Rotarynews.com gets some answers
#1
Administrator
Thread Starter
Rotarynews.com gets some answers
They had an interview with Moray Callum and Jeremy Barnes of Mazda at the Detroit Auto Show and put questions to them posted by readers. the answers are here http://rotarynews.com/node/view/762
mine were the first 2too bad i got a no comment that Jeremy never answers my questions!!
mine were the first 2too bad i got a no comment that Jeremy never answers my questions!!
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the link. Funny how many 'no comments', but the editor's notes were interesting. I especially liked this:
"(Editors note, we never want to see another fight about what RX stands for. Once and for all, from Mazda we have RX standing for Rotary Sports. Period. End of story.)"
Read it all folks.
"(Editors note, we never want to see another fight about what RX stands for. Once and for all, from Mazda we have RX standing for Rotary Sports. Period. End of story.)"
Read it all folks.
#7
Riot Controller
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would more power mean more sales for the RX-8?
That is tough to answer, but we feel it is no. The RX-8 is more than the sum of its numbers. If a customer is purely concerned about the numbers, we invite them to get behind the wheel of the car, and feel what it is about. Mazda has never been known for our horsepower numbers, what we are known for are well balanced best handling, driver centric cars.
That is tough to answer, but we feel it is no. The RX-8 is more than the sum of its numbers. If a customer is purely concerned about the numbers, we invite them to get behind the wheel of the car, and feel what it is about. Mazda has never been known for our horsepower numbers, what we are known for are well balanced best handling, driver centric cars.
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One good thing came from that, I just sent in my email to Mazda telling them I could see a place for a Kabura based, 2500lb rotary car right next to my 2004 RX-8.
#9
RX8 and a Truk....
Yes, as a matter of fact just last month at a SCCA event, two 6 speed MX-5 transmissions failed. These were shipped back to Japan to examine what went wrong. Since the transmissions were stock, no performance parts in them, there could be changes to future transmission based on the data from this event.
That is tough to answer, but we feel it is no. The RX-8 is more than the sum of its numbers. If a customer is purely concerned about the numbers, we invite them to get behind the wheel of the car, and feel what it is about. Mazda has never been known for our horsepower numbers, what we are known for are well balanced best handling, driver centric cars.
#10
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im one of those readers
finally I have an answer
this is the answer I was expecting more or less
the work that the guys at rotary news do is really great, to have the enthusiast ask questions to the executive is priceless
Has the RX-8 been a monetary success for Mazda?
Yes. Every car in our lineup is a success right now.
Yes. Every car in our lineup is a success right now.
Would more power mean more sales for the RX-8?
That is tough to answer, but we feel it is no. The RX-8 is more than the sum of its numbers. If a customer is purely concerned about the numbers, we invite them to get behind the wheel of the car, and feel what it is about. Mazda has never been known for our horsepower numbers, what we are known for are well balanced best handling, driver centric cars.
That is tough to answer, but we feel it is no. The RX-8 is more than the sum of its numbers. If a customer is purely concerned about the numbers, we invite them to get behind the wheel of the car, and feel what it is about. Mazda has never been known for our horsepower numbers, what we are known for are well balanced best handling, driver centric cars.
the work that the guys at rotary news do is really great, to have the enthusiast ask questions to the executive is priceless
Last edited by rotary crazy; 01-13-2006 at 03:20 PM.
#12
I guess I'd like to know why they don't consider to put a Renesis in a MX-5 and call it RX-5 and sell it for $30,000 MSRP. I don't think there would be a need for lots of adaptations.
Why does he think people don't care about power?
Are there S2000 customers that say: Well actually I'd rather have it with 180hp? Or are there any S2000 power reducing kits out there? Besides the S2000 is not exactly a straight line sports car either.
Would more power mean more sales for the RX-8?
That is tough to answer, but we feel it is no. The RX-8 is more than the sum of its numbers. If a customer is purely concerned about the numbers, we invite them to get behind the wheel of the car, and feel what it is about.
That is tough to answer, but we feel it is no. The RX-8 is more than the sum of its numbers. If a customer is purely concerned about the numbers, we invite them to get behind the wheel of the car, and feel what it is about.
