harnesses??
#51
The CG-Lock works great, but there are a few gotchas.
Check out the original thread I posted on the subject for more details.
BTW, anyone in the DC/Baltimore area that wants to see how it fits in an RX-8, just let me know.
Brian
Check out the original thread I posted on the subject for more details.
BTW, anyone in the DC/Baltimore area that wants to see how it fits in an RX-8, just let me know.
Brian
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East France
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi there!
We are a group of French 8 owners ( rx8france.com ) and we're very interested in adding a harness to the 8! I've already seen some great things concerning this but i'm still wondering how you manage to attach the harness to the front seat ( left and right )?
Do you have any infos or photos about this? Thx a lot!
Ben / f1clc
Edit: there's indeed a picture in this thread concerning my question but it sounds a bit strange to me!
The harness is attached behind the front seat?
I wish i could attach it on each sides but i'm aware there's not much space by there!
_
We are a group of French 8 owners ( rx8france.com ) and we're very interested in adding a harness to the 8! I've already seen some great things concerning this but i'm still wondering how you manage to attach the harness to the front seat ( left and right )?
Do you have any infos or photos about this? Thx a lot!
Ben / f1clc
Edit: there's indeed a picture in this thread concerning my question but it sounds a bit strange to me!
The harness is attached behind the front seat?
I wish i could attach it on each sides but i'm aware there's not much space by there!
_
Last edited by f1clc; 10-16-2004 at 12:08 PM.
#55
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AlexCisneros
I'm using two 3/8" Quick Links to attach on the child tethers in the back seat. This makes it much easier to attach and detach
http://www.imperialinc.com/items.asp?item=0247780
I am using the factory Grade 8 bolts and welding a 3/8" eye bolt to the top of the heads.
http://www.imperialinc.com/items.asp?item=0443420
The Sparco Belt is, 2" (just noticed I said 3"):
http://www.sparcousa.com/pharness_tuning.asp?id=401
Like you said, it's not crashworthy but keeps your butt from sliding all over the place
http://www.imperialinc.com/items.asp?item=0247780
I am using the factory Grade 8 bolts and welding a 3/8" eye bolt to the top of the heads.
http://www.imperialinc.com/items.asp?item=0443420
The Sparco Belt is, 2" (just noticed I said 3"):
http://www.sparcousa.com/pharness_tuning.asp?id=401
Like you said, it's not crashworthy but keeps your butt from sliding all over the place
sorry, about the left and right side where you mounted the side belts, did you have to drill or remove something? is there a hole that exists there before that you can screw into at the base of the seats? Thanks!
#56
Registered User
No, I there are two plastic covers behind the seat. One is where the Seatbelt Rail is mounted (left side next to door), the other is where the seat is mounted (right side). Both plastic covers hide these bolts. To these I had eyebolts (more like eye since I cut off the bolt part) welded to the heads.
#59
Originally Posted by AlexCisneros
oui, aussi facile que cela
Do you speak french?
I'm Leo another RX-8 french owner interested by installing harness in my car.
May I ask you some questions in French?
Bye
#60
Does anyone know of any harness guide bar being made for the 8?
This one is nice but they're not making it for the 8 :-(
http://www.sparcousa.com/harness_bars.asp
I probably won't use it to strap my belts on like its shown in the picture though ;-)
This one is nice but they're not making it for the 8 :-(
http://www.sparcousa.com/harness_bars.asp
I probably won't use it to strap my belts on like its shown in the picture though ;-)
#61
Ride Naked!
Originally Posted by RotaryZZ
Does anyone know of any harness guide bar being made for the 8?
This one is nice but they're not making it for the 8 :-(
http://www.sparcousa.com/harness_bars.asp
I probably won't use it to strap my belts on like its shown in the picture though ;-)
This one is nice but they're not making it for the 8 :-(
http://www.sparcousa.com/harness_bars.asp
I probably won't use it to strap my belts on like its shown in the picture though ;-)
Is anyone using a harness with their stock seats? If so, did you run it through the rotor cutout? Is it comfortable?
#62
He's as bad as Can
Originally Posted by Dark8
I doubt anyone will make one for the RX-8 since we don't have B pillars to bolt them on to. The top child safety seat clip in the back seems the best logical mount point.
Is anyone using a harness with their stock seats? If so, did you run it through the rotor cutout? Is it comfortable?
Is anyone using a harness with their stock seats? If so, did you run it through the rotor cutout? Is it comfortable?
#63
What's next?
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I doubt anyone will make one for the RX-8 since we don't have B pillars to bolt them on to. The top child safety seat clip in the back seems the best logical mount point.
In the manual it states that its not to be used for anything other than a child seat.
However... for auto-x purposes... why not use it? The harness in auto-x isn't for safety.. it's for keeping yourself planted in your seat. Now... I don't really know how much force it can withstand when you tighten up the straps. It's made for a child and child safety seat only.... so did they make it to give way or can it break after a certain amt of force is encountered? (I would hope not...)
Will it break when tightening? Will it bend? WIll it give way 1/2 way through the run? Dunno. (But looks like a great place.. I need to see how it's secured in a little more detail.)
