Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Aluminum Flywheel or Suspension (RB)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-01-2004, 11:49 AM
  #26  
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
 
Aoshi Shinomori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central Valley, NY
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by BlacknightX
The Prolite flywheel at Rx8Store.com is only $250. It's 9.5 lbs. which is 1 lb. less than the MS one, but for half the cost. This sounds fishy. Anyone else have any thoughts?
I'm not a complete expert on this, but don't be fooled by the weights of the flywheels. The weight is not the most important factor, rather the flywheels moment of inertia. The placement of the weight is more important than the amount. If the weight is closer to the center than it will have a lower moment of inertia, this is a good thing, but you also want to consider structural integrity. You wouldn't want a company to compromise build quality for a slightly lower moment of inertia. I think I'm right, but someone will correct me if I fudged something up.
Old 12-01-2004, 11:51 AM
  #27  
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wouldn't get a flywheel until your ready to replace the clutch also, thats an expensive install, might as well do everything at once.
Old 12-02-2004, 10:45 AM
  #28  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
The "moment of inertia" point has been made elsewhere, ad nauseum, but it is still a valid point in a way. I don't think that the RX's flywheel diameter is such that weight location will have as much impact as total weight. Brillo's point about doing a clutch/wheel combo is also good advice. If someone only had a couple thousand miles on their car and wanted a flywheel swapped I would say to do it now would mean they might only need the pressure plate and input shaft bearing and seal because the Exedy discs that come stock are pretty much what SR Motorsports provides with their kits.

Charles
Old 12-02-2004, 11:14 AM
  #29  
dmp
RX8 and a Truk....
 
dmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OKC
Posts: 4,658
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill

I don't understand the math involved in the idea that the benefit of a light fly becomes diminished in the higher gears. Did I miss that conversation on the forum?

Charles

This xls spreadsheet was made for a miata - however, if you factor in the numbers for a RX8, it'll still show how the relative gains associated with a lighter flywheel reduce as you go up thru the gears.


http://www.d-mphotos.com/movies/flywheelcalculator.xls
Old 12-02-2004, 11:52 AM
  #30  
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Charles, I noticed you have a ACT clutch, I went to their site but its not listed, could you explain how you got it? Is it a prototype?
Old 12-02-2004, 11:53 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Kart Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
now i want a flywheel too...... Aside from the RB front bumper i really like the kit.
Old 12-03-2004, 06:45 AM
  #32  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
The spreadsheet shows what the final results will be but there is no engineering explanation as to why this is.

My clutch kit was purchased at SR Motorsports. It contains the ACT Extrmeme Duty pressure plate(MZ-010-X), Exedy disc(which looks very stock), Mazda counterweight, and the associated bearings and seals which were genuine Mazda parts. I can't remember how much I paid as it was part of a litany of things I ordered all at once. From things I have read since then, it looks like the RX-8 clutch is the same as the FD set up. Perhaps only the counterweight is different but there are better people than myself who know about that.

Charles
Old 12-03-2004, 06:48 AM
  #33  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
according to that spreadsheet, I gain the most hp by using a 100 lbs flywheel....


also, i'm strongly considering a lightweight flywheel, but with so many people having transmissions replaced, engines replaced, etc. How do you guys justify voiding your power train and engine warrantees? From what I've read, the MS flywheel is 10 lbs and since it has holes around the edges, should perform close to the RB flywheel, while being made out of a stronger chromly (sp) material.
Old 12-03-2004, 09:41 AM
  #34  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
How come I can't understand that spreadsheet???
Is it me? Can anyone read it?
Old 12-03-2004, 10:01 AM
  #35  
dmp
RX8 and a Truk....
 
dmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OKC
Posts: 4,658
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
The spreadsheet shows what the final results will be but there is no engineering explanation as to why this is.

If I were an engineer I could tell you, since I'm not, I'll quote from the guy who made the xls spreadsheet:


. It's greatest effect is in 1st gear and progressively gets less in each gear higher. That is because the lightened flywheel effects your rotational inertia of the drivetrain. The effect in each gear is proportional to the square of the overall gear ratio. That is, a gear ratio of 3:1 would have 9X the reduction in effective rotational inertia vs. a gear ratio of 1:1 with the same flywheel mounted before it. In the case of the Miata, if you had say a 10% improvement in acceleration in 1st gear due a a lightened flywheel, you would have 10% X (1/3.14)^2 or about 1% of an improvement in acceleration in 4th gear.
Old 12-03-2004, 12:01 PM
  #36  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Well I R one and I have no trouble with the theory it's that speadsheet that makes no sense.
Old 12-03-2004, 12:07 PM
  #37  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
what clutches are you guys buying when you replace your flywheel? and what did they cost?