Are there S2000 customers that say: Well actually I'd rather have it with 180hp? Or are there any S2000 power reducing kits out there? Besides the S2000 is not exactly a straight line sports car either.
#13
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are steps being taken to upgrade the RX-8 performance?
There will be progressive improvements to the RENESIS and Rotary
There will be progressive improvements to the RENESIS and Rotary
#15
RX8 and a Truk....
Mazda has never been known for our horsepower numbers...
#16
Originally Posted by globi
I guess I'd like to know why they don't consider to put a Renesis in a MX-5 and call it RX-5 and sell it for $30,000 MSRP. I don't think there would be a need for lots of adaptations.
Why does he think people don't care about power?
Are there S2000 customers that say: Well actually I'd rather have it with 180hp? Or are there any S2000 power reducing kits out there? Besides the S2000 is not exactly a straight line sports car either.
Why does he think people don't care about power?
Are there S2000 customers that say: Well actually I'd rather have it with 180hp? Or are there any S2000 power reducing kits out there? Besides the S2000 is not exactly a straight line sports car either.
The simple answer to your question is: A Mazda is for people who treasure the feel of the car, the balance, the handling, the quickness, the finesse. That's their market.
Ferrari folk have a saying "It's not about the numbers." Even though their numbers tend to be spectacular.
Mazda's the same way. It's not about the numbers, it's about how the car feels, how it drives, how it reacts.
So, those craving large doses of neck-snapping, tire-smoking HP and torque..
go buy some dreadful POS like a Rustang or Charger. It won't drive worth a damn. But it'll sure as hell make big clouds of tiresmoke.
#17
Too much horsepower in a given car can ruin the balance of the car. But it takes an experienced, open-minded driver to realize that.
#18
Originally Posted by globi
No offense but you might have noticed that the gaspedal is not an on/off switch. It allows one to adjust the torque at the rear wheels to any level you please. As long as you know how to use that 'torque regulator', there's no such thing as too much horsepower.
Now take a 427 Cobra around the very same track.
See which one gives you the shorter laptimes.
#19
What's your point?
Take a RX-8 around the track.
Take a RX-8 with a turbo kit around the track.
See which gives you shorter track times.
As long as the power delivery is predictable and linear, there's no such thing as too much horsepower.
As far as I know, there's not one race series where race car teams don't go to the limit of the regulations (eg. max out the displacement of the engine).
The major advantage of the rotary engine is its power to weight ratio and its compactness.
When you want to show the qualities of the rotary engine compared to the piston engine off, you should have it in a car that can clearly surpass the competition due the use of this engine. If Mazda had the Renesis in the MX-5 it would be unbeatable in its class.
Also, I believe it's fair to say that most people that buy Ferraris don't know how to handle fast cars, but that doesn't mean that they shouldn't sell them.
Take a RX-8 around the track.
Take a RX-8 with a turbo kit around the track.
See which gives you shorter track times.
As long as the power delivery is predictable and linear, there's no such thing as too much horsepower.
As far as I know, there's not one race series where race car teams don't go to the limit of the regulations (eg. max out the displacement of the engine).
The major advantage of the rotary engine is its power to weight ratio and its compactness.
When you want to show the qualities of the rotary engine compared to the piston engine off, you should have it in a car that can clearly surpass the competition due the use of this engine. If Mazda had the Renesis in the MX-5 it would be unbeatable in its class.
Also, I believe it's fair to say that most people that buy Ferraris don't know how to handle fast cars, but that doesn't mean that they shouldn't sell them.
#20
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gosh...no comment to everything of importance, and honestly by his comments I actually lost some confidence in Mazda. No matter if they keep bringing out rotary engines it seems they are unwilling to put too much into them.
So, honestly...while I wont pay too much attention I'm left feeling our RX8 is not going to improve much.
You know, we all know that Mazda knows balance, handling, driver-car connection, fun factor, and power delivery...but Mazda needs to learn that HP (while not everything) is not a sin.
Stop kidding yourself Mazda, if the RX8 made 300HP you couldn't keep them on the lots. Who are they kidding...this car does so many things so well that removing a slight weak spot would without a doubt help increase sales.
