Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

Anybody runing TTD in NASA TT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-12-2007 | 01:18 PM
  #26  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
if you took out the ac you would be assessed a point for pulley delete.
Old 07-12-2007 | 01:41 PM
  #27  
altiain's Avatar
Sparky!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: East Jesus (Murphy, TX)
Originally Posted by mac11
if you took out the ac you would be assessed a point for pulley delete.
Umm... that's not how I read it.

Originally Posted by NASA Time Trial Rulebook
ENGINE/DRIVETRAIN:
9) Replacement pulleys (other than for supercharger) +1
Originally Posted by NASA Time Trial Rulebook
NO-POINTS MODIFICATIONS:
4) AC and condenser removal
As I see it, the rule under ENGINE/DRIVETRAIN is referring to underdrive pulleys. It makes no mention of assessing points for removal of pulleys, OEM or not. The rule under NO-POINTS MODIFICATIONS allows for AC and condenser removal, but is not specific as to what constitutes "AC". I would argue that the AC pulley is part of the AC.

Regardless, you can always leave the pulley and run a different belt that bypasses the AC pulley.
Old 07-12-2007 | 01:44 PM
  #28  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by altiain
Umm... that's not how I read it.





As I see it, the rule under ENGINE/DRIVETRAIN is referring to underdrive pulleys. It makes no mention of assessing points for removal of pulleys, OEM or not. The rule under NO-POINTS MODIFICATIONS allows for AC and condenser removal, but is not specific as to what constitutes "AC". I would argue that the AC pulley is part of the AC.

Regardless, you can always leave the pulley and run a different belt that bypasses the AC pulley.
Good call...I read it the way Mac was interpreting it also. Definitely some hp to be picked up from that, and a drop in weight....not so sure I'd go so far to do this step, though.
Old 07-12-2007 | 01:44 PM
  #29  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 7
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Originally Posted by altiain
Avenger, do you ever make it up to MSR near DFW? I'd like to get back into doing some track days, and might end up converting my B Stock RX-8 over to a TTD car in the next couple of years. I'd be curious to see how a B Stock car on V710s (my car currently racks up +14 according to NASA's rules) stacks up against your car.

By my reckoning, you could build a pretty competitive TTD car, starting with an RX-8:

Shocks: +3
Springs: +2 (you could have a pretty sophisticated set of double-adjustable coilover shocks built that would still avoid the +7 assessment)
Sway bars: +2
Exhaust: +1 (no power, but shave 35+ pounds out of the car pretty easily)
245 width V710s: +10
Total: +18 <--- Still in TTD, and can take another 19 pounds in weight loss figuring the alternate min. comp. weight with that last point

Add in some of the "freebie" mods (shorter final drive, lightweight clutch and flywheel, remove a/c and radio), and you'd have to ballast to make min. weight. I'm 205#, and based on what my car weighed in track trim at the Houston SCCA National Tour, I'm only about 5# over the minimum competition weight as it is right now. Get a lighter driver and/or start ripping out free components, and it's time to add ballast.
Put in a rollbar for safety. That will give you your weight back and add some chassis stiffness.
Old 07-12-2007 | 01:46 PM
  #30  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 7
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
You could also fab a idler pully to replace the missing AC unit.
Old 07-12-2007 | 03:03 PM
  #31  
altiain's Avatar
Sparky!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: East Jesus (Murphy, TX)
Originally Posted by alnielsen
Put in a rollbar for safety. That will give you your weight back and add some chassis stiffness.
Yeah, a car built to the limit of the rules would have full safety equipment, including a cage, proper seats and restraints, all airbags removed, etc.. You could then gut the car and use the alternate weight formula (so that you could avoid taking points for the removal of OEM seats, interior parts, etc.). Rip out enough stuff and ballast it back up to the required minimum weight by placing the ballast exactly where you want it.
Old 07-12-2007 | 03:49 PM
  #32  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
The AC runs on it's own belt and drive pulley separate from the main alternator and water pump drive system. The AC drive pulley is a separate part that bolts on in place with the main drive pulley on the e-shaft nose.

So you can remove the AC unit in whole including the drive pulley without needing any mods.

Last edited by TeamRX8; 07-12-2007 at 03:52 PM.
Old 07-12-2007 | 03:59 PM
  #33  
avenger's Avatar
likes to do drawerings
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
I'm not even thinking about it that much. I guess my only real goal is to be competitive. Im sure there are going to be some tough cars in TTD to beat but I'm not going to monkey too much with the car past what I've done to it (except for a cage, seat, and harness). Occasionally I do feel unsettled with what I'm doing with the car and at the speeds.

I've been to MSR up in Cresson. I'm actually going up there this weekend for a DE. I LOVE that new section of the track. Great elevation changes and love working the 180* corners. Great track. Even in the rain. Teaches driver control.
Old 07-12-2007 | 04:12 PM
  #34  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
The AC runs on it's own belt and drive pulley separate from the main alternator and water pump drive system. The AC drive pulley is a separate part that bolts on in place with the main drive pulley on the e-shaft nose.

