Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

280 rwhp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-04-2008 | 07:58 AM
  #1  
Triperformance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
280 rwhp

I'm interested in getting an RX8 and The horsepower I want to make is around 280rwhp. I honestly do not want to go forced induction but I just want to know some figures people are making at the wheels with n/a mods.
Old 03-04-2008 | 08:02 AM
  #2  
nelsonrx8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: new jersey U.S.A
280 F/I only
Old 03-04-2008 | 08:10 AM
  #3  
chrism's Avatar
Misfit Moderator TnC
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 1
From: armpit of the USA
searching may be difficult....bolt ons do nothing but noise.....na your lucky to get to 210
Old 03-04-2008 | 08:31 AM
  #4  
jones75254's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Trip, in case u didnt know the harsh reality (alot of newbs dont), the stock RX-8 makes 170-180whp (has been kown to vary +-5whp).

This should clear up any confusion or misconceptions you may be having.
Old 03-04-2008 | 08:44 AM
  #5  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
You'll have to go FI or 3-rotor. Superchargers are pretty cool, not as hard to install as turbos and no lag!

The best N/A mod you can get right now seems to be the Cobb AccessPort tuning/reflash device (and more!), read https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-engine-tuning-forum-63/accessport-alpha-test-started-138169/ . People are getting +15whp. It costs $695 and would be a step towards going FI too.
Old 03-04-2008 | 09:06 AM
  #6  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by FloppinNachos
You'll have to go FI or 3-rotor. Superchargers are pretty cool, not as hard to install as turbos and no lag!
Don't you wish you knew what you were talking about?
Old 03-04-2008 | 10:37 AM
  #7  
JB_Rotary's Avatar
Always lurking
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by mysql
Don't you wish you knew what you were talking about?
LOL
Old 03-04-2008 | 11:06 AM
  #8  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
Originally Posted by mysql
Don't you wish you knew what you were talking about?
I noticed you drive a turbocharged RX-8...

It's common knowledge that superchargers (especially the only one used for RX-8s, the Pettit kit) are more responsive than turbos. They are generally easier to install too. You don't have to mess with the exhaust and there is less piping to deal with as well.


Can you please point out what is wrong with what I'm saying? or just continue making universal insults....
Old 03-04-2008 | 11:08 AM
  #9  
chrism's Avatar
Misfit Moderator TnC
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 1
From: armpit of the USA
here it comes.....suit up!
Old 03-04-2008 | 11:13 AM
  #10  
staticlag's Avatar
The Professor
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 6
From: Omaha, NE
After installing my own turbo, I would have to agree that shoehorning a manifold and downpipe in a crowded engine bay isn't fun at all.

But the reason I went turbo after all was the expandability, power, and the delicious BOV sound
Old 03-04-2008 | 11:15 AM
  #11  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by FloppinNachos
I noticed you drive a turbocharged RX-8...

It's common knowledge that superchargers (especially the only one used for RX-8s, the Pettit kit) are more responsive than turbos. They are generally easier to install too. You don't have to mess with the exhaust and there is less piping to deal with as well.


Can you please point out what is wrong with what I'm saying? or just continue making universal insults....
I'd be happy to. Unfortunately I'm at work and can't go into much detail.

1. You can install a turbocharged kit in less time than the SC. For example, with the greddy kit, you can easily do it in one day. The only difficult part is removing a wheel and a motor mount to get in the area of the exhaust manifold. The rest is putting pipes together using couplers. If you know lego, you can do it.

2. With a supercharger, specifically the Pettit kit - you only have to look at the dyno comparison thread to see that even in the low rpms, it does not make more power than the turbo kits. So at 3,000 rpm, if you mash the throttle, you will get more boost and a lot more torque with the turbo. There is no "lag" to speak of, when you have a properly sized turbocharger installed on the car. You'd need a giant turbo to get lag. What you're talking about is the urban legend that a supercharger = torque and no lag. In reality, it's the opposite.