It's like they say..."this is enough, to sell just enough" and while I love them for making the RX8...I feel a little (feel people, relax the flame throwers) disapointed in their response.
I know some people are in love with being unique, but I'm in love with this car and would rather see it grow into legend status like the RX7 instead of..."just that car Mazda made for 4 years...what was it called?"
Sure...I realize I can be completely off base here, but based on that interview Mazda just sounds like the RX8 is nothing but a forgotten product.
So, honestly...while I wont pay too much attention I'm left feeling our RX8 is not going to improve much.
Seriously. Good handling doesn't mean that power isn't a priority.
Stop kidding yourself Mazda, if the RX8 made 300HP you couldn't keep them on the lots. Who are they kidding...this car does so many things so well that removing a slight weak spot would without a doubt help increase sales.
It's like they say..."this is enough, to sell just enough" and while I love them for making the RX8...I feel a little (feel people, relax the flame throwers) disapointed in their response.
I know some people are in love with being unique, but I'm in love with this car and would rather see it grow into legend status like the RX7 instead of..."just that car Mazda made for 4 years...what was it called?"
Sure...I realize I can be completely off base here, but based on that interview Mazda just sounds like the RX8 is nothing but a forgotten product.
#21
Listen to Zoom44
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Overland Park
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Devil
One good thing came from that, I just sent in my email to Mazda telling them I could see a place for a Kabura based, 2500lb rotary car right next to my 2004 RX-8.
#22
Super Moderator
Gee that was a hard hitting interview...NOT....
Mazda are not going to tell RN what is going to happen, because in many cases the concept Kabura is just that...a concept and Ideas to put out there, very, few concepts make it to a prototype then production.
I would suggest even those suits have no firm knowledge about the Kabura....hence the NO Comments..
Mazda are not going to tell the public what they are planning and when.
They just don't do it....even at Sevenstock.... all they may tell you is what is generally already out there...like the 6 speed Auto trans for the 2006 RX-8 this year.
Do you really think the Japanese designers are going to tell a stranger (even a Mazda owner/enthusiast) what they are doing in the way of changes to an existing model.....
They are in the business of selling cars they make NOW, not what's down the road in a few years. IF they told the future on the RX-8 and RENISIS, or any model to an owner, what do you think a Mazda Dealer would think if it became common knowledge on the web/press that this or that is changing on the RX-8....it would effect car sales...and existing stocks.
In my experience it has only ever been Dealer Principals (owners) who are told some future model details, again what Mazda want to tell them. A Dealership wants his salespersons to sell what he has in stock today, not in the future.
Mazda will leak the real info when they are good and ready, and generally not before.
Thanks though to RN for trying, I agree the best way is to email Mazda USA about your thoughts on the Kabura and rotaries.
Mazda are not going to tell RN what is going to happen, because in many cases the concept Kabura is just that...a concept and Ideas to put out there, very, few concepts make it to a prototype then production.
I would suggest even those suits have no firm knowledge about the Kabura....hence the NO Comments..
Mazda are not going to tell the public what they are planning and when.
They just don't do it....even at Sevenstock.... all they may tell you is what is generally already out there...like the 6 speed Auto trans for the 2006 RX-8 this year.
Do you really think the Japanese designers are going to tell a stranger (even a Mazda owner/enthusiast) what they are doing in the way of changes to an existing model.....
They are in the business of selling cars they make NOW, not what's down the road in a few years. IF they told the future on the RX-8 and RENISIS, or any model to an owner, what do you think a Mazda Dealer would think if it became common knowledge on the web/press that this or that is changing on the RX-8....it would effect car sales...and existing stocks.
In my experience it has only ever been Dealer Principals (owners) who are told some future model details, again what Mazda want to tell them. A Dealership wants his salespersons to sell what he has in stock today, not in the future.
Mazda will leak the real info when they are good and ready, and generally not before.
Thanks though to RN for trying, I agree the best way is to email Mazda USA about your thoughts on the Kabura and rotaries.
#23
Originally Posted by missinmahseven
Any response to your question will likely inflame and **** off people. Those who get pissed off at my reply are likely Horsepower ******, those who would sell their soul for 20 more ponies. Because More is Better, right? Wrong. Too much horsepower in a given car can ruin the balance of the car. But it takes an experienced, open-minded driver to realize that.