--kC
#64
>I doubt anyone will make one for the RX-8 since we don't have
>B pillars to bolt them on to.
Not really. You can use the bolt for the stock seat belt which is on the virual B-pillar (on the back door) That's what I used to do on my old bimmer before. Of course you can't open the back door while you've the harness guide bar on.
And you shouldn't wrap the harness on the guide bar either. Its not strong enough in case of an accident. I used to hook the harness belts to the stock seat belt anchors at the back seat, and then use the guide bar to bring the belts up to the proper angle. That's what the guide bar is supposed to be used for in the first place.
>B pillars to bolt them on to.
Not really. You can use the bolt for the stock seat belt which is on the virual B-pillar (on the back door) That's what I used to do on my old bimmer before. Of course you can't open the back door while you've the harness guide bar on.
And you shouldn't wrap the harness on the guide bar either. Its not strong enough in case of an accident. I used to hook the harness belts to the stock seat belt anchors at the back seat, and then use the guide bar to bring the belts up to the proper angle. That's what the guide bar is supposed to be used for in the first place.
#65
I all have put a harness in my rx. And the best way to comply is to 1.use the rear baby anchor point as it exceeds the strength to load requiorments. If you want a 2 point rear mount system simply use the rear retractable seat belt mount point, by swaping the bolt for an eye.
This way you can click the harness out if you want to use the rear seat.
This way you can click the harness out if you want to use the rear seat.
#66
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Panhandle FL
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by expo1
I am also interesting in putting in a 5-point harness for track use. I emailed Mazda in regards to what strength standard the top tether of the LATCH system is and they couldn’t or didn’t want to give me that exact info. I thought that would be the case in this litigious world we live in. I did tell them my intentions and they recommended that the top LATCH point was not strong enough to provide restraint of an adult in a crash. Now while going around a track it would be fine and it is at the correct angle but when you would need it the most (a wreak) would it fail? I guess the thing that would answer that question is how much stress, pull, what ever specification they use, the top LATCH can handle as compared to a seatbelt anchor point? This has to be some standard set by the government.
Highway safety/ DOT/someone in the govt should have the regulations on how strong the latch system has to be.
#67
Originally Posted by nazgul350r
Highway safety/ DOT/someone in the govt should have the regulations on how strong the latch system has to be.
There is a table of contents with working links. One of the last items is regrading the strength of the lower anchors. The actual specifications and testing proceudres are further below that (not linked from the TOC).
#68
Originally Posted by Razors Edge
I all have put a harness in my rx. And the best way to comply is to 1.use the rear baby anchor point as it exceeds the strength to load requiorments. If you want a 2 point rear mount system simply use the rear retractable seat belt mount point, by swaping the bolt for an eye.
This way you can click the harness out if you want to use the rear seat.
This way you can click the harness out if you want to use the rear seat.
But can you use the rear seats leaving in place the eyes?
Could you post some pics? :D
#69
Registered User
From NHTSA
S9.4 Strength of the lower anchorages.
S9.4.1 When tested in accordance with S11, the lower anchorages shall not allow point X on SFAD 2 to be displaced more than 125 mm when-
(a) A force of 11,000 N is applied in a forward direction in a vertical longitudinal plane that is parallel to the vehicle's longitudinal centerline; and
(b) A force of 5,000 N is applied in a lateral direction in a vertical longitudinal plane that is 75 + 5 degrees to either side of a vertical longitudinal plane that is parallel to the vehicle's longitudinal centerline.
S9.4.1 When tested in accordance with S11, the lower anchorages shall not allow point X on SFAD 2 to be displaced more than 125 mm when-
(a) A force of 11,000 N is applied in a forward direction in a vertical longitudinal plane that is parallel to the vehicle's longitudinal centerline; and
(b) A force of 5,000 N is applied in a lateral direction in a vertical longitudinal plane that is 75 + 5 degrees to either side of a vertical longitudinal plane that is parallel to the vehicle's longitudinal centerline.
#70
Registered User
From NHTSA
...good find Clyde
S11. Test procedure. Each vehicle shall meet the requirements of S9.4 when tested according to the following procedures. Where a range of values is specified, the vehicle shall be able to meet the requirements at all points within the range.
(a) Forward force direction. Place SFAD 2 in the vehicle seating position and attach it to the two lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Do not attach the tether anchorage. Apply a preload force of 500 N at point X of the test device. Increase the preload pull force to a full force application of 11,000 N within 30 seconds, with an onset rate not exceeding 135,000 N per second, and maintain the 11,000 N level for 10 seconds.
(b) Lateral force direction. Place SFAD 2 in the vehicle seating position and attach it to the two lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Do not attach the tether anchorage. Apply a preload force of 500 N at point X of the test device. Increase the preload pull force to a full force application of 5,000 N within 30 seconds, with an onset rate not exceeding 135,000 N per second, and maintain the 5,000 N level for 10 seconds.
