Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

The STX thread!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 04-14-2021, 01:58 PM
  #3576  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by RE-Vision
The ECU gets it's information from the sensor on the thermostat housing - my sensor is about 4 inches downstream from that, and the difference between the two is never more than 2 degrees. When I had it coming off the heater line per the Racing Beat kit, the temperature was 10 degrees off.
Good to know, thank you! I was thinking the ECU sensor is in the ideal spot.

My upgraded rad and cooling system should be functionally identical other than the pump and in theory the S2 pump should be a lot better.

Last edited by DocWalt; 04-14-2021 at 02:03 PM.
Old 04-14-2021, 08:36 PM
  #3577  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
Just realized I likely don't have the restrictor in the upper hose from t-stat housing to coolant bottle. I ordered an OEM hose with that, and will probably throw the bigger restrictor into the heater core hose as the typical "MIAC" fix though I don't notice the noise.
Old 04-14-2021, 10:40 PM
  #3578  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,785
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,663 Posts
Did you ever consider the possibility that the S2 water pump impeller might lose it’s effectiveness when under-driven?
Old 04-14-2021, 11:00 PM
  #3579  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
Did you ever consider the possibility that the S2 water pump impeller might lose it’s effectiveness when under-driven?
I have, yes. Temps do seem a little better with it under driven. I've only done one event when under driven though. Idle and cruising around temps seem to be completely unaffected (meaning it's not so slow that it's struggling to cool)
Old 04-14-2021, 11:32 PM
  #3580  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,785
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,663 Posts
i only ask because the only reason to under-drive it on the S1 is to avoid cavitation with the rudimentary design of it’s impeller. Even Mazmart recommends not under-driving their improved pump-style impeller design. Was thinking it might be worth testing to see if cooling improves by overdriving the S2 pump like a pump impeller would, but then it won’t really matter to increase flow if the radiator can’t cool it quick enough as a result.
Old 04-14-2021, 11:41 PM
  #3581  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
The thread with CFD of the two S1 pumps (stock and Mazmart) is an interesting read. Would love to see that done with the S2 pump as well. The Mazmart pump was interesting in how much lower flow it had (while also not cavitating) but everyone that runs them on track cars sees *way* better cooling. I'll keep trying things for now. Definitely going to put the properly restricted upper AST line on instead of the poorly fitting silicone line that I have and go from there.

I have parts on order to build a Mazdaspeed style intake like Brett made, hoping to get air out of the radiator quicker that way too.

Also, another factor is that the S2 has the aluminum panel under the oil pan sealing even more air into the engine bay... I've not seen anybody else tracking/autocrossing an S2 that's tracking coolant temps so maybe I'm "fine" and it's not going to get better without hood vents or something to get hot air out of the bay.
Old 04-15-2021, 01:42 PM
  #3582  
Not ******
iTrader: (1)
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 987
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
I don't know why you guys are having problems. I did a test day on Sunday and even after five or six back to back runs with no cooldown my logs don't show water temps ever getting above 190F. :P
The following users liked this post:
DocWalt (04-15-2021)
Old 04-15-2021, 04:50 PM
  #3583  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,785
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,663 Posts
there are a couple of simple, small changes to the OE system that help to relieve that, but the STX ruleset doesn’t permit them
Old 04-16-2021, 09:26 AM
  #3584  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
there are a couple of simple, small changes to the OE system that help to relieve that, but the STX ruleset doesn’t permit them
Like tossing the A/C? or God forbid a piston engine swap?
Old 04-16-2021, 03:45 PM
  #3585  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,785
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,663 Posts
well those obviously aren’t allowed in STX, just as John was obviously kidding, but my comment is relative to the OE Renesis cooling system configuration.
The following users liked this post:
DocWalt (04-19-2021)
Old 04-16-2021, 05:12 PM
  #3586  
Registered
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 542
Received 50 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by RE-Vision
The ECU gets it's information from the sensor on the thermostat housing - my sensor is about 4 inches downstream from that, and the difference between the two is never more than 2 degrees. When I had it coming off the heater line per the Racing Beat kit, the temperature was 10 degrees off.
did the heater hose location read higher or lower than the ECT sensor?

Last edited by hufflepuff; 04-16-2021 at 05:14 PM.
Old 04-16-2021, 05:41 PM
  #3587  
Registered
 
RE-Vision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 115
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by hufflepuff
did the heater hose location read higher or lower than the ECT sensor?
Lower, something like 10 degrees.
Old 04-19-2021, 11:26 AM
  #3588  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
well those obviously aren’t allowed in STX, just as John was obviously kidding, but my comment is relative to the OE Renesis cooling system configuration.
Curious what the changes are, even if not relevant to STX.

