Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

5.5 differential?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-11-2007 | 09:20 AM
  #1  
tuj's Avatar
tuj
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
5.5 differential?

I seem to remember there was talk of a 5.5 final drive differential, but I couldn't find it with a search. Does anyone know what kind of options are available for getting a higher numerical final drive? I am looking for more acceleration, regardless of what rpms I end up at in 6th gear.
Old 01-11-2007 | 10:34 AM
  #2  
'ringmeister's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
i believe there is 5.2 sold by mazda competition parts that is used by the grand-am cup cars. very expensive, and that is too short IMHO for the street. the feed(?) 4.77 is a better choice and cheaper at around $700.
Old 01-11-2007 | 11:33 AM
  #3  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
They dropped the 5.2 R&P price to around $1200, use to be almost $3500
Old 01-11-2007 | 11:53 AM
  #4  
tuj's Avatar
tuj
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
The S2k diff swap gets you 4.777 I believe. I'm looking for something numerically taller than that. Is the Mazda comp unit just the gears, or does it include a whole new LSD?

Is anyone selling the 5.2 or is it just available from Mazda Comp?

Last edited by tuj; 01-11-2007 at 01:21 PM.
Old 01-11-2007 | 03:00 PM
  #5  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Does anyone know if these differential swaps would make a big difference in 0 to 40 and/or 0 to 60 times on a 4 speed AT? If they do, seems like this might be a good option to get better low end acceleration without having to go to the expense, reliability issues, etc of FI, if you are not looking for enourmous gains.
Old 01-11-2007 | 03:37 PM
  #6  
tuj's Avatar
tuj
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
I am not sure what ratio is on the AT, but a shorter final drive (higher numerically) will always increase your acceleration, at the cost of top speed, and higher revs in top gear. Remember, I'm perfectly willing to accept those trade-offs because I am considering making my RX-8 into a track-only toy. I would not go higher than 4.777 on a street car.

Now, in terms of 0-40 or 0-60, you might end up with an extra shift, which could slow those times down, but overall your acceleration will increase.
Old 01-11-2007 | 09:55 PM
  #7  
redcivic's Avatar
Guns, God, and Country
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 603
Likes: 1
From: Hidalgo
Any info on the s2k swap?
Old 01-11-2007 | 10:58 PM
  #8  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
tuj,

I got the optional LSD, so I'm guessing my final drive is the same as the MT.

Not really concerned with top speed. It is plenty fast for me on the public roads. I would like more low end grunt.

Has anyone done the 4.77 swap from FEED?
Old 01-11-2007 | 11:22 PM
  #9  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 25
From: Houston
I personally feel that your cars already have too much rear end ratio in them and need to go down. Going up is really a waste of time unless you are in a certain racing class. If you just want more acceleration, this really isn't a very logical way to go about it. Forced induction would be the best choice.
Old 01-12-2007 | 12:01 AM
  #10  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
^ Yeah, but FI is a lot more expensive and pretty much voids the engine warranty.

Not that I disagree - I'm really considering Petitt's SC. Just researching other options as well. If I can get a little more noticeable low end grunt for under 1k I might do that soon. Might still do the FI down the road.

I did see a review of this in the far east forum where the guy was raving about it.

And from what I've read today it sounds like the 4.77 is the choice for street applications. The 5. something isn't available unless you are involved with mazda motorsports.
Old 01-12-2007 | 02:48 AM
  #11  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
rotarygod - I also meant to ask why you think this isn't such a good idea?
Old 01-12-2007 | 02:56 AM
  #12  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
higher ratios means that in the gears you are running at higher revs at the same approximate speed. i.e right now if you are cruising the freeway at say 3800 RPM already, you might be at 4500 rpm with the new gears. Using more gasoline, putting more wear & tear on the engine, buzzy, etc.

If they offered a higher ratio in the first 4 gears & lower ones in 5th & 6th this car would be about perfect.
Old 01-12-2007 | 03:03 AM
  #13  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
^ but wouldn't you be putting more wear on the engine, etc with FI as well?
Old 01-12-2007 | 03:19 AM
  #14  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Yes, but I was just talking about a regular RX8 and throwing a diff. on there. A turbo would put more wear and tear on the car. Unlike parts like an air intake, hi-flow cat, lightweight flywheel, etc that won't really affect driveability of the car or wear and tear too much.

