.2 and 14.3. Addittionally, interior trim packages affect times. while it may only be a 20 pound decrease between trims, thats a bit off of the 1/4 time.
Old 05-12-2005 | 11:00 PM
  #59  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
yeah rotary maniac you bring up a good point 20 pounds is a lot in a car, also, do drag racers go on diets to get better times?
Old 05-12-2005 | 11:14 PM
  #60  
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
"Call me Darkman"
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
From: Toronto/Florida
Originally Posted by StealthFox
yeah rotary maniac you bring up a good point 20 pounds is a lot in a car, also, do drag racers go on diets to get better times?
No they hire horse jockeys :p

20lbs might make a .005 second difference
Old 05-12-2005 | 11:21 PM
  #61  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,869
Likes: 2,083
the R&T test in April/03 had the Grand Touring option, or at least they had it listed in the configuration data:

http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...2003171557.pdf

Last edited by TeamRX8; 05-12-2005 at 11:23 PM.
Old 05-13-2005 | 12:19 AM
  #62  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
No they hire horse jockeys :p

20lbs might make a .005 second difference
precisely, there is a difference
Old 05-13-2005 | 12:42 AM
  #63  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,869
Likes: 2,083
Originally Posted by StealthFox
precisely, there is a difference

only if the driver is good enough to take advantage of it, for 20# most aren't
Old 05-13-2005 | 12:54 AM
  #64  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
im kidding man, lighten up did you think i was serious about saying that the .005 second advantage mazman stated would give you an advantage?
Old 05-13-2005 | 02:53 AM
  #65  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,869
Likes: 2,083
what was I suppose to think with the way you italicized "difference" and no smiley?

or is the term "lighten up" suppose to be another hidden joke :p
Old 05-13-2005 | 03:06 AM
  #66  
truemagellen's Avatar
Attracts tree branches
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,940
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by markd
That's interesting. I love the 8, but geeze, it beat the G35?? I don't know. That's a beautiful car with a lot of power and a lot of options. I may be misguided, though, since I drive an auto :D
f$&k a g35 :p
Old 05-14-2005 | 12:38 AM
  #67  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
what was I suppose to think with the way you italicized "difference" and no smiley?

or is the term "lighten up" suppose to be another hidden joke :p
I GOTCHA AGAIN BUDDY! :D :D :D







...in all seriousness is there actually people who factor in .005 of a second in tuning their drag car?
Old 05-16-2005 | 09:28 PM
  #68  
RotaryManiac's Avatar
1st time rotorhead
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Closter, NJ
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
No they hire horse jockeys :p

20lbs might make a .005 second difference
If you think it only makes a .005 difference, then why did car and driver correct its times from 0-60 in 6.1 to 0-60 in 5.9 and eventually 5.7. They test drove different trim levels, and the stripped down models had the fastest times. (thats the on i have)

(i dont remember if it was car and driver or road and track that corrected their numbers to 5.7)
Old 05-16-2005 | 10:54 PM
  #69  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
5.7 ugh, so the cars stock get between 0-60 in 5.7 seconds and 7.2 seconds, geezus. so now whenever anyone asks how fast the car is i say"..well, im not sure if its fast or not because its been tested at 5.7-7.2"
Old 05-18-2005 | 08:58 AM
  #70  
bureau13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Well, duh, you say "mid 5s". I thought everyone knew that! :D

Originally Posted by StealthFox
5.7 ugh, so the cars stock get between 0-60 in 5.7 seconds and 7.2 seconds, geezus. so now whenever anyone asks how fast the car is i say"..well, im not sure if its fast or not because its been tested at 5.7-7.2"
Old 05-18-2005 | 10:25 AM
  #71  
cretinx's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 502
Likes: 3
also different cars have different flashes

weight does make a difference, especially on acceleration and braking, but frankly, I don't mind losing a bit of speed because the moment any human steps into my car, sits in my red on black leather seats, and gawks as the nav pops out of the center console, I get about a billion comments like "WOW YOUR CAR IS AWESOME", or, as one girl aptly put it "if you were single I would **** you right now"

I did notice a drop in gas mileage/acceleration/braking when I put my 285s on the rear - even though the rim I used was lighter than the stock rim, all that rubber makes a difference - of course, my handling is insane and straight-line traction, even with a turbo, is undefeatable.
Old 05-18-2005 | 08:23 PM
  #72  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by bureau13
Well, duh, you say "mid 5s". I thought everyone knew that! :D
yeah once i get my lightweight low compression rotors, mild street port, 3mm apex seals, 20psi boost, mp, catback, headers intake and ECU tuning i can say mid 4's

right now i'll just guess high 6's cuz my 8 is a newer one that has a conservative/leaner flash from the factory most likely
Old 05-18-2005 | 08:28 PM
  #73  
RotaryManiac's Avatar
1st time rotorhead
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Closter, NJ
I have the "N" flash and my car feels faster than ever. Why would yours be slower?
Old 05-18-2005 | 08:31 PM
  #74  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
hmm, i thought the earlier 04's had the best one because the newer cars dyno around 170-175whp compard to the older ones dynoing 180-185whp.

nevermind, i havent really looked into flashes and such, dont mind me.
Old 05-18-2005 | 11:19 PM
  #75  
jahfari's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
man, i took my car to moroso last week and couldn't get under a 15.6. but, my reaction times were about 6/10 (i know i'm slow), but my shifting was pretty good through the 1/4 mile and i can't see how my car could can gain a whole second from anything that i could improve in driving. or can it?

btw, these were my three times at the track, haven't done it before.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.