Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

Rx8 Camber Curve with different Caster ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-15-2019, 06:41 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Diyman25's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Taiwan& USA
Posts: 351
Received 39 Likes on 36 Posts
Rx8 Camber Curve with different Caster ratio

As basic rule thumb for suspension geometry, more caster will have better camber gain !!! But how much seen to be no one did a recording

So I took the time to record the different caster affect on dynamic camber gain

Here are my recording, same car same shop same wheel , in 2mo period only thing different is knuckle offset bushing thus the setting on right hand side have more static camber

First number from top is
Caster 4.95
7.67
camber -1.69
-2.39

toe 0
0

With turn caster 4.95 , dynamic camber change -1.69 to -2.59 that is around -1 camber of dynamic gain

0

With turn caster 7.67, dynamic camber change from -2.39 to -3.66 that is around -1.27 camber of dynamic gain


Even the the one with more caster have a little less turn ( kinda da lazy out , after spend whole day work on car ) but u guys should get idea

As u can see more caster do prove more dynamic camber gain at turn !!!!
Attached Thumbnails Rx8 Camber Curve with different Caster ratio-img_20191015_193630_816.jpg  

Last edited by Diyman25; 10-15-2019 at 07:52 AM.
Old 10-15-2019, 06:52 AM
  #2  
What am I doing here?
 
NotAPreppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Posts: 3,606
Received 649 Likes on 510 Posts
Just waiting to see how long until there's a debate about the relative merits of dynamic vs static camber.
Old 10-16-2019, 10:52 PM
  #3  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
It’s not really that simple as there are other dynamic factors involved that aren’t going to be replicated on a static alignment stand. Not really a discussion I’m interested in having.
Old 10-16-2019, 11:04 PM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Diyman25's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Taiwan& USA
Posts: 351
Received 39 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by NotAPreppie
Just waiting to see how long until there's a debate about the relative merits of dynamic vs static camber.
Any discussion is welcome

Originally Posted by TeamRX8
It’s not really that simple as there are other dynamic factors involved that aren’t going to be replicated on a static alignment stand. Not really a discussion I’m interested in having.
Is reference ~
Old 10-17-2019, 08:28 AM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
roflcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Destin
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
It’s not really that simple as there are other dynamic factors involved that aren’t going to be replicated on a static alignment stand. Not really a discussion I’m interested in having.
Then don't have it.

Just for the record... you do realize you're not REQUIRED to comment in every thread you see, right?
The following users liked this post:
NotAPreppie (10-17-2019)
Old 10-17-2019, 02:00 PM
  #6  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
I’m not sure why you’re having or trying to make some kind of personal issue over it, which I already said I didn’t want to get into it other than pointing out to others who may not be aware that there’s more to it than that. I’m not required, but like plenty of other people including the person who liked your post; I participate and comment at my own will.

You do understand that you have the control to block my comments from appearing when you’re logged in, right? Nobody is forcing you to be here either. Just the same, if there’s anything I can do to help you out just let me know. None of this is personal to me, but that’s your choice too.
Old 10-19-2019, 08:22 AM
  #7  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
So at the risk of triggering someone else, let me just throw out that there are a bunch of people on the internet proposing that you can’t have too much caster on a power steering equipped car and there’s no negative to it. Those people are just mimicking something they read or heard somewhere and don’t know what they’re talking about.

which again I’m not looking to debate/argue/bang my head on the wall trying to convince anyone with a drawn out discussion. Which doesn’t mean anything other than you might have to use your own cognitive reasoning, research it on your own, come to an understanding that there are other factors like bump steer etc, how or why dynamic as a variable may or may not produce positive end results, and so on.

or you can have meltdown based on a false premise within your own mind and all the positive benefits it will produce
Old 10-19-2019, 08:32 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
hogcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: n.c.
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Frozen..........
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wrightcomputing
RX-8 Racing
56
12-04-2015 12:11 PM
topolittle
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
14
04-28-2012 11:59 AM
custom8on15s
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
14
04-02-2012 10:55 AM
jmott
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
3
06-16-2005 01:52 PM
PUR NRG
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
3
08-13-2003 04:09 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Rx8 Camber Curve with different Caster ratio



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 AM.