The simple answer to your question is: A Mazda is for people who treasure the feel of the car, the balance, the handling, the quickness, the finesse. That's their market.
Ferrari folk have a saying "It's not about the numbers." Even though their numbers tend to be spectacular.
Mazda's the same way. It's not about the numbers, it's about how the car feels, how it drives, how it reacts.
So, those craving large doses of neck-snapping, tire-smoking HP and torque..
go buy some dreadful POS like a Rustang or Charger. It won't drive worth a damn. But it'll sure as hell make big clouds of tiresmoke.
The simple answer to your question is: A Mazda is for people who treasure the feel of the car, the balance, the handling, the quickness, the finesse. That's their market.
Ferrari folk have a saying "It's not about the numbers." Even though their numbers tend to be spectacular.
Mazda's the same way. It's not about the numbers, it's about how the car feels, how it drives, how it reacts.
So, those craving large doses of neck-snapping, tire-smoking HP and torque..
go buy some dreadful POS like a Rustang or Charger. It won't drive worth a damn. But it'll sure as hell make big clouds of tiresmoke.
I like how you are a experienced, open-minded driver, then throw the cheap shot POS Rustang and Charger comment in.
#24
Riot Controller
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
remember though, that those of us on this forum represent the majority of the enthusiast rx-8 market...and that, unfortunately, is only a sliver of the entire rx-8 population. of course we'd like more power, stickier tires, better drivetrain...but you know what? for 90% of the rx-8 customers, what they have is just fine. the rx-8 is a one of a kind chassis for the mazda line. they must sell as many rx-8's to reduce their per unit cost of design. the rx-8 and the renesis were very expensive to design, much more so than a Z (which uses the same v6 found in every other nissan with a v6). take say, an impreza...subaru knows they can roll millions off the lot and they can use that profit to design econobox+ cars like the wrx or the sti and only build what they think they can sell, not what they need to as in mazda's case. also consider the MS6..i promise you'll see more ferrari's on the road than ms6's. mazda just put a little (relatively) r&d work into the 6 platform, and turned it into an econobox+ model. now all they have to do is sell enough to cover the cost of r&d for that specific trim, not the entire model family...if it's a hit in the market (which I don't see happening) then they'll run with it, but if not then consider it a dead end.
they've got a business to run over there in hiroshima, and pushing the rx-8 any farther than it is would increase MSRP's and costs, both of which could spell the end of the RX line of mazdas for good. im not saying i wouldn't love to see a 350hp FI'd rx-8 on the showroom floor, but it just isn't going to happen.
they've got a business to run over there in hiroshima, and pushing the rx-8 any farther than it is would increase MSRP's and costs, both of which could spell the end of the RX line of mazdas for good. im not saying i wouldn't love to see a 350hp FI'd rx-8 on the showroom floor, but it just isn't going to happen.
#25
Son what is your Alibi?
iTrader: (1)
I don't buy it, all that hub-bub about the RENESIS being a "very expensive" engine to produce.
I was under the impression that when ford took its stake in mazda that they stopped funding on rotary development and laid-off all but one guy from the R&D team. The R&D of the RENESIS was then done chiefly by a single individual in his spare time with assistance from the former empolyees. R&D cost to the company was minimal at best.
Far as the tooling costs, what the hell is he talking about the RENESIS is produced on the same assebly line as the 13B-REW was and is assembled by hand, so once again costs of production is minimal as best....
This guy probably played a roll in original decision to cut funding to the rotary segment, corporate blow hard IMHO
I was under the impression that when ford took its stake in mazda that they stopped funding on rotary development and laid-off all but one guy from the R&D team. The R&D of the RENESIS was then done chiefly by a single individual in his spare time with assistance from the former empolyees. R&D cost to the company was minimal at best.
Far as the tooling costs, what the hell is he talking about the RENESIS is produced on the same assebly line as the 13B-REW was and is assembled by hand, so once again costs of production is minimal as best....
This guy probably played a roll in original decision to cut funding to the rotary segment, corporate blow hard IMHO