Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

High 13s NA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-25-2007, 11:37 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
High 13s NA?

So I know the RX8 isn't ment to be a drag racer. It handles very well, and does very well on a track, but it's VERY under powered, hell it's ***** slow compared to my old car (03 sentra ser w/procharger @ 4.5 psi) as I couldn't launch worth crap (no traction) with a stop watch, it was something like 0-160kph (100mph) in 13.2 seconds with 2 passengers.

Now I'm not looking to be ***** out fast, the sentra was quick, more than enough for me, I don't need that much, but I would like more power, without killing the balance of the car too much (the sentra was basically point and shoot)

So I'm trying to come up with a list of modifications that should put it into the 13s. We know the car can do 14.5 stock

I'm thinking, wider sticker rubber, flywheel/clutch, catless midpipe, ecu rb race reflash (with a more aggressive tune for no cat), should be enough to drop .5 down the 1/4 mile...

but I'm not sure...if I could get a 13.9 NA I don't think I'd have a need to go boost (or would I? hmm)
Old 08-25-2007, 11:46 PM
  #2  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,537
Received 1,500 Likes on 847 Posts
14.5 is a good time on a good day for the rx8 . Its more like 14.8 - 15.0 normally . I have pretty much those mods & its good for around 14.4
Old 08-26-2007, 02:40 AM
  #3  
peterisurhero
 
peterisurhero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: cerritos, CA
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol. we all wish we can get to the 13's. hahah you might be able to. it juss depends on the condition of your car and how many ponies it puts on the wheels. go nitrous. you'll get into the 13's fsho then.hahaha
Old 08-26-2007, 10:57 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd rather go boost than nitrous :p

Boost is always an option, but sometimes it's overkill =/ (I can't believe I just said that...hahaha, because I miss boost sooooooo much)
Old 08-26-2007, 11:45 PM
  #5  
It's a Cavalier
 
YaXMaNGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Daemos
So I'm trying to come up with a list of modifications that should put it into the 13s. We know the car can do 14.5 stock

I'm thinking, wider sticker rubber, flywheel/clutch, catless midpipe, ecu rb race reflash (with a more aggressive tune for no cat), should be enough to drop .5 down the 1/4 mile...
I would admire you if you figured out a way to prove me wrong, but in my opinion, there is no way... NO WAY... an N/A bolt-on RX8 will get into the 13's.
Old 08-27-2007, 08:17 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
05renesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
man its possible, like if you launch at redline, with slicks, every single bolt ons and they don't start the time until you go. lol thats about the only possible way i can see it happening. otherwise i'll have to agree with YaXMaNGTO
Old 08-27-2007, 08:21 AM
  #7  
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
mac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Daemos
So I know the RX8 isn't ment to be a drag racer. It handles very well, and does very well on a track, but it's VERY under powered, hell it's ***** slow compared to my old car (03 sentra ser w/procharger @ 4.5 psi) as I couldn't launch worth crap (no traction) with a stop watch, it was something like 0-160kph (100mph) in 13.2 seconds with 2 passengers.

Now I'm not looking to be ***** out fast, the sentra was quick, more than enough for me, I don't need that much, but I would like more power, without killing the balance of the car too much (the sentra was basically point and shoot)

So I'm trying to come up with a list of modifications that should put it into the 13s. We know the car can do 14.5 stock

I'm thinking, wider sticker rubber, flywheel/clutch, catless midpipe, ecu rb race reflash (with a more aggressive tune for no cat), should be enough to drop .5 down the 1/4 mile...

but I'm not sure...if I could get a 13.9 NA I don't think I'd have a need to go boost (or would I? hmm)
lose weight.
Old 08-27-2007, 03:11 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
dynamho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norwood, NJ
Posts: 1,963
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Custom build an aggressive final gear?
Old 08-28-2007, 08:08 AM
  #9  
1935 lbs. FTW!
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Slicks and 4.77 should get you close, the mph might still be mid 90's but a 1.7 launch could give you a chance.
Old 09-05-2007, 11:37 AM
  #10  
Need Rotary Engine!!!
 
imrtommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to tell you but I have all or most the mods on your list. I ran 15.1 being my best time on 17x8.5. Then again I dynoed a week later and was only pushing out 164.4whp. -_-
Old 09-05-2007, 11:45 AM
  #11  
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
mac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by imrtommy
Sorry to tell you but I have all or most the mods on your list. I ran 15.1 being my best time on 17x8.5. Then again I dynoed a week later and was only pushing out 164.4whp. -_-
e.t. doesn't tell the whole story. what was your 60' times, what kind of tires.

low dyno numbers don't help though. Even done a compression test?
Old 09-05-2007, 02:28 PM
  #12  
1935 lbs. FTW!
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It also depends on elevation, weather, etc. A 14.5 at sea level could be a 15.1 in the mountains.
Old 09-05-2007, 02:33 PM
  #13  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
there are NHRA correction factors for that ... and was it really necessary to start ANOTHER thread on this subject, sheesh

Last edited by TeamRX8; 09-05-2007 at 02:35 PM.
Old 09-05-2007, 10:38 PM
  #14  
It's a Cavalier
 
YaXMaNGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
there are NHRA correction factors for that ... and was it really necessary to start ANOTHER thread on this subject, sheesh
LOL I happen to know of another forum that has entire subforum dedicated to drag racing, and it's not the only one!
Old 09-05-2007, 11:28 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
gr8rx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
those bolt ons, and lose weight and I think it could be done.......in a couple more weeks I will have lost over 220lbs from my 8
Old 09-06-2007, 08:27 AM
  #16  
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
mac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by YaXMaNGTO
LOL I happen to know of another forum that has entire subforum dedicated to drag racing, and it's not the only one!
yea but (most of us) here, aren't rednecks.
Old 09-06-2007, 09:07 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know how a high 13 second car is even considered to be 'redneck' zone.

But my skin is yellow...*shrugs*

From the responses of this thread, it seems 'impossible' for the rx8 to have both good handling and decent 1/4 mile times.

Looks like a low boost system would be the best way to go...
Old 09-06-2007, 09:16 AM
  #18  
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
mac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Daemos
I don't know how a high 13 second car is even considered to be 'redneck' zone.


But my skin is yellow...*shrugs*

i didn't quote you when I said that.






Originally Posted by Daemos
Looks like a low boost system would be the best way to go...
now you are getting somewhere.
Old 09-06-2007, 10:40 AM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mac11
i didn't quote you when I said that.

now you are getting somewhere.
I know you didn't It's been in my experience that for cars like the RX8 which are underpowered and have great handling prowless, the their respective forums somehow have the mentality anything to make the car faster in a straight line is 'redneckish' *shrugs*

Hmm I'm going to see how much the car feels with a midpipe/flywheel/re-tune.

Should be quite the noticeable increase I hope.

midpipe goes in this weekend
Old 09-06-2007, 10:51 AM
  #20  
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
mac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Daemos
I know you didn't It's been in my experience that for cars like the RX8 which are underpowered and have great handling prowless, the their respective forums somehow have the mentality anything to make the car faster in a straight line is 'redneckish' *shrugs*

regardless of anything else 95% of people I see driving f-bodys and taking the quarter mile seriously are rednecks
Old 09-06-2007, 10:57 AM
  #21  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mac11
regardless of anything else 95% of people I see driving f-bodys and taking the quarter mile seriously are rednecks
Can't really argue against that... Although I do like the 1/4 mile I won't obsess about having a 10 second car =/

I personally think trap speed is much more useful than the 1/4 mile, because around a track, or if you need to pass someone, you are usually not going from a dig.
Old 09-06-2007, 11:16 AM
  #22  
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
mac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Daemos
I personally think trap speed is much more useful than the 1/4 mile, because around a track, or if you need to pass someone, you are usually not going from a dig.
+1 Trap speed is all about the power of the car. E.T. is largely about the skill of the driver.
Old 09-06-2007, 01:18 PM
  #23  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
Originally Posted by mac11
regardless of anything else 95% of people I see driving f-bodys and taking the quarter mile seriously are rednecks

Attached Thumbnails High 13s NA?-nascargag.jpg  
Old 09-06-2007, 05:05 PM
  #24  
jersey fresh
 
dillsrotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
actually alot of rx7 owners love drag racing.
Old 09-06-2007, 05:53 PM
  #25  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess I should of asked what the fastest trap speed an RX8 would see NA is. Wonder if we can break into the 100 mph NA, as some cars stock now do that...again this isn't really much for 1/4mile, but the car needs more power out of corners.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: High 13s NA?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.