PS : a upgraded diff. is not going to give you the acceleration like a FI'ed RX8.
Old 01-12-2007 | 03:44 AM
  #15  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by tuj
I am not sure what ratio is on the AT, but a shorter final drive (higher numerically) will always increase your acceleration, at the cost of top speed, and higher revs in top gear. Remember, I'm perfectly willing to accept those trade-offs because I am considering making my RX-8 into a track-only toy. I would not go higher than 4.777 on a street car.

Now, in terms of 0-40 or 0-60, you might end up with an extra shift, which could slow those times down, but overall your acceleration will increase.
it is 4.3 for the 6 speed auto.. i think it is 4.1 for the 4 speed auto...

beers
Old 01-12-2007 | 07:01 AM
  #16  
tuj's Avatar
tuj
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Ideally someone should sell a new 6th gear that is way taller, and then lower the final drive. Maybe 5&6 (are they on the same shaft?). Then we could get the best of both worlds. I really don't know what Mazda was thinking when they did the ratios on this car....

So...is there any way for a normal person to get the 5.2 unit, or do I have to paint my car like the 787b? :-)

Last edited by tuj; 01-12-2007 at 07:04 AM.
Old 01-12-2007 | 11:43 AM
  #17  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Originally Posted by swoope
it is 4.3 for the 6 speed auto.. i think it is 4.1 for the 4 speed auto...

beers
swoope,

Is that true if you get the optional LSD? or are you at the same as the MT then?
Old 01-12-2007 | 11:53 AM
  #18  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Originally Posted by Fanman
Yes, but I was just talking about a regular RX8 and throwing a diff. on there. A turbo would put more wear and tear on the car. Unlike parts like an air intake, hi-flow cat, lightweight flywheel, etc that won't really affect driveability of the car or wear and tear too much.

PS : a upgraded diff. is not going to give you the acceleration like a FI'ed RX8.
Yeah, I realize it is nothing like FI, more of a mod to give you some but not dramatic improvement. Guess I'm wondering if this would be good enough for me for now to help improve 0 to 30 and 0 to 40 times for merging into traffic from a side street, without going to the expense or risk of FI?
Old 01-12-2007 | 12:45 PM
  #19  
tuj's Avatar
tuj
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Um, the 0-30 times are already good. If that's where you want improvement, at stop->low speed acceleration, this isn't what you want.
Old 01-12-2007 | 12:47 PM
  #20  
peterisurhero's Avatar
peterisurhero
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: cerritos, CA
hey guys its "kinda" off topic but i was wondering, would it be better to go with a lower diff of the higher one if i am planning on going nitrous. which one would make it faster? i was thinkin the higher ratio diff but juss wanted to make sure and ask you guys.
Old 01-12-2007 | 06:04 PM
  #21  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
Originally Posted by tuj
The S2k diff swap gets you 4.777 I believe. I'm looking for something numerically taller than that. Is the Mazda comp unit just the gears, or does it include a whole new LSD?

Is anyone selling the 5.2 or is it just available from Mazda Comp?


Well there's typical RX8Club billion page long thread of drivel on the subject and nobody else has found an alternative other than the FD3 R&P's that I'm aware of (which BTW the FD3/SE3P LSDs are also cross-compatible). It's also worth more than just low end if it's being used with great success in GrandAm, but that is a pure racing scenario. The only other place I know of where you can buy a similar ratio is Astra Racing in Italy, but I'm pretty sure it costs more plus the customs and freight additions.


Originally Posted by tuj
Um, the 0-30 times are already good. If that's where you want improvement, at stop->low speed acceleration, this isn't what you want.

LOL, you come asking the question and now you're an expert on the subject
Old 01-12-2007 | 06:40 PM
  #22  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
^ I'm sure the 0 to 30 times on the MT are quite good, but I'm talking about the AT.
Old 01-16-2007 | 07:40 AM
  #23  
tuj's Avatar
tuj
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
LOL, you come asking the question and now you're an expert on the subject
Dude, I was asking about the availability of the a different ratio, not what it did. I don't know why you perpetually try to slam people.

That being said, I did not know that the FD diff was compatible, so thank you for sharing that.
Old 01-16-2007 | 03:19 PM
  #24  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
my sister's baby girl might consider that a slam, but a man probably wouldn't have noticed ...


btw, that's a j/k too
Old 01-17-2007 | 09:07 AM
  #25  
tuj's Avatar
tuj
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mdw1000
^ I'm sure the 0 to 30 times on the MT are quite good, but I'm talking about the AT.
Can you get to 30 in first gear? The MT can. What is your top speed in first and in second?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 5.5 differential?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.