So you can remove the AC unit in whole including the drive pulley without needing any mods.
+1


we talked about and looked at this a couple of weeks ago, RD. I guess if they are not going ot asess any points and you want to retain the a/c you could always just take off the drive belt for the weekend.
Old 07-12-2007 | 09:54 PM
  #35  
BlueRenesis82's Avatar
Registered Tracker
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
How much performance difference are we talking about with the AC belt removal?
Old 07-12-2007 | 10:05 PM
  #36  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
dunno on the 8. depends on the compressor. some can be a large drag and some can be almost not noticed. belt looks pretty easy to take off. try it out? Possibly an experiment for next weekend?
Old 07-12-2007 | 10:28 PM
  #37  
BlueRenesis82's Avatar
Registered Tracker
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Personally I would rather try and get the last tenth out of my driving before I start ripping off belts on my car. But like you said, if it makes a big deal I might be more open to the work
Old 07-12-2007 | 10:31 PM
  #38  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
with as easy as it is to take the belt off (and as hard - in comparison - to get the last tenth out of my driving abilities) i would be willing to give it a shot next weekend if i am running.
Old 07-12-2007 | 10:42 PM
  #39  
BlueRenesis82's Avatar
Registered Tracker
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
I guess, just be sure nothing else weird that might be related is happening
Old 07-12-2007 | 11:04 PM
  #40  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 7
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
The compressor has a clutch on it. The compressor only turns when the clutch is engaged. There will some small loss with the belt on, but not much. The biggest gain would be in weight when you removed the system.
Old 07-12-2007 | 11:06 PM
  #41  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
not sure what that might be? as said the a/c is the only accessory on that belt. Taking it off won't affect anything else at all whatsoever end of story bottom of the 9th you're out.
Old 07-13-2007 | 07:21 AM
  #42  
avenger's Avatar
likes to do drawerings
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
You guys are way too concerned over that damn ac. Unless you're prepping a full out race car I just don't see the continuous tangible benefit. Just as a point of contention ... The last time I was out on track on the 2nd day I ran with the A/C turned on! I kept forgetting I had it on because I was baking in the car while waiting on grid so I kept it on while I was waiting. When the grid marshall released us I totally forgot turn it off (4 times that day ... yes I'm a little absent minded occasionally). Here's the kicker ... I was almost as fast as I was without it on and passed the same cars that I normally did. In fact there wasn't enough of a difference until I pitted and realized I had cold air blowing in my face (lap times differed by 0.11 ac vs. no ac).

See when I feel that I'm slow around any part of the track or the track as a whole, I don't touch the car. I go find someone who is turning faster times and go look at their line (either by riding along or tailing them next session). Of course this is in relation to our cars (I'm not going to go try and take an AWD line). Most of the time I realize that there is somethings he does better than me and me something better than him. I try to incorporate that into my driving and poof typically after that I can keep up.

I just don't see the belt removal as being beneficial unless you're already at the edge of what the car can do (and honestly does anyone think they are?). I still see the rx8 as a momentum car. I'll do stuff that helps me keep speed rather finding ways to speed up faster. It's not like Nasa TT clocks you from a stop.

Anyway ... my $0.02.
Old 07-13-2007 | 07:54 AM
  #43  
BlueRenesis82's Avatar
Registered Tracker
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
^ +1
Old 07-13-2007 | 08:48 AM
  #44  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
Its probably because the A/C shuts down when at WOT. So you really didn't have the A/C on.
Old 07-13-2007 | 09:07 AM
  #45  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by mac11
Its probably because the A/C shuts down when at WOT. So you really didn't have the A/C on.
Beat me to it.

And I don't see the harm in A/C discussion when the subject is prepping the cars for competitive events where every .01 of a second can be the difference between earning points and not.

Personally, I'll still be driving my RX-8 on the street so I'm not giving up A/C or having a roll cage installed, or do anything drastic.
Old 07-13-2007 | 09:13 AM
  #46  
avenger's Avatar
likes to do drawerings
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
I dunno ... having a roll cage is just a safety thing. Just like having a harness. I'm honestly to the point where I'm holding back because I don't have a cage.

As for the whole AC thing. Time a lap with the belt on and then time a lap with no belt. Lets see the difference.
Old 07-13-2007 | 09:25 AM
  #47  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by avenger
I dunno ... having a roll cage is just a safety thing. Just like having a harness. I'm honestly to the point where I'm holding back because I don't have a cage.

As for the whole AC thing. Time a lap with the belt on and then time a lap with no belt. Lets see the difference.
If you drive your car on the street, you are interfering with the safety equipment in the car - airbags. I wouldn't ride in a car with a roll cage without a helmet, the idea of my head hitting one of those metal bars isn't very enticing.
Old 07-13-2007 | 09:44 AM
  #48  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
Originally Posted by Red Devil
I wouldn't ride in a car with a roll cage without a helmet, the idea of my head hitting one of those metal bars isn't very enticing.
Beat me to it. A street driven car should not have a roll cage. I think I have heard it may even be illegal?
Old 07-13-2007 | 02:23 PM
  #49  
avenger's Avatar
likes to do drawerings
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Wow. 4 point cage. ... do you guys really like driving the car at its limits on the track without one? Haven't seen a car roll on track? Watch what happens to hood.
Old 07-13-2007 | 02:30 PM
  #50  
avenger's Avatar
likes to do drawerings
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Red Devil
If you drive your car on the street, you are interfering with the safety equipment in the car - airbags. I wouldn't ride in a car with a roll cage without a helmet, the idea of my head hitting one of those metal bars isn't very enticing.
You do know they also wrap the bars in the areas where it could come in contact with you with foam. I'm mean it's not the best but its better than bare metal. And also a 4 point cage is BEHIND you but it will save your head from being smashed in the event of a roll over.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Anybody runing TTD in NASA TT?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.