Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

280 rwhp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-04-2008, 11:55 AM
  #26  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Red Devil
Of course you're correct, as long as you ignore that there are positive displacement superchargers, or only acknowledge the existence of turbos that supply medium boost levels.
We're talking about a turbo that capability currently exceeds what we can do with the engine. So I wouldn't call 380-400 whp medium on a renesis.

Size the tool proper for the job, right?

Positive displacement superchargers are OK if you don't mind how inefficient it is or how hot the charged air will be at 9,000 rpm.
Old 03-04-2008, 12:02 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql
We're talking about a turbo that capability currently exceeds what we can do with the engine. So I wouldn't call 380-400 whp medium on a renesis.

Size the tool proper for the job, right?

Positive displacement superchargers are OK if you don't mind how inefficient it is or how hot the charged air will be at 9,000 rpm.
I have yet to see publicly 380-400whp on your setup...would love to see it, though. The upgrade over the GReddy where you're at now must be really nice, to say the least.

That's a little subjective. Won't disagree that pd SCs are more inefficient, the compressor maps prove as much. But if I were looking for 280whp like the original poster, a pd SC can get you there just like a turbo. Yeah, less torque but whoever only wants 280whp wasn't looking for absolute power anyway. Now if the desire was 380-400whp, like what you listed above, turbo is the only proven method for the engine at this point, and absolutely the most efficient way to get there. Bottom line, I see a place and range of usage for both not so much an absolute.
Old 03-04-2008, 12:03 PM
  #28  
Reginald P. Billingsly
iTrader: (5)
 
bose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Taylorsville, UT
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Big Fart Noise
Old 03-04-2008, 12:09 PM
  #29  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Red Devil
I have yet to see publicly 380-400whp on your setup...would love to see it, though. The upgrade over the GReddy where you're at now must be really nice, to say the least.
I don't have those numbers. That's the numbers of what the GT3071R is capable of. So when you said it was a medium sized turbo, I simply wanted to illustrate that it can do more than we've seen on the car so far. I plan to get to 350 whp and leave it at that. The car is getting close to being "Fast enough" now



Won't disagree that pd SCs are more inefficient, the compressor maps prove as much.
The rotary engine was supposed to be a pd sc, so I'm not dissing them

I simply think that the SC's give you less bang for the buck and that turbos have a bad reputation for being laggy when that's not the case unless you install a giant turbo for no apparent reason.

If you like SC's, go for it. But if you tell me it makes more power down low, or up high, or whatever, I have not yet seen any evidence of that for the RX-8.
Old 03-04-2008, 12:14 PM
  #30  
Finally Boosted!!!!!!!
 
tdiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central IL
Posts: 1,035
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For 280 whp, I say go for a Greddy kit with all the necessary updates. If you still want more when you get there then upgrade it to the MM GT3071 Turbo.
Old 03-04-2008, 12:56 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql
But if you tell me it makes more power down low, or up high, or whatever, I have not yet seen any evidence of that for the RX-8.
Don't think you'll ever catch me claiming that one.
Old 03-04-2008, 01:19 PM
  #32  
I'll snap his neck.
 
mdw1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EVOLV-Chicago
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
To me, the one area where an SC has an advantage over a turbo is the fact that if you size the pulleys properly, you have no chance of overboosting on a SC.

As far as the originally poster's question: the only way I see getting 280whp NA on a streetable engine is by going to a 3-rotor engine. I recently saw in an article where Racing Beat had a high power NA engine that I think was a 2-rotor, but it was for racing only. Plus all the ports were peripherial, so it wasn't a renesis.
Old 03-04-2008, 01:35 PM
  #33  
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Jedi54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 22,410
Received 2,714 Likes on 1,955 Posts
Trip: unfortunately it's impossible to get 280 without Forced Induction. Trust me, I'm trying to see how much I can squeeze out of my N/A 8 and it's not pretty.

I dyno'd at 191 hp with RB intake + exhaust. Since then I've added the mazmart water pump and high flow cat. I doubt I'm at 200 with those... (no knock on those parts, they're top notch items, just tough to squeeze hp out of the Renesis without FI)
Car definitely sounds great though.
Old 03-04-2008, 01:46 PM
  #34  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
well I was at 220 rwhp on a Mustang dyno, that would potentially be very close to that figure at the flywheel

EDIT: ok, he said 280 rwhp NA --->

Last edited by TeamRX8; 03-04-2008 at 01:50 PM.
Old 03-04-2008, 01:48 PM
  #35  
RX-8s Official Cool Guy
 
HiTMaNN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Red Devil
I guess next time I'll put in my two cents like you did in your first post on this thread, laugh at the OP, but offer nothing remotely constructive.
I LoL'd because people ask this question every day... I mean every day
Old 03-04-2008, 02:06 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
well I was at 220 rwhp on a Mustang dyno, that would potentially be very close to that figure at the flywheel

EDIT: ok, he said 280 rwhp NA --->
Despite, in itself for an OEM 13B that's DAMN impressive! Blows every other OEM 13B out of the water.
Old 03-04-2008, 02:08 PM
  #37  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
better add a 3rd rotor ...
Old 03-04-2008, 02:41 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
FloppinNachos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess all of the turbo lag fear got to my head.

