5.5 differential?
#27
Then yes, a numerically higher rear ratio will get you to 30 and 40 faster. But like everyone said, your hwy rpms will super suck. The 4.77 might not be too bad, but it will make your milage worse.
Maybe swap in a 6AT?
Maybe swap in a 6AT?
#28
Originally Posted by Fanman
If they offered a higher ratio in the first 4 gears & lower ones in 5th & 6th this car would be about perfect.
#30
Ok, I am gong to try to explain this. If you get a higher numerical rear ratio, the top speeds in all of your gears will go down. This means you will accelerate faster. This will also mean that the rpms in top gear when you are crusing on the hwy will be raised as well. Therefore this is a compromise.
I think everyone agrees that the 5th and 6th gear ratios are too high numerically, and that the car could benefit esp. from a 6th gear that would let us turn under 3k at say 70 mph. The problem here of course, is that opening up the transmission is significantly harder than swapping a differential.
I think everyone agrees that the 5th and 6th gear ratios are too high numerically, and that the car could benefit esp. from a 6th gear that would let us turn under 3k at say 70 mph. The problem here of course, is that opening up the transmission is significantly harder than swapping a differential.
#31
Originally Posted by CKay
Would the 4.77 work on the MT then, and i read somewhere that a rx-8 with intake exhuast, gears and tunned can run mid to low 13s
I would think intake, pulley, hi-flowcat, exhaust ECU flashing, and gears would probably land you in the high 13's, if you are lucky.
#32
Originally Posted by mdw1000
I can get to the upper 40s in first gear. Not sure what the top speed is in second gear, but it is quite high. Very tall gearing in the 4AT. Its main weakness, IMHO.
Ok now back to useful info damnit!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Touge
Canada Forum
0
09-01-2015 10:47 PM
Touge
Canada Forum
0
07-18-2015 05:41 PM