The STX thread!
#3576
The ECU gets it's information from the sensor on the thermostat housing - my sensor is about 4 inches downstream from that, and the difference between the two is never more than 2 degrees. When I had it coming off the heater line per the Racing Beat kit, the temperature was 10 degrees off.
My upgraded rad and cooling system should be functionally identical other than the pump and in theory the S2 pump should be a lot better.
Last edited by DocWalt; 04-14-2021 at 02:03 PM.
#3577
Just realized I likely don't have the restrictor in the upper hose from t-stat housing to coolant bottle. I ordered an OEM hose with that, and will probably throw the bigger restrictor into the heater core hose as the typical "MIAC" fix though I don't notice the noise.
#3579
I have, yes. Temps do seem a little better with it under driven. I've only done one event when under driven though. Idle and cruising around temps seem to be completely unaffected (meaning it's not so slow that it's struggling to cool)
#3580
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
i only ask because the only reason to under-drive it on the S1 is to avoid cavitation with the rudimentary design of it’s impeller. Even Mazmart recommends not under-driving their improved pump-style impeller design. Was thinking it might be worth testing to see if cooling improves by overdriving the S2 pump like a pump impeller would, but then it won’t really matter to increase flow if the radiator can’t cool it quick enough as a result.
#3581
The thread with CFD of the two S1 pumps (stock and Mazmart) is an interesting read. Would love to see that done with the S2 pump as well. The Mazmart pump was interesting in how much lower flow it had (while also not cavitating) but everyone that runs them on track cars sees *way* better cooling. I'll keep trying things for now. Definitely going to put the properly restricted upper AST line on instead of the poorly fitting silicone line that I have and go from there.
I have parts on order to build a Mazdaspeed style intake like Brett made, hoping to get air out of the radiator quicker that way too.
Also, another factor is that the S2 has the aluminum panel under the oil pan sealing even more air into the engine bay... I've not seen anybody else tracking/autocrossing an S2 that's tracking coolant temps so maybe I'm "fine" and it's not going to get better without hood vents or something to get hot air out of the bay.
I have parts on order to build a Mazdaspeed style intake like Brett made, hoping to get air out of the radiator quicker that way too.
Also, another factor is that the S2 has the aluminum panel under the oil pan sealing even more air into the engine bay... I've not seen anybody else tracking/autocrossing an S2 that's tracking coolant temps so maybe I'm "fine" and it's not going to get better without hood vents or something to get hot air out of the bay.
#3582
I don't know why you guys are having problems. I did a test day on Sunday and even after five or six back to back runs with no cooldown my logs don't show water temps ever getting above 190F. :P
The following users liked this post:
DocWalt (04-15-2021)
#3584
The following users liked this post:
DocWalt (04-19-2021)
#3586
Registered
The ECU gets it's information from the sensor on the thermostat housing - my sensor is about 4 inches downstream from that, and the difference between the two is never more than 2 degrees. When I had it coming off the heater line per the Racing Beat kit, the temperature was 10 degrees off.
Last edited by hufflepuff; 04-16-2021 at 05:14 PM.
#3588
Temps were "fine" yesterday on a lower speed course. Max speed ~56 mph and ~30 second runs, peak temp of ~205F on course and climbed to 210F on the crawl back to grid.
#3589
Registered
I think Team is referring to the body work mods for cooling. I'm not 100% sure on that, maybe he'll clarify. But from my understanding, it means you can't make hood vents that serve the purpose of cooling the engine bay, as then it's a functional vent that's not from the OEM. But I could be wrong about the intended definition of "functional" and "non-functional".
F. Addition of spoilers, splitters, rear wings, bumper covers, valances, side skirts, and non-functional scoops/vents is allowed provided that either:
1. It is a production part which is standard or optional equipment of a US model of the vehicle. (“Model” is defined in Section 12.)
2021 SCCA® National Solo® Rules — 87
Section 14
2. It is listed in the vehicle manufacturer’s US accessory catalog for that vehicle for normal highway use. This does not allow for parts sold through a manufacturer’s performance catalog (e.g., Ford Racing, HPD, Mazdaspeed, Mopar Performance, Mugen, NISMO, SPT, TRD, etc).
Parts must be installed as directed by the manufacturer. Exact replicas, including weight, from alternate sources are also permitted.
F. Addition of spoilers, splitters, rear wings, bumper covers, valances, side skirts, and non-functional scoops/vents is allowed provided that either:
1. It is a production part which is standard or optional equipment of a US model of the vehicle. (“Model” is defined in Section 12.)
2021 SCCA® National Solo® Rules — 87
Section 14
2. It is listed in the vehicle manufacturer’s US accessory catalog for that vehicle for normal highway use. This does not allow for parts sold through a manufacturer’s performance catalog (e.g., Ford Racing, HPD, Mazdaspeed, Mopar Performance, Mugen, NISMO, SPT, TRD, etc).
Parts must be installed as directed by the manufacturer. Exact replicas, including weight, from alternate sources are also permitted.
#3592
Went and got my car dyno'd... I've had weak/sluggish starts for a couple of weeks. Looks like one or more of my coils died. BHR D585, so I upgraded to the new BHR OEM direct fit coils and all good now. Just a waste of a dyno session, haha.
#3594
Yep... just waiting for the "compliant" coils to have issues because they're still D585s inside, but at least I'll be able to have Charles replace them. My car came with the LS style D585s from BHR so I can't have them replaced under warranty.
The most interesting part is that my AFRs under load were off everywhere with the weak/failed coil(s). My expected AFR is 13:1 AFR and as you can see it was well below that especially after APV opened.
The most interesting part is that my AFRs under load were off everywhere with the weak/failed coil(s). My expected AFR is 13:1 AFR and as you can see it was well below that especially after APV opened.
Last edited by DocWalt; 05-27-2021 at 09:25 AM.
The following users liked this post:
sharingan 19 (04-13-2022)
#3597
#3598
Have been testing Nankang CR-1 as the Yokohamas aren't readily available and we're saving them for nats. Did some more testing this past weekend, this time at Pocono! Amy's first real experience using third gear on course and we sorted out the feel of the Nankangs! They feel a lot better and they seemed to be more on pace too versus where they were at for NNJR.
Amy's fastest run:
My fastest run:
Amy's fastest run:
My fastest run:
#3599