Do you think you would be able to tell the difference between getting on the gas in a supercharged RX-8 as compared to one with a GT3071R?

The turbo muffles the sound a good bit, right? Can you/Do you run a catless exhaust after the turbo?
Old 03-04-2008, 03:05 PM
  #39  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by FloppinNachos
I guess all of the turbo lag fear got to my head.

Do you think you would be able to tell the difference between getting on the gas in a supercharged RX-8 as compared to one with a GT3071R?
We have dynos of the Pettit at 8 psi, so the closest dyno I have is mine at 9 psi - so slightly more pressure, but the difference is approx 50 rwtq on the 3071R over the Pettit for most of the RPM range. I would say the difference would be noticeable.


The turbo muffles the sound a good bit, right? Can you/Do you run a catless exhaust after the turbo?
A turbo is like adding 2/3rds of the muffling sound of a cat. So it's quieter, but not quite stock. If you ran a cat and a turbo, it would be really quiet. Check my videos in my sig.
Old 03-04-2008, 03:15 PM
  #40  
The Professor
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by FloppinNachos
do you think no cat and a stock exhaust would be pretty acceptable for the street?
Depends on where you live.
Old 03-04-2008, 03:21 PM
  #41  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no cat + turbo will sound virtually stock. I ran this way for several months. It was cool to hit the gas and go ZOOMING away but the car not make much sound. But I decided I wanted a bit more sound.
Old 03-04-2008, 03:25 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
FloppinNachos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do you only use the stock ecu and cobb AP for tuning? or do you need some kind of MAP sensor setup?
Old 03-04-2008, 03:44 PM
  #43  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
AP works by itself.

If your car is stock, you plug the AP into the odb2 connector and upload the new flash to the car's computer. You're done.

If your car is turbocharged, you unplug whatever you were using before, then plug the AP into the odb2 connector and upload the new flash to the car's computer. You're done.

The only thing you should consider changing is your intake. I don't think the foam filter + maf housing that the greddy kit ships with is ideal.
Old 03-04-2008, 04:08 PM
  #44  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
x-attack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey guys this may be a real dumb question so please don't cut me down I'm a newbie to FI. Wouldn't technically a supercharger kit put strain on the renesis since it has to have an extra peripherial running off the eccentric shaft, since you have added another pulley to the belt setup.
Old 03-04-2008, 04:42 PM
  #45  
PUSHER ROBOT
 
w0rm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Norman
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strain? not really.. Draw? yes, it is parasitic. You're obviously getting more power back in return than you've leeched off the system though.

This is the same with all superchargers.
Old 03-04-2008, 04:46 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pettit's system probably draws around 35hp @ 8psi, as I recall from the compressor maps.
Old 03-04-2008, 05:49 PM
  #47  
Banned
 
FloppinNachos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jedi54
Trip: unfortunately it's impossible to get 280 without Forced Induction. Trust me, I'm trying to see how much I can squeeze out of my N/A 8 and it's not pretty.

I dyno'd at 191 hp with RB intake + exhaust. Since then I've added the mazmart water pump and high flow cat. I doubt I'm at 200 with those... (no knock on those parts, they're top notch items, just tough to squeeze hp out of the Renesis without FI)
Car definitely sounds great though.
Actually the Mazmart Pump is so much more efficient than Mazda's stamp and bend paddlewheel that I believe it made 4 more horsepower on the engine dyno. So you only need 5 from the high flow!
Old 03-04-2008, 05:59 PM
  #48  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For all the talk of how much power the Pettit CAN make it's interesting to note we haven't seen a consumer dyno of over 260-rwhp. And there are a few that have dyno'ed with the Pettit LOWER than stock (not mentioning any names...)
Old 03-04-2008, 08:40 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
sosonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If you do almost everything possible with NA than it appears the best you can do would be around 210WHP more or less.

To get 280WHP, then you have to go FI.

SuperCharger vs Turbo, is a plus versus minus scenario. Don't buy into the propaganda from either side or bias that some people have that distorts facts or hides all this issues with a setup.

Evaluate and choose the solution that is best for you.
Old 03-04-2008, 08:44 PM
  #50  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by sosonic
SuperCharger vs Turbo, is a plus versus minus scenario. Don't buy into the propaganda from either side or bias that some people have that distorts facts or hides all this issues with a setup.
Yep, best to do your own research and evaluate your goals. That way if you pick incorrectly, you can only blame yourself

I had considered SC for a while, but it became apparent after a while that it wasn't the right choice for me.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 280 rwhp



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.