2006 SCCA solo2 rules online
#3
Thread Starter
05-08 SCCA BS Natl Champ
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Coto de Caza, CA
Originally Posted by Imp
Where the **** are the STU and STS2 rules? This is bullcrap man.
That is strange because I had read a post from Doug Gill that it would be listed this year.....
http://www.scca.org/garage/forum/for...956&PN=1&TPN=1
Last edited by ULLLOSE; 12-14-2005 at 01:18 PM.
#5
Originally Posted by Imp
Where the **** are the STU and STS2 rules? This is bullcrap man.
http://www.scca.com/_FileLibrary/Fil...talclasses.pdf
#6
Originally Posted by John V
Pace yourself, they're right on that same page.
http://www.scca.com/_FileLibrary/Fil...talclasses.pdf
http://www.scca.com/_FileLibrary/Fil...talclasses.pdf
This is one of the other issues: There are quite a few draconian regions that run by the mantra "If they're not in the rule book, then we won't offer them." They were in Fastracks since '04 also... and some regions refuse to offer them still.
Sad, but true. Not having it in the rules also further hinders subscription to the class. And this is where one can put the tin foil hat on... the SEB doesn't want the class to become a class in 2007. Just saying 'oops' doesn't cut it with me, nor most of the other people in the classes that run there.
They (SEB) pulled the same kind of crap with STX when it came out. (Town Hall Meeting at Nats) It's one of them things... old school vs new.
--kC
Last edited by Imp; 12-15-2005 at 06:59 AM.
#7
I am farily new to the autocross world. I just completed my first season, but only participated in about half of the events. So please excuse my noob question.
Why is STU not conisidered a legitimate class?
In our region, there are about 3 cars that show up on a regular basis for STU, an Sti, a Saleen S281 and myself. So I am stuck fighting for 2nd place. It would be nice to have a little more competition. Especially since I am stuck in STU or BSP. And nobody in our region shows for BSP, so that is no fun.
Why is STU not conisidered a legitimate class?
In our region, there are about 3 cars that show up on a regular basis for STU, an Sti, a Saleen S281 and myself. So I am stuck fighting for 2nd place. It would be nice to have a little more competition. Especially since I am stuck in STU or BSP. And nobody in our region shows for BSP, so that is no fun.
#8
Keith I agree, it's a catch-22 situation - it's a "supplemental" class until it makes enough numbers at nationals X years in a row. But it's unlikely to make good numbers on the regional and divisional level until it's an "official" class.
#9
Thread Starter
05-08 SCCA BS Natl Champ
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Coto de Caza, CA
Originally Posted by L8APEX
I am farily new to the autocross world. I just completed my first season, but only participated in about half of the events. So please excuse my noob question.
Why is STU not conisidered a legitimate class?
In our region, there are about 3 cars that show up on a regular basis for STU, an Sti, a Saleen S281 and myself. So I am stuck fighting for 2nd place. It would be nice to have a little more competition. Especially since I am stuck in STU or BSP. And nobody in our region shows for BSP, so that is no fun.
Why is STU not conisidered a legitimate class?
In our region, there are about 3 cars that show up on a regular basis for STU, an Sti, a Saleen S281 and myself. So I am stuck fighting for 2nd place. It would be nice to have a little more competition. Especially since I am stuck in STU or BSP. And nobody in our region shows for BSP, so that is no fun.
#11
there's no agenda, etc.
The SEB reviewed and discussed the new rulebook material with the STAC a month or two ago, it was just a simple clerical error
so Keith, STFU with the ignorance already, it's easy to have demanding expectations when they're on somebody else, having served in the position I can tell you it's a second job unto itself except with no pay or benefits, it only takes away from your personal life. It's a wonder anyone would even want to serve because guys like Keith can't do anything but bitch and moan for every last drop of blood from them ... that's exactly why I have no remorse for leaving
what an id--t ...
The SEB reviewed and discussed the new rulebook material with the STAC a month or two ago, it was just a simple clerical error
so Keith, STFU with the ignorance already, it's easy to have demanding expectations when they're on somebody else, having served in the position I can tell you it's a second job unto itself except with no pay or benefits, it only takes away from your personal life. It's a wonder anyone would even want to serve because guys like Keith can't do anything but bitch and moan for every last drop of blood from them ... that's exactly why I have no remorse for leaving
what an id--t ...
Last edited by TeamRX8; 12-15-2005 at 10:53 AM.
#12
Mark,
Are you on the SEB? Only they have the right to tell me to STFU. Didn't you get the memo? And besides.. who the **** are you to tell me to shut the **** up?
I happen to be the more vocal on it. Trust me on this... there are many more people than myself that are way more pissed about this 'clerical error'.
It's really simple: it shouldn't have happend PERIOD. I can give them missing it for one year. Fine. I'm cool with that. 2 years in a row when they KNOW that they have classes that need membership to show up to run to have the class become a class? Nope. Sorry, just not buying it.
People dropped the ball. Twice with the same mistake. The worst that can happen is words on a forum. Scared of that? Of some major displeasure? Be thankful that's all that can happen. I know people that have been fined and fired for simple stuff. WHat the **** happens to the SEB? NOTHING.
Is it too much to ask for some accountability? That's all many people are asking.
--kC
Are you on the SEB? Only they have the right to tell me to STFU. Didn't you get the memo? And besides.. who the **** are you to tell me to shut the **** up?
I happen to be the more vocal on it. Trust me on this... there are many more people than myself that are way more pissed about this 'clerical error'.
It's really simple: it shouldn't have happend PERIOD. I can give them missing it for one year. Fine. I'm cool with that. 2 years in a row when they KNOW that they have classes that need membership to show up to run to have the class become a class? Nope. Sorry, just not buying it.
People dropped the ball. Twice with the same mistake. The worst that can happen is words on a forum. Scared of that? Of some major displeasure? Be thankful that's all that can happen. I know people that have been fined and fired for simple stuff. WHat the **** happens to the SEB? NOTHING.
Is it too much to ask for some accountability? That's all many people are asking.
--kC
Last edited by Imp; 12-15-2005 at 11:09 AM.
#17
Originally Posted by StrokerAce
Imp: Want some cheese with that whine? Afterall there are 250+ million people in the US whose only purpose in life is to jerk you around.
Ray
Ray
And about them people... THEY OWE ME MONEY! Two dollars each should suffice. :D
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shankapotamus3
Series I Trouble Shooting
28
03-14-2021 03:53 PM
Touge
Canada Forum
1
09-23-2019 06:45 PM
Michael Bryant
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
5
10-12-2015 03:07 PM
Touge
Canada Forum
0
09-23-2015 10:51 PM