Amount of gas in tank for best balance?
#1
Amount of gas in tank for best balance?
Does anyone know what amount of gas in the tank will give the best balanced performance for autocross?
Also, I think I'm going to run my first event next week, looking at my mods, would i be a BSP?
Also, I think I'm going to run my first event next week, looking at my mods, would i be a BSP?
#2
Originally Posted by staticlag
Does anyone know what amount of gas in the tank will give the best balanced performance for autocross?
Also, I think I'm going to run my first event next week, looking at my mods, would i be a BSP?
Also, I think I'm going to run my first event next week, looking at my mods, would i be a BSP?
#3
Originally Posted by staticlag
Does anyone know what amount of gas in the tank will give the best balanced performance for autocross?
Also, I think I'm going to run my first event next week, looking at my mods, would i be a BSP?
Also, I think I'm going to run my first event next week, looking at my mods, would i be a BSP?
#4
I found this old thread and thought I'd revive it, because I'm trying to figure out why my car was so loose at the last autocross I ran, after feeling pretty darn good previously.
The only variables which changed in the last event were tire wear (going over 60 runs now on the V710's) and fuel load. The first couple of events in this car, I ran with close to/over 1/2 tank, simply because I didn't really monitor it going into the weekend. The last event, I made sure to have less than 1/4 tank...closer to 1/8 tank.
Has anyone noticed any real difference in handling balance with as little as 3-4 gallons less/more in the tank? Also, has anyone noticed any difference in front/rear grip levels as the Kumhos start to taper off?
The only variables which changed in the last event were tire wear (going over 60 runs now on the V710's) and fuel load. The first couple of events in this car, I ran with close to/over 1/2 tank, simply because I didn't really monitor it going into the weekend. The last event, I made sure to have less than 1/4 tank...closer to 1/8 tank.
Has anyone noticed any real difference in handling balance with as little as 3-4 gallons less/more in the tank? Also, has anyone noticed any difference in front/rear grip levels as the Kumhos start to taper off?
#5
I try to run mine as low as possible, and at local events (local to me at least), I get away with running with the light on. However, at Nationals I about shat my pants because the thing cut out twice during my first run...I think during sustained, high g right handers.
I would guess your loose condition is related to something else, but I would defer to others in the know...
I would guess your loose condition is related to something else, but I would defer to others in the know...
#6
I got fuel starve at natls with just under a 1/4 tank on the right course, first one we ran, on my first two runs. After the fast long left hand sweeper, which is the direction that gives the road racers problems, I down shifted to 1st for the very tight almost 180 right turn. I got a hick-up in 1st gear coming out of the turn on my first run. I thought maybe that car was cold or I just spun the tires and did not worry about it. On run two it did the same thing so I put an extra gallon of gas in for my 3rd run and the problem went away.
#7
I'm going to run this weekend with between 1/4 and 1/2 and see how it goes. I'm just searching, here...can't admit that it was my driving that was loose, not the car
Jason, is there any RV parking at Cal Speedway on weekends when Cal Club does two day events?
Jason, is there any RV parking at Cal Speedway on weekends when Cal Club does two day events?
#8
you'll find that rear camber & toe changes more than you think based on rear weight loading, that's why I recommend a small amount of rear toe-in over zero toe
otherwise go for minimum weight, which WRT the original question is the minimum amount of fuel required to prevent starvation, and balance the car using other available methods
otherwise go for minimum weight, which WRT the original question is the minimum amount of fuel required to prevent starvation, and balance the car using other available methods
Last edited by TeamRX8; 11-29-2006 at 07:02 PM.
#9
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
you'll find that rear camber & toe changes more than you think based on rear weight loading, that's why I recommend a small amount of rear toe-in over zero toe
otherwise go for minimum weight, which WRT the original question is the minimum amount of fuel required to prevent starvation, and balance the car using other available methods
otherwise go for minimum weight, which WRT the original question is the minimum amount of fuel required to prevent starvation, and balance the car using other available methods
#10
Originally Posted by mwood
I'm going to run this weekend with between 1/4 and 1/2 and see how it goes. I'm just searching, here...can't admit that it was my driving that was loose, not the car
Jason, is there any RV parking at Cal Speedway on weekends when Cal Club does two day events?
Jason, is there any RV parking at Cal Speedway on weekends when Cal Club does two day events?
#12
Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
People have stayed there but the policy is no overnight parking. Unless you join one of the local cal clubs I doubt you will get in to a practice day, most of them fill up in a day or two.
Doesn't San Diego run on Saturdays at Qualcom, btw?
