Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

4.778 Final Drive For $296

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-23-2005 | 05:21 PM
  #51  
brillo's Avatar
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
I still like you Paul
Old 11-23-2005 | 05:47 PM
  #52  
QBallz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Visalia, CA
At the same time your not going to lose a whole lot. Just go slower on the highways

Originally Posted by rotarygod
I'm just going to sit back and wait for the eye opening reaction of those who actually think that a 4.77 gear will give them better gas mileage anwhere compared to what they have now. That ought to be a good one.

I still like you Paul!
Old 11-23-2005 | 07:06 PM
  #53  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
Likes: 63
Originally Posted by brillo
I still like you Paul
Brillo,
I think I'm gonna cry.
Paul.
Old 11-23-2005 | 07:54 PM
  #54  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 25
From: Houston
Originally Posted by QBallz
At the same time your not going to lose a whole lot. Just go slower on the highways
Since the people who really want this change actually have the craving to go faster, at least when it comes to acceleration, doesn't it seem a little bit contradictory to drive slower on the freeway?
Old 11-23-2005 | 08:02 PM
  #55  
Slick8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Philly
It's not about going fast, its about improving a fine automobile (RX-8) to your own specs.
Old 11-23-2005 | 08:16 PM
  #56  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 25
From: Houston
So by making it slower and getting worse gas mileage, it is improving it? Hmmm. OK to each their own I guess. I still think the factory rear end is too much already and it should come with a 4.10. That would definitely improve the car.
Old 11-23-2005 | 08:33 PM
  #57  
Slick8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Philly
12. Use the transmission properly. If your vehicle has a manual transmission, shift gears as soon as the engine can run smoothly in the next gear. Low gear at 20 mph gives only about two-thirds the mileage as high gear at the same speed. In second gear, it's four-fifths the mileage you'd get in high. With an automatic transmission, lifting your foot slightly off the accelerator will make the transmission shift sooner.
Ways to Save Fuel

Last edited by Slick8; 11-23-2005 at 08:36 PM.
Old 11-23-2005 | 08:40 PM
  #58  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
yeah, that's been proven time and time again, getting into high gear as soon as possible is always the most fuel efficient, I fell on the floor laughing when I read the post about getting better mileage with a shorter gear, hoo boy ...
Old 11-23-2005 | 08:42 PM
  #59  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
Originally Posted by MadDog
Thats an infuriating post. Why don't you just come out and say what you are thinking instead of alluding to something in such a passive-agressive way?
so you prefer something more direct like say, "STFU"

Old 11-23-2005 | 08:53 PM
  #60  
Slick8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Philly
So by making it slower and getting worse gas mileage, it is improving it? Hmmm. OK to each their own I guess. I still think the factory rear end is too much already and it should come with a 4.10. That would definitely improve the car.
I'm sure Mr. Rotarygod is just teasing... I hope .

The 4.778 gear will improve stop-and-go city gas mileage (50-75% of most peoples' driving) and greatly improve acceleration (real world driving, no insane 1/4 mile tests on public roads). Highway mileage will suffer to a small degree.

If your concerned about the highway miles, just drive 65-75 mph instead of the 80mph+ most us RX-8er have a habit of on the highway . I think there's a 7-8mph spread at RPM between the 4.10 and 4.77. Obeying the speed limit laws are a good thing...

Last edited by Slick8; 11-23-2005 at 09:05 PM.
Old 11-23-2005 | 09:11 PM
  #61  
Slick8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Thats the Catch22 in a NA RX-8,

4.77 Ring and Pinion

        4.10 Ring and Pinion
              Old 11-23-2005 | 10:15 PM
                #62  
              QBallz's Avatar
              Registered User
               
              Joined: Jan 2005
              Posts: 522
              Likes: 0
              From: Visalia, CA
              You can still drive faster on the hwy if you want your just gonna lose a few MPG. Much like everything else if life you don't get everything, but you do get a choice.

              Originally Posted by rotarygod
              Since the people who really want this change actually have the craving to go faster, at least when it comes to acceleration, doesn't it seem a little bit contradictory to drive slower on the freeway?
              Old 11-23-2005 | 10:49 PM
                #63  
              army_rx8's Avatar
              X-Sapper
               
              Joined: Jan 2004
              Posts: 2,392
              Likes: 0
              From: where angle's fear to tread
              i think there is a 7-9 mph spread from 4.444 to 4.778 ( in 6th gear at redline)..i've been looking it up.

              i'd have to say no to the better gas milage...can't see how that would ever come about from changing to this set up...but i woudl see how acceleration would improve slightly......only one real way to find out i supose.

              did that person who had feed a 4.778 gear and a Kaaz l.s.d. ever post there impressions of it? anyone ? anyone?
              Old 11-23-2005 | 10:53 PM
                #64  
              IZoomZoomI's Avatar
              Boost needed
               
