The RX8 is gone
09-09-2008, 12:09 AM
#26
the Z4 3.0 didn't have an LSD and I had no problems putting the power down, even ran a few 1.8x 60 ft Pro Solo launch times in it and 1.9's were the common norm, mad FSB tuning skillz are the key 
IMO people are underestimating the 135i the same as they did the RX-8 for BS when it first came out, frankly FM ain't no deepthroat WRT being a reliable source
IMO people are underestimating the 135i the same as they did the RX-8 for BS when it first came out, frankly FM ain't no deepthroat WRT being a reliable source
Last edited by TeamRX8; 09-09-2008 at 12:11 AM.
09-09-2008, 08:49 AM
#27
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FM
09-09-2008, 05:00 PM
#28
The 135i got positive reviews because the bar has been set so low. Writes usually talk apologetically, about the numb steering (if such a thing is even dared to be mentioned outside of the UK press), heavy weight and lack of LSD. As if those things are a part of the natural order of things and we should just be happy with what we got.
I am kind of interested in the M coupe cause it looks like last proper attempt at a drivers (perhaps not at successful as they hoped) car barring the X6
09-17-2008, 10:51 PM
#35
2009 BS Nat'l Champ
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Central CA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A fast one? It's a 2004 with 21,000 miles and OEM hardtop. All stock aside from bake pads/fluid and alignment. A variety of photos: http://www.pbase.com/bryanh/2k4s2k
It's a 2004 with 21,000 miles and OEM hardtop. All stock aside from bake pads/fluid and alignment. A variety of photos: http://www.pbase.com/bryanh/2k4s2k
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post