Also, back on topic, I realize now that I did have two changes that would make a difference in rear weight and weigh balance, last event. First, as mentioned, I was somewhere between 28-35lbs lighter on fuel. Second, I also had just done the single exit exhaust, which takes about 25lbs directly off the tail. So, maybe a 50-60lbs reduction in rear weight + having my alignment done with almost a full tank of gas could be something to consider...
When I install the Konis over the holidays and put the car back on the rack, I'll be sure to get my alignment done with about 1/4 tank, just to eliminate any noise from that variable.
#13
Originally Posted by mwood
Oh well, I was thinking about coming down for a weekend in January to run with you guys...but, that's a hike for one day/three runs. Maybe if I ask nice, and solicit the help of some of my friends down there, I can get in to a practice day?
Doesn't San Diego run on Saturdays at Qualcom, btw?
Also, back on topic, I realize now that I did have two changes that would make a difference in rear weight and weigh balance, last event. First, as mentioned, I was somewhere between 28-35lbs lighter on fuel. Second, I also had just done the single exit exhaust, which takes about 25lbs directly off the tail. So, maybe a 50-60lbs reduction in rear weight + having my alignment done with almost a full tank of gas could be something to consider...
When I install the Konis over the holidays and put the car back on the rack, I'll be sure to get my alignment done with about 1/4 tank, just to eliminate any noise from that variable.
Doesn't San Diego run on Saturdays at Qualcom, btw?
Also, back on topic, I realize now that I did have two changes that would make a difference in rear weight and weigh balance, last event. First, as mentioned, I was somewhere between 28-35lbs lighter on fuel. Second, I also had just done the single exit exhaust, which takes about 25lbs directly off the tail. So, maybe a 50-60lbs reduction in rear weight + having my alignment done with almost a full tank of gas could be something to consider...
When I install the Konis over the holidays and put the car back on the rack, I'll be sure to get my alignment done with about 1/4 tank, just to eliminate any noise from that variable.
#15
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
yeah Mike, you probably lost enough rear camber to cause an issue, of course you could always put a stiffer front bar on instead ...
Seriously, if you lost camber from, in effect, raising rear ride height, wouldn't you gain toe in? Have you ever plotted the change in camber and toe for a given movement upwards?
#16
Originally Posted by mwood
Are you serious about this camber loss, or trying to get me to buy a Team RX8 sta bar?
Seriously, if you lost camber from, in effect, raising rear ride height, wouldn't you gain toe in? Have you ever plotted the change in camber and toe for a given movement upwards?
Seriously, if you lost camber from, in effect, raising rear ride height, wouldn't you gain toe in? Have you ever plotted the change in camber and toe for a given movement upwards?
Joe runs very little camber and toe out as well. I think Kieth Casey ran some toe out also.
#18
Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
Going up should go to toe out. So if your car came up you would have lost some camber and toe.
Joe runs very little camber and toe out as well. I think Kieth Casey ran some toe out also.
Joe runs very little camber and toe out as well. I think Kieth Casey ran some toe out also.
#19
Originally Posted by altiain
Hmm... that might explain why my new car feels a bit twitchier than the car I'd driven for most of last season, despite otherwise similar specs...
#20
I ran the car today, but with almost 3/4 tank of gas...kind of like adding back the stock muffler and the 3/8-1/2 tank I'd been running with (approx. 60 lbs)...and the car was much more neutral. Of course, we were on a different surface, but the front/rear grip was much more even, in any case. The car still felt a little loose, but the tires are now over 80 runs. I may go to a tiny bit of rear toe in, next alignment.
So, the upshoot is that when I install my shocks, I'm going to be sure to do the alignment with the car as it's going to be run...1/8 tank gas and all items removed (tire kit, floor mats, undercoating...oops, jk!). At least then I'll know exactly what I'm working with.
So, the upshoot is that when I install my shocks, I'm going to be sure to do the alignment with the car as it's going to be run...1/8 tank gas and all items removed (tire kit, floor mats, undercoating...oops, jk!). At least then I'll know exactly what I'm working with.
Last edited by mwood; 12-04-2006 at 01:11 AM.
#21
mike, im sure you know that most people think GGF makes cars a lot more loose than monster. doesnt seem to affect me (in any of my cars)- i go loose even in front drivers :P
i was sick as a dog and lying down with my head swimming before my runs, so i hardly remember anything that happened sunday. its so bumpy at monster im not sure its easy to tell much there other than if your car hits rubber or metal when it bottoms.
james
i was sick as a dog and lying down with my head swimming before my runs, so i hardly remember anything that happened sunday. its so bumpy at monster im not sure its easy to tell much there other than if your car hits rubber or metal when it bottoms.
james
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Michael Bryant
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
5
10-12-2015 04:07 PM