Temps were "fine" yesterday on a lower speed course. Max speed ~56 mph and ~30 second runs, peak temp of ~205F on course and climbed to 210F on the crawl back to grid.
Old 04-19-2021, 12:24 PM
  #3589  
Registered
 
0-TO-100_Real_Quick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 196
Received 40 Likes on 33 Posts
I think Team is referring to the body work mods for cooling. I'm not 100% sure on that, maybe he'll clarify. But from my understanding, it means you can't make hood vents that serve the purpose of cooling the engine bay, as then it's a functional vent that's not from the OEM. But I could be wrong about the intended definition of "functional" and "non-functional".

F. Addition of spoilers, splitters, rear wings, bumper covers, valances, side skirts, and non-functional scoops/vents is allowed provided that either:
1. It is a production part which is standard or optional equipment of a US model of the vehicle. (“Model” is defined in Section 12.)
2021 SCCA® National Solo® Rules — 87
Section 14
2. It is listed in the vehicle manufacturer’s US accessory catalog for that vehicle for normal highway use. This does not allow for parts sold through a manufacturer’s performance catalog (e.g., Ford Racing, HPD, Mazdaspeed, Mopar Performance, Mugen, NISMO, SPT, TRD, etc).
Parts must be installed as directed by the manufacturer. Exact replicas, including weight, from alternate sources are also permitted.
Old 04-19-2021, 05:35 PM
  #3590  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,785
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,663 Posts
nope, mods to the cooling system, not the bodywork.
.
Old 04-20-2021, 01:01 PM
  #3591  
Registered
 
0-TO-100_Real_Quick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 196
Received 40 Likes on 33 Posts
I'm not sure what you're referring to then, because from what I could tell, most cooling mods are allowed provided they're not reducing weight/capacity.
Old 05-26-2021, 10:32 PM
  #3592  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
Went and got my car dyno'd... I've had weak/sluggish starts for a couple of weeks. Looks like one or more of my coils died. BHR D585, so I upgraded to the new BHR OEM direct fit coils and all good now. Just a waste of a dyno session, haha.



Old 05-27-2021, 06:02 AM
  #3593  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,785
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,663 Posts
those D585 coils never fail, everyone on the forum says so …
.
Old 05-27-2021, 09:22 AM
  #3594  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
those D585 coils never fail, everyone on the forum says so …
.
Yep... just waiting for the "compliant" coils to have issues because they're still D585s inside, but at least I'll be able to have Charles replace them. My car came with the LS style D585s from BHR so I can't have them replaced under warranty.

The most interesting part is that my AFRs under load were off everywhere with the weak/failed coil(s). My expected AFR is 13:1 AFR and as you can see it was well below that especially after APV opened.

Last edited by DocWalt; 05-27-2021 at 09:25 AM.
Old 05-28-2021, 02:25 PM
  #3595  
Registered
 
RE-Vision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 115
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
I'd throw those away and just get the IGN-1As.
The following users liked this post:
sharingan 19 (04-13-2022)
Old 05-28-2021, 03:18 PM
  #3596  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,785
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,663 Posts
waits for the new dyno to be posted
Old 05-28-2021, 08:25 PM
  #3597  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
waits for the new dyno to be posted
Gonna be a while, no chance to get back for a while. Hopefully before nats.

Data logs are back to normal mid 220s g/s now, so meh.
Old 06-15-2021, 08:32 AM
  #3598  
Registered
 
DocWalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 244
Received 54 Likes on 38 Posts
Have been testing Nankang CR-1 as the Yokohamas aren't readily available and we're saving them for nats. Did some more testing this past weekend, this time at Pocono! Amy's first real experience using third gear on course and we sorted out the feel of the Nankangs! They feel a lot better and they seemed to be more on pace too versus where they were at for NNJR.

Amy's fastest run:


My fastest run:

Old 06-15-2021, 06:39 PM
  #3599  
Registered
 
CbyDesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 78
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
i only ask because the only reason to under-drive it on the S1 is to avoid cavitation with the rudimentary design of it’s impeller.
Under what circumstances does the pump cavitate? Sincerely asking.
Old 06-16-2021, 08:09 AM
  #3600  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,785
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,663 Posts
continuous high rpm

It’s main purpose is for street car use, not a competition vehicle operating at high rpm for extended periods of time.

which most owners tend to over-rev their Renesis engine unnecessarily as well.
.
The following 2 users liked this post by TeamRX8:
CbyDesign (06-16-2021), DocWalt (06-16-2021)


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: The STX thread!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.