09 RX8 to be released in Detroit
#1
09 RX8 to be released in Detroit
Sounds interesting....From what I have heard. But what do I know
Actually, I'm kind of suprised they're keeping it around with the lack luster sales and high fuel prices but it will be a great to see an updated RX8.
And yes, I know this should go in a different forum so maybe I'll make this post relavent by asking "Do you think the 09 RX8 will stay in BS". I hear there will be more power but that's yet to be seen.....
Stuart
Actually, I'm kind of suprised they're keeping it around with the lack luster sales and high fuel prices but it will be a great to see an updated RX8.
And yes, I know this should go in a different forum so maybe I'll make this post relavent by asking "Do you think the 09 RX8 will stay in BS". I hear there will be more power but that's yet to be seen.....
Stuart
#2
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To add some 'meat' to your thread, here's a story from Autoweek about the 2009 RX-8:
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl.../71212001/1065
RX-8 for '09
While the Furai concept will likely steal all the spotlight on the Mazda stand in Detroit, the 2009 RX-8 will also be revealed.
Mazda is downplaying changes to the new sports car, saying only that it will sport "a freshened design, improved handling, acceleration, quality and features," which could mean anything.
While the Furai concept will likely steal all the spotlight on the Mazda stand in Detroit, the 2009 RX-8 will also be revealed.
Mazda is downplaying changes to the new sports car, saying only that it will sport "a freshened design, improved handling, acceleration, quality and features," which could mean anything.
#3
If it really does have "improved acceleration, handling...", wouldn't it be likely that SEB would stick it into AS, initially, so as not to upset the status quo in BS?
The class seems strong and lots more people are discovering the great bang for the buck/practicality of the '8 for autocross, which should just lead to more participation in BS...I wouldn't think you'd want to screw that up...of course, looking at how the rally cars have been treated, I guess expecting a pragmatic response to the new '8 is questionable...
The class seems strong and lots more people are discovering the great bang for the buck/practicality of the '8 for autocross, which should just lead to more participation in BS...I wouldn't think you'd want to screw that up...of course, looking at how the rally cars have been treated, I guess expecting a pragmatic response to the new '8 is questionable...
#6
"Power numbers for the 16X will be somewhere around 270-280hp and 190 ft lbs of torque or so."
#8
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a thought...
#9
It could actually have good reason to end up in BS. Why? If CS is getting as close to BS as Rick's latest PAX numbers indicate, maybe BS needs to speed up some more. This faster BS could allow some uncompetitive cars in AS to move down - like the 1st gen 201hp Porsche Boxster (non S).
Just a thought...
Just a thought...
If that were the case, I guess you could move the current RX8 into CS, since you're already breaking up the Boxster line, what's one more?...sure, you'd have two Mazdas with somewhat different missions in life in the class, but, the whole idea of "similar cars" doesn't seem to be very important in many of the recent classing decisions, so what the heck...interesting...
Last edited by mwood; 12-12-2007 at 08:24 PM.
#10
And...a very intelligent thought
If that were the case, I guess you could move the current RX8 into CS, since you're already breaking up the Boxster line, what's one more?...sure, you'd have two Mazdas with somewhat different missions in life in the class, but, the whole idea of "similar cars" doesn't seem to be very important in many of the recent classing decisions, so what the heck...interesting...
If that were the case, I guess you could move the current RX8 into CS, since you're already breaking up the Boxster line, what's one more?...sure, you'd have two Mazdas with somewhat different missions in life in the class, but, the whole idea of "similar cars" doesn't seem to be very important in many of the recent classing decisions, so what the heck...interesting...
Regardless, we don't know what the differences are going to be just yet. Maybe the differences will be big enough that most everyone agrees on the 09 being an AS car. Maybe they'll be so slight that everyone agrees it should stay in BS. Maybe it will be different enough that reasonable people disagree.
Until we know, though...what do we know?
#11
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah....U BS guys need to speed up or design all the courses so you stay up above 50mph's on courses so us loser CS guys don't make you look so bad.
LOL!
Just kidding.
This new 8 might be something worth getting.
FM
LOL!
Just kidding.
This new 8 might be something worth getting.
FM
#13
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mason City, Iowa
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks like Lightning McQueen with a smile on his face.
Tangential thoughts:
To stay a viable player in the class (not autocross class, class of cars in general), the RX8 has to increase horsepower and, perhaps more important, torque. In addition, improving fuel economy would be nice. Getting crappy mileage in a performance car is understandable, but its tough to take in a car that is so gutless on the street. Hopefully the 1.6 will address the gutlessness and/or the fuel economy.
I believe the increase in torque will make a difference in stock class autocross competition especially if the suspension setup is similar. An increase in wheel width but not diameter would be pretty cool as well.
As much as the rotary purists hate the idea, I think that an rx8 with the 3.7 V6 would be an excellent car. You might lose some in handling, but it would be faster and, with appropriate gearing, get much better gas mileage. That said, I have to respect Mazda's devotion to both the rotary and building affordable cars that handle so well.
Tangential thoughts:
To stay a viable player in the class (not autocross class, class of cars in general), the RX8 has to increase horsepower and, perhaps more important, torque. In addition, improving fuel economy would be nice. Getting crappy mileage in a performance car is understandable, but its tough to take in a car that is so gutless on the street. Hopefully the 1.6 will address the gutlessness and/or the fuel economy.
I believe the increase in torque will make a difference in stock class autocross competition especially if the suspension setup is similar. An increase in wheel width but not diameter would be pretty cool as well.
As much as the rotary purists hate the idea, I think that an rx8 with the 3.7 V6 would be an excellent car. You might lose some in handling, but it would be faster and, with appropriate gearing, get much better gas mileage. That said, I have to respect Mazda's devotion to both the rotary and building affordable cars that handle so well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Audio Concepts ATL
New Member Forum
21
09-26-2021 01:59 PM
{FS/WTT} 04 Black Rx-8 TRACK AUTOX TIMEATTACK
Billy Marcial
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
5
03-01-2018 06:50 AM