(a) Forward force direction. Place SFAD 2 in the vehicle seating position and attach it to the two lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Do not attach the tether anchorage. Apply a preload force of 500 N at point X of the test device. Increase the preload pull force to a full force application of 11,000 N within 30 seconds, with an onset rate not exceeding 135,000 N per second, and maintain the 11,000 N level for 10 seconds.
(b) Lateral force direction. Place SFAD 2 in the vehicle seating position and attach it to the two lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system. Do not attach the tether anchorage. Apply a preload force of 500 N at point X of the test device. Increase the preload pull force to a full force application of 5,000 N within 30 seconds, with an onset rate not exceeding 135,000 N per second, and maintain the 5,000 N level for 10 seconds.
#71
He's as bad as Can
Originally Posted by clyde
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/rules/...FinalRule.html
There is a table of contents with working links. One of the last items is regrading the strength of the lower anchors. The actual specifications and testing proceudres are further below that (not linked from the TOC).
There is a table of contents with working links. One of the last items is regrading the strength of the lower anchors. The actual specifications and testing proceudres are further below that (not linked from the TOC).
S6.3 Strength requirements for tether anchorages.
S6.3.1 Subject to S6.3.2, when tested in accordance with S8--
(a) Any point on the tether anchorage must not be displaced more than 125 mm; and
(b) There shall be no complete separation of any anchorage component.
S6.3.2 In vehicles manufactured before September 1, 2004, each user-ready tether anchorage in a row of designated seating positions in a passenger car may, at the manufacturer's option (with said option selected prior to, or at the time of, certification of the vehicle), instead of complying with S6.3.1, withstand the application of a force of 5,300 N, when tested in accordance with S8.2, such that the anchorage does not release the belt strap specified in S8.2 or allow any point on the tether anchorage to be displaced more than 125 mm.
S6.3.3 In the case of a row of designated seating positions that has more than one tether anchorage, the force referred to in S6.3.1 and S6.3.2 may, at the agency's option, be applied simultaneously to each tether anchorage. However, a particular tether anchorage need not meet further requirements after the lower anchorages of the child restraint anchorage system of the designated seating position at which the tether anchorage is installed have met S9.4.
#72
Registered User
Damn, this stuff is hard to read...
So is it 15,000N or 5300N? Either way if you do simple math (not that this is the correct way...) using this info...
@ 30MPH a 195lb person would load the anchor 20,681N ([3500/33]*195) Now a 4 point harness has two additional load points, and the belts are designed to flex. So in an AutoX where (if the SSS is doing his job) the speeds do not normally exceed 60MPH and 45mph in a turn this system may be sufficient. That however would be up to the BOD.
On a track though... I'll repeat myself. It is NOT crashworthy.
The proposal would have required the same strength requirements that Canada applies now to (non-user ready) reinforced holes for tether anchorages, i.e., a 5,300 N (1,124 lb) force, attained within 30 seconds and held at the 5,300 N level for one second. This final rule has increased this to 15,000 N to reflect the use of the fixture in testing tether anchorages. In addition, the agency has determined that the 15,000 N force level is high enough to ensure that the anchorage will withstand the loads generated by children in forward-facing restraints.
Canada conducted 30 mph dynamic tests of a CANFIX prototype child restraint (weighing 32 lb) using a 3-year-old (33 lb) dummy and found dynamic loads of about 3,500 N and 4,000 N on the tether anchorage (loads on the lower attachments ranged from 3,000 N to 4,000 N).
On a track though... I'll repeat myself. It is NOT crashworthy.
#73
He's as bad as Can
Originally Posted by AlexCisneros
Damn, this stuff is hard to read...
So is it 15,000N or 5300N? Either way if you do simple math (not that this is the correct way...) using this info...
@ 30MPH a 195lb person would load the anchor 20,681N ([3500/33]*195) Now a 4 point harness has two additional load points, and the belts are designed to flex. So in an AutoX where (if the SSS is doing his job) the speeds do not normally exceed 60MPH and 45mph in a turn this system may be sufficient. That however would be up to the BOD.
On a track though... I'll repeat myself. It is NOT crashworthy.
So is it 15,000N or 5300N? Either way if you do simple math (not that this is the correct way...) using this info...
@ 30MPH a 195lb person would load the anchor 20,681N ([3500/33]*195) Now a 4 point harness has two additional load points, and the belts are designed to flex. So in an AutoX where (if the SSS is doing his job) the speeds do not normally exceed 60MPH and 45mph in a turn this system may be sufficient. That however would be up to the BOD.
On a track though... I'll repeat myself. It is NOT crashworthy.
http://www.shaneracing.com/RX8_Perfo...ior_Parts.html
#74
Ride Naked!
#75
>If you want a 2 point rear mount system simply use the rear retractable >seat belt mount point, by swaping the bolt for an eye.
That brings us back to the subject of requiring the harness guide bar in the beginning so that the belts will be at the correct angle.
>http://www.shaneracing.com/RX8_Perf...rior_Parts.html
Do they said when will it be available?
That brings us back to the subject of requiring the harness guide bar in the beginning so that the belts will be at the correct angle.
>http://www.shaneracing.com/RX8_Perf...rior_Parts.html
Do they said when will it be available?