my car just hit 8,000 miles. Wouldn't the stock clutch last 100k+ miles?
Old 12-03-2004, 12:17 PM
  #38  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
If the spreadsheet engineer were thinking of things in terms of percentages, then I see exactly where he is coming from. The problem is, what constitutes a "10% improvement in acceleration"? I could see one saying that he cut 10% off of his acceleration time by going from a 5 s 0-60 to a 4.5 s, but the problem is that evaluating acceleration by using percenatges is not very useful. To see a .5s reduction in the 0-60 time would be more easily analyzed by using the popular weight-to-power ratio models alongside the rules of thumb offered out there. In my case, I have read the formula to be 2.7 h.p. per pound off the drivetrain weight. I realize that is a rather vague way to go about it, but my car is responding in at least the fashion (if not better) than those models have indicated. Besides, my handy slide rule from Moroso, which is over 20 years old, has been right on the money since I started modding my car. The only caveat with the slide rule is that it assumes 100% traction. The cool thing is that the G-Tech is showing similar results, which is why I am fairly confident that my readings are accurate.

Charles

p.s. I have an ACT Extreme Duty(#MZ-010-X) pressure plate with a stock-looking Exedy disc and Mazda counterweight, bearings and seal.
Old 12-03-2004, 12:28 PM
  #39  
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
 
Aoshi Shinomori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central Valley, NY
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Keep kickin' *** Charles. By the way, you still working on that header design? Thanks
Old 12-03-2004, 12:53 PM
  #40  
dmp
RX8 and a Truk....
 
dmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OKC
Posts: 4,658
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
If the spreadsheet engineer were thinking of things in terms of percentages, then I see exactly where he is coming from. The problem is, what constitutes a "10% improvement in acceleration"? I could see one saying that he cut 10% off of his acceleration time by going from a 5 s 0-60 to a 4.5 s, but the problem is that evaluating acceleration by using percenatges is not very useful. To see a .5s reduction in the 0-60 time would be more easily analyzed by using the popular weight-to-power ratio models alongside the rules of thumb offered out there. In my case, I have read the formula to be 2.7 h.p. per pound off the drivetrain weight. I realize that is a rather vague way to go about it, but my car is responding in at least the fashion (if not better) than those models have indicated. Besides, my handy slide rule from Moroso, which is over 20 years old, has been right on the money since I started modding my car. The only caveat with the slide rule is that it assumes 100% traction. The cool thing is that the G-Tech is showing similar results, which is why I am fairly confident that my readings are accurate.

Charles

p.s. I have an ACT Extreme Duty(#MZ-010-X) pressure plate with a stock-looking Exedy disc and Mazda counterweight, bearings and seal.
The spredsheet doesn't show percentage of acceleration improvement - it shows the 'net effective gain' - as if the car would accelerate as if it had "x" many HP, for each gear. That's the point of the spredsheet.

In first gear, the car will accelerate as if it has 10 more HP (Than it had w/ a heavier Flywheel)...and so on.
Old 12-03-2004, 03:58 PM
  #41  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
OK, so Charles you can't read it as I can't. I just went back and looked again with what you said and what dmp said in mind. I still can't understand it. Remember when you were in elementry school you had to turn in your worksheet with your math to show you really know the equations. That would help here.

Someone tell the guy to turn in his worksheet.
Old 12-03-2004, 05:32 PM
  #42  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by SilverBullitt
UPDATE:

I ordered the RB suspension package today + End Links

I'll Keep you posted!!!


Simon.

simon i see you already made your decision but i thought i'd throw my .02 in anyway.IMHO if your going to do the flywheel you might as well save up the money and have a new clutch installed at the same time. no sense in doing the flywheel only to open her up a second time to do the clutch. waste of Labor dollars.
Old 12-03-2004, 05:36 PM
  #43  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
oh well upon furthur reading i see brillo and Charles already made that point. so carry on
Old 12-03-2004, 05:48 PM
  #44  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
I would make a clear distinction regarding the flywheel alone vs. the package approach, and it is this- if one is not too likely to go for major boosts in output like FI or nitrous and the vehicle has only a few thousand miles on it, then do a flywheel-only deal and save some money. The factory disc is an Exedy disc that looks very much like the one that can with my kit from SR Motorsports and the rest of the kit is also full of OEM Mazda parts . In addition, I have spoken with a friend who dyno's Indy and now NASCAR engines and he told me in the past that the Indy cars use factory Honda discs because the cars are so light and the factory piece works great.

Charles

BTW, Aoshi, the header, Ti PPF, and Ti rear links are all coming up very soon. I will be storing my car in the next week, or so, and that's when the prototyping begins.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TotalAutoPerformance
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-2018 09:00 AM
olyrx7
Canada For Sale/Wanted
2
10-26-2015 09:23 AM
duworm
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
1
10-01-2015 04:57 PM
archon
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
3
10-01-2015 06:08 AM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 01:53 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Aluminum Flywheel or Suspension (RB)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 PM.