3 tubes on intake before throttle body??
#76
Bullshit you looked everywhere.
+1 on what Xero Ryuu said not to mention all the other available information out there that you'll need.
Like the impact of boost on those hoses.
Try searching and reading a bit harder
I'll even start you off:
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tec...iagram-214910/
Used Simple google search site:rx8club.com vacuum line
Oh and this was the 7th thread result using the forums search
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tro...nipple-248244/
Right before it was the Greddy Turbo Kit FAQ by Rotarygod
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-maj...em-here-59834/
+1 on what Xero Ryuu said not to mention all the other available information out there that you'll need.
Like the impact of boost on those hoses.
Try searching and reading a bit harder
I'll even start you off:
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tec...iagram-214910/
Used Simple google search site:rx8club.com vacuum line
Oh and this was the 7th thread result using the forums search
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tro...nipple-248244/
Right before it was the Greddy Turbo Kit FAQ by Rotarygod
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-maj...em-here-59834/
xxoo wcs
#79
So it seems that some people are on the fence about this, in that case I think I might try this out. Depending on the cost of this system it may not happen at all. I will say that if I were to get it I'm gonna take my sweet *** time with it, definitely not anything I'm gonna rush into and just slap it on. Probably the best thing to do is just wait until it's been put on other small engine cars and see how it works out before trying it on an 8.
#80
You're referring to the electric powered intake fan/blower correct? The one that is going to net you 5psi of boost at WOT?
I skimmed through the thread the other day and saw a handful of links. Please specific with the one you are choosing.
I skimmed through the thread the other day and saw a handful of links. Please specific with the one you are choosing.
#81
Flame suit engaged.
I feel the need to respond.
I'm not the best at reading these things .. and I don't have much time but I'm going to take a shot at this.
First the efficiency range isn't exactly that good.
As Brettus indicated the RPM of the device is 20k rpm yet this compressor map is indicating +40k rpm
The compressor map shows it flows between 0.7 lb/min (below surge) and 17 lb/min (before choke)
That's 5.29 g/s to 128 g/s
That's roughly for our engine idle to 4000 rpm WOT .. give or take
With a Pressure Ratio of 1.3 then remove thermal efficiency of the compressor.
I would be surprised if it made 5 psi or 19.7 psia
Furthermore as stated by Brettus (and his solution) if you install this device in the main intake system it will IMO restrict airflow in the upper rpm range and if the device is left in the ON position during the WOT run you're likely risking Choke which could potentially ruin the compressor.
2c
Gotta run
Will be back in a few hours to read the flames .. cheers
#82
TBH, I wasn't sure if we were baiting jcola or not. jcola, I've got to come clean. anything positive I've suggested as far as you seeing benefits with this type of setup has been 100% pure sarcasm.
#83
Furthermore as stated by Brettus (and his solution) if you install this device in the main intake system it will IMO restrict airflow in the upper rpm range and if the device is left in the ON position during the WOT run you're likely risking Choke which could potentially ruin the compressor.
The system (phantom S/C)was designed to keep a little more then atmospheric pressure at high rpm range. then again that totally depends on the engine and how much air it draws in at its highest rpm. In that case then yes if the phantom system wouldn't be able to keep up at all.
also yall say that you need at least 40k rpm of a compressor to make any type of boost. Wouldn't that depend solely on the gearing ratio with in the the S/C itself in this case a real S/C like procharger or rotrex or vortech blowers?
#84
The system (phantom S/C)was designed to keep a little more then atmospheric pressure at high rpm range. then again that totally depends on the engine and how much air it draws in at its highest rpm. In that case then yes if the phantom system wouldn't be able to keep up at all.
also yall say that you need at least 40k rpm of a compressor to make any type of boost. Wouldn't that depend solely on the gearing ratio with in the the S/C itself in this case a real S/C like procharger or rotrex or vortech blowers?
also yall say that you need at least 40k rpm of a compressor to make any type of boost. Wouldn't that depend solely on the gearing ratio with in the the S/C itself in this case a real S/C like procharger or rotrex or vortech blowers?
#86
Something like this is more like it :
http://www.phantomsuperchargers.com/fts-tq25024v.html
WCS : I doubt that chart you posted has anything to do the the SC from the ebay add - i found the same chart on the site above and they are def not the same item.
So : the Ebay fan posted about will do nothing and is just junk . The SC from the above site mite work as we have been discussing .
Last edited by Brettus; 11-24-2013 at 02:56 PM.
#88
so that's a little different.... I think the anderson power pole connectors will easily add 5-10hp alone
Seriously though ... separate power, proper placement, a true high RPM brushless motor and controller and you should see a couple HP. but that ebay work of art is just garbage.
Seriously though ... separate power, proper placement, a true high RPM brushless motor and controller and you should see a couple HP. but that ebay work of art is just garbage.
#90
Here is the map from the link above :
This one will just about flow enough to keep up with the engine at high rpm (210g/s) so useless for top end but I think it would definately boost the midrange if setup on the vfad as mentioned earlier .
Maybe even change the vfad opening rpm to around 7000 to get the most out of it .
They get decent results with a 2.0L piston engine but the 1.3 rotary flows much more air than one of those . Because of the high airflow of a rotary, you are at a big disadvantage trying to make an electric SC work on a rotary .
This one will just about flow enough to keep up with the engine at high rpm (210g/s) so useless for top end but I think it would definately boost the midrange if setup on the vfad as mentioned earlier .
Maybe even change the vfad opening rpm to around 7000 to get the most out of it .
They get decent results with a 2.0L piston engine but the 1.3 rotary flows much more air than one of those . Because of the high airflow of a rotary, you are at a big disadvantage trying to make an electric SC work on a rotary .
Last edited by Brettus; 11-24-2013 at 03:46 PM.
#91
Actually I was thinking that once obtaining the phantom kit, that you could replace the brushless motor with an even better one. So that's where you could get a higher rpm from brushless technology. Yea it would draw more amps, but you could just add another battery in parallel to add more amps per hour to the system.
#92
I should not have posted from my phone.
I'm a bit confused but FWIW I was referencing this compressor map and RPM
TECH - New site
#93
Sorry Brettus
I should not have posted from my phone.
I'm a bit confused but FWIW I was referencing this compressor map and RPM
TECH - New site
I should not have posted from my phone.
I'm a bit confused but FWIW I was referencing this compressor map and RPM
TECH - New site
But we are no same wavelength now
#100