              Joined: Dec 2003
              Posts: 2,557
              Likes: 0
              From: San Jose, CA
              Originally Posted by army_rx8
              i think there is a 7-9 mph spread from 4.444 to 4.778 ( in 6th gear at redline)..i've been looking it up.

              i'd have to say no to the better gas milage...can't see how that would ever come about from changing to this set up...but i woudl see how acceleration would improve slightly......only one real way to find out i supose.

              did that person who had feed a 4.778 gear and a Kaaz l.s.d. ever post there impressions of it? anyone ? anyone?
              read the thread "mi new parts".
              Old 11-23-2005 | 10:58 PM
                #65  
              army_rx8's Avatar
              X-Sapper
               
              Joined: Jan 2004
              Posts: 2,392
              Likes: 0
              From: where angle's fear to tread
              ^just did..lol thanks
              Old 11-24-2005 | 01:09 PM
                #66  
              ddub's Avatar
              always preoccupied.
               
              Joined: Feb 2005
              Posts: 827
              Likes: 0
              From: Kirkland, WA
              This is pretty interesting. I'm going to sit back and wait for someone to do this, but this is something I'd be interested in.
              Old 11-24-2005 | 08:14 PM
                #67  
              hondasr4kids's Avatar
              Registered
               
              Joined: Mar 2004
              Posts: 422
              Likes: 0
              From: El Centro, Ca.
              I don't think changing the final will improve MPG, specially because our foot will get heavier . I don't care about that, if i wanted to get better gas milage I would have got a hybrid car instead and coming from 13 mpg FD the 8 is a improvement. I just want to know if this is worth it. I want to do this since I do track my car and this will improve exit acceleration I believe.
              Old 11-24-2005 | 09:02 PM
                #68  
              Jaguar_MBA's Avatar
              Registered User
               
              Joined: Aug 2004
              Posts: 495
              Likes: 0
              From: Des Moines, Iowa
              I wonder why Racing Beat did not think of offering a 4.778 gear for better acceleration.
              Old 11-24-2005 | 09:07 PM
                #69  
              army_rx8's Avatar
              X-Sapper
               
              Joined: Jan 2004
              Posts: 2,392
              Likes: 0
              From: where angle's fear to tread
              ^hmm..maybe they didn't think of it......or they thought that the benifits didn't out weight the costs...who knows...maybe they'll see this and chime in
              Old 11-24-2005 | 11:21 PM
                #70  
              hondasr4kids's Avatar
              Registered
               
              Joined: Mar 2004
              Posts: 422
              Likes: 0
              From: El Centro, Ca.
              Originally Posted by army_rx8
              or they thought that the benifits didn't out weight the costs
              Cost? this is cheaper than putting a catback and it actually improve something.
              Old 11-24-2005 | 11:25 PM
                #71  
              army_rx8's Avatar
              X-Sapper
               
              Joined: Jan 2004
              Posts: 2,392
              Likes: 0
              From: where angle's fear to tread
              when i said cost i was refering to acceleration gained vs. mpg lost not the actual price

              and teh feed set is high 500's...wonder what the install is on that....probable a lot (more than a cat-back)..hehe glad i can do it myself i guess.......now to pick what upgrade i want for x-mas
              Old 11-25-2005 | 12:52 AM
                #72  
              kngfmsta's Avatar
              Registered
               
              Joined: Apr 2005
              Posts: 50
              Likes: 0
              From: Philly
              if i were to get the 4.778 gear for acceleration, and then later decided that i want to go FI would the 4.778 gears still be better for acceleration or would i need to get smaller ones like stock or 4.1?
              Old 11-25-2005 | 01:02 AM
                #73  
              hondasr4kids's Avatar
              Registered
               
              Joined: Mar 2004
              Posts: 422
              Likes: 0
              From: El Centro, Ca.
              Originally Posted by army_rx8
              when i said cost i was refering to acceleration gained vs. mpg lost not the actual price
              Okay still better than a RB intake then. and don't say the RB intake gives better MPG.
              Old 11-25-2005 | 02:00 AM
                #74  
              IZoomZoomI's Avatar
              Boost needed
               
              Joined: Dec 2003
              Posts: 2,557
              Likes: 0
              From: San Jose, CA
              Originally Posted by hondasr4kids
              Okay still better than a RB intake then. and don't say the RB intake gives better MPG.
              it does doesn't it?
              Old 11-25-2005 | 03:27 AM
                #75  
              kw1k's Avatar
              Banned
               
              Joined: Jun 2005
              Posts: 660
              Likes: 0
              From: cali baby
              i will be buying this MOD soon. I dont really care if it's going to either give me better or worst in the MPG.. I know my City for a fact will be the same on the highway its going to hurt me BUt whatever.

              As long as my RX8 is a little bit quicker i'll be happy. Im really getting bored of the speed of my car its not quick enough.


              You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

              Quick Reply: 4.778 Final Drive For $296



              All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.