In summary, you have to look forward to more cost (per hp), more moving parts, and a lot less torque if you went with a SC.
Old 03-04-2008 | 11:39 AM
  #12  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
So you don't experience any unresponsiveness with your turbo?
Old 03-04-2008 | 11:49 AM
  #13  
staticlag's Avatar
The Professor
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 6
From: Omaha, NE
Originally Posted by FloppinNachos
So you don't experience any unresponsiveness with your turbo?
watch the video in his signature line
Old 03-04-2008 | 11:53 AM
  #14  
bose's Avatar
Reginald P. Billingsly
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 1
From: Taylorsville, UT
You reach peak boost in a turbo at lets say 3000 rpm. In a s/c you don't reach full boost until about redline, the power delivery is linear in a s/c and the boost increases with the rpm. so a turbo kicks a s/c in the nutz on power delivery, and in coolness factor.
Old 03-04-2008 | 11:58 AM
  #15  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
I honestly had always thought that high hp adding turbos all had a good bit of lag.

So what are the advantages of the supercharger?
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:02 PM
  #16  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 32
From: Planet Earth
mysql knows what he is doing.

and lets not forget, the turbo in Greddy kit is small, smaller = faster + Tunning = not much lag.
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:08 PM
  #17  
Wind Dance's Avatar
Central Valley RX8
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: CenCal
Petit doesn't have much over the PROPERLY installed greddy turbo kit, but lets stay on topic here.

Tripaperformance 280hp, not even stating to the wheels is near-impossible n/a on our rennie. This is not your typical 4cyl or 6cyl where you could up the compression and mess with internals.
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:15 PM
  #18  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by FloppinNachos
I honestly had always thought that high hp adding turbos all had a good bit of lag.

So what are the advantages of the supercharger?
The boost is very linear so the power curve is very close to stock. Depending on the set-up it can also be more reliable, though many people seem to think means "idiot-proof."
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:28 PM
  #19  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by nycgps
and lets not forget, the turbo in Greddy kit is small, smaller = faster + Tunning = not much lag.
That used to be the conventional wisdom, but even with a larger turbo like the GT3071R from MazdaManiac, the spool time is indistinguishable from the smaller greddy, while giving you +40 whp gains at the same PSI.

When I get the accessPort I'll once again tweak the boost controller, I still believe I can decrease spool time further.
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:31 PM
  #20  
HiTMaNN's Avatar
RX-8s Official Cool Guy
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver BC
100 rwhp without FI or NO2? Lawls
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:33 PM
  #21  
Bastage's Avatar
DEVILMAN
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 1
From: Melbourne, FL
Here's a good place to learn from an unbiased source:

https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-major-horsepower-upgrades-93/power-adders-fi-dummies-turbo-supercharger-nitrous-122645/
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:37 PM
  #22  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
^ That thread is a good source. We've gone over a lot of this stuff before.
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:42 PM
  #23  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by bose
You reach peak boost in a turbo at lets say 3000 rpm. In a s/c you don't reach full boost until about redline, the power delivery is linear in a s/c and the boost increases with the rpm.
Of course you're correct, as long as you ignore that there are positive displacement superchargers, or only acknowledge the existence of turbos that supply medium boost levels.

I'm so sick of this BS between the SC and turbo crowd. Pick out a desired power level, purchase the appropriate tool and be happy. Why is such a concept so hard that every time a thread like this starts all the propaganda begins...
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:45 PM
  #24  
HiTMaNN's Avatar
RX-8s Official Cool Guy
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by Red Devil
Of course you're correct, as long as you ignore that there are positive displacement superchargers, or only acknowledge the existence of turbos that supply medium boost levels.

I'm so sick of this BS between the SC and turbo crowd. Pick out a desired power level, purchase the appropriate tool and be happy. Why is such a concept so hard that every time a thread like this starts all the propaganda begins...
Because every time a discussion starts a mediator like yourself likes to get his 2 cents heard on how we all should just hold hands and make love not war.
Old 03-04-2008 | 12:52 PM
  #25  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by HiTMaNN
Because every time a discussion starts a mediator like yourself likes to get his 2 cents heard on how we all should just hold hands and make love not war.
I guess next time I'll put in my two cents like you did in your first post on this thread, laugh at the OP, but offer nothing remotely constructive.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 AM.